• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Schiff considers fining Trump officials held in contempt $25,000 a day

then why hasnt Pelosi started proceedings?

what is holding her back? other than her common sense....lol

Why don't you call the House switchboard or her office and ask her?

Things don't work at the pace you want.
 
This is just the most recent example of the House Dems showing their desperation. They didn't get what they wanted from the Mueller report and it showed them to be damn liars for 2 years!. They are now running the House committees like opposition research groups fishing for dirt while claiming it is congressional oversight. Shifty Schiff can threaten all he wants, it isn't going anywhere just like Mueller will not be giving testimony to their committees. But what is on track to happen is Horowitz will be releasing his report and referrals of prosecution are coming. Anyone who has been following this picked up a lot of bombshells Barr was sharing and those who are guilty picked up on them as well like the fact there have already been indictments over leaking classified information. Barr also stated his investigative team would be working closely with Horowitz in the days to come. That left some folks with lumps in their throats.
 
Irrelevant. If you lack the intellectual honesty to read what I linked (and it's even in bullet points) it's not my problem. I accept your concession that collusion was demonstrated.

What IS it with you and irrelevancy. Yes, I understand that my president is a mobbed-up whore for the Russians. Never disputed it.

Exactly. Collusion was demonstrated and established.

Pwned.

Hang onto your delusions, it's all you have and he will still be your President tomorrow. So how come your lib "leaders" are not pushing to impeach for "collusion"?

My "concession" has taken place in the same place the "collusion" happened, in your imagination.
 
Lol i dont find any of them being crooked tolerable. I am a firm believer that those entrusted to make the laws and enforce them should be held to the highest standard possible.

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk

Do you hold your president to the same standard? Do you find his being crooked tolerable? Should he be held to the highest standard possible?
 
Adam Schiff wants to fine Trump officials who refuse to comply with their subpoenas $25,000 a day. Of course, the devil is in the details:

1) What is the enforcement mechanism? If that mechanism is an institution controlled by Trump (such as the Treasury or the DOJ), then the fines will have no teeth.
2) Will Trump just sue the House Intelligence Committee and hold up the fines in court? That seems pretty likely.

Another lesson in civics! Also known as: every day under a Trump Presidency.



Adam Schiff considers fining Trump officials held in contempt of Congress $25,000 a day - Axios

I think Trump should pay the $25,000 to the treasury but dock Schiff's salary for the same amount.
 
Schiff is determined to make this worse... with each passing day.

it is all TDS.
what is worse is that he thinks that this is going to help democrats in 2020.
this is the very reason they should never be allowed to hold power.
 
Exactly. Collusion was demonstrated and established.


Please don't confuse the lemmings who only get their news from Fox. *psst* Fox hasn't told them what the report says, so they can only go by what they are being fed.
 
I think Trump should pay the $25,000 to the treasury but dock Schiff's salary for the same amount.

I know you want Trump to be a dictator, but he doesn't have that authority yet.
 
"In some time."

You've been here less than 2 months.

Hmm.

As in, the entire internet. You poor libs, such victims of those mean old Conservatives...
You know "some time" can mean today, this week, this month, etc?
 
Adam Schiff wants to fine Trump officials who refuse to comply with their subpoenas $25,000 a day. Of course, the devil is in the details:

1) What is the enforcement mechanism? If that mechanism is an institution controlled by Trump (such as the Treasury or the DOJ), then the fines will have no teeth.
2) Will Trump just sue the House Intelligence Committee and hold up the fines in court? That seems pretty likely.

Another lesson in civics! Also known as: every day under a Trump Presidency.



Adam Schiff considers fining Trump officials held in contempt of Congress $25,000 a day - Axios

Far as I know, the courts use US Marshalls or Sheriffs to collect or enforce levying of fines, but I am not sure Congress operates the same way.
When I have sued entities in Small Claims Court or in a superior court, it was indeed the Sheriff's Office who "tapped the till" at a business to enforce collection on a judgment.

One such entity was a major record company.
 
If Trump continues to plunge us into autocracy, you may yet live to see your dream come true in which every Democrat is investigated by the FBI.
Oh, come now. That's Obama's M.O., not Trump's.
 
Do you hold your president to the same standard? Do you find his being crooked tolerable? Should he be held to the highest standard possible?
Me personally, yes i hold them all to the same standard.

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk
 
Hang onto your delusions, it's all you have and he will still be your President tomorrow. So how come your lib "leaders" are not pushing to impeach for "collusion"?

My "concession" has taken place in the same place the "collusion" happened, in your imagination.

Him being POTUS is irrelevant to anything I've posted.

Thanks for the easy win by admitting the report demonstrated collusion

Pwned
 
Him being POTUS is irrelevant to anything I've posted.

Thanks for the easy win by admitting the report demonstrated collusion

Pwned

Thanks for further proof of your delusions. Just hear whatever makes you content.

You "win" something, just not what you imagine.
 
Oh, come now. That's Obama's M.O., not Trump's.

Boom! And the left knows they are going to be found out when the indictments start flowing.
 
Adam Schiff wants to fine Trump officials who refuse to comply with their subpoenas $25,000 a day. Of course, the devil is in the details:

1) What is the enforcement mechanism? If that mechanism is an institution controlled by Trump (such as the Treasury or the DOJ), then the fines will have no teeth.
2) Will Trump just sue the House Intelligence Committee and hold up the fines in court? That seems pretty likely.

Another lesson in civics! Also known as: every day under a Trump Presidency.



Adam Schiff considers fining Trump officials held in contempt of Congress $25,000 a day - Axios

Schitff for brains is no match for Trump.
 
Adam Schiff wants to fine Trump officials who refuse to comply with their subpoenas $25,000 a day. Of course, the devil is in the details:

1) What is the enforcement mechanism? If that mechanism is an institution controlled by Trump (such as the Treasury or the DOJ), then the fines will have no teeth.
2) Will Trump just sue the House Intelligence Committee and hold up the fines in court? That seems pretty likely.

Another lesson in civics! Also known as: every day under a Trump Presidency.



Adam Schiff considers fining Trump officials held in contempt of Congress $25,000 a day - Axios

Easy to do I should think, you garnish their pay check like any other Fed employee who has a debt to the Gov.
 
It's odd Trump is blocking everything that would enable the House to examine the 10 examples of Trump Obstruction of Justice that Special Counsel Robert Mueller included in his Report.

Now why would a self-proclaimed innocent man act like a mafia don? Rhetorical question.

No conservative here has managed to answer that one yet. They just resort to 'But Obama, but Clinton'. Sad, so sad.
 
Back
Top Bottom