- Joined
- Mar 18, 2018
- Messages
- 47,304
- Reaction score
- 16,467
- Location
- San Diego
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Other
Your post still doesn't follow from mine......
Your post still doesn't follow from mine......
Your post still doesn't follow from mine.
Your post still doesn't follow from mine.
But you’re good with our Race Baiter in Chief?
?I look to a day when people will not be judged by the color of their skin, but by the content of their character. Martin Luther King, Jr.
Read more at Martin Luther King, Jr. - I look to a day when people will...
I know the meaning of per capita, thanks anyway.Yeah, his post did follow from yours. Go back and try again.
Hint: Look up the meaning of "per capita".
How's the weather in New Moscow? Your Gov still running for Commissar? eh...President.
You're playing jabberwocky. A crime committed by an illegal is a crime that shouldn't have happened. Not a difficult concept. Repeated crimes by an illegal that has been repeated deported is an abomination. This isn't rocket science.Read the bolded part again. Heck, read the whole thing. Your argument is more population is more crime. That's an absurd complaint. It has nothing to do with crime.
You're arguing for population, not crime, control.
If we frame population reduction as crime reduction, we're all in trouble.
You're playing jabberwocky.
Breaking news: racists don't like being called racists.
breaking news, people who aren't racists tire of liberals using that term because they don't have rational arguments.
Racists thank you. After all, that's what they've been saying all along.
You see more racists than McCarthy saw commies. and the difference is-most of the people McCarthy called commies were communists. Of course you have a blind side. You have stated that no one but whites can be racist. So you grossly expand the term "racist" against whites, while shrinking it to the point of non-existence when applied to anyone else.
"If someone calls something racist, it means you're really smart and you owned the libs!"
Yeah, okay. That's not supporting racists.
I agree with you on some issues. You're one of the few people who actually understand the foundation of what the constitution is based on-natural law and natural rights. I reject your definition of racism and I find your claims of what is racist, to be hyperbolic in many cases, and blind in others
This has nothing to do with the definition of anything. You're literally claiming that racists are always right.
stop lying
your definition of racist is worthless and not one I, or many others, accept. and I have never said "racists" are right.
You see more racists than McCarthy saw commies. .
stop lying
your definition of racist is worthless and not one I, or many others, accept. and I have never said "racists" are right.
The dictionary (2b) and sociological definition of racism has nothing to do with my objection. By claiming "racism is a claim used by liberals when they can't win" you are, in fact and literally, claiming racists are always right.
There is no "your" definition of racism. There is only the definition of racism.
rac·ism
/ˈrāˌsizəm/
noun
prejudice, discrimination, or antagonism directed against someone of a different race based on the belief that one's own race is superior.
"a program to combat racism"
synonyms: racial discrimination, racialism, racial prejudice/bigotry, xenophobia, chauvinism, bigotry, bias, intolerance;
the belief that all members of each race possess characteristics or abilities specific to that race, especially so as to distinguish it as inferior or superior to another race or races.
"theories of racism"
Im sorry but your race card has been declined. Do you have another form of argument?
The race card company has gone bankrupt. Its stock is worthless.
NO, what I am claiming is that liberals use the race card when they have no valid argument.