• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Apparently intoxicated Pelosi caught on tape.

KLATTU

KLATTU

Banned
DP Veteran
Joined
Jan 2, 2013
Messages
19,259
Reaction score
6,899
Gender
Undisclosed
Political Leaning
Conservative
I do not like Speaker Pelosi, either, but we should not mock her for any physical ailments.

Actually, being the fair-minded person that I am, she should be congratulated:


1. She looks great for her 79 years of age. Her surgeon has done a great job.


2. According to Google, her net worth is $120 million. (So, of course, she and her loved ones will never be inconvenienced by the negative impact of unauthorized immigration.)
 
KLATTU said:
NOT doctored (and wow!): Nancy Pelosi falls all over herself explaining why illegal immigrants shouldn’t be deported (watch) – twitchy.com

Nancy Pelosi doesn’t think people who have ‘violated their status’ should be deported.

Wow, Democrats can spin like nobody’s business when they want to … unless the Botox is finally going to their brain. This is truly painful to watch and before anyone starts complaining, no it has not been doctored.

This is Nancy in her true form. Heh.
Click to expand...

Clearly, she is spinning the narrartive to forward an agenda. She is wrong. What kind of lawmaker is she? Someone needs to take away her mic. The president is not above the law but illegal aliens in violation of their final deportation orders are.

Any individual who falls within any ground of inadmissibility under INA §212(a) is deportable. This section of the law both incorporates all of the grounds of inadmissibility and makes an individual deportable if at the time of admission or adjustment of status, he or she was in fact inadmissible based on any of the grounds of inadmissibility under §212(a).

For example, if an individual is admitted to the United States or is granted adjustment of status based on a fraudulent statement or willful misrepresentation of material fact, that individual can be found deportable based on the fact that he or she was actually inadmissible at the time of admission or adjustment but for the fraud or misrepresentation.

Present in Violation of Law
INA §237(a)(1)(B) makes an individual deportable if that person is present in the United States in violation of the immigration laws "or any other law of the United States."

INA §237(a)(1)(B).
This is a very broad statute making an individual subject to deportation if he or she is present in violation of virtually any of the immigration statutes. For example, an individual is present in violation of law where his or her authorized stay under a nonimmigrant visa has expired even where there is an extension request pending, unless and until that extension request is approved. The fact that an extension request is pending before U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) does not legalize one’s status before the immigration court.

Violation of Nonimmigrant Status or Conditions of Entry
Click to expand...

Grounds of Deportability Based on Immigration Violations | San Diego Visa Lawyers
 
KLATTU said:
NOT doctored (and wow!): Nancy Pelosi falls all over herself explaining why illegal immigrants shouldn’t be deported (watch) – twitchy.com

Nancy Pelosi doesn’t think people who have ‘violated their status’ should be deported.

Wow, Democrats can spin like nobody’s business when they want to … unless the Botox is finally going to their brain. This is truly painful to watch and before anyone starts complaining, no it has not been doctored.

This is Nancy in her true form. Heh.
Click to expand...

What do you expect from somebody who was all for border security--she voted for the secure fence act--until she was against it? Now time and time and time again she had declared those of us who believe immigration law is necessary and needed and who think a physical barrier will help enforce our immigration laws to be 'immoral'.

She even applauds those who bring their children here illegally:

[video]https://www.c-span.org/video/?c4713541/nancy-pelosi-illegal-aliens-breaking-law[/video]
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom