You did, but what you quoted proved what I said correct and what you said incorrect. So obviously you just wrote a sentence and didn't read the context surrounding it.
So, as I said, you should read.
How you get all that from (Not the concept of collusion) is beyond my understanding. According to Mueller, he did not apply the concept of Collusion.
That's exactly what I am saying. Mueller investigated conspiracy, not collusion. Which means that Mueller did not say "no collusion", which was the original topic of conversation. Mueller said he could not establish a crime of conspiracy, but, as I said, conspiracy is NOT the same thing as collusion, though it can fall under the umbrella of collusion.
You also posted Conspiracy =/= collusion Doesn't really gel with what you are saying now
No, it 100% is exactly what I am saying now.
Conspiracy and collusion are not interchangeable. I'll give you the benefit of the doubt and address this like you really don't understand.
Think of soda. There are many different kinds of soda (Mountain Dew, Pepsi, Coke, Dr. Pepper, etc.). But all of those drinks are soda.
Now, let's apply that to this discussion. Collusion is "soda". Conspiracy is "Mountain Dew". Bribery could be "Pepsi". Aiding and Abetting could be "Coke". Meeting with Russian government officials to get "dirt" on Hillary can be "Dr. Pepper". All of those are potentially collusive acts. Mueller simply could not find enough evidence to charge Mountain Dew. However, that does NOT mean he said "no soda".
Do you get it yet?
My apologizes, My mistake
Fair enough, I appreciate your acknowledgement.
Usually in the normal world, If you tell the same lie over and over, its just the same lie.
But you've said it over and over, which means you have repeatedly lied. If a child tells you "no I did not eat the cookie" and say they did not eat the cookie 5 different times, then they lied to you 5 times, not once.
That's how it works in the normal world.
In the new Liberal world, If a Liberal disagrees or claims the information to be misleading, its a lie. If you tell this lie in an email and send it to 500 people you have lied 500 times and that gets multiplied by how times it was forwarded. Currently Liberal have counted 10,476 lies stating Trump lies 29 times a day. This new Liberal norm isn't ever applied to a Democrat and for some reason can only be counted by a Liberal.
I challenged you to show which ones on that list were not lies and which ones were repeats. You have not done so.
Please show me which ones are not lies.
When you can show me where Obama, Clinton, and their staff has 10,000 plus lies over the (Benghazi was started from an internet video) story that was proven a fake claim, or the hundreds of times Clinton landed under enemy fire, or the keep your Dr. and keep your plan was used under the same criteria, let me know.
That's the stupidest thing I've heard.
Do you not get it? Trump is a serial liar. Most people are not. You are trying to create a false equivalence. I don't have to show where Obama has lied 10,000 times because it is entirely possible Obama did not lie 10,000 times. Just Trump. Because Trump is a liar. And only an incredibly partisan hack would think that has to be an equivalence.
Until then, its viewed for what it is. More childish accolades from a small group of entitled brats who lost an election
Noting how many times Trump has lied has nothing to do with an election, just Trump's rampant dishonesty.
1. Prosecutors do not exonerate. If they don't charge and successfully convict you, then you are presumed innocent.
Mueller LITERALLY said he would state if he could exonerate the President, but that he could not.
2. Mueller had the authority to state that he found probable cause in any one or all of the alleged "crimes."
And he said he could not establish enough evidence to have a good faith basis in a conviction on conspiracy, but he made no such statement on obstruction.
3. The fact it is DOJ policy not to indict a sitting President would not stop him from making the declarations in point #2 above.
Mueller LITERALLY stated it did.
Seriously, why the hell do you talk about a report you clearly have not read?
Not sure what this has to do with the Trump campaign.
The Clinton campaign is the campaign that employed foreigners and received information from other foreigners.
This is a lie.
Trump defenders are the worst liars.
:lamo
No one believes you did.
