• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Read All About It! NO COLLUSION... NO COLLUSION.... NO COLLUSION!

Trippy Trekker said:
While I have never faced a Federal Conspiracy charge, the State of Florida charged me with Felony Conspiracy in 1973 ... and again in 1986.

In the first case, the State dropped the charge after a judge ruled a wiretap illegal.

In the second case, I never waived my Right to Speedy Trial. At the end of 180 days, the State dropped the charge. I assume the State lacked confidence in the prospect of obtaining a conviction.

I have never had anywhere close to the resources that Team Chump has to mount a spirited defense. I conclude a prosecution team has to surmount a very high bar to win a conviction on a Conspiracy charge.
Click to expand...

trouble13 said:
Do you deny that we were told at the start of the investigation we we were told that trump and his campagin were being investigated for colluding with Russia?

Many of us have said from the begining that collusion is not a crime. Now you have in the report, mueller saying collusion is not a crime too. He makes the admission that he added to the scope of his investigation to include conspiracy.

That admission reinforces the claim that Mueller was on a fishing expedition. Stop and think about what they are admitting now.

Mueller was hired to investigate something that was not a crime. He then went on to find a crime to investigate Trump for. That is far different than saying in the course of investigating a crime we found no evidence that linked the suspect to that crime but in the course of the investigation we uncovered evidence linking the suspect to other crimes.

It sounds to me that many of the critics of this investigation were right about it from the start and its concluding almost exactly as they had predicted it would.

The only crimes being charged are process crimes and there are even very few of them overall.

Now instead of admitting their suspicions were wrong and closing this. The Democrats trying to move on from it by demanding more investigations into other aspects of his personal life in hopes of finding evidence to link him to new crimes that have not even been identified yet.

Is this the new precident we want to set for elected officals. Should they all prepare themselves for neverending criminal investigations into their lives and those associated with them now?





Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

Bruh', I understand Bradentucky mentality! Have you read as much as 10 pages of the redacted Report?
 
VanceMack said:
Its funny that after 3 years of ****ting themselves SCREAMING.... "TRUMP!!! COLLUSION!!! AAAAARRRRRRGGGGHHHHH" the idiot leftists are NOW running around claiming collusion was never the focus. WHat? Collusion? Who said anything about collusion?

:lamo

You just cant make that **** up. Its too ****ing funny.
Click to expand...
They are running from it faster than rats fleeing from a sinking ship.

It does not fly though. The question remains why was mueller investigating something they now by their own addmission admit isn't a crime.

They are unwittingly conceding that this was a fishing expedition.

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk
 
VanceMack said:
Its funny that after 3 years of ****ting themselves SCREAMING.... "TRUMP!!! COLLUSION!!! AAAAARRRRRRGGGGHHHHH" the idiot leftists are NOW running around claiming collusion was never the focus. WHat? Collusion? Who said anything about collusion?

:lamo

You just cant make that **** up. Its too ****ing funny.
Click to expand...

I love it. Trump is exposed as a completely dishonest individual, but his base sees this as a win, because Mueller chose not to prosecute a sitting POTUS.

The American POTUS is at the same level as a mafia boss they can't convict. Everyone knows they're dirty as hell, but there's not enough evidence to convict.

That is your representative, the best of Conservative values in the USA? No wonder you're world wide laughing stocks, eh.

America the laughingstock
Trump Has Made America Into A Laughingstock
The year the world laughed at U.S.
European diplomats: Trump is a 'laughing stock'
'People here think Trump is a laughingstock'
Trump is making America the laughingstock of the world


So you're right, and the world agrees: " :lamo You just cant make that **** up. Its too ****ing funny."
 
Last edited:
The primary difference is that Democrats have been using the colloquial sense of the word while republicans have been applying a legal function to it. When you understand that then you can understand why republicans and democrats have been talking past each other for the last two years.

What’s also funny that at the same time republicans have been applying a legal function to the word, they’ve been simultaneously arguing that “collusion is not a crime.”

If that confuses you, then congratulations: you’re still sane.
 
Trippy Trekker said:
Bruh', I understand Bradentucky mentality! Have you read as much as 10 pages of the redacted Report?
Click to expand...
The content of the report isn't relative to my response to your post.

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk
 
Trippy Trekker said:
While I have never faced a Federal Conspiracy charge, the State of Florida charged me with Felony Conspiracy in 1973 ... and again in 1986.

In the first case, the State dropped the charge after a judge ruled a wiretap illegal.

In the second case, I never waived my Right to Speedy Trial. At the end of 180 days, the State dropped the charge. I assume the State lacked confidence in the prospect of obtaining a conviction.

I have never had anywhere close to the resources that Team Chump has to mount a spirited defense. I conclude a prosecution team has to surmount a very high bar to win a conviction on a Conspiracy charge.
Click to expand...

JustHanging said:
Trump is their representative. He represents their morals and values.

Do you think Trump cares one wit about he or his allies breaking the law? So I think Trump wins with his base. He represents their morals, so why wouldn't he?
Click to expand...

I agree Chump has currently held on to the vast majority of his base. Losing 2 to 4% of his base, decreasing the influence of Russian interference and energizing voters who chose not or could not participate in 2016 could make the difference in 2020.

During the 2018 election cycle, Florida voted to restore voting rights to felons who have completed their sentence.

If the DEMs take Florida ... along with PA, WI and MI, Chump cannot win reelection.

I expect the details in the Mueller Report and the related ancillary investigations into the Chump operations to doom Team Chump's reelection prospects.
 
<alt>doxygen said:
Yes, that's it. The trumpies and the ruskies met multiple times to discuss their common goals. They exchanged information. tRumpie lied repeatedly about that.

I like the actual report just fine (still rereading it), but BarrTrumpWorld seems a tad upset now that the whole story has erased Barr's spin.
Click to expand...

Trippy Trekker said:
Better now? Huh?

I already explained in post #8, a prosecution team has to surmount a very high bar to win a Conspiracy conviction.

The redacted Mueller Report cast Team Chump in a very bad light. The Devil lies in the details. Chump continues to face intense scrutiny from 14 other ancillary investigations.

...
Click to expand...

"...did not establish that members of the Trump Campaign conspired or coordinated with the Russian government in its election interference activities."
Barr was exactly correct.
Anyone who says otherwise is exactly incorrect.
 
trouble13 said:
They are running from it faster than rats fleeing from a sinking ship.

It does not fly though. The question remains why was mueller investigating something they now by their own addmission admit isn't a crime.

They are unwittingly conceding that this was a fishing expedition.

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
No collusion...but OBSTRUCTION....yeah...OBSTRUCTION...THATS what we meant...even though at no time was the Special Counselor impeded and had unlimited access to manpower and resources and quit when it was obvious there was, in their own words...NO COLLUSION by the Trump team with Russia...

OBSTRUCTION!!!!

Idiot leftists will never quit.

Meanwhile...the economy continues to roar and the democrats continue to prove they are inept at governing and their candidates can only run on fabricated hatred and promises of free **** to their crippled and dependent little pets.
 
JustHanging said:
I love it. Trump is exposed as a completely dishonest individual, but his base sees this as a win, because Mueller chose not to prosecute a sitting POTUS.

The American POTUS is at the same level as a mafia boss they can't convict. Everyone knows they're dirty as hell, but there's not enough evidence to convict.

That is your representative, the best of Conservative values in the USA? No wonder you're world wide laughing stocks, eh.

America the laughingstock
Trump Has Made America Into A Laughingstock
The year the world laughed at U.S.
European diplomats: Trump is a 'laughing stock'
'People here think Trump is a laughingstock'
Trump is making America the laughingstock of the world


So you're right, and the world agrees: " :lamo You just cant make that **** up. Its too ****ing funny."
Click to expand...
The only thing that has been exposed is the legion o mindless leftist twats that have been running around shrieking their hatred for the last 3 years. Every time your "bombshells" blew up in your face you just jumped right to the next idiotic line of rhetoric hoping SOMETHING...ANYTHING would sate your sad pathetic hatred.

****, it must be MISERABLE being you.



and if you need the condensed version...



and you havent stopped for 3 years.

****ing pathetic.
 


Nothing has changed. Before the results of the unimpeded Mueller investigation...after...nothing has changed.

Idiot leftists...

:lamo

Sorry...you are just going to have to embrace your mindless hatred and a ****ing GREAT economy.
 
VanceMack said:
No collusion...but OBSTRUCTION....yeah...OBSTRUCTION...THATS what we meant...even though at no time was the Special Counselor impeded and had unlimited access to manpower and resources and quit when it was obvious there was, in their own words...NO COLLUSION by the Trump team with Russia...

OBSTRUCTION!!!!

Idiot leftists will never quit.

Meanwhile...the economy continues to roar and the democrats continue to prove they are inept at governing and their candidates can only run on fabricated hatred and promises of free **** to their crippled and dependent little pets.
Click to expand...
Yup they are trying to arguing that Trump os guility of a process crime of an investigation into a non-crime. Which is exactly what many predicted in the begining.

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk
 
I said 18 months ago that collusion would probably not get Trump, he is not smart enough to put together a conspiracy. What I did say was obstruction would be his biggest problem, he is stupid enough to do exactly that, and I was correct.
 
trouble13 said:
Maybe you will all have better luck at the next fishing hole.

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

All the guys I know gifted at catching fish make a point of not sharing their fishing holes.
 
Trippy Trekker said:
....Chump and many of his Trumpanzees......
Click to expand...


.....are all superior to you.

The Mueller report makes it clear that the Russian interference failure was Obama's & Obama's alone. He was the commander in chief!

You simply can't read the Mueller report & conclude anything other than Barack Obama spectacularly failed America.

Democrats cannot win on the issues, they cannot win on the record of accomplishments under this president, and they cannot win on the economy that continues to sizzle.

D4nHO6MWAAAa-zZ.jpg
 
KAG2020 said:
.....are all superior...
The Mueller report makes it clear that the Russian interference..... He was the commander in chief!
You simply can't read the Mueller report....
Democrats cannot win on the issues, they cannot win on the record of accomplishments under this president, and they cannot win on the economy that continues to sizzle. ...
Click to expand...

Keep fooling yourself! The DEMs took back the House in 2018! The Mueller Report bodes massive trouble ahead for the king of scum!

NakedChump.jpg
 
Trippy Trekker said:
Keep fooling yourself! The DEMs took back the House in 2018! The Mueller Report bodes massive trouble ahead for the king of scum!

View attachment 67255474
Click to expand...

Why do you obsess so about Trumps penis? You should probably keep your weird fantasies to yourself. Not judging you though.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
bubbabgone said:
"...did not establish that members of the Trump Campaign conspired or coordinated with the Russian government in its election interference activities."
Barr was exactly correct.
Anyone who says otherwise is exactly incorrect.
Click to expand...

Go with that. It works in the tRumpOsphere.
 
VanceMack said:
Why do you obsess so about Trumps penis? You should probably keep your weird fantasies to yourself. Not judging you though.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

Your post reveals more about you than me. Before that post, outside of some anger issues, it never occurred to me.

How do you feel about Mayor Pete? I hope his campaign continues to gain momentum!
 
Mycroft said:
Perhaps you can tell me who did something wrong.

If you can do that, then perhaps Rosenstein appointed the wrong person to be special counsel, eh?
Click to expand...

How many times in the report does it say “did not identify evidence” or “the evidence was not sufficient to support criminal charges.“ ??
Do you really think that’s the same thing as saying “there was absolutely no wrong-doing”????
 
pinqy said:
How many times in the report does it say “did not identify evidence” or “the evidence was not sufficient to support criminal charges.“ ??
Do you really think that’s the same thing as saying “there was absolutely no wrong-doing”????
Click to expand...

So...you cannot tell me who did something wrong. Okay.

Moving on...
 
Trippy Trekker said:
Your post reveals more about you than me. Before that post, outside of some anger issues, it never occurred to me.

How do you feel about Mayor Pete? I hope his campaign continues to gain momentum!
Click to expand...
:lmao

nice attempt at a dodge. its you lot that seem to be penis obsessed. Strange group, you leftists. And you sort of drive the point home by next targeting the openly gay candidate in the race.

Seriously...you guys got some issues.
 
VanceMack said:
Why do you obsess so about Trumps penis? You should probably keep your weird fantasies to yourself. Not judging you though.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

I don't see a penis anywhere in that picture. You sure you know what one looks like?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom