• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Dems Furious About Media Not Covering John Dean Hearings

Moderate Right

DP Veteran
Joined
Oct 21, 2015
Messages
53,813
Reaction score
10,864
Location
Kentucky
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Slightly Conservative
Obviously they care more about partisan politic witch hunts making it to MSM than they do about possible terrorist attacks or a huge skyscraper possibly burning down possibly killing thousands, all similar to 9/11. That's how off the rails they have become.

Dems Say Cable Nets Erred By Not Covering John Dean Hearing Live After Helicopter Crash

Everyone knew John Dean was a dip**** and had nothing to do with anything current. I'm glad Jerry Go-Nadler looked even more stupid than he already is.
 
Obviously they care more about partisan politic witch hunts making it to MSM than they do about possible terrorist attacks or a huge skyscraper possibly burning down possibly killing thousands, all similar to 9/11. That's how off the rails they have become.

Dems Say Cable Nets Erred By Not Covering John Dean Hearing Live After Helicopter Crash

The Dems. are showing more desperation as we inch closer to election day with their reality TV smoke and mirrors. Anti-Trumper John Dean to their rescue? What a joke.
IF Trump were guilty of obstruction of justice, he would have already been impeached. The Dems know they have nothing, but are still trying to convince the public that Trump should be thrown out of office.

Agree with O/P, the Democrats are off the rails.
 
The Dems. are showing more desperation as we inch closer to election day with their reality TV smoke and mirrors. Anti-Trumper John Dean to their rescue? What a joke.
IF Trump were guilty of obstruction of justice, he would have already been impeached. The Dems know they have nothing, but are still trying to convince the public that Trump should be thrown out of office.

Agree with O/P, the Democrats are off the rails.

The boom is about to be lowered on the far leftist deep state/globalists and Jerry GoNadler knows it. So he has to pull out all the stops and switch to full on whacker-doodle mode to dazzle the kook base, which as you can tell from various posts, it is working.

The left is, and has been over the last three years, been lead around by the nose like good little Bolsheviks by their masters. Lied to all day every day, and they love and celebrate it. The ship sank and the rats are clinging to the wreckage. :lamo
 
Pelosi, Schumer, Nadler, Schiff....what a line up of complete NUTTERS. They've birthed AOC monster and she's coming for the castle...gonna burn it down.
 
The Dems. are showing more desperation as we inch closer to election day with their reality TV smoke and mirrors. Anti-Trumper John Dean to their rescue? What a joke.
IF Trump were guilty of obstruction of justice, he would have already been impeached. The Dems know they have nothing, but are still trying to convince the public that Trump should be thrown out of office.

Agree with O/P, the Democrats are off the rails.
I want to know why they wanted john deens testimony before Muellers?

Why are they allowing him to quietly ride off into the sunset before getting him to answer under oath if he believes trump broke the law.

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk
 
Obviously they care more about partisan politic witch hunts making it to MSM than they do about possible terrorist attacks or a huge skyscraper possibly burning down possibly killing thousands, all similar to 9/11. That's how off the rails they have become.

Dems Say Cable Nets Erred By Not Covering John Dean Hearing Live After Helicopter Crash
A Democratic official who said the networks should have gone back to Dean’s testimony does not equal “furious Democrats”.

Thread fail.
 
Obviously they care more about partisan politic witch hunts making it to MSM than they do about possible terrorist attacks or a huge skyscraper possibly burning down possibly killing thousands, all similar to 9/11. That's how off the rails they have become.

Dems Say Cable Nets Erred By Not Covering John Dean Hearing Live After Helicopter Crash

"Furious"?

Democrat Congressman Steve Cohen told MSNBC’s Ari Melber that the big three cable news networks should have covered it:


“The president’s guilty of that [obstruction of justice]. I think we had a successful hearing,” Cohen said. “It’s just how many people saw it I don’t know. It should have been on MSNBC, it should have been on CNN, it should have been on Fox, and not just on C-SPAN 3.”

Melber asked Cohen if the the media made a mistake by not covering it.

“I definitely think the media did,” Cohen responded. “And I think all three of the major stations should have. C-SPAN 3 doesn’t have the coverage. It was important witnesses, people who are knowledgeable and experts and their testimony and their opinions should have been heard.”

OMG, he sounded so FURIOUS.

:roll:
 
A Democratic official who said the networks should have gone back to Dean’s testimony does not equal “furious Democrats”.

Thread fail.

You mean that Yahoo got it wrong? Literally the first line in the story is below. You seem a widdle worked up.

"Democrats are furious that the John Dean hearing before the House Judiciary Committee was not covered live today by cable networks."
 
You mean that Yahoo got it wrong? Literally the first line in the story is below. You seem a widdle worked up.

"Democrats are furious that the John Dean hearing before the House Judiciary Committee was not covered live today by cable networks."
Yeah, Yahoo got it wrong. Nothing in the short opinion piece supports the headline.

Do you also have a really low threshold to theatrics? Never mind, you’re a Trumpster. Of course you do.
 
A Democratic official who said the networks should have gone back to Dean’s testimony does not equal “furious Democrats”.

Thread fail.

Now thats funny. A Democratic Official? Not even Democrats will confirm their own identity when confirming they weren't furious? Can you not see the hypocrisy in that single statement?

When you can't even provide the identity of your own party member making a statement, you know its fakes news right off the bat.
 
Yeah, Yahoo got it wrong. Nothing in the short opinion piece supports the headline.

Do you also have a really low threshold to theatrics? Never mind, you’re a Trumpster. Of course you do.

Maybe they got it wrong, and maybe they didn't. You weren't there, so you don't know. Sounds remarkably like you're claiming "fake news". Very Trumpian of you.
 
I want to know why they wanted john deens testimony before Muellers?

Why are they allowing him to quietly ride off into the sunset before getting him to answer under oath if he believes trump broke the law.

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk

Because Mueller already said that his report is his testimony and that while Mueller laid out o of j scenarios, there is not enough evidence to convict. The Democrats know this... all they are doing now is trying to create the illusion of criminality moving toward the 2020 election.
 
Now thats funny. A Democratic Official? Not even Democrats will confirm their own identity when confirming they weren't furious? Can you not see the hypocrisy in that single statement?

When you can't even provide the identity of your own party member making a statement, you know its fakes news right off the bat.

You don’t read too good, do you?

From the cited article; “Democrat Congressman Steve Cohen told MSNBC’s Ari Melber that the big three cable news networks should have covered it:”
 
Maybe they got it wrong, and maybe they didn't. You weren't there, so you don't know. Sounds remarkably like you're claiming "fake news". Very Trumpian of you.
I read the author’s own words and those of the single Democratic representative he quoted, and formed an opinion based on that. If the author had more compelling evidence/information to support his obviously exaggerated headline, he should have included it.

That you so eagerly slurp up any purported anti-Democratic crap without engaging your critical thinking skills (if you have any) clearly demonstrates how far down the rabbit hole with Trump you’ve gone.
 
I read the author’s own words and those of the single Democratic representative he quoted, and formed an opinion based on that. If the author had more compelling evidence/information to support his obviously exaggerated headline, he should have included it.

That you so eagerly slurp up any purported anti-Democratic crap without engaging your critical thinking skills (if you have any) clearly demonstrates how far down the rabbit hole with Trump you’ve gone.

I didn't slurp up anything. I don't give a damn. You do. So, who speaks for the democrats? Mr. Creosote, er Nadler? Pelosi? AOC? I can see.why there might be some confusion there.
 
I didn't slurp up anything. I don't give a damn. You do. So, who speaks for the democrats? Mr. Creosote, er Nadler? Pelosi? AOC? I can see.why there might be some confusion there.
No reason to get testy. You ought to be used to comments regarding your Trump love.
 
Is that your only defense to your ridiculous claims? Dang, that’s really pathetic.

Such delicious irony.

You come into the thread like Stormin' Norman with certainty that my claim, according to you, is "horse****".
In turn, and in the spirit of furthering the discussion, I asked you to prove me wrong.
You didn't, couldn't or wouldn't...

Thanks for your concession.
 
Such delicious irony.

You come into the thread like Stormin' Norman with certainty that my claim, according to you, is "horse****".
In turn, and in the spirit of furthering the discussion, I asked you to prove me wrong.
You didn't, couldn't or wouldn't...

Thanks for your concession.
:lamo You and your “delicious irony”.

Tell ya what, you prove that if frogs had wings they wouldn’t bump their asses when they hop, and in turn, I’ll prove the negative you’ve requested an explanation for. Deal?
 
These Republican comments are basically insane, and raise questions about our ability to function as a democracy if these posters get too large in number. Luckily, their days are numbered in their corrupt power. They then can go back to being the irrelevant crazies they've always been.
 
No reason to get testy. You ought to be used to comments regarding your Trump love.

Testy? Heh. I just finished weeding. Might have a beer or two. Give Mr. Creosote a hug, why don't ya? He looks like he needs one. And a subpoena, with mustard.
 
The boom is about to be lowered on the far leftist deep state/globalists and Jerry GoNadler knows it. So he has to pull out all the stops and switch to full on whacker-doodle mode to dazzle the kook base, which as you can tell from various posts, it is working.

The left is, and has been over the last three years, been lead around by the nose like good little Bolsheviks by their masters. Lied to all day every day, and they love and celebrate it. The ship sank and the rats are clinging to the wreckage. :lamo

Bwahaha

Ya ypu keep buying what Hannity is selling, bunch of rubes

desperate to distract from Trump big time obstruction
 
Back
Top Bottom