Honestly, I have no further interest in spending paragraph after paragraph and page after page explaining myself to you because you have no command of the obvious. You continually make up your own definitions to what you think something means when its convenient. When I do explain (what most would consider the most elementary idea), you come around and say I support Liberal ideas but it takes about 3 pages of explanations for it to get in your head what I was originally stating. This has become tiresome and boring.
Example #1: You obviously don’t know what the term keyboard warrior is even when I told you what I meant by it. I defined it for you. People who make personal attacks and threats to other posters.
Now you come at me saying I am a keyboard commando because I post opinions, not threats. When I show you your own post of childish rants you now want to dissect each one for what their content while (again) conveniently overlooking the actual behavior I am accusing you of. This is typical Liberal behavior trying to dodge the actual claim by diverting attention to something else.
Example #2: I posted, Now Trump has Pelosi and the Democratic party coming to the rescue of the 4 little communist that have about 8% support showing every voter just how far left they have all become.
PRICELESS
Your rebuttal is
But the part that makes me question your thought processes the most is when you contradict yourself in the same sentence:
Originally Posted by Condor060
...that have about 8% support showing every voter just how far left they have all become.
If these persons only have about 8 percent support then that would prove that we haven't become very far left.
Are you sure you're thinking things through before sitting down in your keyboard commando chair?
Again, you have no command of the obvious, so I have to spend another page showing you what the current support is for Omar. You know I wasn’t talking about how they got elected but its what you jump to just so you can have some obtuse point about nothing just to make an argument. I have no idea if its intentional or educational but at either rate, I have no interest in continually providing the most obvious and public information to you just for the sake of argument. No my thing.
Example #3: I stated Democrats refuse to address the Asylum laws attributing to the child trafficking of using kids to cross the border. Now we have kids being abducted and used to help beat the asylum laws to enter the country.
You go off on a full page rant about how illegals are being housed in private prisons and how I have to Admit I know this if I want you or a ton of others to respect my arguments because I know it's the truth. I have no clue as to how privatized prisons have anything to do with what happens with the Democrat run House and through several pages of conversation you were never able to provide any link what-so-ever so I just decided to abandon any further conversation on the subject.
At this point I think its just better you find someone else to debate with. I honestly have no further interest in having a conversation with someone who is more interested in arguing none productive points that have absolutely nothing to do with the conversation and spending my time overcoming the most obvious of facts.
I call them as I see them, if that's to much for you, I just don't really care. But I am tired of you stalking
EVERY thread I post in to rehash the same old arguments over and over that has nothing to do with the actual thread I am in. You don't care about debating anyone. You just have this need to win some argument by taking snippets of old conversations and applying them to current conversations so you can make some claim.
Its like Gomer Pyle running behind Barney Fifes squad car yelling Citizens arrest, Citizens Arrest. Move on dude. I lost interest.
