• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Who is A.G. John Durham that A.G. Barr assigned to investigate?

joko104

Banned
Suspended
DP Veteran
Joined
Jan 21, 2009
Messages
65,981
Reaction score
23,408
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Undisclosed
WHO Attorney General Barr appointed is VERY revealing.

John Durham's history is specific and specialized as a prosecutor and attorney general. He investigated and prosecuted
FBI agents
CIA personnel
police and
corrupt elected officials for :

racketeering,
people falsely imprisoned on fake and false evidence and testimony,
illegally destroying government documents, and
illegally trying to protect guilty people.

If you think of that list, Comey and Hilary Clinton both come to mind on destroying documents - and trying to protect guilty people - for starters. But anyone guilty of anything on the Trump or Republican side should be sweating bullets too. In terms of connections to get things done, he has been recognized as one of the most powerful (but least famous) people in DC.

While many Democrats on this forum immediately raged as ordered to by their superiors that Durham is a Trump shill, that is just because LYING is the primary tactic of the Democratic Party - so that's what they then also do.

Durham is no partisan hack. In fact, A.G. Durham was appointed by Democratic President Obama's "wingman," Democrat A.G. Eric Holder to investigation the Bush administration's "enhanced interrogation tactics" (such as waterboarding) under Republican President Bush - and is responsible for exposing the practice leading to it being ended. Calling Durham a partisan groupie is not only a deliberate and outrageous lie, but shows just how far many Democrats will outright lie against good people to try to destroy their reputation with their lies.

U.S. Attorney General William Barr is doing this both seriously and straight up. Durham is in no one's pocket.

Durham doesn't play games. He does NOT buy into the attitude that if the FBI, CIA, police or military does it then is must be legal - or must be covered up. No matter who it is, if they are guilty he'll figure it out, prove it and get convictions, But he also will not tolerate innocent people being set up or falsely prosecuted - even to take on the FBI on behalf of shady people that were falsely convicted on false evidence. He is NOT the type to just overlook false affidavits such as the dossier being used in federal court against political opposite - if that is what happened.
.
There are VERY few people willing to take on the FBI, CIA, police and the US military. So HIGHLY respected for his INTEGRITY - he has been appointed by BOTH President Reagan AND Eric Holder - as opposite as it gets on the political spectrum. Eric Holder would not have appointed a partisan Republican lacky - would he?


John Durham is a non-nonsense hard nosed top ranking investigator and prosecutor. In terms of investigating these issues, NO ONE in the USA is more experienced and proven. The dog whistle some Democrats are blowing screaming he is a Trump groupie - which everyone knows is false - only serves to strongly suggest to him there is a desperation to try to divert and hide something. For someone like John Durham, it will have the opposite effect.

If you are innocent, you WANT John Durham running the investigation. But if you are guilty, you're screwed.



John Durham (lawyer) - Wikipedia
 
WHO Attorney General Barr appointed is VERY revealing.

John Durham's history is specific and a prosecutor and attorney general. He investigated and prosecuted
FBI agents
CIA personnel
police and
corrupt elected officials for :

racketeering,
people falsely imprisoned on fake and false evidence and testimony,
illegally destroying government documents, and
illegally trying to protect guilty people.

If you think of that list, Comey and Hilary Clinton both come to mind on destroying documents - and trying to protect guilty people - for starters. But anyone guilty of anything on the Trump or Republican side should be sweating bullets too. In terms of connections to get things done, he has been recognized as one of the most powerful (but least famous) people in DC.

While many Democrats on this forum immediately raged as ordered to by their superiors that Durham is a Trump shill, that is just because LYING is the primary tactic of the Democratic Party - so that's what they then also do.

Durham is no partisan hack. In fact, A.G. Durham was appointed by Democratic President Obama's "wingman," Democrat A.G. Eric Holder to investigation the Bush administration's "enhanced interrogation tactics" (such as waterboarding) under Republican President Bush - and is responsible for exposing the practice leading to it being ended. Calling Durham a partisan groupie is not only a deliberate and outrageous lie, but shows just how far many Democrats will outright lie against good people to try to destroy their reputation with their lies.

U.S. Attorney General William Barr is doing this both seriously and straight up. Durham is in no one's pocket.

Durham doesn't play games. He does NOT buy into the attitude that if the FBI, CIA, police or military does it then is must be legal - or must be covered up. No matter who it is, if they are guilty he'll figure it out, prove it and get convictions, But he also will not tolerate innocent people being set up or falsely prosecuted - even to take on the FBI on behalf of shady people that were falsely convicted on false evidence. He is NOT the type to just overlook false affidavits such as the dossier being used in federal court against political opposite - if that is what happened.
.
There are VERY few people willing to take on the FBI, CIA, police and the US military. So HIGHLY respected for his INTEGRITY - he has been appointed by BOTH President Reagan AND Eric Holder - as opposite as it gets on the political spectrum. Eric Holder would not have appointed a partisan Republican lacky - would he?


John Durham is a non-nonsense hard nosed top ranking investigator and prosecutor. In terms of investigating these issues, NO ONE in the USA is more experienced and proven. The dog whistle some Democrats are blowing screaming he is a Trump groupie - which everyone knows is false - only serves to strongly suggest to him there is a desperation to try to divert and hide something. For someone like John Durham, it will have the opposite effect.

If you are innocent, you WANT John Durham running the investigation. But if you are guilty, you're screwed.



John Durham (lawyer) - Wikipedia


Do you have a source for this?
The dog whistle some Democrats are blowing screaming he is a Trump groupie
 
This what I think most partisan junkie loyalists on both side can't grasp - because they always reason backwards from the results they want to make their conclusions as if everything of government exists for purposes of partisan hackery and politics, for which those in government should do partisan crap in their favor - using their power for their political agenda.

What such people do not understand is that many, maybe most, in the criminal justice system will NOT put up with using the criminal justice system improperly or illegally at a political weapon or to concoct juicy "sources say" accusations on partisan gossip and innuendos. They are professional investigators, prosecutors and lawyers whose actions and goals are dictated by the precise fine letter of the law - and nothing else.

They don't make political, personal, or partisan decisions. They are the legitimate government lawyers that make decisions and take actions upon the standard every lawyer should - solely upon the FACTS and the EVIDENCE.

Yes, there is a power struggle going on within the Federal government. But it isn't just between Republicans and Democrats trying to use the system wrongly for power. There is a 3rd player in the power struggle - those who are 100% non-partisan legitimate who will oppose with the very being ANYONE using or trying to use the federal criminal justice system wrongly or illegally for political purpose and power.

ALL OF US, Republican, Democratic, Independent, should be pulling for the non-partisan legitimate professionals of the federal criminal justice system to WIN this fight - and END the using the criminal justice system as a political weapon. If they succeed, we-the-people win regardless of our political views. If they lose, we-the-people lose.
 
Last edited:
Do you have a source for this?

This forum for starters. Almost immediately upon Durham's appointment our blind partisan Democrats instantly are ranting Durham is a corrupt Trump cultist. Nothing could be further from the truth.
 
Democrats on the forum rant that Republicans in administrative government are corrupt. Republicans on the forum rant that Democrats in administrative government are corrupt. Both claim the criminal justice system has and is being used corruptly for partisan reasons - and rage it is the other side who is the guilty parties.

In my opinion, administrative government and the criminal justice system has been seeded with and contains an increasing number of corrupt federal players on BOTH sides - corrupting our government.

What we-the-people need is hard nosed prosecutors and investigators like John Durham to ferret them ALL out, both sides, and expose their corruption, their perverting the government and criminal justice system for their own benefit, agendas and power - to drive them ALL - Republican, Democrats or just lying crooks and thieves - OUT of government by being fired when exposed and prosecuted if their misconduct was/is criminal.

Corrupt people aren't really partisan, they just play whichever party title serves their personal corrupt goals. Their own interest in the partisan affiliations has nothing to do with issues or policies of either party. It is singularly for their own convenience and tactics. They USE their political party as their personal weapon and to hide behind - knowing no matter how corrupt and illegal they are, mindless party loyalists will do and say ANYTHING to try to protect them and destroy their targets.

It is unfortunately that BOTH political parties seem only interested in protecting their own - no matter how corrupt - and destroying the opposition - no matter how legitimate. This HAS to end! If not, no one honest and legitimate will remain in government and our government will just become two perfectly amoral, corrupt and abusing power sets of liars, thieves and traitors - both side wearing the badge and cape of a political party.
 
Last edited:
This forum for starters. Almost immediately upon Durham's appointment our blind partisan Democrats instantly are ranting Durham is a corrupt Trump cultist. Nothing could be further from the truth.

I see no evidence that Durham's a hack, and I'm obviously not a Trump supporter.

Barr? He's a hack.
 
The dog whistle some Democrats are blowing screaming he is a Trump groupie

If they're screaming it, it's not a dog whistle. Please learn the meaning of words before you regurgitate them.
 
Democrats are going to keep calling Mueller and his entire team liars, Trump groupies and Russian assets, while John Durham quietly and methodically ferrets out the TRUE criminals now that Mueller and Barr have totally exonerated President Trump.
 
Democrats are going to keep calling Mueller and his entire team liars, Trump groupies and Russian assets, while John Durham quietly and methodically ferrets out the TRUE criminals now that Mueller and Barr have totally exonerated President Trump.

Durham was also involved in the two generation corruption of the Boston FBI that led to a $100 million settlement due to FBI malpractice (including Mueller to some degree) He’s a walking “full employment program” for defense lawyers. He has sent FBI officers to jail before.

Memo to Rep. Nadler: “mess with the bull, you get the horn”.
 
~ From what I have read ( background history ) Durham is straightforward no nonsense investigator. Like Barr he is his own person and not a political hack. The fact the Democrats are nervous about him speaks volumes.
' If 'these two guys are indeed the real deal we may soon see some real fireworks ! 🎆🎉
 
Ultimately, the integrity of the FBI, DOJ, CIA and the FISA Court will be allowed only so much damage be done - in the best interests of the county. Nor do I see any chance of either President Obama nor Hillary Clinton formally charged with any crime - regardless of any evidence found justifying do so.

Instead, my HOPE as a REALISTIC hope that enough people are given the choice of resign or be fired in such administrative and justice system agencies and organizations, with a possibility of a few process crimes and technical crimes of secondary people pleading out to little-prison time crimes.

Who, what, when, where - it is irrelevant the party of the person or the person's motive - political, economic, ideological, just a corrupt or lazy person - doesn't matter. If the misconduct was severe and clearly against known departmental policies even if not criminally illegal is grounds for the correct decision of firing the person. It doesn't matter the political party. I believe that for many it was not about partisan politics, but about their own egos and power tripping - that THEY are in charge and will have things their way. For others it definitely was partisan or candidate specific - both political parties.

The purpose of such absolutely necessary measures make it clear to all to never think of taking such wrongful actions - whether a crime or just serious professional misconduct. The other reason is to reward those who resisted such temptations and continued to be good, honest civil servants by making the vacancies in their organizations they are advanced into for their honesty and integrity.

This is NOT rightly a battle between Democrats and Republicans nor rightly about President Trump. Presidents come and presidents go. It is between those of honest government versus those of corrupt government. We the people need for TRUTH to win on behalf of the good people in government - again of both political parties - and most who are not particularly interested in politics either way. Technically, we can police politicians by our votes. But we MUST rely upon government itself to protect us and our government from those within government who are corrupt or incompetent.
 
Last edited:
Ultimately, the integrity of the FBI, DOJ, CIA and the FISA Court will be allowed only so much damage be done - in the best interests of the county. Nor do I see any chance of either President Obama nor Hillary Clinton formally charged with any crime - regardless of any evidence found justifying do so.

Instead, my HOPE as a REALISTIC hope that enough people are given the choice of resign or be fired in such administrative and justice system agencies and organizations, with a possibility of a few process crimes and technical crimes of secondary people pleading out to little-prison time crimes.
~ Yeah ... That's about how I see it also. However I do believe Comey/ McCabe will be indicted. They will plea bargain, get probation and write a book. 😕
 
~ Yeah ... That's about how I see it also. However I do believe Comey/ McCabe will be indicted. They will plea bargain, get probation and write a book. ��

I'd really like to see Comey fired. He outright lied to Congress, plus the bizarre TV appearance just before the election about Clinton was outrageous - from any partisan perspective (though not illegal). He is at the core of this. The worst culprit in reality probably in Brennan, but I doubt there will be action against him in terms of prosecution and he avoided signing things.
 
I'd really like to see Comey fired. He outright lied to Congress, plus the bizarre TV appearance just before the election about Clinton was outrageous - from any partisan perspective (though not illegal). He is at the core of this. The worst culprit in reality probably in Brennan, but I doubt there will be action against him in terms of prosecution and he avoided signing things.

BRAIN FREEZE CORRECTION: Comey PROSECUTED.
 
Back
Top Bottom