• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Trump is afraid he’ll lose reelection, and he’s in a fury over it

You can blame the idiots who voted for Trump for that. And look what you got; a pervert, a liar, a cheat, a hooker-****er, a failed businessman, a coward and an incompetent, thin-skinned whiny, narcissistic little bitch-all in one orange lardarse. Congratulations, America is so 'great again':lamo

Actually, what the voters revealed is a class of people who in their loss, have confirmed levels of insanity and obsession that continues to startle normal people every day.

:screwy
 
You can blame the idiots who voted for Trump for that. And look what you got; a pervert, a liar, a cheat, a hooker-****er, a failed businessman, a coward and an incompetent, thin-skinned whiny, narcissistic little bitch-all in one orange lardarse. lamo

don't forget ....Russian agent!

Laffriot
 
Re: Trump is afraid he’ll lose reelection, and he’s in a fury over it

If that headline were accurate , it would say " left wing experts desperately hope for a recession by 2020".

#TRUTH

First of all, these headlines have nothing to do with politics. It is information that is given for stock investors, meaning there is nothing there political.

Second of all, the DOW was at 26951 on October 3rd of last year and today it is at 26295 (about 660 points lower) and that means that over the past 9 months there has been no growth, which in turn suggests that new buying interest is not occurring and that means traders are looking at problems in the near future. Traders normally start anticipating things happening 9 months in the advance.

I am happy for you that you are so positive in your view of Trump but one thing I have learned in my 73 years of being alive is that reality never takes a back seat to fantasy.
 
I think you give far too much credit to the office of the President, especially in recent times, but yeah, basically

This one's a little different. This current "president" has to make sure he's in the news every day and not in a good way. I'll be so glad when he's gone and I certainly hope America has learned their lesson, by electing a disgusting playboy/TV star to the highest office in the land. The "experiment" didn't work.
 
This one's a little different. This current "president" has to make sure he's in the news every day and not in a good way. I'll be so glad when he's gone and I certainly hope America has learned their lesson, by electing a disgusting playboy/TV star to the highest office in the land. The "experiment" didn't work.
oh, so you’re for “the status quo” of wasteful spending, weak military.
 
oh, so you’re for “the status quo” of wasteful spending, weak military.

Yeah, you got my number pal. You forgot to accuse me of being for open borders and communism :roll:
 
Point taken on the deferments. I trust you didn't give Obama any ____ over them. College deferments were given due to the contribution degreed Americans could give. As long as they attended class, they didn't have to lie and cheat, in the eyes of their country, they had met their obligation. Until they graduated;

"...I had an educational deferment for 4 years in college, then upon graduation was informed that I was scheduled to be drafted in a couple of months, as did many of my fellow graduates. So much for the myth that only poor, uneducated kids got drafted. I did the honorable thing and enlisted before getting drafted, also so I could control when I had to report..."

I can't blame all the guys that applied for a college deferment. All three presidents used them and I'd probably have done the same. But you must be abe to see the difference between going to college verse faking a medical condition and lying to the Selective Service;

"...“Mr. Trump claimed (his medical deferment) was because of a bone spur, but when I asked for medical records, he gave me none and said there was no surgery,” Cohen told members of the House Oversight Committee..."

You may claim he had a legitimate medical reason, but given his record of honesty and doing the right thing, I think he's lying. He could make his x-rays public, although we'll probably see them about the same time he releases his tax returns. After the government ends its 12 year audit, :roll:, the lying bastard.

Given Don's service record, his BS bravado and continuing to denigrate McCain, a real American hero, shows us just how pathetic he is. Neither Clinton or Obama sunk so low, but for his cult members, it doesn't matter how low. If he demanded it, I wonder how many would drink the Kool-Aid. Btw, I always try not to be selective in my thought processes, although we know which side of the political spectrum is known for being open minded and which narrow minded.

You're right, as of now the economy is doing great, but what I find it amazing why Repubs would put our country's security at risk in exchange. Obama's may not been as good as it is now, but it wasn't much worst and we didn't have a 12 year old who thinks that following his gut and the morning Fox commentators is the right way to run our country.

His aides won't tell him secrets, least he reveal him to Putin at the next, unrecorded private meeting. We haven't had a Secretary of Defense for six months and why? Because Don knows best, he's a one man show and wants to run the country as he sees fit. The other two branches can go ____ themselves. War with Iran is around the corner. He believes dictators promises over his own country's intelligence. He's not fit for the office, this economy is just not worth the risk.

Maybe more spending on social programs might keep enough homeless off the streets, least tourists from flyover country have to cast their eyes on them and ruin their vacation...

Unlike you I want a President that generates results. Personally I cannot stand Trump but to me the alternative was much, much worse as are the alternatives now being offered by the Democrats. Results matter to me not opinions, not his past and history will judge him on his performance not his past none of which have been proven. In this country a person is innocent until PROVEN Guilty and all the charges in the world are just that until a trial and conviction none of which have happened.

I posted the economic results generated and to me that is what matters. What someone says or supposedly said is irrelevant and he has violated NO laws or there would be indictments and a trial. All this bull**** about Russia ignores the basic reality, Russia received no benefit at all from Trump unless a stronger NATO and a stronger U.S. economy and military benefits Russia and I don't see how.

Until the Democrats get back to their roots and abandon the radical left they will never win a national election and will be relegated to fringe district wins that mean absolutely nothing
 
As a Trump supporter, I acknowledge that the thread title is accurate.

The President's empty threat to deport "millions," for example, shows desperation on his part.


If I am able to vote in 2020, I will, of course, vote for President Trump.


But I realize that he is toast.


It seems that our country will be returning to where we left off in 2016. May God help us!

Disagree, the silent majority is still out there in this country and as always the squeaky wheel seems to get the grease except when it comes to reality of choice. There isn't a Democrat running that is worth the effort and the people in 2020 will look at their own personal results, hold their nose and vote for Trump
 
Like I said it is early to predict. Didn’t you read my post?

Yes, read your post and if the numbers are like they are today, Trump wins in a landslide and even if they aren't he will still win as there is no viable candidate competing against him and thus no valid reason to vote for any Democrat
 
You can blame the idiots who voted for Trump for that. And look what you got; a pervert, a liar, a cheat, a hooker-****er, a failed businessman, a coward and an incompetent, thin-skinned whiny, narcissistic little bitch-all in one orange lardarse. Congratulations, America is so 'great again':lamo

I am one of those idiots because to me results matter, not personal opinions of people like you


Every Time Democrats Talk, I Want To Vote For Trump Twice
 
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opin...tion-hes-fury-over-it/?utm_term=.32dcda05bb6c



Good! I hope he's as miserable as he's made most of the world since he and his criminal family have polluted our great white house and our formerly honorable administration.

What does he expect after the disgusting way he's presided over the great office. What a whiny bastard!

yeah Trumps in a fury...AGAIN. silly headline for silly click baiters

washington post...can't believe a word of it. paper of hate has lost all credibility. can't possibly be objective on anything Trump...ever. just another TDS story.
 
Re: Trump is afraid he’ll lose reelection, and he’s in a fury over it

First of all, it is established fact that cutting taxes increases GDP.



Nonetheless, this past tax cut helped the wealthy a lot more than the middle class and the positive effects have been minimal, especially when compared to what they should have been and even more so to what Trump stated they would be (4-6% growth in GDP).



Last but not least, due to Trump's trade was with China, the probability of a recession by 2020 has grown to 60%

Experts warn of 'high' chance of a recession by 2020

and......

The Yield Curve Just Inverted, Putting The Chance Of A Recession At 30%

More gloom and doom predictions which means the American public has to be hurt to return power to radical Democrats and massive federal spending. Sorry don't agree with these op ed pieces and it doesn't bother me at all that the people who pay the most in taxes got the most benefit out of the tax cuts, why does that bother you?

People keeping more of their own money makes liberals go ballistic as if that hurts them or their families, as it doesn't. 30% chance of recession?? Wow, really bothers me so put all that extra money aside for that potential and like all other tax cuts having more spendable income alleviates the harm of a recession
 
Yes, read your post and if the numbers are like they are today, Trump wins in a landslide and even if they aren't he will still win as there is no viable candidate competing against him and thus no valid reason to vote for any Democrat

I respect your opinion but I disagree. We will see what happens. Have a nice day.
 
WAPO has a paywall, and I don't see another source.

What you want us to pay for you and tell you what we find? Sounds like socialism to me. He made his argument, he provided a source, not his fault you don't have the resources to participate. You can complain that information should be free, so everyone can have an opinion. But that's just another argument for socialism. You are not entitled to WaPo's product for free.
 
Re: Trump is afraid he’ll lose reelection, and he’s in a fury over it

More gloom and doom predictions which means the American public has to be hurt to return power to radical Democrats and massive federal spending. Sorry don't agree with these op ed pieces and it doesn't bother me at all that the people who pay the most in taxes got the most benefit out of the tax cuts, why does that bother you?

People keeping more of their own money makes liberals go ballistic as if that hurts them or their families, as it doesn't. 30% chance of recession?? Wow, really bothers me so put all that extra money aside for that potential and like all other tax cuts having more spendable income alleviates the harm of a recession

Tax cuts have always resulted in economic problems down the line. Yes, they feel good for the short term but bring big problems later on.

As far as why it bothers me that the rich get the most benefit from tax cuts has more to do that giving the rich more money does not help the economy as the middle and poor class are not able to buy more, which is basically what a capitalistic society depends on. This is a nation that is supposed to go forward as a family that helps everyone but when 1% of the population makes what the other 99% make, it is not a healthy situation other than for the 1%. Given that I am not in that 1% and given that I care about people in general, I prefer that things get done that help all, not just a few.

Does that answer your question?
 
Re: Trump is afraid he’ll lose reelection, and he’s in a fury over it

Tax cuts have always resulted in economic problems down the line. Yes, they feel good for the short term but bring big problems later on.

As far as why it bothers me that the rich get the most benefit from tax cuts has more to do that giving the rich more money does not help the economy as the middle and poor class are not able to buy more, which is basically what a capitalistic society depends on. This is a nation that is supposed to go forward as a family that helps everyone but when 1% of the population makes what the other 99% make, it is not a healthy situation other than for the 1%. Given that I am not in that 1% and given that I care about people in general, I prefer that things get done that help all, not just a few.

Does that answer your question?

Sorry, disagree how does you keeping more of what you earn cause problems down the line? do you need a bureaucrat spending your money for you?

Why aren't you more concerned about the 44% of income earning Americans paying ZERO in Federal Income Taxes vs. the top 1% paying 40% of FIT? You think it is a rich person's responsibility to provide for your personal responsibility needs and why aren't you addressing the benefits those rich people provide for the state and local communities including charities?

No, you haven't answered the question because I still want to know first how much more revenue the gov't is going to get from the rich with higher taxes and why that even bothers you? If you truly care about people then do some good in your local community getting a dollar benefit out of a dollars spent vs. giving it to a federal bureaucrat who spends it where they see fit and after deducting Admin costs?
 
Re: Trump is afraid he’ll lose reelection, and he’s in a fury over it

Sorry, disagree how does you keeping more of what you earn cause problems down the line? do you need a bureaucrat spending your money for you?

Why aren't you more concerned about the 44% of income earning Americans paying ZERO in Federal Income Taxes vs. the top 1% paying 40% of FIT? You think it is a rich person's responsibility to provide for your personal responsibility needs and why aren't you addressing the benefits those rich people provide for the state and local communities including charities?

No, you haven't answered the question because I still want to know first how much more revenue the gov't is going to get from the rich with higher taxes and why that even bothers you? If you truly care about people then do some good in your local community getting a dollar benefit out of a dollars spent vs. giving it to a federal bureaucrat who spends it where they see fit and after deducting Admin costs?

Well, here is where we get into an area that I have previously been very vocal about.

Contrary to what people like you believe, this is not an island where someone with talent to make money (whether legally or illegally) can do so without paying their fair share to everyone involved. To me, a nation is supposed to be a family that works together against all enemies. In a family there are many members but likely only one person in that family is talented enough to be the economic provider. That does not mean that every other member of the household don't play important parts. The wife may be the one that cooks the meals and keeps the house clean, the uncle may be the one that takes care of getting things done such as insurance, payment of bills, etc. The niece may be the one that organizes parties and get-togethers etc, etc, etc.

All of the members of the family should enjoy what everyone else does and not just the breadwinner being catered on because he is the one that brings the economics to the family.

In a nation, there are roads, buildings, businesses, services, and required needs such as emergency vehicles, hospitals, maid services, etc, etc, etc. All of these are part of the good life that the earner enjoys and without those, his life would not be as good. Like living on an island alone.

As such, the bread winner should give as much to the family economically as everyone else gives in their way to the family.

That is what I believe and you are not going to convince me otherwise. It is what my family taught me and what I now institute in my family. I am the bread winner but my wife is as important to my life style as the money I bring, Without her, it would all be meaningless. That is why I give all I can to her and vice versa. That is the same that should happen in a nation.
 
There isn't a Democrat running that is worth the effort and the people in 2020 will look at their own personal results, hold their nose and vote for Trump

I hope that you are right.

But I do not trust blue or purple states from stopping unauthorized immigrants from voting. They could make the difference, especially in purple states.

The President's enemies (they do not qualify as legitimate "critics") will do anything to get him out of office.




Have a nice new week.
 
Re: Trump is afraid he’ll lose reelection, and he’s in a fury over it

Luckyone;1070220821]Well, here is where we get into an area that I have previously been very vocal about.

Contrary to what people like you believe, this is not an island where someone with talent to make money (whether legally or illegally) can do so without paying their fair share to everyone involved. To me, a nation is supposed to be a family that works together against all enemies. In a family there are many members but likely only one person in that family is talented enough to be the economic provider. That does not mean that every other member of the household don't play important parts. The wife may be the one that cooks the meals and keeps the house clean, the uncle may be the one that takes care of getting things done such as insurance, payment of bills, etc. The niece may be the one that organizes parties and get-togethers etc, etc, etc.

Where on earth did you develop this attitude that it was federal taxpayer responsibilities to pay for personal needs in your state and local communities? What is the role of the state and local governments in that world in which you live? Can you explain why this past year charitable giving has set records as has state and local revenue coffers? We do have state and local governments or did you forget?

All of the members of the family should enjoy what everyone else does and not just the breadwinner being catered on because he is the one that brings the economics to the family.

how does a federal bureaucrat assure what you want? See above

In a nation, there are roads, buildings, businesses, services, and required needs such as emergency vehicles, hospitals, maid services, etc, etc, etc. All of these are part of the good life that the earner enjoys and without those, his life would not be as good. Like living on an island alone.

As such, the bread winner should give as much to the family economically as everyone else gives in their way to the family.

yes, funded by various taxes and fees. State and local governments also fund roads, buildings, services, emergency vehicles, hospitals, etc. Where did you develop the idea this was the responsibility of a federal bureaucrat and not a state and local official that is governed under term limits?

That is what I believe and you are not going to convince me otherwise. It is what my family taught me and what I now institute in my family. I am the bread winner but my wife is as important to my life style as the money I bring, Without her, it would all be meaningless. That is why I give all I can to her and vice versa. That is the same that should happen in a nation.

Probably will never convince otherwise because I can see you have no idea as to the role of the federal, state, and local governments nor the taxes you pay and their purpose. You put way too much emphasis on the President and the federal gov't when the true control you have is local.
 
I hope that you are right.

But I do not trust blue or purple states from stopping unauthorized immigrants from voting. They could make the difference, especially in purple states.

The President's enemies (they do not qualify as legitimate "critics") will do anything to get him out of office.




Have a nice new week.

Yes, but the electoral colleges proved accurate this last election as Trump lost California by 4 million votes which gave Hillary the popular vote win and we saw the outcome with the electoral college. Flyover country is never going to turn this country over to the radicals the Democrats have on their ticket right now. Cannot wait for them to "out left" and destroy each other
 
yeah Trumps in a fury...AGAIN. silly headline for silly click baiters

washington post...can't believe a word of it. paper of hate has lost all credibility. can't possibly be objective on anything Trump...ever. just another TDS story.

Well, then don't believe WaPo. Believe trump's own words when he told George Snufalupogus that his own pollsters were wrong. HIS OWN POLLSTERS!

And then he fired them because he "king" can't handle bad news :)

You guys crack me up :)
 
Back
Top Bottom