• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Epstein Paid $350,000 to Possible Witnesses Against Him, Prosecutors Say

beefheart

Ice Cream for Crow?
DP Veteran
Joined
Sep 30, 2013
Messages
61,531
Reaction score
64,668
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Moderate
Wow....


Epstein Paid $350,000 to Possible Witnesses Against Him, Prosecutors Say - The New York Times

Epstein Paid $350,000 to Possible Witnesses Against Him, Prosecutors Say

Federal prosecutors made the allegations in an effort to have bail denied for Mr. Epstein, the financier facing sex-trafficking charges.

By Benjamin Weiser

July 12, 2019

Jeffrey Epstein, the financier facing sex-trafficking charges in New York, tried to influence possible witnesses against him, prosecutors said on Friday, wiring $350,000 to two people who might testify against him at trial.

Mr. Epstein sent the money to the potential witnesses in late November and early December, 2018, shortly after the Miami Herald began publishing an investigative report about a secret deal he had reached with the authorities in Florida to avoid federal prosecution, prosecutors said.

The United States attorney’s office in Manhattan made the new allegations in a court filing asking that Mr. Epstein be denied bail while he awaits trial, saying the payments were evidence that he might try to influence witnesses if he were not detained.

The prosecutors have not charged Mr. Epstein in connection with the new allegations, and a spokesman for the United States attorney’s office declined to comment on that possibility.

Mr. Epstein’s lawyers maintain their client has lived a law-abiding life for the past 14 years, since he pleaded guilty to state prostitution charges in Florida and served 13 months in jail. He has plead not guilty to the new federal indictment in Manhattan.

Prosecutors said Mr. Epstein had paid significant amounts of money to influence individuals who were close to him and “who might be witnesses against him at a trial,” the government’s filing said.

Two days after the Herald published its expose, Mr. Epstein wired $100,000 to a person who had been named as a possible co-conspirator in his deal with Florida prosecutors a decade ago.

Three days later, Mr. Epstein sent $250,000 to a person who not only had been named as a co-conspirator in the Florida agreement, but was also identified in the New York indictment as an employee who helped Mr. Epstein in his sex-trafficking scheme.

The payments and their timing, the prosecutors wrote, “suggests the defendant was attempting to further influence co-conspirators who might provide information against him in light of the recently emerging allegations.”

Three days later, Mr. Epstein sent $250,000 to a person who not only had been named as a co-conspirator in the Florida agreement, but was also identified in the New York indictment as an employee who helped Mr. Epstein in his sex-trafficking scheme.
 
Wow....


Epstein Paid $350,000 to Possible Witnesses Against Him, Prosecutors Say - The New York Times

Epstein Paid $350,000 to Possible Witnesses Against Him, Prosecutors Say

Federal prosecutors made the allegations in an effort to have bail denied for Mr. Epstein, the financier facing sex-trafficking charges.

By Benjamin Weiser

July 12, 2019

Jeffrey Epstein, the financier facing sex-trafficking charges in New York, tried to influence possible witnesses against him, prosecutors said on Friday, wiring $350,000 to two people who might testify against him at trial.

Mr. Epstein sent the money to the potential witnesses in late November and early December, 2018, shortly after the Miami Herald began publishing an investigative report about a secret deal he had reached with the authorities in Florida to avoid federal prosecution, prosecutors said.

The United States attorney’s office in Manhattan made the new allegations in a court filing asking that Mr. Epstein be denied bail while he awaits trial, saying the payments were evidence that he might try to influence witnesses if he were not detained.

The prosecutors have not charged Mr. Epstein in connection with the new allegations, and a spokesman for the United States attorney’s office declined to comment on that possibility.

Mr. Epstein’s lawyers maintain their client has lived a law-abiding life for the past 14 years, since he pleaded guilty to state prostitution charges in Florida and served 13 months in jail. He has plead not guilty to the new federal indictment in Manhattan.

Prosecutors said Mr. Epstein had paid significant amounts of money to influence individuals who were close to him and “who might be witnesses against him at a trial,” the government’s filing said.

Two days after the Herald published its expose, Mr. Epstein wired $100,000 to a person who had been named as a possible co-conspirator in his deal with Florida prosecutors a decade ago.

Three days later, Mr. Epstein sent $250,000 to a person who not only had been named as a co-conspirator in the Florida agreement, but was also identified in the New York indictment as an employee who helped Mr. Epstein in his sex-trafficking scheme.

The payments and their timing, the prosecutors wrote, “suggests the defendant was attempting to further influence co-conspirators who might provide information against him in light of the recently emerging allegations.”

Three days later, Mr. Epstein sent $250,000 to a person who not only had been named as a co-conspirator in the Florida agreement, but was also identified in the New York indictment as an employee who helped Mr. Epstein in his sex-trafficking scheme.

So Epstein is helping the prosecution identify his co-conspirators. Awesome! And Epstein can now add witness tampering to his list of charges. No one can argue that the statute of limitations has expired on that one either. FYI - it's my understanding there's not statute of limitations on sex crimes involving minors.

Burn eternally, all of them!
 
Wow....


Epstein Paid $350,000 to Possible Witnesses Against Him, Prosecutors Say - The New York Times

Epstein Paid $350,000 to Possible Witnesses Against Him, Prosecutors Say

Federal prosecutors made the allegations in an effort to have bail denied for Mr. Epstein, the financier facing sex-trafficking charges.

By Benjamin Weiser

July 12, 2019

Jeffrey Epstein, the financier facing sex-trafficking charges in New York, tried to influence possible witnesses against him, prosecutors said on Friday, wiring $350,000 to two people who might testify against him at trial.

Mr. Epstein sent the money to the potential witnesses in late November and early December, 2018, shortly after the Miami Herald began publishing an investigative report about a secret deal he had reached with the authorities in Florida to avoid federal prosecution, prosecutors said.

The United States attorney’s office in Manhattan made the new allegations in a court filing asking that Mr. Epstein be denied bail while he awaits trial, saying the payments were evidence that he might try to influence witnesses if he were not detained.

The prosecutors have not charged Mr. Epstein in connection with the new allegations, and a spokesman for the United States attorney’s office declined to comment on that possibility.

Mr. Epstein’s lawyers maintain their client has lived a law-abiding life for the past 14 years, since he pleaded guilty to state prostitution charges in Florida and served 13 months in jail. He has plead not guilty to the new federal indictment in Manhattan.

Prosecutors said Mr. Epstein had paid significant amounts of money to influence individuals who were close to him and “who might be witnesses against him at a trial,” the government’s filing said.

Two days after the Herald published its expose, Mr. Epstein wired $100,000 to a person who had been named as a possible co-conspirator in his deal with Florida prosecutors a decade ago.

Three days later, Mr. Epstein sent $250,000 to a person who not only had been named as a co-conspirator in the Florida agreement, but was also identified in the New York indictment as an employee who helped Mr. Epstein in his sex-trafficking scheme.

The payments and their timing, the prosecutors wrote, “suggests the defendant was attempting to further influence co-conspirators who might provide information against him in light of the recently emerging allegations.”

Three days later, Mr. Epstein sent $250,000 to a person who not only had been named as a co-conspirator in the Florida agreement, but was also identified in the New York indictment as an employee who helped Mr. Epstein in his sex-trafficking scheme.

Who cares! Hillary is going to have him executed anyways like she has in the past to protect Bill and her bad name :)
 
Who cares! Hillary is going to have him executed anyways like she has in the past to protect Bill and her bad name :)

What an amazingly stupid post.

Thanks for contributing nothing to the topic.
 
So Epstein is helping the prosecution identify his co-conspirators. Awesome! And Epstein can now add witness tampering to his list of charges. No one can argue that the statute of limitations has expired on that one either. FYI - it's my understanding there's not statute of limitations on sex crimes involving minors.

Burn eternally, all of them!

But as a darling of the democrats, he won't get solitary like Manafort did.
 
I don't think the girls who are going to testify against him would feel very comfortable with him on the loose, either.
 
What an amazingly stupid post.

Thanks for contributing nothing to the topic.

There is nothing to contribute. The article was from the New York Slimes and who knows if any of it is true. Fake news paper. As far as the post, my statement is highly accurate and truthful. 53 people have died suspiciously when they become to deadly to the Clinton's. Good old Hillary and her protection for Bill the rapist and molester.
 
I don't understand how the OP deserves two but-Clintons, a but-Manafort and a fake-news. Still waiting for my favorite...
 
But as a darling of the democrats, he won't get solitary like Manafort did.

He stopped donating to Democrats in 2005 when he realized they couldn't help him stay out of prison. So naturally, he turned to Republicans. Acosta is the republican who gave him the illegal and super lenient plea deal. He just resigned today.
 
Probably a lot of the rich and the famous are swimming in the sleazy Epstein swamp.

He's already said his finances are out of bounds for prosecutors.

He's a sexual predator and probably running a Ponzi scheme. His trial should be .... a classic.
 
There is nothing to contribute. The article was from the New York Slimes and who knows if any of it is true. Fake news paper. As far as the post, my statement is highly accurate and truthful. 53 people have died suspiciously when they become to deadly to the Clinton's. Good old Hillary and her protection for Bill the rapist and molester.

Are you just here to make stupid posts?

Go peddle your idiotic conspiracy crap somewhere else.
 
I don't understand how the OP deserves two but-Clintons, a but-Manafort and a fake-news. Still waiting for my favorite...

Benghazi!!!!!!! :lamo
 
I don't think the girls who are going to testify against him would feel very comfortable with him on the loose, either.

They might best get used to it, because he'll get a few years (maybe), then probation, or he might even skate.
 
I don't think the girls who are going to testify against him would feel very comfortable with him on the loose, either.

The Clintons don't want him locked up either. The chances of him being hit by a meteorite or a flying knife are small... But it does happen...
 
They might best get used to it, because he'll get a few years (maybe), then probation, or he might even skate.

I don't think so...but what makes you think so?

He's already down for violating the agreement and now witness tampering.
 
The Clintons don't want him locked up either. The chances of him being hit by a meteorite or a flying knife are small... But it does happen...

I haven't heard that. In fact, I haven't a heard a peep from them since this all started. Do you have a link?
 
He stopped donating to Democrats in 2005 when he realized they couldn't help him stay out of prison. So naturally, he turned to Republicans. Acosta is the republican who gave him the illegal and super lenient plea deal. He just resigned today.

Wrong. The state had the weak case and the weak deal. Acosta went in and worked out a deal that got him in prison for 40 some on months, and made him register as a sex offender. Palm Beach County Prosecutor was prepared to allow Epstein to plead guilty to soliciting prostitution charges that would have brought no jail time whatsoever before Acosta intervened to stop it.

A Manhattan prosecutor asked for Epstein to receive the lowest-level sex offender status. And Epstein never checked in with New York City police as required by law, so basically, NY ignored his sex offender status because he was one of them.
 
I don't think so...but what makes you think so?

He's already down for violating the agreement and now witness tampering.

He has too much dirt on too many Democrats.

He hasn't been convicted of jack****.
 
He has too much dirt on too many Democrats.

He hasn't been convicted of jack****.

Democrats, Republicans, Foreign leaders, CEOs, college professors, actors, rock stars are all probably just the tip of the iceberg,

Let the chips fall where they may. Pelsosi said the list might includes some of our 'faves'. I wonder if she knows who some of the 'faves' are?
 
Wrong. The state had the weak case and the weak deal. Acosta went in and worked out a deal that got him in prison for 40 some on months, and made him register as a sex offender. Palm Beach County Prosecutor was prepared to allow Epstein to plead guilty to soliciting prostitution charges that would have brought no jail time whatsoever before Acosta intervened to stop it.

A Manhattan prosecutor asked for Epstein to receive the lowest-level sex offender status. And Epstein never checked in with New York City police as required by law, so basically, NY ignored his sex offender status because he was one of them.

And if you buy that I got a bridge in Alaska to sell ya. The prosecutor has the email correspondence between Epstein's lawyers and Acosta and they don't support Acosta's story.
 
Three days later, Mr. Epstein sent $250,000 to a person who not only had been named as a co-conspirator in the Florida agreement, but was also identified in the New York indictment as an employee who helped Mr. Epstein in his sex-trafficking scheme.
It's as though Acosta's crack investigators didn't even look into anything....at all...other than immunity for everyone in exchange for no federal charges. I mean...gave them all immunity AND no federal charges, and let him do a 6 day a week work year in state.
 
Back
Top Bottom