• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Scarborough: Democrats are now the only party for rule of law

haymarket said:
If I kill somebody but never use the word KILL, is the victim still dead?

If I rape somebody but never use the word RAPE is the victim still been attacked?

If I go to the grocery store and stock up on food, did I sill SHOP if I never used that word?
Click to expand...

What’s in the water up there?
 
WCH said:
Married one too.
Click to expand...


You mean like Melania, with her naked pixs of her grabbing her crotch in full frontal who marries a rich guy for his dough?
 
haymarket said:
like I said, the Trumpkins have been parroting Barr for weeks now - ts.
Click to expand...


On the only things that mattered , Barr parroted Mueller.
he copied and pasted right out the rport.


So people are parroting Mueller not Barr .On the only things that matter.

The rest is just noise, designed to gin up the kookenutters in the hive.
 
OscarLevant said:
The story was not 'phony'. There were 127 documented communications b GOP.
Click to expand...

Blahblah blah .Nothing nothing ...lw spin
nobody cares execpt fringer .
Wake me when anybody does anything any of that.
 
code1211 said:
It's really amazing that idiots believe liars repeating lies from other liars.

What is the actual basis of the the lies that this moron is ranting about?

Do you know? Can you link to the exact words spoken that you are so excitedly referencing? If you accept lies as truth and then repeat the lies, it only makes you look less intelligent than you may be.

Where's the beef? Have you actually even researched this? Even thought about this beyond the simple level of an MSNBC host's parrot-like understanding?
Click to expand...




Oh, it's a lot of things, and really, you haven't been paying attention.

And nothing spells "I'm for rule of law" than stating publicly you will not comply with any congressional subpoena, etc.

Nothing spells "I'm for rule of law" like asking the FBI to lay off a criminal investigation

Nothing spells "I'm for rule of law" like Trump's incessant attempts to undermine American's institutions and diss the dedicated people that work for them in an attempt to curry favor with your base,

Nothing spells "I'm for rule of law', than Trump's incessant attempts to undermine the investigation into his own conduct, for over 2 years

etc.

Yeah, right.

Trump's Assault on the Rule of Law

The “rule of law” distinguishes democracies from dictatorships. It’s based on three fundamental principles. Trump is violating every one of them.
Click to expand...
 
KLATTU said:
Blahblah blah .Nothing nothing ...lw spin
nobody cares execpt fringer .
Wake me when anybody does anything any of that.
Click to expand...


I reported a fact. Your reply was spin.

Wake us up when you stop doing it.


ZZzzzzzzzz.
 
OscarLevant said:
I reported a fact. Your reply was spin.

Wake us up when you stop doing it.


ZZzzzzzzzz.
Click to expand...

You repoerted a worthles bunch of trivia.
Not useful in the real world.

Mueller didn't come through for you guys. Not my fault.
 
KLATTU said:
On the only things that mattered , Barr parroted Mueller.
he copied and pasted right out the rport.


So people are parroting Mueller not Barr .On the only things that matter.

The rest is just noise, designed to gin up the kookenutters in the hive.
Click to expand...

He cherry picked parts of larger sentences and left out lots and lots and lots of important things. As such he was not accurate nor honest. Oc course, we was not trying to be either.
 
haymarket said:
He cherry picked parts of larger sentences and left out lots and lots and lots of important things. As such he was not accurate nor honest. Oc course, we was not trying to be either.
Click to expand...

A summary report is ALL 'cherry picked',by definition. HE called it as he saw it. He works for Trump. He wasn't trying to please far left people like you. We don't pay attention to what you people call" honest".

And as great woman once said" at this point what difference does it make". Barr's summary is completely irrelevant . We have the actual report.
 
KLATTU said:
A summary report is ALL 'cherry picked',by definition. HE called it as he saw it. He works for Trump. He wasn't trying to please far left people like you. We don't pay attention to what you people call" honest".

And as great woman once said" at this point what difference does it make". Barr's summary is completely irrelevant . We have the actual report.
Click to expand...

Actually, Barr does work for all the American people. He is NOT the personal lawyer of Trump.
 
haymarket said:
If I kill somebody but never use the word KILL, is the victim still dead?

If I rape somebody but never use the word RAPE is the victim still been attacked?

If I go to the grocery store and stock up on food, did I sill SHOP if I never used that word?
Click to expand...

Are you really as incapable as your posts indicate?

Your post supports the President and attacks those that are playing the word games.

Is it seriously your intention to defend Trump?
 
code1211 said:
Are you really as incapable as your posts indicate?

Your post supports the President and attacks those that are playing the word games.

Is it seriously your intention to defend Trump?
Click to expand...

Your post make no rational sense as I am attacking Trump by demonstrating that the Report describes lots of COOPERATION between the Trump Campaign and the Russians.
 
OscarLevant said:
Oh, it's a lot of things, and really, you haven't been paying attention.

And nothing spells "I'm for rule of law" than stating publicly you will not comply with any congressional subpoena, etc.

Nothing spells "I'm for rule of law" like asking the FBI to lay off a criminal investigation

Nothing spells "I'm for rule of law" like Trump's incessant attempts to undermine American's institutions and diss the dedicated people that work for them in an attempt to curry favor with your base,

Nothing spells "I'm for rule of law', than Trump's incessant attempts to undermine the investigation into his own conduct, for over 2 years

etc.

Yeah, right.

Trump's Assault on the Rule of Law
Click to expand...

The only way to comply with the subpoena from Congress is to break the laws passed by Congress.

Do you see any problem in this?
 
haymarket said:
Your post make no rational sense as I am attacking Trump by demonstrating that the Report describes lots of COOPERATION between the Trump Campaign and the Russians.
Click to expand...

The problem with your attack is that it addresses the transgressions being made by those who are attacking Trump.

They are spying and refuse to use the word "spying" thinking this "washes away the stink". The examples you cite as killing, raping or shopping, demonstrate that a rose is still rose by any other name- as is spying.

You are unaware that you're are attacking yourself.

Hate blinds all that it grips and it has you tightly in its grasp. While sad for you, this is really pretty comical to those who watch you.
 
code1211 said:
The problem with your attack is that it addresses the transgressions being made by those who are attacking Trump.

They are spying and refuse to use the word "spying" thinking this "washes away the stink". The examples you cite as killing, raping or shopping, demonstrate that a rose is still rose by any other name- as is spying.

You are unaware that you're are attacking yourself.

Hate blinds all that it grips and it has you tightly in its grasp. While sad for you, this is really pretty comical to those who watch you.
Click to expand...

I am sorry but I do not hear the same right wing dog whistles as you do so the entire "spying" thing just seems lame to me.
 
haymarket said:
I am sorry but I do not hear the same right wing dog whistles as you do so the entire "spying" thing just seems lame to me.
Click to expand...

Your selective blindness is well known.

Your inability is not surprising.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom