• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Conduct Unbecoming

Just don't eat there. No patronage and the business will go under. Seems to be a sensible solution to me. Not enough? Open an excellent Middle Eastern fast-food restaurant across the road and poach his business with delicious shawarma, lovely shish-kebabs, healthy falafel and mouth-watering mergez sausages, savoury kebeh plus Lebanese barbaque.

If direct action is more your flavour, have local kids cover the place in glued-up sheets of Arabic text all dealing with the dangers of fast-food and the cruelty of the food animal industry.

Cheers.
Evilroddy.
 
Evilroddy said:
Just don't eat there. No patronage and the business will go under. Seems to be a sensible solution to me. Not enough? Open an excellent Middle Eastern fast-food restaurant across the road and poach his business with delicious shawarma, lovely shish-kebabs, healthy falafel and mouth-watering mergez sausages, savoury kebeh plus Lebanese barbaque.

If direct action is more your flavour, have local kids cover the place in glued-up sheets of Arabic text all dealing with the dangers of fast-food and the cruelty of the food animal industry.

Cheers.
Evilroddy.
Click to expand...

When patrons stop coming, the business likes to find out why. It doesn't do much good to stop eating there and never explaining the reason.
 
[
ocean515 said:
Yep. Hit every socialist Progressive talking point, just like the good little indoctrinated robots that they are.
Click to expand...

Tangmo is not a socialist.

Tangmo is a capitalist.

But don't facts disturb your hard drive ideological rote programming. The mindless recitations that preclude debate.
 
Tangmo said:
[


Tangmo is not a socialist.

Tangmo is a capitalist.

But don't facts disturb your hard drive ideological rote programming. The mindless recitations that preclude debate.
Click to expand...

You wrote the following screed, and accuse me of hard drive ideological rote programming and mindless recitations that preclude debate?

I'll highlight, once again, the evidence of ideological rote programing, and mindless recitations that preclude debate:

You have roughly half the Marine Corps enlisted personnel on your side yet you're not only paranoid you're frantic. You have every redneck on your side.] American Nazis love Trumpolini same as you do yet you're worried someone is coming after you. You're itching for confrontation yet you swear up and down you're placid and harmless. The President of the United States doesn't do or say anything without being solicitous of your armband opinions, beliefs and historically discredited values. The House of Grossburger continues to thrive yet you see it as at risk and under siege. While you're being deliberately provocative you plead innocence. There is more because all in all you're a piece of work who believes he who posts last wins.​
 
ocean515 said:
You wrote the following screed, and accuse me of hard drive ideological rote programming and mindless recitations that preclude debate?

I'll highlight, once again, the evidence of ideological rote programing, and mindless recitations that preclude debate:
American Nazis love Trumpolini
Click to expand...

I know this wasn't addressed to me, but this post is nonsensical.

Of course American NeoNazis love Trump. Trump gained his street cred with his base by being the leader of the racist Birther Movement. He attacked a sitting POTUS for almost a decade, accused the POTUS of being UnAmerican, for no other reason than the POTUS had black skin.

WIth Trump's long and well documented history of racist behavior, they knew exactly what they were getting when Trump was elected, which is why they celebrated in their own unique way:

White nationalists mark Trump win with Nazi salute


And weren't they right, as Trump is the first POTUS in my recollection to publicly defend Neo Nazis and the KKK:

Trump Defends White-Nationalist Protesters: 'Some Very Fine People'


Trump loves them, and they love Trump:


Neo-Nazis Praise Trump's Charlottesville Reaction: 'He Loves Us All'


It's a match made in heaven. To deny that is to deny reality.
 
Last edited:
Tangmo said:
[


Tangmo is not a socialist.

Tangmo is a capitalist.

But don't facts disturb your hard drive ideological rote programming. The mindless recitations that preclude debate.
Click to expand...

When you're defending a blatant racist like Trump, someone who publicly defends Neo Nazis and the KKK, "mindless recitations" are all there is.
 
Praxas said:
Yeah just don’t go putting a cross in a jar of piss or step/burn a flag. Then the righties go nuts and then turn into snowflakes.
Click to expand...

And don't you dare ever wish anyone, "Happy Holidays", you pagan! This is a Christian country, dammit!<sarcasm>
 
JustHanging said:
I know this wasn't addressed to me, but this post is nonsensical.

Of course American NeoNazis love Trump. Trump gained his street cred with his base by being the leader of the racist Birther Movement. He attacked a sitting POTUS for almost a decade, accused the POTUS of being UnAmerican, for no other reason than the POTUS had black skin.

WIth Trump's long and well documented history of racist behavior, they knew exactly what they were getting when Trump was elected, which is why they celebrated in their own unique way:

White nationalists mark Trump win with Nazi salute


And weren't they right, as Trump is the first POTUS in my recollection to publicly defend Neo Nazis and the KKK:

Trump Defends White-Nationalist Protesters: 'Some Very Fine People'


Trump loves them, and they love Trump:


Neo-Nazis Praise Trump's Charlottesville Reaction: 'He Loves Us All'


It's a match made in heaven.
Click to expand...

More Progressive Bullcrap. Save it for someone without a working brain. There are millions of them, and countless numbers on this site.
 
ocean515 said:
You wrote the following screed, and accuse me of hard drive ideological rote programming and mindless recitations that preclude debate?

I'll highlight, once again, the evidence of ideological rote programing, and mindless recitations that preclude debate:

You have roughly half the Marine Corps enlisted personnel on your side yet you're not only paranoid you're frantic. You have every redneck on your side.] American Nazis love Trumpolini same as you do yet you're worried someone is coming after you. You're itching for confrontation yet you swear up and down you're placid and harmless. The President of the United States doesn't do or say anything without being solicitous of your armband opinions, beliefs and historically discredited values. The House of Grossburger continues to thrive yet you see it as at risk and under siege. While you're being deliberately provocative you plead innocence. There is more because all in all you're a piece of work who believes he who posts last wins.​
Click to expand...

I'm just waiting for the day that we can all jump up and down on the Trumpolini.
 
DifferentDrummr said:
I found it quite entertaining, actually. You're someone in whose misery I always take pleasure.
Click to expand...

Why are you so obsessed with my posts? I'm flattered and all, but stalking is kind of creepy.


Anything of substance to say, or are you already way out of your league, so this is the best I can expect?
 
ocean515 said:
More Progressive Bullcrap.
Click to expand...

LOL, yep, reality definitely has a liberal bias. Everything I said was supported by links to reputable sites.

Save it for someone without a working brain.
Click to expand...

Yeah, I was talking to you.

There are millions of them, and countless numbers on this site.
Click to expand...

I know, Trump has made it very clear they are his base, they're the people he loves:

Donald Trump loves the 'poorly educated' — and they love him

I'm the product of a great public education system, that's why I can put together a coherent argument with all of my assertions supported by citations to reputable sites.

Unfortunately for you, you're the product of a terrible public education system, as Trump himself so eloquently pointed out, and honestly,it shows. Thank you Donald! :lamo
 
Last edited:
JustHanging said:
LOL, yep, reality definitely has a liberal bias. Everything I said was supported by links to reputable sites.



Yeah, I was talking to you.



I know, Trump has made it very clear they are his base, they're the people he loves:

Donald Trump loves the 'poorly educated' — and they love him

I'm the product of a great public education system, that's why I can put together a coherent argument with all of my assertions supported by citations to reputable sites.

Unfortunately for you, you're the product of a terrible public education system, as Trump himself so eloquently pointed out. Thank you Donald! :lamo
Click to expand...

You might try using some new stuff they made up for you. This drivel you're posting is old hat.

Surely the Machine has better stuff than this for it's acolytes to use?
 
ocean515 said:
You might try using some new stuff they made up for you. This drivel you're posting is old hat.

Surely the Machine has better stuff than this for it's acolytes to use?
Click to expand...


:lamo That is some amazing projection.

Dude, I've given links to reputable sites to support all my assertions. All you have written since the beginning are ridiculous statements that have no basis in reality.

Seriously, you need to learn how to evaluate information. Here, check out this site:, I'm sure you would learn a lot, and it's a good place to start:

Evaluating Websites - Velma Bell Hamilton Middle School
 
JustHanging said:
:lamo That is some amazing projection.

Dude, I've given links to reputable sites to support all my assertions. All you have written since the beginning are ridiculous statements that have no basis in reality.

Seriously, you need to learn how to evaluate information. Here, check out this site:, I'm sure you would learn a lot, and it's a good place to start:

Evaluating Websites - Velma Bell Hamilton Middle School
Click to expand...

Reputable sites?

Now that's just about the funniest thing I've seen on this site today.

Go back to your teacher tomorrow and ask them for help understanding what a credible news source is.


Also, ask them for some lessons on context, and have them define "confirmation bias" for you.
 
ocean515 said:
You wrote the following screed, and accuse me of hard drive ideological rote programming and mindless recitations that preclude debate?

I'll highlight, once again, the evidence of ideological rote programing, and mindless recitations that preclude debate:

You have roughly half the Marine Corps enlisted personnel on your side yet you're not only paranoid you're frantic. You have every redneck on your side.] American Nazis love Trumpolini same as you do yet you're worried someone is coming after you. You're itching for confrontation yet you swear up and down you're placid and harmless. The President of the United States doesn't do or say anything without being solicitous of your armband opinions, beliefs and historically discredited values. The House of Grossburger continues to thrive yet you see it as at risk and under siege. While you're being deliberately provocative you plead innocence. There is more because all in all you're a piece of work who believes he who posts last wins.​
Click to expand...

From that you said I am a socialist. I corrected you in the matter. I am a capitalist. You however are everything I said in the post. And more.

I stated in another related post you have filled the thread with your ideological projections and boilerplate chirping about robot indoctrinated socialist progressive libruls blah blah blurp blurp. I wrote because your every post says this. Your posts accuse everyone you disagree with of being an indoctrinated robot who posts only programmed pulp. What you are doing of course is precluding debate. The how and the why is in my post which I thank you yet again for reposting. You have of course missed my points in the post while others recognize 'em and know 'em exactly and precisely.
 
ocean515 said:
Reputable sites?

Now that's just about the funniest thing I've seen on this site today.

Go back to your teacher tomorrow and ask them for help understanding what a credible news source is.


Also, ask them for some lessons on context, and have them define "confirmation bias" for you.
Click to expand...

USA Today is considered to be a reputable site, particularly when they're quoting Trump. But you are suggesting that USA Today is lying, and Trump didn't say:

Trump: "We won with poorly educated. I love the poorly educated,"


Go to mediabiasfactcheck.com. USA Today: Factual Reporting: HIGH


Seriously, every one of your posts just emphasizes how little you know about evaluating information sources. Which explains why you never provide citations to support your statements.

The fact that you think USA Today is lying when they quote Trump proves that. And that you think quoting Trump is somehow "confirmation bias". You obviously don't even know what that term means.

Look, don't be afraid. It might seem too difficult when you start, but I'm sure if you stick to it, you will eventually figure things out:

Evaluating Websites | A How-To Guide for Middle-School Students
 
Last edited:
JustHanging said:
USA Today is considered to be a reputable site, particularly when they're quoting Trump. Are you seriously suggesting that USA Today is lying, and Trump didn't say:


We won with poorly educated. I love the poorly educated,


Go to mediabiasfactcheck.com. USA Today: Factual Reporting: HIGH
Click to expand...

First, USA Today is not a reputable site. Media Bias has them left leaning.

Second, this was the Presidents full comment:

"We won the evangelicals. We won with young. We won with old. We won with highly educated. We won with poorly educated. I love the poorly educated."

Lots of people are poorly educated. Why do you hate poorly educated people? More of them are liberals than not.

You want me to post those facts?


USA Today - Media Bias/Fact Check

USA Today.jpg

Further, prior to the election they did something they had never done in their history. They wrote an editorial telling it's readers not to vote for President Trump.


Analysis / Bias

USA Today had never taken a position in a US presidential election. However, in 2016, USA Today published an editorial urging readers not to vote for Donald Trump. Further, they did not endorse Hillary Clinton either. USA Today explained its decision behind the “disendorsement” in a separate editorial titled: “Why we’re breaking tradition: Our view,” in which they explain that founder Al Neuharth in his column, described Trump in 2012, as “a clown who loves doing or saying things to get attention, no matter how ridiculous.” Essentially, they felt that this is what Al Neuharth would have wanted if he were alive. Although they did not endorse any single candidate they clearly were opposed to Donald Trump.​
 
Tangmo said:
From that you said I am a socialist. I corrected you in the matter. I am a capitalist. You however are everything I said in the post. And more.

I stated in another related post you have filled the thread with your ideological projections and boilerplate chirping about robot indoctrinated socialist progressive libruls blah blah blurp blurp. I wrote because your every post says this. Your posts accuse everyone you disagree with of being an indoctrinated robot who posts only programmed pulp. What you are doing of course is precluding debate. The how and the why is in my post which I thank you yet again for reposting. You have of course missed my points in the post while others recognize 'em and know 'em exactly and precisely.
Click to expand...

I'm trying to help him learn how to evaluate information sources so he can at least make a start at figuring out when he's being lied to. I did a bit of research and found a good site for him to start on.
 
ocean515 said:
First, USA Today is not a reputable site. Media Bias has them left leaning.
Click to expand...

Dude, you didn't go to that site about evaluating information, did you? I know because your statement above is nonsense.

Just because a site has some bias, does not mean it isn't reputable. Particularly when they're being used to confirm a quote. Hint: Factual Reporting: High.

If you're not even going to try and learn how to properly evaluate information sources, there's not much point in me wasting time trying to help you, is there?

All you have are ridiculous insults and statements that only serve to make you look ignorant:
Lots of people are poorly educated. Why do you hate poorly educated people? More of them are liberals than not.
Click to expand...

If you want to continue this conversation, you have to at least try to learn. I took the time to help you get started, it would be nice if you did your part.


Evaluating Websites | A How-To Guide for Middle-School Students
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom