• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Hope Hicks testimony.

Mycroft said:
"numerous"???

Tell me...exactly how many hearings was Hillary brought in for?
Click to expand...

Oh, yeah, almost forgot ... there was that testimony she had to give before a grand jury in 1996 regarding that Whitewater thing.

Seriously, I don't think any political figure in our history has been investigated as much as Hillary Clinton. And since no charges were ever filed, she's either not guilty, or she's the single greatest criminal mastermind in history. You pick.
 
Obscurity said:
Pelosi needs to impeach. This is entirely different then the Clinton impeachment.

The republicans have hand over fist ensured this illegal activity went unpunished for 2 years while they salivated at the chance to get their donors off; now the reaper has come home to roost and the constitutional authority of the house is being stonewalled by these illegal activities.
Click to expand...

What "illegal activities"?
 
Idiometer said:
Oh, yeah, almost forgot ... there was that testimony she had to give before a grand jury in 1996 regarding that Whitewater thing.

Seriously, I don't think any political figure in our history has been investigated as much as Hillary Clinton. And since no charges were ever filed, she's either not guilty, or she's the single greatest criminal mastermind in history. You pick.
Click to expand...

LOL!!

So...now TWO is "numerous".
 
code1211 said:
Do you have a link quoting this exchange in context?
Click to expand...

Best I can come up with is that it comes from some comments committee members made. I saw a reference to similar dialog in a CNN article.

From the sound of things the WH lawyer with her wouldn’t allow her to say anything at all about anything related to her time in the administration. That pretty much makes sense because the scumbags running the committee will use a misplaced comma to hang her or Trump.
 
bongsaway said:
If it's any consolation, I think you are not alone in your feelings. I honestly don't see how this president can win again. He has insulted everything and everyone in america except for his loyal followers. People are tired of a president who plays the victim card all the time and then attacks whoever or whatever he wishes. We have a man child as president who has a bad temper due to never being told no in his life. I hope he drags the GOP into depths they can't get out of for a long, long time. So far they are doing their best because they are so afraid of their electorate.
Click to expand...

He could win again. Never underestimate the power of stupid people in large groups.
 
Mycroft said:
Wrong.

The House Dems broke it when they changed the House rules to enable them to use their committees for blatant political purposes.

Oh...wait...you don't KNOW about Pelosi's rule changes, do you?

Never mind. I'm wasting my time here.
Click to expand...

Wrong. The house has -every- right to investigate potential illegal activities by Trump and you know it. The Mueller report detailed many instances of potential (IMHO, proven) obstruction of justice, and the house -must- be able to investigate this as they have the sole authority to impeach.
 
Mycroft said:
What "illegal activities"?
Click to expand...

Ordering the firing of investigators. Ordering the firing of directors. Hanging pardons over the heads of those who would "vindicate" trump if they lied for him. Emoluments violations with regard to Israel and Saudi Arabia.

But we can't even get you lot to agree on what's illegal, so this conversation is over.

I am no longer wasting my time on a contrarian for contrarian's sake.
 
Trying to use the justice system to remove a duly elected president is very bad form. Especially after 4 or 5 investigations in which nothing was found.
Want to dump Trump? Get a viable candidate to challenge him.
 
gdgyva said:
oooooh.....and the latest and greatest giveaway

reparations.....

lets give free money to generations just because.....

oi vey!
Click to expand...

Wrong thread.

:eek:t
 
Grandpappy said:
Trying to use the justice system to remove a duly elected president is very bad form. Especially after 4 or 5 investigations in which nothing was found.
Want to dump Trump? Get a viable candidate to challenge him.
Click to expand...

Except that there was one investigation in which much has been found, your post is spot-on.
 
trouble13 said:
I think one of the things that infuriates the left so much is he ises the same playbook that dems have been using for as long as i have been alive.

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

Examples, please.
 
trouble13 said:
I dont agree that Trump has committed an impeachable offense but i can at least respect you for your position because you i believe sincerely do think he has.

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

I read the entire report, even the footnotes. Trump is guilty of at least four counts of felony obstruction of justice.
 
Obscurity said:
Wrong. The house has -every- right to investigate potential illegal activities by Trump and you know it. The Mueller report detailed many instances of potential (IMHO, proven) obstruction of justice, and the house -must- be able to investigate this as they have the sole authority to impeach.
Click to expand...

If they want to impeach, open impeachment procedures. But that's not what they want. They want dirt and they are using their committees contracted dirt.

They are using their Congressional powers for political purposes.
 
Lutherf said:
It’s illegal to tell Democrats to **** off if they really want something from you.
Click to expand...

It's not illegal for the President to withhold information from Congress.
 
Obscurity said:
Ordering the firing of investigators. Ordering the firing of directors. Hanging pardons over the heads of those who would "vindicate" trump if they lied for him. Emoluments violations with regard to Israel and Saudi Arabia.

But we can't even get you lot to agree on what's illegal, so this conversation is over.

I am no longer wasting my time on a contrarian for contrarian's sake.
Click to expand...

Trump didn't do any of those things.
 
Mycroft said:
Trump didn't do any of those things.
Click to expand...

And he didn't say Grab them by the *****, did he?

Pathetic and useless, your dereliction of fact.
 
I understand some of you feel very strongly about Trump, but seriously, you need to move on. For your own mental health.
 
Barnacle said:
It is the action of a man who has been proven to be innocent.

For 2 years Trump allowed every member of his administration, including his son, to be hauled in front of various committees - in some cases multiple times - and be available for multiple interviews by Mueller & Co.

The investigation ended with Mueller's report: No wrongdoing found.

It is Trump's right to say: "Enough is enough!"


David Horowitz, May 21, 2019:

Democrats' position on obstruction: "While we recognize that the man did not actually steal any horses, he is obviously guilty of trying to resist being hanged for it."
Click to expand...

You cons held 21 Benghazi hearings, so don't sell this crap to me, I'm not buying. Go sell it to some dumb Trump supporter that might believe the bull**** your spouting.
 
Grandpappy said:
I understand some of you feel very strongly about Trump, but seriously, you need to move on. For your own mental health.
Click to expand...

Trump is STILL going on about Hillary, so yeah, tell us to move on :lamo

Trump and many Trump supporters have some serious mental health issues they need to deal with FIRST.
 
Idiometer said:
I read the entire report, even the footnotes. Trump is guilty of at least four counts of felony obstruction of justice.
Click to expand...

We won't know that until a jury convicts. But, I can say there are at least four counts on which it would be very difficult for him to win an acquittal.
 
Mycroft said:
LOL!!

So...now TWO is "numerous".
Click to expand...

Three. And yes, it's numerous when you consider the viciousness with which the GOP has gone after her time after time. Eight House investigations into Benghazi, a lengthy investigation into the home server, on top of that whole stupid Whitewater fiasco. And not a single charge filed.

So, pick one: not guilty, or criminal mastermind?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom