Democrats read Mueller Report through Pink liberal LGBT Goggles...

Tanngrisnir · Jun 8, 2019

Cougarbear said:
Then, Mueller would have been able to easily recommend indicting not only the President, but he would have been able to indict others for obstruction of justice. But, he didn't have enough probable cause to do so nor to recommend it. To impeach, there has to be high crimes and misdemeanors. Pelosi knows there is no there, there. No crimes nor misdemeanors. It's funny how Democrats and never-Trumpers demanded that Trump accept the election results. In the primaries and in the general election, Trump was asked to accept the results of the elections. He did. But, you Democrats refuse to accept the elections. Instead, the cultist Democrats and Never-Trumpers conjured up a big lie to try and entrap Trump with the Russian collusion lie. You guys all demanded Trump leave Mueller alone and let him finish his investigation and that Trump accept his results. But, just like the elections, you guys refuse to accept the results. No collusion and no obstruction of justice. Now you want impeachment which you will demand that Trump accept that too. When he's still in office for another 5 and a half years, you will be mad at the non-impeachment of Trump. A total scam!!!

He specifically stated that he couldn't and why he couldn't.

You, not having read the report, wouldn't know that.

Trump has committed no end of high crimes and misdemeanors and Mueller is irrelevant to most of them. It's odd that Marxists like you can never grasp that.

And I accept the results of the report. They indicate he obstructed justice at least 8 times.

Jon Cryer on Twitter: "1/First of all, remember that impeachment is a political process, not a criminal one. Impeachable offenses are not necessarily criminal offenses but abuses of presidential power. Abuses that contradict his oath to uphold the constitution"

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opin...p-should-be-impeached/?utm_term=.1a0839b9335d

Cougarbear · Jun 10, 2019

Tanngrisnir said:
He specifically stated that he couldn't and why he couldn't.

You, not having read the report, wouldn't know that.

Trump has committed no end of high crimes and misdemeanors and Mueller is irrelevant to most of them. It's odd that Marxists like you can never grasp that.

And I accept the results of the report. They indicate he obstructed justice at least 8 times.

Jon Cryer on Twitter: "1/First of all, remember that impeachment is a political process, not a criminal one. Impeachable offenses are not necessarily criminal offenses but abuses of presidential power. Abuses that contradict his oath to uphold the constitution"

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opin...p-should-be-impeached/?utm_term=.1a0839b9335d

HAHAHAHAHAHA!!! Mueller never said or wrote Trump was guilty of any crimes or collusion which isn't a crime. And, while the House can go ahead and vote for impeaching the President, the Senate is the one that convicts and that isn't going to happen either. I doubt it will happen in the House either. Why? Because there are no high crimes and misdemeanors that the Senate could convict on which they must according to the Constitution. Then, there is the SCOTUS that will not back up the biased crazy Democrat Party. Group psychosis!!!

Mueller or any prosecutor doesn't try to find anyone innocent of a crime. That isn't their job. Probable Cause is only for the prosecution to decide if they have enough to move forward for the attempt to convict. In the meantime, the defense is assumed innocent until proven guilty. Which is why Mueller had no business of trying to say he's guilty before being proved innocent. The SCOTUS would throw this case out so fast it would spin your head around 360 degrees. There is no There, there :duel

Tanngrisnir · Jun 10, 2019

Cougarbear said:
HAHAHAHAHAHA!!! Mueller never said or wrote Trump was guilty of any crimes or collusion which isn't a crime. And, while the House can go ahead and vote for impeaching the President, the Senate is the one that convicts and that isn't going to happen either. I doubt it will happen in the House either. Why? Because there are no high crimes and misdemeanors that the Senate could convict on which they must according to the Constitution. Then, there is the SCOTUS that will not back up the biased crazy Democrat Party. Group psychosis!!!

I never claimed that Mueller 'said or wrote' twump was guilty of any crimes, so spare me the strawman. His report does clearly show collusion, however, and collusion in the form of high crimes and misdemeanors. And for impeachment hearings, which would expose the national TV audience to sworn testimony about twump's misdeeds and obstruction, the senate isn't necessary. Neither is conviction. The SCOTUS has nothing, whatsoever to do with the process. You have no idea what you're babbling about.

Mueller or any prosecutor doesn't try to find anyone innocent of a crime. That isn't their job. Probable Cause is only for the prosecution to decide if they have enough to move forward for the attempt to convict. In the meantime, the defense is assumed innocent until proven guilty. Which is why Mueller had no business of trying to say he's guilty before being proved innocent. The SCOTUS would throw this case out so fast it would spin your head around 360 degrees. There is no There, there :duel

Irrelevant to anything I've posted. The SCOTUS will never hear any case involving impeachment because it's a political process, not a criminal. No such case will come before them. You have no idea what you're babbling about.