• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

NY Times: Say, this Steele dossier appears to be false (and maybe was a Russian disinformation effor

They quote the NY Times... Do you have a problem with them?

When the rats start leaving a sinking ship in the last of the lifeboats, the ones left behind do a lot of cussing.
 
As usual, you're completely divorced from reality. Maybe you should try looking at the source article and reading what it actually says instead of just reading the hyperpartisan, ridiculous opinion about the source article.
 
I would suggest people actually read the NYT's pieces being referenced in the HOT AIR piece. Now there is a banner-head that is at least appropriate, HOT AIR.
 
Oh, so NOW you guys are against Russian interference? Funny how before (just today in fact) it was "they didn't influence a single vote!" One of you is spouting the wrong nonsense.

And now you're for it? :lamo
 
Why is there always enough time (verify sorce-ry) to do it right the second time round? Walked back in true times fashion...New York style! Losers.
 
I would suggest people actually read the NYT's pieces being referenced in the HOT AIR piece. Now there is a banner-head that is at least appropriate, HOT AIR.

Yeah, in the NY Times piece there really isn't anything new there and Hot Air did their usual spin.
 
The fact that we can draw a line connecting Hillary to Russians doling out dirt on Trump, which was then used to obtain a warrant to spy on his campaign? Yeah, Barr isn't going to look the other way on this.

We shall see. I will believe it when that happens, until then its just hot air.
 
Why is there always enough time (verify sorce-ry) to do it right the second time round? Walked back in true times fashion...New York style! Losers.

We shall see. I will believe it when that happens, until then its just hot air.

Why would it be inconceivable that Russia would send false information about Trump to the Clinton campaign?

I mean, the entire theory for the past couple years had been based upon how rotten, devious Putin is.
 
its time to find out who is fake news and who's not with a very much needed investigation into this stuff.

Some one best inform Sanders, oh wait, maybe not. She is not the most credible source now is she:lamo
 
The leftists and the idiots in the leftist 'news' media have taken to ignoring they ever said a single thing 'Russian Collusion'.

Must be nice to be able to wipe your memory and conscious clean at your own convenience.
The Mueller investigation was about Russian interference. Collusion was never in the mandate. Most of the collusion mentioning came from fox news and trumps Twitter.
 
If he's got nothing to hide it shouldn't matter...
Sorry im not following you. If who has nothing to hide, Trump?

My comment was speaking to the corruption that appears to be behind the investigation of Trump.

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk
 
Fake headline. The NYT does not say it is fake or may be fake, it only questions two facets.

Thread fail, article headline fail.
 
Fake headline. The NYT does not say it is fake or may be fake, it only questions two facets.

Thread fail, article headline fail.
Are you saying that you believe the content in the dossier to be accurate and/or not sourced from Russia?

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk
 
Are you saying that you believe the content in the dossier to be accurate

I do not make any claims as to the authenticity of the contents of the Steele dossier. I am simply commenting on the false headline of the HotAir article and this thread.

and/or not sourced from Russia?

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk

Of course it came from Russian sources. It was about Trump's potential contacts/communications/ties with Russians. Where else would Steele have gotten such information?
 
I do not make any claims as to the authenticity of the contents of the Steele dossier. I am simply commenting on the false headline of the HotAir article and this thread.



Of course it came from Russian sources. It was about Trump's potential contacts/communications/ties with Russians. Where else would Steele have gotten such information?
Well then, what is your issie with the headline?

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk
 
The New York Times never concluded that, please show evidence.
Now a right winger spin opinion in the right wing hotwire entertainment blog said those headlines

Straight from the NYT piece:

some of the most sensational claims in the dossier appeared to be false, and others were impossible to prove.

You know what this means for the FBI agents who used the dossier to obtain a FISA warrant, right? :lamo
 
I do not make any claims as to the authenticity of the contents of the Steele dossier. I am simply commenting on the false headline of the HotAir article and this thread.



Of course it came from Russian sources. It was about Trump's potential contacts/communications/ties with Russians. Where else would Steele have gotten such information?

The headline literally paraphrased the article. :lamo

Check it:

some of the most sensational claims in the dossier appeared to be false, and others were impossible to prove.
 
Yeah, in the NY Times piece there really isn't anything new there and Hot Air did their usual spin.

You mean, you already knew the dossier was bull****?
 
Fake headline. The NYT does not say it is fake or may be fake, it only questions two facets.

Thread fail, article headline fail.

Jesus, a good chunk of the base has been literally wetting themselves with excitement over this, and now you've gone and ruined it all. What the hell are you doing, introducing reality into the discussion? :(
 
Back
Top Bottom