• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

The Iranians take a second British tanker...

SCrider said:
Yes, our education system is too blame.......:lamo
Click to expand...

Our education system is ran, lock, stock, and barrel by, you guessed it...leftists.
 
Trump's escalation plan continues after the US requested the British seize the Iranian oil tanker immediately before this incident. The British dumbly did what the US told them to do.
 
Let's just go to war already. I am sick of them playing games and DJT needs something, anything, to deflect from his blatant racism.
 
snakestretcher said:
By withdrawing from an agreement whom everyone, including his own administration and the IAEA, confirmed Iran was in 100% compliance with. Trump created this crisis; own it.
Click to expand...

You rest easy now, America will take it from here. Thanks
 
snakestretcher said:
By withdrawing from an agreement whom everyone, including his own administration and the IAEA, confirmed Iran was in 100% compliance with. Trump created this crisis; own it.
Click to expand...

You mean the agreement Obama had with Iran. The same Obama how sent over billions to these terrorist? The agreement that wasn't provided by Congress? Yeah, we know all about it.

We don't make deals with Terrorist and I don't care what kind of agreement Obama had with Iran. Iran doesn't get to make a nuclear weapon, not on our watch. If you are so uninformed to the fact that Iran never abides by treaties, never keeps agreements, is the largest supporter and trainer of terrorism on the globe, and is in the process of arming themselves with a nuclear weapon, then you really shouldn't be supporting them.

Or maybe you have some other motive for supporting that regime.
 
Condor060 said:
You mean the agreement Obama had with Iran. The same Obama how sent over billions to these terrorist? The agreement that wasn't provided by Congress? Yeah, we know all about it.

We don't make deals with Terrorist and I don't care what kind of agreement Obama had with Iran. Iran doesn't get to make a nuclear weapon, not on our watch. If you are so uninformed to the fact that Iran never abides by treaties, never keeps agreements, is the largest supporter and trainer of terrorism on the globe, and is in the process of arming themselves with a nuclear weapon, then you really shouldn't be supporting them.

Or maybe you have some other motive for supporting that regime.
Click to expand...

That money belonged to Iran; it was never American cash but assets seized and released. You don't make deals with terrorists? Reagan did. As for not keeping deals it was TRUMP who reneged. Iran was in full compliance so don't lie; both the IAEA and Trump's own administration were happy that Iran was keeping to her side of the bargain. You haven't got a clue-all you can do is lock-step denial and defend Trump's stupidity in potentially catastrophically destabilizing a region already perilously dangerous. But it's all Iran's doing, right?

Here's some more stuff for you to ignore and deny about your squeaky-clean, 'we don't make deals with terrorists', country: United States and state-sponsored terrorism - Wikipedia

"Blah, blah, blah I can't hear you" is all you have. Pathetic.
 
Last edited:
Condor060 said:
You rest easy now, America will take it from here. Thanks
Click to expand...

Yes, we've had ample evidence of America taking it from here; Iraq, Vietnam, Afghanistan; all dismal failures despite your awesome military might. You can't get anything right; can't even win a war against a bunch of peasant farmers with antiquated weapons in Afghanistan. How long have you been taking it from here in Afghanistan? Nearly 20 years so far?
 
snakestretcher said:
That money belonged to Iran; it was never American cash but assets seized and released. You don't make deals with terrorists? Reagan did. As for not keeping deals it was TRUMP who reneged. Iran was in full compliance so don't lie; both the IAEA and Trump's own administration were happy that Iran was keeping to her side of the bargain. You haven't got a clue-all you can do is lock-step denial and defend Trump's stupidity in potentially catastrophically destabilizing a region already perilously dangerous. But it's all Iran's doing, right?

Here's some more stuff for you to ignore and deny about your squeaky-clean, 'we don't make deals with terrorists', country: United States and state-sponsored terrorism - Wikipedia

"Blah, blah, blah I can't hear you" is all you have. Pathetic.
Click to expand...

Its obvious which side you are on. I don't care if it was their money. I don't care if they are in compliance, I don't care what Obama back room deal he pulled with Iran. None of this has anything to do with the fact that Iran NEVER abides by agreements, EVER, and even if they did abide by it they would have nuclear capabilities within 10 years.

Trump made it clear before he was elected that we would not honor this idiotic deal. Thats right, we reneged. So sit back in your safe space while we fix a stupid problem (just like NK) of politicians kicking the can down the road. I pray Iran continues to attack tankers and the US military. We won't send over a bunch of troops this time with limited orders on rules of engagement. We will send over enough firepower to end this in about two weeks.

Or did you just prefer to treat Iran like a poor little kitten while they arm themselves with the worlds most devastating weapons? Wake up. There is no agreements that will stop Iran.
 
snakestretcher said:
Yes, we've had ample evidence of America taking it from here; Iraq, Vietnam, Afghanistan; all dismal failures despite your awesome military might. You can't get anything right; can't even win a war against a bunch of peasant farmers with antiquated weapons in Afghanistan
Click to expand...
. How long have you been taking it from here in Afghanistan? Nearly 20 years so far?
Click to expand...

Says the guy who would be speaking German right now if it wasn't for America.
 
snakestretcher said:
Yes, we've had ample evidence of America taking it from here; Iraq, Vietnam, Afghanistan; all dismal failures despite your awesome military might.
Click to expand...

All dismal failures of Liberal run government and Liberal ideas. Stupid rules of engagement so peoples feelings don't get hurt. You can't win a war if your government doesn't allow you too. How long do you think these wars would last if we released the full non nuclear force of American forces on them. 30 days?
 
Condor060 said:
Its obvious which side you are on. I don't care if it was their money. I don't care if they are in compliance, I don't care what Obama back room deal he pulled with Iran. None of this has anything to do with the fact that Iran NEVER abides by agreements, EVER, and even if they did abide by it they would have nuclear capabilities within 10 years.

Trump made it clear before he was elected that we would not honor this idiotic deal. Thats right, we reneged. So sit back in your safe space while we fix a stupid problem (just like NK) of politicians kicking the can down the road. I pray Iran continues to attack tankers and the US military. We won't send over a bunch of troops this time with limited orders on rules of engagement. We will send over enough firepower to end this in about two weeks.

Or did you just prefer to treat Iran like a poor little kitten while they arm themselves with the worlds most devastating weapons? Wake up. There is no agreements that will stop Iran.
Click to expand...

You're clueless. Have a great day.
 
Condor060 said:
All dismal failures of Liberal run government and Liberal ideas. Stupid rules of engagement so peoples feelings don't get hurt. You can't win a war if your government doesn't allow you too. How long do you think these wars would last if we released the full non nuclear force of American forces on them. 30 days?
Click to expand...

Nuclear force against a country bordering China or Russia? How do you think they'd enjoy your nuclear fallout drifting over their borders and killing their civilians? You really haven't got a bloody clue. Not one.
 
snakestretcher said:
Nuclear force against a country bordering China or Russia? How do you think they'd enjoy your nuclear fallout drifting over their borders and killing their civilians? You really haven't got a bloody clue. Not one.
Click to expand...

All dismal failures of Liberal run government and Liberal ideas. Stupid rules of engagement so peoples feelings don't get hurt. You can't win a war if your government doesn't allow you too. How long do you think these wars would last if we released the full
non nuclear force of American forces on them. 30 days?
Click to expand...

I thought I made it pretty clear, No?
 
Grandpappy said:
Trump says he'll talk with the British. The ignorant. biased media just want to play gothcha with Trump in the news conference happening now.

MSM Morons...I think our education system is to blame.
Click to expand...

LOL, YEs, education is to blame for the idiocy you just posted

Who started all this stuff? Trump. Who reneged on a deal that was made and was working? Who slapped harmful sanctions on Iran? Who started flying drones in their territory and flying their warships in Iran's backyard? Trump.

Nothing more dumb and ignorant and showing lack of education than claiming the media other than Fox news is biased, when its fox news that is biased and that is selling you guys that garbage

Grandpappy said:
We don't have many tankers in the Gulf. Haha, why, you ask?
Because Trump de-Obamaed the American petroleum industry.
We no longer need ME oil....

Now that's ironic, right there. :lamo
Click to expand...

And this yet again shows your ignorance. Oil production in the US went up under Obama. You think fracking just started with TRump? ANd you have the nerve to call others stupid
 
snakestretcher said:
Yes, you made it perfectly clear that dropping nukes on countries neighbouring your traditional enemies is likely to result in nukes being dropped on you. Sheer ****ing genius.
Click to expand...

Uh, yeah. What I made perfectly clear was using American forces to its capabilities without the use of nuclear forces.

Hence the words non nuclear force!!!!!
 
snakestretcher said:
Yes, you made it perfectly clear that dropping nukes on countries neighbouring your traditional enemies is likely to result in nukes being dropped on you. Sheer ****ing genius.
Click to expand...

Uh, yeah. What I made perfectly clear was using American forces to its capabilities without the use of nuclear forces.

Hence the words non nuclear force!!!!!
 
Condor060 said:
Uh, yeah. What I made perfectly clear was using American forces to its capabilities without the use of nuclear forces.

Hence the words non nuclear force!!!!!
Click to expand...

Remind us, how long did Operation Rolling Thunder continue (three and a half years in case you need a reminder)-y'know the one where you unloaded everything except nukes on North Vietnam. Didn't work, did it?

Operation Rolling Thunder - Wikipedia
 
snakestretcher said:
Remind us, how long did Operation Rolling Thunder continue (three and a half years in case you need a reminder)-y'know the one where you unloaded everything except nukes on North Vietnam. Didn't work, did it?

Operation Rolling Thunder - Wikipedia
Click to expand...

You actually have no clue what happened in Vietnam. Obviously.

USAF pilots and their military leaders complained year after year of unwarranted restrictions imposed on them by US civilian leaders, not only with respect to target selection but as to strike parameters. Rolling Thunder was to be an interdiction campaign, a punitive expedition, and a test of will. As part of the then-prevalent United States theory of limited war, however, it was viewed as a limited campaign to avoid widening the war beyond the two Vietnams.

The United States made it clear that it had no intention of invading North Vietnam; nor did it intend to destroy the Hanoi regime, compel the North Vietnamese people to adopt another form of government, nor devastate North Vietnam. Political offices responsible for the direction of the war, would not be attacked and/or holding facilities for air to air missiles or combat vehicles stored in the north to be provided on the border.

The USAF command was complaining that important military targets were immune to attack. Men required to fly against a particular target at great personal risk, and forbidden to divert their attacks to other targets of greater military significance because American Liberal leaders decided that if they went too far, this would provoke China into entering the war. China had made this quite clear, placing tens of thousands of Chinese military personnel in the northern sections of North Vietnam so its valuable targets that would have broken the back of the NVC were off limits.

How do I know this, My father was a Lt Colonel and squadron commander of the 419th air refueling squadron and the pilots who were involved in rolling thunder were leaving the service because they were tired of flying missions and risking their lives for targets that had no value. Two tents under a tree or some abandoned building.

If you want to know what happens when you release the full force of the US ground and air forces upon an enemy without Liberal objectors, look no further than George Patton.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom