• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

When We Balk at Nepotism

calamity

Privileged
Supporting Member
DP Veteran
Monthly Donator
Joined
Feb 12, 2013
Messages
160,900
Reaction score
57,844
Gender
Undisclosed
Political Leaning
Centrist
Good article below which implies that we seem to have our limits.

George Washington warned against nepotism in America, refusing to give his own family members plum jobs and commissions precisely because that represented everything the revolutionaries loathed about Europe. Even before taking office, he assured a friend that he would “discharge the duties of the office with that impartiality and zeal for the public good, which ought never to suffer connections of blood or friendship to intermingle.” He told another friend that he “would not be in the remotest degree influenced, in making nominations, by motives arising from the ties of amity or blood.” Even the Framers, all of whom were enmeshed and co-mingled and conflicted with other elite framers, understood that their children weren’t princelings and their families weren’t monarchs.

That’s a far cry from where we are now: in a place where every time a Trump family member sneezes, another Trump family member gets to put fresh hotels on Boardwalk and Park Place. Americans tend to balk at dynasties—whether its Clintons following Clintons or Bushes on the heels of Bushes. Even as we understand that Kennedys get better tables and people have been buying their children into Ivies long before Lori Loughlin got caught doing it, we don’t comfortably accede to the idea that those children should rule over us. The Trump family took something American elites have done in stealth and discretion for decades and tried to turn it into a sales pitch: “Nobody does nepotism like we do nepotism.”

Trump’s blatant nepotism might finally be too much to ignore.


...although, when exactly that limit will be reached under the current Nepotist in Chief is anyone's guess.
 
Good article below which implies that we seem to have our limits.




...although, when exactly that limit will be reached under the current Nepotist in Chief is anyone's guess.



I still fear our citizenry way........ more


"The tyranny of a prince in an oligarchy is not so dangerous to the public welfare as the apathy of a citizen in a democracy."--Montesquieu, Spirit of the laws, 1748.
 
The right wing hates democracy. They love monarchy and long to be ruled by kings and princelings

They can't help it. After all, the right wing was created in support of royalty and in opposition to democracy
 
The right wing hates democracy. They love monarchy and long to be ruled by kings and princelings

They can't help it. After all, the right wing was created in support of royalty and in opposition to democracy

Yeah, especially when we vote a school district Tax levy down and the school district just keeps running it until they get their way(Emotion)
 
The right wing hates democracy. They love monarchy and long to be ruled by kings and princelings

They can't help it. After all, the right wing was created in support of royalty and in opposition to democracy

The right wing despises democracy because of their drift toward radical right libertarianism. Thus Redmap and census questions and any underhanded trick they can employ to ensure they misrepresent the majority of americans.

The old school "Vote all republican/democrat" buttons need to go.
 
Yeah, especially when we vote a school district Tax levy down and the school district just keeps running it until they get their way(Emotion)

How about when states vote to legalize cannabis, or expand medicaid/care, and the minority party in control of the state, the GOP, refuses to go with the will of the people and their votes?

Like that?
 
The right wing hates democracy. They love monarchy and long to be ruled by kings and princelings

They can't help it. After all, the right wing was created in support of royalty and in opposition to democracy

Does any evidence exist that could support your opinion?
 
How about when states vote to legalize cannabis, or expand medicaid/care, and the minority party in control of the state, the GOP, refuses to go with the will of the people and their votes?

Like that?

and the minority party in control of the state,

The minority party is in control?
 
I love how liberals always think they have all the answers. And just make stuff up as they go along. But here’s a hint. We have a democratically elected President. He is not a king or a monarch or anything close. So babble on. Democracy means knowing you lost the election and not spending your time trying to overthrow it.
 
How about when states vote to legalize cannabis, or expand medicaid/care, and the minority party in control of the state, the GOP, refuses to go with the will of the people and their votes?

Like that?


Your state can expand Medicaid, mine chose not to. See how freedom works!
 
The minority party is in control?

Don't play coy with me. The Republicans are a minority party. Less overall people identify as republican. In states where the GOP has control, they even ignore their own voter base.

Michigan is a routinely blue state.

GOP ignores big wins for pot, gerrymandering, voting access

And yet, here they go again, ignoring the will of their constituency and democracy because, well, those dumb voters just don't know what's best for them - but strict father cons do! No, we won't abide your democracy!

The GOP is not for democracy. They are the party of poll taxes, oligarchy and rigged games.
 
I love how liberals always think they have all the answers. And just make stuff up as they go along. But here’s a hint. We have a democratically elected President. He is not a king or a monarch or anything close. So babble on. Democracy means knowing you lost the election and not spending your time trying to overthrow it.

He acts like a king. He acts like a monarch.

Who is trying to overthrow the election?
 
How about when states vote to legalize cannabis, or expand medicaid/care, and the minority party in control of the state, the GOP, refuses to go with the will of the people and their votes?

Like that?

Or the country elects a President, and the losers spend every minute afterword's trying to overturn that result?
 
You miss the point.

GOP ignores big wins for pot, gerrymandering, voting access

States ARE choosing to do things and GOP state legislatures and governors are refusing the will of the people.


Well when the democrats placed that mandate on their stupid unaffordable care act they were refusing the will of the people and were committing acts of tyranny. And I thought democrats were pro choice. What they are is pro liars.
 
Well when the democrats placed that mandate on their stupid unaffordable care act they were refusing the will of the people and were committing acts of tyranny. And I thought democrats were pro choice. What they are is pro liars.

The ACA is a hallmark to the HEART act. The HEART act included:

Individual mandate
Creation of purchasing pools
Standardized benefits
Vouchers for the poor
Ban on denial of coverage for pre-existing conditions

So a republican bill from the 90's was the first to include the more "troubling" of the ACA's mandates, the individual one.

You do realize this was done for the ACA precisely because the republicans themselves had proposed this sort of bill in 1993? The Chafee plan it was called. This bill was of course considered an unacceptable compromise by the more fringe radical elements of the conservative base at the time.

Tyranny? You mean like Redmap? Or, the looming census issue, or the VoterID poll tax? All of these things have been done by the republicans to rig elections and you have the balls to complain about a republican bill being passed by a center-right democrat?

I balk at your sanctimonious post. Truly baffling.
 
The ACA is a hallmark to the HEART act. The HEART act included:

Individual mandate
Creation of purchasing pools
Standardized benefits
Vouchers for the poor
Ban on denial of coverage for pre-existing conditions

So a republican bill from the 90's was the first to include the more "troubling" of the ACA's mandates, the individual one.

You do realize this was done for the ACA precisely because the republicans themselves had proposed this sort of bill in 1993? The Chafee plan it was called. This bill was of course considered an unacceptable compromise by the more fringe radical elements of the conservative base at the time.

Tyranny? You mean like Redmap? Or, the looming census issue, or the VoterID poll tax? All of these things have been done by the republicans to rig elections and you have the balls to complain about a republican bill being passed by a center-right democrat?

I balk at your sanctimonious post. Truly baffling.
Nothing is baffling about anything someone says once you realize they are willing to say anything
 
I love how liberals always think they have all the answers. And just make stuff up as they go along. But here’s a hint. We have a democratically elected President. He is not a king or a monarch or anything close. So babble on. Democracy means knowing you lost the election and not spending your time trying to overthrow it.

Well said.

There is nothing wrong with nepotism, as long as the CEO believes this person they likely know better than anyone else can do the job.

The dog whistles from the far left Progressive hack, Dahlia Lithwick, who wrote the bit of comedy from Slate linked in the OP is SOP these days.

Princelings, Monarchy?

I wonder if embarrassment will ever set in on the left?
 
Nothing is baffling about anything someone says once you realize they are willing to say anything

Apparently. The sad part of this is that they don't even realise it. They just continue consuming the radicalized hyperventilating of Fox news and other sordid and less desirable outlets like Breitbart.

I've never in my life before seen anything like this. It's like a mass hysteria has befallen half the nation and they are so hyperpartisan they're willing to burn this mother ****er down to get back at 8 years of center right injustice.
 
Or the country elects a President, and the losers spend every minute afterword's trying to overturn that result?

Explain who is doing what to undo the election. As far as I'm aware, the president is still the president.
 
The ACA is a hallmark to the HEART act. The HEART act included:

Individual mandate
Creation of purchasing pools
Standardized benefits
Vouchers for the poor
Ban on denial of coverage for pre-existing conditions

So a republican bill from the 90's was the first to include the more "troubling" of the ACA's mandates, the individual one.

You do realize this was done for the ACA precisely because the republicans themselves had proposed this sort of bill in 1993? The Chafee plan it was called. This bill was of course considered an unacceptable compromise by the more fringe radical elements of the conservative base at the time.

Tyranny? You mean like Redmap? Or, the looming census issue, or the VoterID poll tax? All of these things have been done by the republicans to rig elections and you have the balls to complain about a republican bill being passed by a center-right democrat?

I balk at your sanctimonious post. Truly baffling.
The census issue? Now why don’t DemonRats want the question? You want to hide your illegal voters?
 
Back
Top Bottom