- Joined
- Jan 21, 2009
- Messages
- 65,981
- Reaction score
- 23,408
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Undisclosed
WHO Attorney General Barr appointed is VERY revealing.
John Durham's history is specific and specialized as a prosecutor and attorney general. He investigated and prosecuted
FBI agents
CIA personnel
police and
corrupt elected officials for :
racketeering,
people falsely imprisoned on fake and false evidence and testimony,
illegally destroying government documents, and
illegally trying to protect guilty people.
If you think of that list, Comey and Hilary Clinton both come to mind on destroying documents - and trying to protect guilty people - for starters. But anyone guilty of anything on the Trump or Republican side should be sweating bullets too. In terms of connections to get things done, he has been recognized as one of the most powerful (but least famous) people in DC.
While many Democrats on this forum immediately raged as ordered to by their superiors that Durham is a Trump shill, that is just because LYING is the primary tactic of the Democratic Party - so that's what they then also do.
Durham is no partisan hack. In fact, A.G. Durham was appointed by Democratic President Obama's "wingman," Democrat A.G. Eric Holder to investigation the Bush administration's "enhanced interrogation tactics" (such as waterboarding) under Republican President Bush - and is responsible for exposing the practice leading to it being ended. Calling Durham a partisan groupie is not only a deliberate and outrageous lie, but shows just how far many Democrats will outright lie against good people to try to destroy their reputation with their lies.
U.S. Attorney General William Barr is doing this both seriously and straight up. Durham is in no one's pocket.
Durham doesn't play games. He does NOT buy into the attitude that if the FBI, CIA, police or military does it then is must be legal - or must be covered up. No matter who it is, if they are guilty he'll figure it out, prove it and get convictions, But he also will not tolerate innocent people being set up or falsely prosecuted - even to take on the FBI on behalf of shady people that were falsely convicted on false evidence. He is NOT the type to just overlook false affidavits such as the dossier being used in federal court against political opposite - if that is what happened.
.
There are VERY few people willing to take on the FBI, CIA, police and the US military. So HIGHLY respected for his INTEGRITY - he has been appointed by BOTH President Reagan AND Eric Holder - as opposite as it gets on the political spectrum. Eric Holder would not have appointed a partisan Republican lacky - would he?
John Durham is a non-nonsense hard nosed top ranking investigator and prosecutor. In terms of investigating these issues, NO ONE in the USA is more experienced and proven. The dog whistle some Democrats are blowing screaming he is a Trump groupie - which everyone knows is false - only serves to strongly suggest to him there is a desperation to try to divert and hide something. For someone like John Durham, it will have the opposite effect.
If you are innocent, you WANT John Durham running the investigation. But if you are guilty, you're screwed.
John Durham (lawyer) - Wikipedia
John Durham's history is specific and specialized as a prosecutor and attorney general. He investigated and prosecuted
FBI agents
CIA personnel
police and
corrupt elected officials for :
racketeering,
people falsely imprisoned on fake and false evidence and testimony,
illegally destroying government documents, and
illegally trying to protect guilty people.
If you think of that list, Comey and Hilary Clinton both come to mind on destroying documents - and trying to protect guilty people - for starters. But anyone guilty of anything on the Trump or Republican side should be sweating bullets too. In terms of connections to get things done, he has been recognized as one of the most powerful (but least famous) people in DC.
While many Democrats on this forum immediately raged as ordered to by their superiors that Durham is a Trump shill, that is just because LYING is the primary tactic of the Democratic Party - so that's what they then also do.
Durham is no partisan hack. In fact, A.G. Durham was appointed by Democratic President Obama's "wingman," Democrat A.G. Eric Holder to investigation the Bush administration's "enhanced interrogation tactics" (such as waterboarding) under Republican President Bush - and is responsible for exposing the practice leading to it being ended. Calling Durham a partisan groupie is not only a deliberate and outrageous lie, but shows just how far many Democrats will outright lie against good people to try to destroy their reputation with their lies.
U.S. Attorney General William Barr is doing this both seriously and straight up. Durham is in no one's pocket.
Durham doesn't play games. He does NOT buy into the attitude that if the FBI, CIA, police or military does it then is must be legal - or must be covered up. No matter who it is, if they are guilty he'll figure it out, prove it and get convictions, But he also will not tolerate innocent people being set up or falsely prosecuted - even to take on the FBI on behalf of shady people that were falsely convicted on false evidence. He is NOT the type to just overlook false affidavits such as the dossier being used in federal court against political opposite - if that is what happened.
.
There are VERY few people willing to take on the FBI, CIA, police and the US military. So HIGHLY respected for his INTEGRITY - he has been appointed by BOTH President Reagan AND Eric Holder - as opposite as it gets on the political spectrum. Eric Holder would not have appointed a partisan Republican lacky - would he?
John Durham is a non-nonsense hard nosed top ranking investigator and prosecutor. In terms of investigating these issues, NO ONE in the USA is more experienced and proven. The dog whistle some Democrats are blowing screaming he is a Trump groupie - which everyone knows is false - only serves to strongly suggest to him there is a desperation to try to divert and hide something. For someone like John Durham, it will have the opposite effect.
If you are innocent, you WANT John Durham running the investigation. But if you are guilty, you're screwed.
John Durham (lawyer) - Wikipedia