• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Democrats - Murderers of Children

It's a form of insanity, as Mr. Shapiro points out--that ten centimeters between the inside of the birth canal and out should decide for some whether killing an infant is acceptable or unconscionable.

I don't profess to understand it.

At this point in time, the best any of us can do is impress upon every woman as well as every man unwilling to support a woman he's impregnated the enormity of the act they're committing. That they are in fact sacrificing their children and offspring. Some may hear and understand.

We can't hate these people. They're deceived. They've been raised their entire lives in a society that worships the self, even to the point of child sacrifice. We need to love them, admonish them, entreat them, work with them to change their hearts and minds, in spite of this great evil.

Judgment is left to God, Who knows the heart, to Judge whom He will and forgive whom He will. Our job is to instruct, admonish, remove temptation, and lead by example, without malice or hypocrisy.

Sure thing. I don't think we should waste another minute worrying about women's rights and abortion and focus on the real important stuff like taking away children, even infants from their mothers and lock them up in secure cages or plop them in the desert in 'containment detention camps' made out of tents. Or maybe we should really concentrate on burning down the churches of black people or worry about what to do with the American Muslim population, it's a problem ya know?
 
Wow

You Righties really would like a one party State, freaking scary !!
 
John 8:44

While I am not a bible thumper, I damn well know that has nothing to do with the Democratic Party.

Try again
 
While I am not a bible thumper, I damn well know that has nothing to do with the Democratic Party.

Try again

I was hoping for a Christian-hating fascist (so much fun), but he's calling the devil the father of Dems.
 
I was hoping for a Christian-hating fascist (so much fun), but he's calling the devil the father of Dems.

I sort of guessed that. idiotic claim
 
I sort of guessed that. idiotic claim

If he was calling Jesus the father of Dems in a disparaging militant atheist sorta way, man, that woulda been fun. Moralist authoritarianism without even a mythical attempt at rationalization. But he's just garden variety Christian-moralizing.
 
Firast this:

Dems Defend Infanticide
Senate Democrats block bill to keep newborns alive
Dems Defend Infanticide

Now this:

Senate vote on abortion legislation fails to advance measure
Senate vote on abortion legislation fails to advance measure

The bill fell short on a procedural vote, 53-44, despite lobbying efforts by anti-abortion groups and support from President Donald Trump. Sixty votes were required to proceed on the measure.
The vote came after Democrats have pursued legislation on the state level to increase access to abortion during the later stages of pregnancy.

Why are Democrats Baby-Murderers

Gosh, a hyperbolic and stupid post, imagine...
 
Gosh, a hyperbolic and stupid post, imagine...

As a suggestion......instead of grading posts like the OP on functionality, start grading it on how over the top they appear to be trying to be.

It at least adds SOMETHING worthwhile to the experience....otherwise all you end up is sad.
 
Firast this:

Dems Defend Infanticide
Senate Democrats block bill to keep newborns alive
Dems Defend Infanticide

Now this:

Senate vote on abortion legislation fails to advance measure
Senate vote on abortion legislation fails to advance measure

The bill fell short on a procedural vote, 53-44, despite lobbying efforts by anti-abortion groups and support from President Donald Trump. Sixty votes were required to proceed on the measure.
The vote came after Democrats have pursued legislation on the state level to increase access to abortion during the later stages of pregnancy.

Why are Democrats Baby-Murderers

Unbelievable...
The lowly liberal/Demo keeps stooping lower and lower week by week. Now they attempting to past measures legalizing killing babies. They forget November 2020 is just around the corner. The lowly liberal/Demos are making it too easy for our President Trump to have four more years.
 
Wow, talk about a click-bait title "democrats, murderers of children'. I think you've just won the 'most ignorant of 2019' thread of the year prize with this thread starter.

There has been a campaign of late to retire the award to perpetuity. The scary part is that I am sure other contestants are back under their rocks trying to come up with competitive offerings.

IMO, if the moderators and administrators don't take note they will drive actual discussion and/or debate right off the site and it will become another site owned by the circle jerkers.
 
Firast this:

Dems Defend Infanticide
Senate Democrats block bill to keep newborns alive
Dems Defend Infanticide

Now this:

Senate vote on abortion legislation fails to advance measure
Senate vote on abortion legislation fails to advance measure

The bill fell short on a procedural vote, 53-44, despite lobbying efforts by anti-abortion groups and support from President Donald Trump. Sixty votes were required to proceed on the measure.
The vote came after Democrats have pursued legislation on the state level to increase access to abortion during the later stages of pregnancy.

Why are Democrats Baby-Murderers

Lying partisan garbage thread promoting despicable right wing political stunt.
The unlawful killing of a person is murder, which is already a crime. Also, as has been pointed out in another post, there is already a law on the books protecting newborns.
Born-Alive Infants Protection Act of 2002 - Wikisource, the free online library
 
Unbelievable...
The lowly liberal/Demo keeps stooping lower and lower week by week. Now they attempting to past measures legalizing killing babies. They forget November 2020 is just around the corner. The lowly liberal/Demos are making it too easy for our President Trump to have four more years.
Uninformed right wing drivel. Like Trump, you don’t know what you’re talking about.
 
There has been a campaign of late to retire the award to perpetuity. The scary part is that I am sure other contestants are back under their rocks trying to come up with competitive offerings.

IMO, if the moderators and administrators don't take note they will drive actual discussion and/or debate right off the site and it will become another site owned by the circle jerkers.

i was actually admonished for personally insulting someone nearly of OPs caliber the other day. yet, these threads are allowed to exist at all. they're almost literally hatespeech at this point. certainly libel or slander, whichever one you use for writing on the Internet.

i don't know if they're not aware that crazy conservatives have been sending bombs and **** to Dems and other people that Trump dislikes, or if they are just okay with it, but given our current climate, calling people baby killers is really not good. all of this fear and hate mongering, all of the blatant lies. it's insane.
 
Firast this:

Dems Defend Infanticide
Senate Democrats block bill to keep newborns alive
Dems Defend Infanticide

Now this:

Senate vote on abortion legislation fails to advance measure
Senate vote on abortion legislation fails to advance measure

The bill fell short on a procedural vote, 53-44, despite lobbying efforts by anti-abortion groups and support from President Donald Trump. Sixty votes were required to proceed on the measure.
The vote came after Democrats have pursued legislation on the state level to increase access to abortion during the later stages of pregnancy.

Why are Democrats Baby-Murderers

Murdering babies is illegal. Nobody is trying to change that. Good grief.
 
Firast this:

Dems Defend Infanticide
Senate Democrats block bill to keep newborns alive
Dems Defend Infanticide

Now this:

Senate vote on abortion legislation fails to advance measure
Senate vote on abortion legislation fails to advance measure

The bill fell short on a procedural vote, 53-44, despite lobbying efforts by anti-abortion groups and support from President Donald Trump. Sixty votes were required to proceed on the measure.
The vote came after Democrats have pursued legislation on the state level to increase access to abortion during the later stages of pregnancy.

Why are Democrats Baby-Murderers

These types of OP's that bring misinformation to surface should be exposed for the bias they promote. How can any intelligent, or even self-thinking person not look at the truth of what is discussed and believe a statement that says Democrats are baby-murderers. Pure unadulterated garbage.

Here is the truth:

But the disinformation campaign about “late-term abortion” — a term that obstetrician-gynecologists say is “medically inaccurate” and has “no clinical meaning” — is on another level.

More than 60 percent of Americans support the 1973 Roe v. Wade Supreme Court decision that protects a woman’s right to make her own health care decisions, in consultation with her doctor and in private. Only 13 percent support access to abortion after 21 weeks. This is largely based on conflicts over when “life” begins, making it of crucial importance that we have a standard defined by science and not by false rumors.

It’s important for the public to know that only 1.3 percent of abortions in the United States occur after 21 weeks, and fewer than 1 percent after 24 weeks. It’s not a procedure that’s performed except in extraordinary circumstances.

The Supreme Court revisited the question of abortion in Planned Parenthood v. Casey in 1992. Because of that case, abortions can be permitted in the third trimester, but only for medical emergencies that threaten the life of the mother. The court defined “medical emergency” as: “…(t)hat condition, which, on the basis of the physician’s good-faith clinical judgment, so complicates the medical condition of a pregnant woman so as to necessitate the immediate abortion of her pregnancy to avert her death, or for which a delay will create serious risk of substantial and irreversible impairment of a major bodily function.”

The uproar over late-term abortion rights was provoked by the statements, and then the actions, of Virginia Gov. Ralph Northam. His refusal to clarify his comments have left us to speculate about the horrors of the “new” law. The bill in question wouldn’t have changed the number of weeks that a woman can have an abortion, only the number of doctors who need to sign off on the procedure.

It also needs to be mentioned that it is illegal for the mother to have an abortion after the 20th week without it being necessary to protect the mothers life. In this case, the decision for an abortion to occur is done by the doctors involved and not by the mother or politicians.

The earliest premature baby was born at 21 weeks and that is why it is presently illegal to have an abortion after 20 weeks. As such, this discussion is pure biased garbage.
 
Why are Democrats Baby-Murderers


You know, friend, everyone is being very tough on you, and I think it's unfair. Clearly you're just suffering a little from misunderstanding. I think the following will prove very helpful to you for future posts - this was a really good one, it just missed the mark a little, in terms of demonstrating you know the first thing about what you're talking about. Please observe the following, paying special attention to the differences:


ba·by

/ˈbābē/

noun

noun: baby; plural noun: babies

1. a very young child, especially one newly or recently born.
"his wife's just had a baby"

synonyms: infant, newborn, child, tot, little one; More



fe·tus

/ˈfēdəs/

noun

noun: fetus; plural noun: fetuses; noun: foetus; plural noun: foetuses

an unborn offspring of a mammal, in particular an unborn human baby more than eight weeks after conception.

synonyms: embryo, fertilized egg, unborn baby, unborn child


So, rather than Baby Murderers, I think you wanted to say Fetus Murderers. Except Fetus Murder isn't really "murder", because of the following:

mur·der

/ˈmərdər/

noun

noun: murder; plural noun: murders

1. the unlawful premeditated killing of one human being by another.
"the stabbing murder of an off-Broadway producer"

•informal
a very difficult or unpleasant task or experience.
"my first job at the steel mill was murder"

verb

verb: murder; 3rd person present: murders; past tense: murdered; past participle: murdered; gerund or present participle: murdering

1. kill (someone) unlawfully and with premeditation.
"somebody tried to murder Joe"

Given that abortion is legal, it can't be murder.

So, maybe what you meant to say was "Democrats are not breaking the law, and therefore are law abiding citizens in this topic, so I should probably mind my own ****ing business, and let people mind theirs, within the context of the law, and not make a difficult decision for everyone into a cheap partisan dig...because that's gross".

Maybe? :) Just a little? C'mon....
 
Anyone else notice that the OP has run off, if there an example of Trolling this BS thread is a good one.
 
Republican- the most dishonest idiots

Sorry, as usual, right wingers have to make stuff up instead of argue what is actually being said. it's not about killing a born child, but the doctor not being forced to provide extraordinary measure for a kid who has no quality of life, no chance of longterm survival, and would be suffering.

I know many religious people worship an asshole that loves his people suffering and being tortured, but the rest of use don't have to follow that
 
It's a form of insanity, as Mr. Shapiro points out--that ten centimeters between the inside of the birth canal and out should decide for some whether killing an infant is acceptable or unconscionable.

I don't profess to understand it.

At this point in time, the best any of us can do is impress upon every woman as well as every man unwilling to support a woman he's impregnated the enormity of the act they're committing. That they are in fact sacrificing their children and offspring. Some may hear and understand.

We can't hate these people. They're deceived. They've been raised their entire lives in a society that worships the self, even to the point of child sacrifice. We need to love them, admonish them, entreat them, work with them to change their hearts and minds, in spite of this great evil.

Judgment is left to God, Who knows the heart, to Judge whom He will and forgive whom He will. Our job is to instruct, admonish, remove temptation, and lead by example, without malice or hypocrisy.

There is no 'god'. We, humans, invented them when we were too primitive to understand the world around us; hence sacrifices to appease them if something went wrong that we couldn't figure out why. Religion is coercive nonsense seasoned with a large dose of bribery.
 
Last edited:
Sure thing. I don't think we should waste another minute worrying about women's rights and abortion and focus on the real important stuff like taking away children, even infants from their mothers and lock them up in secure cages or plop them in the desert in 'containment detention camps' made out of tents. Or maybe we should really concentrate on burning down the churches of black people or worry about what to do with the American Muslim population, it's a problem ya know?
What do any of these things have to do with infanticide?

Am I burning down churches, or supporting people who do?

Are children being slain in detention camps?

Are the children of Muslim couples being slain?

What other evil even beings to approach this? And if some evil did compare, would their mutual existence make either one any less evil?

As Mr. Shapiro says, when the child is just a few cells and nine months of pregnancy loom, although I deplore the decision, I can at least comprehend how a couple can rationalize, "It's not a child; it's just a few cells. Nine months of pregnancy will be difficult. Best to be rid of it." But to violently put to death a fully-formed baby, inches away from living, breathing, crying? And the term of pregnancy nearly complete? How can any parent, doctor, or lawmaker live with such innocent blood on their hands? How can such an act be rationalized, legal or not?

It must be a form of panic or temporary insanity. As worshipful of the self as our society is, I refuse to believe that any parent of sound mind can sanely, rationally weigh their comfort and aspirations against the life of their child and conclude that the former is more valuable. They must panic, act in a state of panic, and subsequently force the issue out of their minds.

It seems to me, therefore, that we ought to do as much as possible to lessen that state of panic. Emphasize the joys and incredible rewards of parenthood. Emphasize the value of children and the life of the child. Put things into proper perspective. If we can agree on nothing else, surely we can agree on this one thing.
 
Back
Top Bottom