Oh, are conservatives concerned about fairness now. I guess I was confused by their steadfast opposition to the equal rights amendment among other things. Where is the sense of fairness when the right wing is encouraging unlimited political spending by corporate persons to compete with my meager political spending? Don't kid yourself that conservatives love fairness, they just hate queers and anyone who doesn't conform to their biblical gender definitions.
You tell me, is there any merit to the claim that they stand against equal pay for women, or that they are against equality in education or voting accessibility for the poor?
Rather than obscure their infamous treachery in senseless denial, own it and we can end this charade.
And where do those "defenseless" little fetuses reside? That's right, in WOMEN. These "defenseless" fetuses live within, draw nutrition from their blood, defecate inside them, cause them untold agony, injury and death to WOMEN. For you, or ANY other con to play this pretend you're not aware game is exactly the sort of selective conservative advocacy I was speaking of. Jesus, it's infuriating to try to have a rational conversation with people who get their education from bumper stickers.
1. I guess no conservative can comment on the preferential treatment being advocated by liberals and the unequal treatment that others then receive, without being accused of "hating" the group so elevated. That's intellectually vapid, weak and plainly embarrassing. It also conveniently relieves you and others of having to logically and cogently defend the unlevel playing field you've championed and created.
2. I don't advocate unlimited political spending and haven't indicated anywhere in this forum that I do. I haven't seen anybody in here support it that I can recall. That's just more liberal boilerplate devoid of facts. In case you missed it, also, the majority of people rejected the ERA because they recognize that it is redundant. We all have the same rights under the Constitution. It's the same type of thinking that makes one assault or murder worse than another by attaching the "hate crime" label to it. Murder is murder. Assault is assault. By giving more weight to certain motivations, we create lesser categories of victims.
3. No, there is no merit to your claims. Equal pay for women? Sure. However, studies show they make less than men for equal work. That falls on business owners, many, many of whom are liberals and Democrats, I can assure you. Also, how you would enforce that in every business? You'd have to look at EVERY employee and decide who is doing equal jobs. It's impossible. Again, libs make these broad claims but have zero idea about the difficulties of implementation.
Equality in education? What does that mean exactly? That anyone who can fog up a mirror gets into Harvard? When did ability start to be the second or third consideration? The SAT people are now cooking up a test that measures social standing. If you live in a poor neighborhood or come from a broken home, you get preference over someone who does not. Nevermind if the other person has superior ability or past performance. This, again, is the unequal playing field liberals set up with their group preferences and it doesn't just disadvantage whites but, more often, Asians who score the highest of all groups. I say let everyone compete on their ability. Heck, take names, races and the rest off applications. Pick the best and the brightest.
Voting accessability? Every legal US citizen who is registered and appears at the proper voting place, should be allowed to vote. The breathless claims of voter suppression spewed by the MSM and people like Stacy Abrams are simply not supported. They are excuses for losing.
4. Your comments regarding fetuses are equal parts laughable and sad. Yea, childbirth is hard. It's been that way from the beginning. Everyone knows that. That has NOTHING to do with the fact that we are talking about ending another human life. Sometimes that is necessary but we've made it a matter of whim and convenience in most places. It's the height of hypocrisy to see the "compassion" party endlessly champion abortion at any time for any reason.
5. I refer you to earlier comments. Dems are the party of preference, not equality. Removing barriers isn't good enough for them. They insist on putting the unfavored groups at a disadvantage. That's simply observable fact, no history book required. Anytime you want to discuss actual history and not the history you've been spoonfed, feel free.
Enough with the personal attacks, swipes and general asshattery. Either discuss the topic with civility or face the music.
