• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

The Barr Cover Up

hanger4 said:
Why do you believe you're privileged to review/read grand jury matters and compromising intelligence.
Click to expand...

Did anyone say that?

CONGRESS has that right (and duty) and that ability and they did so in Watergate and other cases as well.
 
Lesh said:
Did anyone say that?

CONGRESS has that right (and duty) and that ability and they did so in Watergate and other cases as well.
Click to expand...

They sure do, once it has been redacted. There is absolutely nothing stopping Nadler and Schiff from doing their own investigation. They should probably get moving on it...
 
Lesh said:
Did anyone say that?

CONGRESS has that right (and duty) and that ability and they did so in Watergate and other cases as well.
Click to expand...

Helix certainly alluded to such;

Helix said:
nothing to hide, nothing to fear, right? that's what they told me when i didn't like the "patriot" act, at least.
Click to expand...

Watergate was a simple break in being investigated not a counter intelligence investigation. Apples to oranges lesh.
 
calamity said:
lol...that "tard" knows a lot more than all the Right Wingers on this site combined, and then some. Of course, that is not saying much. But there is a reason the basement dweller has 200k followers, many of them top journalists.
Click to expand...

th


And from that this thread was born.
 
bubbabgone said:
th


And from that this thread was born.
Click to expand...

Well, considering she is a freelance reporter who gets published in places like WaPo, I can see where you would mock it. But, then again, you probably believe Trump when he says noise causes cancer. :roll:
 
Lesh said:
Then you have your eyes shut. What Schiff pointed out is what is in the public record. He is saying and I believe...that there is much more in the Report that we need to see
Click to expand...

We can all look at the report when It's released. Realize that mueller was consulted before Barr released his summary, and Barr and Rosenstein are working with Mueller to accomplish the required redactions. Mueller would certainly have voiced any objection to Barr's summary if he had one.

Y'all are just terminally pissed that justice isn't always a partisan exercise, and this is one instance of that.
 
calamity said:
Well, considering she is a freelance reporter who gets published in places like WaPo, I can see where you would mock it. But, then again, you probably believe Trump when he says noise causes cancer. :roll:
Click to expand...

"freelance" meaning WAPO will print it in the "letters from readers" section so they don't have to pay her?
Who is this famous anonymous journalist?
 
Mr Person said:
Mueller's team prepared the report with summaries in their own words. Why should anyone accept a Trump appointee's summary?

You're lying to a shrinking choir.
Click to expand...

Exactly, if the Mueller team provided summaries, why didn't we see those summaries?

Trump supporters are the kind of citizens that kill democracy. As long as it's their guy in office they don't care what he does.
 
SonOfDaedalus said:
Exactly, if the Mueller team provided summaries, why didn't we see those summaries?

Trump supporters are the kind of citizens that kill democracy. As long as it's their guy in office they don't care what he does.
Click to expand...

As noted in the news, every page of those summaries were flagged as containing classified information.
 
SonOfDaedalus said:
Exactly, if the Mueller team provided summaries, why didn't we see those summaries?

Trump supporters are the kind of citizens that kill democracy. As long as it's their guy in office they don't care what he does.
Click to expand...

The summaries also contained information that could not legally be released.
 
bubbabgone said:
As noted in the news, every page of those summaries were flagged as containing classified information.
Click to expand...

lol...and you believe that, I am sure. Oh, "noise from windmills will give you cancer." Do you believe that too?

"Immigrants are animals." Do you believe that as well?

"Mexico will pay for the wall." Are you still waiting?

:roll:
 
humbolt said:
We can all look at the report when It's released. Realize that mueller was consulted before Barr released his summary, and Barr and Rosenstein are working with Mueller to accomplish the required redactions. Mueller would certainly have voiced any objection to Barr's summary if he had one.

Y'all are just terminally pissed that justice isn't always a partisan exercise, and this is one instance of that.
Click to expand...

But they won't give up as long as Schiff keeps insisting he knows things Mueller doesn't.
Speaking of Schiff, have you ever seen them in the same room together? heh? Just sayin'.
schiff latka.jpg
th
 
calamity said:
lol...and you believe that, I am sure. Oh, "noise from windmills will give you cancer." Do you believe that too?

"Immigrants are animals." Do you believe that as well?

"Mexico will pay for the wall." Are you still waiting?

:roll:
Click to expand...

Well, it came from the NY TIMES. Perhaps though you find Fox News more reputable.
 
A whole bunch of triggered folks here all about a misplaced word.
Barr didn't lie he gave his opinion and we all know opinions are like assholes everyone has one.
Our whole justice system is based on peoples opinions....now you see the problem.
I see Trump as a gift that keeps giving....lots of changes coming I don't think those on the right will be happy for the next 20 years be prepared everyone for the backlash. Don't fall asleep again!
 
Athanasius68 said:
Well, it came from the NY TIMES. Perhaps though you find Fox News more reputable.
Click to expand...

Ignorant people hate the NYT. Smart people see Fox for what it is.
 
hanger4 said:
Why do you believe you're privileged to review/read grand jury matters and compromising intelligence.
Click to expand...

ah, that route. why are you afraid of the "exoneration" report's release?
 
hanger4 said:
Helix certainly alluded to such;



Watergate was a simple break in being investigated not a counter intelligence investigation. Apples to oranges lesh.
Click to expand...

let's see the report!
 
calamity said:
Ignorant people hate the NYT. Smart people see Fox for what it is.
Click to expand...

Then what are you getting bent out of shape about? It is the TIMES, not Trump, who is saying this.
 
Helix said:
ah, that route. why are you afraid of the "exoneration" report's release?
Click to expand...

Typical evasive answer. That route is law Congress passed, why not ask Congress ??
 
Before the Trumpets expend more bodily fluids in another premature ejaculation we should get something straight regarding Grand Jury Testimony and what the House can or can't see.

It takes a Court Order to release Grand Jury Testimony (meaning direct quotes from Grand Jury Testimony) to the House. That is entirely possible and would be supported by precedent though a full SC fight would take time. However, the Mueller team can comment on, opine on, offer material conclusions in its Report for consideration till doomsday regarding Grand Jury Testimony and all of that would be available to the House Committees without Court Order. A Barr contention otherwise would be as absurd as what he has offered so far.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom