• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Trump whine fest

Pound4abrown said:
That is odd, each and every article I've read said the money for security remained stagnant. But more to the point, the money needed to assure more security at all of our embassies could not be pushed through my Democrats, it would have taken the majority to get the job done.
And the Democrats were not in the majority.
Click to expand...

While it's true that Congress did not fully fund embassy security requests from the Obama administration in recent years, funding for embassy security is actually up from 2008, and up dramatically since before 9/11.

Fact-checking Benghazi: The rhetoric hasn't matched up with reality | PolitiFact

So no, it wasn't a lack of funds
 
j brown's body said:
I love this Trump logic. Its middle school rationalizations. "SHE started it!" Can we please be grown-ups? Not with Trump around.
Click to expand...

Pelosi wasn't grown-up either.

In this case it took two.
 
She’s having a news conference. Bashing Trump with every syllable. Now I wonder why she says Trump was supposed to figure out how to pay for infrastructure when the bitch tells us over and over again she holds the purse strings. Now we are on impeachment. Get on with it.
 
Crystal said:
She’s having a news conference. Bashing Trump with every syllable. Now I wonder why she says Trump was supposed to figure out how to pay for infrastructure when the bitch tells us over and over again she holds the purse strings. Now we are on impeachment. Get on with it.
Click to expand...

See post #76 here for a quick education regarding what the Dems should do on Infrastructure.

As for Pelosi's press conference, Trump is likely tossing his rattles and spoiling his diapers again after that one.
 
jnug said:
See post #76 here for a quick education regarding what the Dems should do on Infrastructure.

As for Pelosi's press conference, Trump is likely tossing his rattles and spoiling his diapers again after that one.
Click to expand...

She’s a phoney baloney. Offering up prayers for Trump. She should put those prayers where the moon don’t shine.
 
hanger4 said:
Pelosi accused Trump of being involved in an illegal cover up just moments before that meeting Simon, so I ask again, why do you give Pelosi a pass while you castigate Trump ??
Click to expand...
This isn't even the same topic as when I answered the question a moment ago.

What is it you would like to me castigate about now?
 
RaleBulgarian said:
What kinda backwards twisted logic game are you trying to play?

Pelosi and Schumer went to the White House for a previously scheduled meeting, ready and willing to discuss infrastructure. You know, doing their jobs. Trump was the one to say he will shirk his Constitutional duty to the American people because he’s upset.
Click to expand...



She said what she said knowing full well she was to meet with him. Why the **** would she want to meet with someone she says is engaged in a cover up. She should meet with her raucucs caucus and get that impeachment underway.
 
Crystal said:
She’s having a news conference. Bashing Trump with every syllable. Now I wonder why she says Trump was supposed to figure out how to pay for infrastructure when the bitch tells us over and over again she holds the purse strings. Now we are on impeachment. Get on with it.
Click to expand...
Tsk tsk, somebody’s letting their illogical anger get the best of them.

FYI, the time between the first meeting and yesterday’s was, in part, to work out plans to finance an infrastructure bill. There was never any comment from Congress saying they wouldn’t contribute. None at all. And for now, because of Trump’s pissy tantrum, none of get to know what, if any plan Trump’s people came up with.
 
Casper said:
Sure you are, except that if trump did it you would cheer him on. Double Standard
Click to expand...

no its wrong....think about collateral damage from those drone strikes...not worth it. kill 1 birth 10
 
RaleBulgarian said:
Tsk tsk, somebody’s letting their illogical anger get the best of them.

FYI, the time between the first meeting and yesterday’s was, in part, to work out plans to finance an infrastructure bill. There was never any comment from Congress saying they wouldn’t contribute. None at all. And for now, because of Trump’s pissy tantrum, none of get to know what, if any plan Trump’s people came up with.
Click to expand...

You poor little things!
 
Crystal said:
She said what she said knowing full well she was to meet with him. Why the **** would she want to meet with someone she says is engaged in a cover up. She should meet with her raucucs caucus and get that impeachment underway.
Click to expand...


So what. Did Nixon or Clinton cry and run away from their duties while they were being investigated and publicly accused by Republican officials? No, they didn’t

Stop making excuses where there is no place for them.
 
Trump said:
no its wrong....think about collateral damage from those drone strikes...not worth it. kill 1 birth 10
Click to expand...

Nope, I am right, know why, because the military still does this, yet you don't say a word.
 
RaleBulgarian said:
I’m not ignoring anything. Pelosi’s comment has squat to do with infrastructure. Trump must man up and do his job.

Don’t forget that this is not the first, or second, time in modern history when a president was under investigation while conducting the business of our country.

No excuse.
Click to expand...

Her comment had everything to do with whom (moments later) she had a meeting with in hopes of working a bipartisan deal on infrastructure.
 
Trump said:
what part of "no its wrong" don't you understand?
Click to expand...

The part where you cannot show you don't have a double standard with your outrage. Have you ever complained about the practice being continued under trump? Have you ever disagreed with anything trump has done. Can you point out the posts here?
 
Casper said:
The part where you cannot show you don't have a double standard with your outrage. Have you ever complained about the practice being continued under trump? Have you ever disagreed with anything trump has done. Can you point out the posts here?
Click to expand...

you mean like ever and ever in the whole 2 weeks I've been on this board?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom