• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Trump whine fest

Trump said:
you mean like ever and ever in the whole 2 weeks I've been on this board?
Click to expand...

So ya got nothing, we will wait to see if you ever disagree with him. So, how about starting now?
 
Casper said:
So ya got nothing, we will wait to see if you ever disagree with him. So, how about starting now?
Click to expand...

please read our discussion S L O W L Y one more time. its there twice. have a great Thursday. last word is all yours )
 
Lutherf said:
Pelosi gets in front of the camera before the meeting and tells the world that she believes Trump is "covering up" some unspecified crime then tries to meet about an infrastructure plan and complains that Trump cancelled the meeting? I mean, that's just flat out telling the world that she really has no intention of working to get anything other than messing with Trump done.

The ENTIRE Democrat platform is to **** with Trump. Somehow or other they figure that's going to win them 2020.
Click to expand...

With good diplomacy, a president should be able to go into a meeting where his opponents slung dirt, and use it to his advantage. Not act like a twelve year old who was caught with his hand in the cookie jar. I mean FFS how ever did the last 4 presidents do anything with the opposing party always slinging mud? Its like Trump never knew what politics was like.
 
hanger4 said:
Her comment had everything to do with whom (moments later) she had a meeting with in hopes of working a bipartisan deal on infrastructure.
Click to expand...
Of course Pelosi’s comment has to do with Trump. She explicitly said so. That isn’t the point. If every time Trump said something harsh or accusatory about any Democrat they cried and said “I’m not gonna work with you ‘cause you hurt my feewings”, nothing would get done.

Bottom line, crybaby Trump has a Constitutional duty to us, and being upset does not excuse him.
 
Crystal said:
Can’t wait. Let’s not hesitate. Forward on!
Click to expand...

:lamo You're really on tilt today, aren't you...

You should probably put the keyboard down today...maybe stay away from crowded places too. I think you need a people break.

Not trying to be mean, legit concerned. I hate that loser more than anyone, but nobody's getting impeached. Deep breaths. :)
 
Rogue Valley said:
Aww. Poor, poor Trump baby.

As Pelosi stated, Trump is involved in a cover up. It's obvious to anyone with a functioning brain.
Click to expand...

It is obvious to anyone with a functioning brain to note Pelosi neglected to say exactly or even generally what the coverup was concerning.

Congress invested everything they had in a lie and have nowhere to go......

The "reporters" of course neglected to do their fundamental jobs and ask what the heck she was talking about.

Quite the display for those easily amused.

This noisy wild congressional scramble seems more like a prelude of more document releases that will have these roaches running to the dark corners in upcoming times.


"the FBI and its then-director, James Comey, swore to the FISA court on Oct. 21, 2016, that they had verified the FISA warrant application and deemed Steele a credible informant with no known derogatory information, the government knew:

Steele had told senior Justice official Bruce Ohr he was “desperate” to defeat Trump and was working in some capacity for the Clinton campaign;

he leaked his dossier to the news media;

he offered demonstrably false intelligence, such as the Alfa pings and an allegation given to Kavalec that Russian hackers were being paid by a nonexistent Russian Consulate in Miami."
 
Last edited:
Crystal said:
Tell me what he has done wrong. And, please, let Mueller know.
Click to expand...

Mueller already told you, but you obviously didn't read or couldn't understand the report.

You repeat What you were told , but that isn't what it says.

And independents can read.

How do you think trumps 'Who you gonna believe? Me or your lying eyes?" bit is playing with them?

Are you sure they all get all of their information from.conservative media?

Because if they don't, the conspiracy theory laid out there won't cut it.
 
What if...? said:
Mueller already told you, but you obviously didn't read or couldn't understand the report.

You repeat What you were told , but that isn't what it says.

And independents can read.

How do you think trumps 'Who you gonna believe? Me or your lying eyes?" bit is playing with them?

Are you sure they all get all of their information from.conservative media?

Because if they don't, the conspiracy theory laid out there won't cut it.
Click to expand...
The charges are? When will he be arrested? Jailed? Impeached?
 
Crystal said:
No he did not.
Click to expand...

You have to do better that "Nuh uh!'.

Don't be mad at us if your side lied to you and believing it made you look stupid. You know they do that on purpose, right? They fill your head with nonsnese so you'll repeat it. But people who know better mock you for it. Which hurts your feelings. Aaand. You hate them for it.

Mission accomplished.

Me, I hate the folks who.lied to me, not those who chastise me for repeating those lies.

But your propagandists know how strong the human resistance to admitting to themselves they've been fooled is. Hell, its apparently what they count on most
 
What if...? said:
You have to do better that "Nuh uh!'.

Don't be mad at us if your side lied to you and believing it made you look stupid. You know they do that on purpose, right? They fill your head with nonsnese so you'll repeat it. But people who know better mock you for it. Which hurts your feelings. Aaand. You hate them for it.

Mission accomplished.

Me, I hate the folks who.lied to me, not those who chastise me for repeating those lies.

But your propagandists know how strong the human resistance to admitting to themselves they've been fooled is. Hell, its apparently what they count on most
Click to expand...

You sound paranoid!
 
RaleBulgarian said:
Pelosi and Schumer are ready and willing to do their jobs for the American people.
Click to expand...

"To" the American people is more accurate.

Top contributors Chuck U Schumer Campaigns
Contributor Total
Goldman Sachs $592,490
Citigroup Inc $523,817
Paul, Weiss et al $444,477
JPMorgan Chase & Co $372,063
Credit Suisse Group $369,594
Morgan Stanley $351,579
Deloitte LLP $303,058
Ernst & Young $291,350
UBS AG $282,650
Sullivan & Cromwell $240,110
Bear Stearns $239,600
Lazard Ltd $239,500
Schulte, Roth & Zabel $234,825
Lehman Brothers $226,450
Merrill Lynch $226,400
 
Lutherf said:
Pelosi gets in front of the camera before the meeting and tells the world that she believes Trump is "covering up" some unspecified crime then tries to meet about an infrastructure plan and complains that Trump cancelled the meeting? I mean, that's just flat out telling the world that she really has no intention of working to get anything other than messing with Trump done.

The ENTIRE Democrat platform is to **** with Trump. Somehow or other they figure that's going to win them 2020.
Click to expand...

And were you upset when that was the entire republican plan for 8 years?

I'm not big on whataboutism but this would merely be tit for tat politics as usual.

The right started this ****show, they don't get to whine about the whirlwind they are reaping.
 
What if...? said:
Mueller already told you.
Click to expand...

Correct in a sense.

The end of the Mueller melodrama has marked the beginning of real fear in Washington.

" entire Trump-Russia collusion narrative was always implausible.

One, the Washington swamp of fixers such as Paul Manafort and John and Tony Podesta was mostly bipartisan and predated Trump.

Two, the Trump administration’s Russia policies were far tougher on Vladimir Putin than were those of Barack Obama. Trump confronted Russia in Syria, upped defense spending, increased sanctions, and kept the price of oil down through massive new U.S. energy production. He did not engineer a Russian “reset” or get caught on a hot mic offering a self-interested hiatus in tensions with Russia in order to help his own reelection bid.

Three, Russia has a long history of trying to warp U.S. elections that predated Trump and that had earned only lukewarm pushback from the Obama administration.

It’s also worth remembering that President Bill Clinton and the Clinton Foundation had been recipients of Russian and Russian-related largesse — ostensibly because Hillary Clinton had used her influence as secretary of state under Obama to ease resistance to Russian acquisitions of North American uranium holdings.

As far as alleged Russian collusion goes, Hillary Clinton used three firewalls — the Democratic National Committee, the Perkins Coie law firm, and the Fusion GPS strategic intelligence firm — to hide her campaign’s payments to British national Christopher Steele to find dirt on Trump and his campaign; in other words, to collude. Steele in turn collected his purchased Russian sources to aggregate unverified allegations against Trump. He then spread the gossip within government agencies to ensure that the smears were leaked to the media — and with a government seal of approval.

No wonder that Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s partisan team spent 22 months and $34 million only to conclude the obvious: that Trump did not collude with Russia.

Mueller’s failure to find collusion prompts an important question. If the Steele dossier — the basis for unfounded charges that Trump colluded with Russia — was fraudulent, then how and why did the Clinton campaign, hand in glove with top Obama administration officials, use such silly trash and smears to unleash the powers of government against Trump’s campaign, transition team, and early presidency?

The question is not an idle one.

There may well have occurred a near coup attempt by high-ranking officials to destroy a campaign and then to remove an elected president. Likewise, top officials may have engaged in serial lying to federal investigators, perjury, the misleading of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court, the illegal insertion of informants into a political campaign, the leaking of classified documents, and the obstruction of justice.

So, how can we tell that the former accusers are now terrified of becoming the accused? Because suddenly the usual band of former Obama officials and Trump accusers have largely given up on their allegations that Trump was or is a Russian asset.

Instead, John Brennan, James Clapper, James Comey, Andrew McCabe, and Rod Rosenstein are now beginning to accuse one another of wrongdoing.

Even their progressive media handlers are starting to sense the desperation in their new yarns — and the possibility that these hired-gun analysts or guests were themselves guilty of crimes and were using their media platforms to fashion their own defense.

The end of the Mueller melodrama has marked the beginning of real fear in Washington."
 
What if...? said:
And you just proved my point. Perfectly.

Thank you.
Click to expand...

Maybe your doctor can help you with Thorazine. It is possible the many duplicates of trump in your room may then saunter out of the room.
 
akyron said:
Correct in a sense.

The end of the Mueller melodrama has marked the beginning of real fear in Washington.

" entire Trump-Russia collusion narrative was always implausible.

One, the Washington swamp of fixers such as Paul Manafort and John and Tony Podesta was mostly bipartisan and predated Trump.

Two, the Trump administration’s Russia policies were far tougher on Vladimir Putin than were those of Barack Obama. Trump confronted Russia in Syria, upped defense spending, increased sanctions, and kept the price of oil down through massive new U.S. energy production. He did not engineer a Russian “reset” or get caught on a hot mic offering a self-interested hiatus in tensions with Russia in order to help his own reelection bid.

Three, Russia has a long history of trying to warp U.S. elections that predated Trump and that had earned only lukewarm pushback from the Obama administration.

It’s also worth remembering that President Bill Clinton and the Clinton Foundation had been recipients of Russian and Russian-related largesse — ostensibly because Hillary Clinton had used her influence as secretary of state under Obama to ease resistance to Russian acquisitions of North American uranium holdings.

As far as alleged Russian collusion goes, Hillary Clinton used three firewalls — the Democratic National Committee, the Perkins Coie law firm, and the Fusion GPS strategic intelligence firm — to hide her campaign’s payments to British national Christopher Steele to find dirt on Trump and his campaign; in other words, to collude. Steele in turn collected his purchased Russian sources to aggregate unverified allegations against Trump. He then spread the gossip within government agencies to ensure that the smears were leaked to the media — and with a government seal of approval.

No wonder that Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s partisan team spent 22 months and $34 million only to conclude the obvious: that Trump did not collude with Russia.

Mueller’s failure to find collusion prompts an important question. If the Steele dossier — the basis for unfounded charges that Trump colluded with Russia — was fraudulent, then how and why did the Clinton campaign, hand in glove with top Obama administration officials, use such silly trash and smears to unleash the powers of government against Trump’s campaign, transition team, and early presidency?

The question is not an idle one.

There may well have occurred a near coup attempt by high-ranking officials to destroy a campaign and then to remove an elected president. Likewise, top officials may have engaged in serial lying to federal investigators, perjury, the misleading of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court, the illegal insertion of informants into a political campaign, the leaking of classified documents, and the obstruction of justice.

So, how can we tell that the former accusers are now terrified of becoming the accused? Because suddenly the usual band of former Obama officials and Trump accusers have largely given up on their allegations that Trump was or is a Russian asset.

Instead, John Brennan, James Clapper, James Comey, Andrew McCabe, and Rod Rosenstein are now beginning to accuse one another of wrongdoing.

Even their progressive media handlers are starting to sense the desperation in their new yarns — and the possibility that these hired-gun analysts or guests were themselves guilty of crimes and were using their media platforms to fashion their own defense.

The end of the Mueller melodrama has marked the beginning of real fear in Washington."
Click to expand...

I've heard the Cospiracy theory ad nauseum. Thanks though.

Problem is I can read legalese.

So I know what the report says, as opposed to what someone told you it says.

Netflix wouldn't even greenloght your narrative. Nobody could suspend disbelief enough to enjoy it without months of exposure to the crisis management plan that has been on a loop on conservative media since Mueller was appointed.

Y'all actually beileve that its our entire law enforcement and intelligence apparatus being infected by a "deep state" involved in a conspiracy to pull a soft coup because Hillary lost instead of just shady AF trump being shady.

Occam is ashamed of you.
 
akyron said:
"To" the American people is more accurate.

Top contributors Chuck U Schumer Campaigns
Contributor Total
Goldman Sachs $592,490
Citigroup Inc $523,817
Paul, Weiss et al $444,477
JPMorgan Chase & Co $372,063
Credit Suisse Group $369,594
Morgan Stanley $351,579
Deloitte LLP $303,058
Ernst & Young $291,350
UBS AG $282,650
Sullivan & Cromwell $240,110
Bear Stearns $239,600
Lazard Ltd $239,500
Schulte, Roth & Zabel $234,825
Lehman Brothers $226,450
Merrill Lynch $226,400
Click to expand...

Trump and his family have donated thousands to Sen. Chuck Schumer - Business Insider
 
akyron said:
Maybe your doctor can help you with Thorazine. It is possible the many duplicates of trump in your room may then saunter out of the room.
Click to expand...

And yet another steps up to prove my point!

Thank you too!
 
akyron said:
"To" the American people is more accurate.

Top contributors Chuck U Schumer Campaigns
Contributor Total
Goldman Sachs $592,490
Citigroup Inc $523,817
Paul, Weiss et al $444,477
JPMorgan Chase & Co $372,063
Credit Suisse Group $369,594
Morgan Stanley $351,579
Deloitte LLP $303,058
Ernst & Young $291,350
UBS AG $282,650
Sullivan & Cromwell $240,110
Bear Stearns $239,600
Lazard Ltd $239,500
Schulte, Roth & Zabel $234,825
Lehman Brothers $226,450
Merrill Lynch $226,400
Click to expand...
A pathetic diversion attempt.

This thread is about Trump crying like a baby and refusing to do his sworn duty.

You want to start another thread about contributions over the decades (like your above over 30 year assessment of Schumer’s), that’s cool. Maybe by the time the Dems are done investigating Trump’s finances we’ll know what contributions/kick backs/payoffs, etc., that he's been part of. I’ll bet it’s a boat load more than any politician in history. ;)
 
poweRob said:
Trump just made an impromptu speech on the lawn of the whitehouse to whine about the investigations. Had a podium he was at where he had a poster hanging also bitching about the investigations.

He proceeded to cry about investigations, Pelosi, and then actually... i **** you not, said he is the most transparent president in the history of the nation. Then declared he will not work with Dems until investigations stop. Nothing new. Same old lies. But for some reason, he felt like he needed to call a press conference to cry in front of and then in his "press conference", he answered two questions from the press and walked off.

Seriously... a poster hanging from his podium. He is such a worthless used car salesman and such a disgrace to the office.
Click to expand...
yep the leftist whine fest is getting old and people are not paying attention to it anymore.
yes the leftists in congress are as worthless as a used car salesman and they are a huge disgrace to their office and this country.

i am so embarrassed to have people like pelosi and schumer in congress along with the rest of the leftist nitwits.
they are a disgrace to our country the rule of law and our republic.
 
RaleBulgarian said:
A pathetic diversion attempt.

This thread is about Trump crying like a baby and refusing to do his sworn duty.

You want to start another thread about contributions over the decades (like your above over 30 year assessment of Schumer’s), that’s cool. Maybe by the time the Dems are done investigating Trump’s finances we’ll know what contributions/kick backs/payoffs, etc., that he's been part of. I’ll bet it’s a boat load more than any politician in history. ;)
Click to expand...

the only people not doing what they are supposed to be doing it schumer and pelosi.
they are too busy trying to pull a political coupe of our government.

that is the disgrace but the leftist nitwits of this country do not care.
 
Crystal said:
The charges are? When will he be arrested? Jailed? Impeached?
Click to expand...

Again, if you read the report and understood it, that will depend on if the house decides to impeach.

Of course we all know McConnell would block impeachment is there was video and a thousand nuns as witnesses of trump eating a baby.

So it would be a waste of energy.

Politically its just better to expose trump for the shady **** anybody who has been paying attention for the last forty years knows full well he is.
 
RaleBulgarian said:
A pathetic diversion attempt.
Click to expand...

Actually it outlined quite clearly exactly why Chuck U Schumer is better equipped to represent a bankers union than "The American People" You suddenly profess to care about.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom