• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Triggers

RaleBulgarian said:
Your links to articles telling me what I already know is supposed to help me how? You think that the articles somehow support your idiotic premise?

The surgeon musta really dug deep into your noggin. :2no4:
Click to expand...

YOU asked who the Democrat-Socialists are.

I assumed you must not know since you asked. I provided links so you might understand that which you indicated you did not understand.

You asked, I answered. You complain that I supplied the exact answer you asked for.

You then muse that it's ME who has a medical condition limiting cognition.

Am I the only person that is expressing concern about your cognitive abilities? That seems unlikely...
 
Torus34 said:
Hi! Yup! It certainly does! I recommend familiarization with the Studentized 't' distribution table.

Regards.
Click to expand...

I have to admit that I am not familiar with any polling technique based on one response that is useful in a societal application.
 
Torus34 said:
The question which the quote posed was this: Was President of the United States of America telling the truth or was he telling a falsehood?

Regards.
Click to expand...

Fair enough.
 
code1211 said:
YOU asked who the Democrat-Socialists are.

I assumed you must not know since you asked. I provided links so you might understand that which you indicated you did not understand.

You asked, I answered. You complain that I supplied the exact answer you asked for.

You then muse that it's ME who has a medical condition limiting cognition.

Am I the only person that is expressing concern about your cognitive abilities? That seems unlikely...
Click to expand...
You assert now that this entire thread is about just two members of Congress?
code1211 said:
Of late, there seem to be a variety of Triggers that affect people on both sides of the political spectrum.

Triggers that incite the Democrat-Socialist Progressives seem to be wide and varied:

Trump, the National Anthem, the American Flag, election results, any accurate historical fact, enforcing any law as written, Police from any level of government, any male non-minority historical figures, any American Foundational Documents, the racists they cite in our society including Trump, Betsy Ross, Thomas Jefferson, Joe Biden, Nancy Pelosi, Mitt Romney and John McCain and, of course, the ongoing injustices committed by bakeries.

Triggers that incite Republicans seem to be pretty narrow:

The ongoing Clown Show conducted by the Democrat-Socialist Progressives.

How can we ever bridge these divides?

;)
Click to expand...

There you go, proving my post #51 right.
 
lwf said:
I'm glad you are not triggered by those things, but every single one of those things has triggered and continues to trigger many self-professed conservatives into irrational and emotional responses on this board and elsewhere. Both sides are quite easily triggered by a whole slew of topics, but not everyone on either side is easily triggered by the same things.
Click to expand...

I'm not sure that irrational responses are irrational based only on topic matter rather than the writer.

I've seen both very rational and very irrational responses from people I disagree with on this board.

It seems that rationality and passion are often present in inverse proportion.

I assume that various posters on this board would think of me when reading that last thought.

;)
 
Moderate Right said:
One thing we really need to do is not allow any part of Congress to be involved in purely partisan investigations, allowing a party in power to abuse that power. In order to launch an investigation we need like a panel of six Republicans and six Democrats and a 2/3's vote in order to begin an investigation of those in power. I'm OK with tweaking those numbers as long as the party in power doesn't have carte blanche to do political witch hunts.
Click to expand...

Now the only problem is to have the party in power change the rules to hamstring themselves knowing full well that the next party will change them back.
 
code1211 said:
Now the only problem is to have the party in power change the rules to hamstring themselves knowing full well that the next party will change them back.
Click to expand...

I admit it was a fantasy.
 
code1211 said:
I have to admit that I am not familiar with any polling technique based on one response that is useful in a societal application.
Click to expand...

Hi! Please accept my apology for being obtuse.

One way of reading my OP, and the way it was intended to be read, is simply that all of the President of the United States of America Donald Trump's supporters subscribe to the same sound bites. Thus, all you'd need to poll is one of them. It also suggests a certain inability to think for themselves.

Regards, and again, sorry for the misunderstanding.
 
code1211 said:
Very typical misunderstanding from liberals. I was going to write that I have no idea why you ask this, but, you're a liberal. Liberals seem to dismiss facts, logic and truth in favor of identities, demographics and political affiliations.

The speaker of "her truth" makes no difference. If "her truth" is hers and hers alone, or his, then it's more likely a belief.

I'm more annoyed at the perversion of the language than the speakers of their individual "truth", that is, beliefs.

Truth is truth. When you call a non-truth "truth", you display a willful intent to deceive.

When you accept and help promote a non-truth as truth, you join into the con.
Click to expand...

That's quite an incoherent ramble.
 
RaleBulgarian said:
View attachment 67260585


What Trumpsters do all of the time.
Click to expand...

Did you watch the pathetically inept and incompetent Mueller demonstrating an utter lack of understanding for the content of the report labeled with his name?

It was actually painful to watch. Judging only by his resume, this man was once great, astute and incisive.

Judging only by his presentation, he is become a doddering old relic trotted out to lend credibility to the litany of lies presented by the lynch mob headed by the Hillary Clinton supporter, Andrew Weissmann.

You may take this as the "evidence of your eyes and ears". Feel free to reject it in keeping with the instructions of your party.
 
RaleBulgarian said:
You assert now that this entire thread is about just two members of Congress?


There you go, proving my post #51 right.
Click to expand...

I asserted what I asserted.

Trace the words with your finger and move your lips as you read.
 
Torus34 said:
Hi! Please accept my apology for being obtuse.

One way of reading my OP, and the way it was intended to be read, is simply that all of the President of the United States of America Donald Trump's supporters subscribe to the same sound bites. Thus, all you'd need to poll is one of them. It also suggests a certain inability to think for themselves.

Regards, and again, sorry for the misunderstanding.
Click to expand...

Are statistics measuring real world occurrences what you consider to be sound bites?
 
code1211 said:
Did you watch the pathetically inept and incompetent Mueller demonstrating an utter lack of understanding for the content of the report labeled with his name?

It was actually painful to watch. Judging only by his resume, this man was once great, astute and incisive.

Judging only by his presentation, he is become a doddering old relic trotted out to lend credibility to the litany of lies presented by the lynch mob headed by the Hillary Clinton supporter, Andrew Weissmann.

You may take this as the "evidence of your eyes and ears". Feel free to reject it in keeping with the instructions of your party.
Click to expand...
What does Mueller’s performance on Wednesday have to do with triggering AOC and Sanders (the topic of your thread)?

code1211 said:
I asserted what I asserted.

Trace the words with your finger and move your lips as you read.
Click to expand...
You say “I asserted what I asserted” because you can’t remember what your own thread is about.
 
code1211 said:
Maybe if you trace the words with your finger while you move your lips while reading...
Click to expand...

My finger had a seizure while tracing your rambling words. :lamo
 
Torus34 said:
Have a great day!

Regards.
Click to expand...

I see...

Asking for evidence that you might use to support your bias that is based on real world events has triggered you.

Alrighty, then!
 
RaleBulgarian said:
What does Mueller’s performance on Wednesday have to do with triggering AOC and Sanders (the topic of your thread)?


You say “I asserted what I asserted” because you can’t remember what your own thread is about.
Click to expand...

I responded to your post. It's kind of like the way a conversation works. You may be unfamiliar with an exchange of ideas if you're a liberal.

Liberals seem prone to shout an insanity, usually profane, and then run away after dowsing their target in milkshakes, water or spit.

I remember pretty well. At least as far as I can recall... ;) If you had adequate comprehension skills, you might also remember well.

Consult a physician and check the side effects before beginning and drug regimen.
 
AProudLefty said:
My finger had a seizure while tracing your rambling words. :lamo
Click to expand...

Probably as result of the limited abilities controlling that digit.

Better luck next time.
 
code1211 said:
I responded to your post. It's kind of like the way a conversation works. You may be unfamiliar with an exchange of ideas if you're a liberal.

Liberals seem prone to shout an insanity, usually profane, and then run away after dowsing their target in milkshakes, water or spit.

I remember pretty well. At least as far as I can recall... ;) If you had adequate comprehension skills, you might also remember well.

Consult a physician and check the side effects before beginning and drug regimen (You should take your own advice).
Click to expand...
^^ Why it’s best to review one’s posts before tapping “post quick reply”. :doh
 
RaleBulgarian said:
^^ Why it’s best to review one’s posts before tapping “post quick reply”. :doh
Click to expand...

Well, this is new. Now you are ADDING words to my post and presenting your words as if they are a part of my quote. Why?

It's difficult to respond to your posts.

Your posts are wrapped with a shroud for logic, forethought and reason.
 
code1211 said:
Well, this is new. Now you are ADDING words to my post and presenting your words as if they are a part of my quote.
Click to expand...

Below is your original, unedited, post. The only thing I did was highlight the most idiotic/incoherent parts, and in parenthesis reply to you about consulting a physician. If you believe I tampered with your posts, please feel free to go tattle to the mods.
code1211 said:
I responded to your post. It's kind of like the way a conversation works. You may be unfamiliar with an exchange of ideas if you're a liberal.

Liberals seem prone to shout an insanity, usually profane, and then run away after dowsing their target in milkshakes, water or spit.

I remember pretty well. At least as far as I can recall... ;) If you had adequate comprehension skills, you might also remember well.

Consult a physician and check the side effects before beginning and drug regimen.
Click to expand...
 
RaleBulgarian said:
Below is your original, unedited, post. The only thing I did was highlight the most idiotic/incoherent parts, and in parenthesis reply to you about consulting a physician. If you believe I tampered with your posts, please feel free to go tattle to the mods.
Click to expand...

Attempting to change the meaning of words is the strategy used by a lot of Trump supporters to deny his blatant racism.
 
JustHanging said:
Attempting to change the meaning of words is the strategy used by a lot of Trump supporters to deny his blatant racism.
Click to expand...
Yep. Sadly for Code1211, his limited intelligence and vocabulary prevent him from posting comments that give him plausible deniability as to his true intent.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom