• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Democrats Have Always Called Republicans "Racists" and Other Vile Names

Everybody from Chuck Schumer to Kamala Harris was calling for his resignation. Seems rather strange that you would single out a woman of color for this.

I don't like Chuck Schumer all that much, but a woman of color? Really? No, the person most to blame is Gillibrand. Hands down. Kamala Harris said that "the best thing for him to do would be to resign." She also praised him on many issues. Tulsi and Gillibrand were the ones who were out for blood. It was a complete circus. We have an ethics committee. They can determine who is fit to serve and what the best course of action is. Franken's extremely juvenile, unacceptable act occurred at the height of #metoo. He was given no voice, no leeway, no chance. I find it absurd and it enrages me. I remain calm when enraged, but Franken is ten times smarter and competent than any of the above.

I support Harris, but I think Warren is the only one I can completely forgive on the issue. Her call for his resignation was last and seemed totally forced.
 
So now that we know there was no mass migration of Dixiecrats to the Republican party in the 60s and 70s, the SS is a myth. It was based on the accusations of all these racist Democrats becoming republicans and you can't find any of those people who migrated over (which the SS was predicated on) because Liberals have been called out on this myth for years now. Hence the wives tale that you so boldly defended.

Man, you are bad at this.

I have to snip this to fit it in the character limit. Rest assured that none of your statements will be altered in the creation of this beatdown.

You apparently are having a hard time differentiating between a mass exodus of Dixiecrats to the Republican Party (which I never claimed happened, for the record) and pandering to the very people who used to vote for those very same people. Its a difference, and a very big one. Understanding it would stop you from conflating the ideas that there was a huge number of politicians who became Republicans and the people who voted for those people changing who they started voting for.

Now you want to claim its the ideology that changed and not the actual people. You can change what you want to claim over and over but what you can't change is the actual Democrat votes on civil rights, or the history of the Republican party who actually freed the slaves.

God damn you are thickheaded. Yes, conservatives voted to keep civil rights not a right for minorities. How many times do I have to keep saying that? Liberals (you know, like Abraham Lincoln) have always fought for the rights of minorities. Conservatives (like 99% of southern politicians in the 1860's) fought to keep them in chains.

Yes Virginia, ideology DOES matter in this discussion. You keep framing it the way you do (Democrat vs. Republican) because to have it on honest parameters (conservative vs. liberal) puts you in a ****ty spot. I get it....like childbirth, just breath through it.

The Republican Party emerged in 1854 to combat the Kansas–Nebraska Act and the expansion of slavery into American territories. The early Republican Party consisted of African-Americans, northern white Protestants, businessmen, professionals, factory workers, and farmers.

Yep, and they were called liberals by the southern state Democrats of the time. That I keep having to point this out to you just makes me sad that you can't figure out that I actually agree with you on what party freed the slaves. The difference is that I understand what they stood for and what they would be more akin to in this day and age than you apparently do.

Democrats voted to keep Africans Americans in slavery, opposing the 13th Amendment which officially freed the slaves. Only four Democrats voted for it.

Man, if only the voting records for these things didn't exist, right? Then, I wouldn't be able to once again support my claim that it was ideology that drove that vote and not inherently party affiliation. The 4 Democrats who voted for it were from the openly more liberal north. The ones who didn't vote for it were from, you guessed it, what used to be Confederate states. Every one of them. Guess what states started voting Republican shortly after the CRA was passed? Those same former Confederate states. Guess what area is STILL voting primarily Republican.....nevermind, I'm sure you get the picture even if you aren't intellectually honest enough to admit it.

Republicans also passed the 14th Amendment which granted slaves U.S. citizenship; Democrats voted against it.

Liberals also passed the 14th Amendment which granted slaves U.S citizenship; Conservatives voted against it.

Fixed it for you.
 
Long after slavery was over, the Democratic Party continued down their path to deny African Americans their rights. Wikipedia refers to this as the era of "disenfranchisement" when "Democrats worked to exclude blacks" from civil liberties.

The Democratic Party identified itself as the 'white man's party' and demonized the Republican Party as being 'Negro dominated,' even though whites were in control.

They were considered Negro dominated because they actually looked at them as people, not because blacks actually had any power. For the love of God, try comprehending what you are reading. You remind me of Oswald Bates:



The Democratic Party was responsible for passing Jim Crow laws, in addition to Black Civil Codes that forced Americans to utilize separate drinking fountains, swimming pools, and other facilities in the 20th century.

How many times are you gonna bring up things I haven't disputed. I disputed what caused those things to happen...heres a hint...it wasn't them being Democrats, it was them being conservatives. This isn't that hard.

It was also a Republican, Sen. Everett Dirksen from Illinois, who wrote numerous pieces of legislation including the Civil Rights Act of 1968 which banned discrimination in housing.

Take a look a the above statement you just made an tell me what sticks out.....heres a hint.....where was that good man from? It damned sure wasn't the racist assed south, now was it? Just remember this....the vote for that very bill is available for anyone to go back and look at it....ironically, every Republican from former Confederate states ALSO voted against it. I bet you think that was just a coincidence. It just goes to prove my point further....the SOUTH is and always has been the conservative heartbeat of this country. It also happens to be where the roots of discrimination were the strongest for most of our history.

It was Republican President Richard M. Nixon who introduced the "Philadelphia Plan" that serves as the blueprint for affirmative action today.

Nice try buddy, but I'm smarter than that. It was JFK who introduced Affirmative Action in an EO in 1961.

That's right, these were Republicans, not Democrats.

While loved by conservatives for some reason, Reagan was hardly one himself. I already showed you your other example was completely wrong, so again, I ask if thats all you got?

So you want to explain, (now that your Southern strategy myth is debunked) just when this magical change in ideology took over? I guess since you can't find any actual evidence of this Southern strategy, you now need to push another narrative of after 200 years of the Republican party defending the Black race in America while Democrats all hated them, we all just somehow changed our minds on both sides?

The final nail in the coffin for that change came after the passing of the CRA in 1968. The northern Democrats were looked at by the southern Democrats as traitors to the cause. As Nixons own campaign manager stated, it was a good plan to sow the division for political purposes, and so was born the Southern Strategy. You can say its a myth, but an actual political operative at the time says you're wrong...and not just some dude claiming to be a Republican, but the ****ing campaign manager for the Republican candidate for President. I'm gonna guess he would know better than you what strategy they put in place.

Yeah. lets roll with that BS for a while

The only BS is your recollection of history. Hope the above helps.
 
It's a documented fact that Trump was the leader of the racist Birther Movement:

Donald Trump Clung to ‘Birther’ Lie for Years, and Still Isn’t Apologetic - The New York Times

Trump is still reportedly pushing his racist “birther” conspiracy theory about Obama - Vox

Le phénomène Trump et la racialisation de la politique américaine
(translation)
Trump’s popularity is the outcome of the Republican Party’s longtime “Southern Strategy” that goes back to Nixon if not earlier, a coded appeal to white race prejudice and bigotry.6 The new White House incumbent is decidedly the GOP’s creature and the latest symptom of its crisis, a demagogue whose outspokenness made him the hero and mouthpiece of white nationalism and helped it morph into open militancy. There is grim irony in the fact that America’s first black President was “followed by the untitled leader of the Birther movement, a candidate slow to disavow support from the Ku Klux Klan7 and happy to receive the backing of white nationalists […]”; in that sense “Donald Trump can easily be portrayed as a personal repudiation and also proof of racial regression”.8

They've provided all the links to reputable sources to support those statements. If you disagree, let me know which sources you disagree with and why.

So as a citizen if I want proof the man running for president is a citizen that makes me a racist. WOW.
 
So as a citizen if I want proof the man running for president is a citizen that makes me a racist. WOW.

He was already proven a citizen by the FEC. Since no other president in history had that request made of them, it stands to reason that people would try to figure out what the underlying difference was.

Heres a hint.....his skin color.
 
So as a citizen if I want proof the man running for president is a citizen that makes me a racist. WOW.

Oh! That's all Trump was doing? It just took him a decade to ask it? :lamo

And when Obama showed his birth certificate in 2008, Trump said it wasn't acceptable proof.

But yeah, it was just a citizen checking to see if the POTUS was really an American. For a decade. And a birth certificate wasn't acceptable proof. Because this is typical acceptable behavior. It has happened how many times to the 43 white POTUS who came before the first black POTUS? Hmmmmm, let me think, let me think. Why I believe the answer is.....Zero.

But this had nothing to do with skin colour. Suuuurrrreee it didn't. Nothing racist there. Naaahhhhhh.
 
Last edited:
Oh yes...it DID change since Trump was elected...they ramped it up about 1000%.

Racists hate being called racists.

Trump brought all the slime out from under the rocks, they started spewing their racist crap, and they got called on it...

If racists don't want be called a racist, then they can stop being racists, its not that hard of a thing to do.
 
Racists hate being called racists.

Trump brought all the slime out from under the rocks, they started spewing their racist crap, and they got called on it...

If racists don't want be called a racist, then they can stop being racists, its not that hard of a thing to do.

Yep.

They act like racists, then go full snowflake when people point out they're acting like racists.
 
Sure it does, Haven't you heard? The fraud squad told us so. You can't reprimand them because they are women of color. Just ask San Fran Nan. You didn't hear, shes now a racist as well.

Over the last several years, going back further than Trump, the left has more and more called it racism whenever a person of color is criticized for their beliefs. Criticize Bernie for being a socialist? That's OK because he's an old white guy. Criticize the squad for being socialists? Now that's racist.
 
Over the last several years, going back further than Trump, the left has more and more called it racism whenever a person of color is criticized for their beliefs. Criticize Bernie for being a socialist? That's OK because he's an old white guy. Criticize the squad for being socialists? Now that's racist.

When did Trump tell Bernie to go back to where he came from?
 
He was already proven a citizen by the FEC. Since no other president in history had that request made of them, it stands to reason that people would try to figure out what the underlying difference was.

Heres a hint.....his skin color.

First off his father was not an American. Second if you think our government has accurate information then there were weapons of mass destruction. I waited a long time before I actually saw a definitive birth certificate on line to end the accusations. The true racist are the people who call people racist who have the audacity to question a minority. Sorry if I could care less and treat them the same as a white male that I can say anything I want about.
 
First off his father was not an American. Second if you think our government has accurate information then there were weapons of mass destruction. I waited a long time before I actually saw a definitive birth certificate on line to end the accusations. The true racist are the people who call people racist who have the audacity to question a minority. Sorry if I could care less and treat them the same as a white male that I can say anything I want about.

So what is the issue if someone's father isn't American? If one parent is American, what more do you need? Is there something scary about a person with a parent born elsewhere?

Donald Trump's mother was born in Scotland. I remember all the posts you made on here in 2016 asking for Trump's birth certificate. Or do I?
 
giphy-downsized-large.gif

Gosh, Emilia Clarke is so wonderful.
 
Oh! That's all Trump was doing? It just took him a decade to ask it? :lamo

And when Obama showed his birth certificate in 2008, Trump said it wasn't acceptable proof.

But yeah, it was just a citizen checking to see if the POTUS was really an American. For a decade. And a birth certificate wasn't acceptable proof. Because this is typical acceptable behavior. It has happened how many times to the 43 white POTUS who came before the first black POTUS? Hmmmmm, let me think, let me think. Why I believe the answer is.....Zero.

But this had nothing to do with skin colour. Suuuurrrreee it didn't. Nothing racist there. Naaahhhhhh.

So since JFK all the presidents up until Obama had a parent from another country and nobody cared. WOW! I didn't know that. Sorry.
 
So what is the issue if someone's father isn't American? If one parent is American, what more do you need? Is there something scary about a person with a parent born elsewhere?

Donald Trump's mother was born in Scotland. I remember all the posts you made on here in 2016 asking for Trump's birth certificate. Or do I?

Well, Scotland is mostly white. Obama is black, so therefore we can trust 'dem darkies, and we have to accuse him of being a Kenyan, because all the people who supported the birther movement are racists and racist sympathizers.
 
So what is the issue if someone's father isn't American? If one parent is American, what more do you need? Is there something scary about a person with a parent born elsewhere?

Donald Trump's mother was born in Scotland. I remember all the posts you made on here in 2016 asking for Trump's birth certificate. Or do I?

Donald Trumps mother legally immigrated to this country and became a us citizen before Trump was born. Big difference.
 
Yeah, of course democrats say that, because Republican are
 
Back
Top Bottom