• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

I Wrote an Article Suggesting Trump Was Compromised by Russia. I Was Right.

hanger4 said:
*asking Wikileaks to find 30,000 emails of HRC. Which, coincidentally they complied with the request the very next day*

Ooooooh FFS HumblePi, Trump never asked Russia (not WikiLeaks) anything, he said "if you find" and WikiLeaks didn't comply, WikiLeaks published DNC emails not HRC's deleted 30k emails. Geebus.
Click to expand...

Yep, we still haven't seen Hill's emails.
 
OscarLevant said:
Congress is not going to "make **** up". No one can be indicted or impeached without evidence.


Quit projecting.
Click to expand...

Schiff does. Where is his evidence of collusion? Mueller couldn't find any, but we're supposed to believe balloon head Schiff has some? I'm sorry. Schiff couldn't find his own ass with a map.
 
hanger4 said:
*asking Wikileaks to find 30,000 emails of HRC. Which, coincidentally they complied with the request the very next day*

Ooooooh FFS HumblePi, Trump never asked Russia (not WikiLeaks) anything, he said "if you find" and WikiLeaks didn't comply, WikiLeaks published DNC emails not HRC's deleted 30k emails. Geebus.
Click to expand...

The type of stolen documents released the next day by Wikileaks is a moot point, the fact that they complied with the request IS the point.
 
HumblePi said:
Trump knew what Russia was doing, giving them a green light to interfere in the election by asking Wikileaks to find 30,000 emails of HRC. Which, coincidentally they complied with the request the very next day. By looking the other way, he knew he couldn't be directly accused of collusion but he most certain aided and abetted the Russians, and in so doing he's as guilty as Manafort is. The interference by Russia wasn't something that people would just wake up one day and think 'oh my God, they were right, this country has suffered at the hands of Russia interference'. It was a slower revelation that, as time went on, some starting to peek over that edge and begin to ask themselves the honest questions.

There's three things the Kremlin wanted. They wanted Hillary to lose, they wanted to damage our democracy and they wanted to undermine people's faith in our system.

Done.
Click to expand...

BTW HumblePi, DCLEAKS published the DNC emails in June and July 2016 before WikiLeaks July 22, 2016. Just so you know.
 
HumblePi said:
The type of stolen documents released the next day by Wikileaks is a moot point, the fact that they complied with the request IS the point.
Click to expand...

But they didn't publish HRC's deleted 30k emails HumblePi and Trump didn't ask WikiLeaks, Trump didn't ask anybody to hack, he said "Russia if you find".
 
JacksinPA said:
My Article Saying Trump Was Compromised by Russia Was Right

Robert Mueller’s failure to establish a criminal conspiracy between Donald Trump and the Russian government has set off a wave of revisionist attacks from both the right and the far left. Even though the full details of Mueller’s report remain secret, Trump’s defenders insist that it has negated not only the wild hopes that Trump might be removed from his job through prosecutorial means but over two years’ worth of reporting on his suspect relations with Moscow.

I am not a reporter and have not broken any of the stories Trump’s defenders are now trying to discredit. But I did write a long feature last summer tying together the body of reporting as it stood at the time into a narrative exploring the Trump-Russia relationship. That story placed me among Trump’s targets for revenge.
================================================
This investigative reporter made a convincing case that Trump had been compromised by Putin some time ago & all the revelations so far have only proven him to have been correct.
Click to expand...

Uh-huh. With his own madeup bull****. Some "case".
 
HumblePi said:
I'm so glad you asked. Here's the link to Wikileaks itself and you can search them all day to your delight if you wish. Enjoy.

clinton-emails
Click to expand...

WikiLeaks didn't publish nor do they have HRC's 30k deleted emails. The emails published were DNC emails, DCLEAKS published first then WikiLeaks.
 
Mycroft said:
"not evidence sufficient for prosecution of conspiracy"

Where on earth did you get this from? Certainly not from Barr's letter to Congress, where he said this:

"The Special Counsel’s investigation did not find that the Trump campaign or anyone associated with it conspired or coordinated with Russia in its efforts to influence the 2016 U.S. presidential election. As the report states: “[T]he investigation did not establish that members of the Trump Campaign conspired or coordinated with the Russian government in its election interference activities.”
Click to expand...

That still leaves the possibility that trump was compromised against his will. Which is really no better for us Americans than if the president did so willingly.

If we just go by the summery of the Mueller report by Barr, he does not clear the President of many things that could get a president impeached. You are just making excuses for a politician that you like. my position is that I hate and do not trust all politicians, all of them. This president that we have right now is one of the slimmiest politicians sense Bill Clinton.
 
JacksinPA said:
Did you even bother to READ the article? I did not write it, nor claim to have done so. The writer writes in the first person. I write about him in the third person. Do you remember that part in school, or were you out that week?
Click to expand...

Did you or did you not write this?
This investigative reporter made a convincing case that Trump had been compromised by Putin some time ago & all the revelations so far have only proven him to have been correct.
Click to expand...

That's what I was referring to. :)


Tim-
 
OscarLevant said:
Congress is not going to "make **** up". No one can be indicted or impeached without evidence.


Quit projecting.
Click to expand...

Well then, Trump won't get impeached, will he?

Too bad, eh?
 
FreedomFromAll said:
That still leaves the possibility that trump was compromised against his will. Which is really no better for us Americans than if the president did so willingly.

If we just go by the summery of the Mueller report by Barr, he does not clear the President of many things that could get a president impeached. You are just making excuses for a politician that you like. my position is that I hate and do not trust all politicians, all of them. This president that we have right now is one of the slimmiest politicians sense Bill Clinton.
Click to expand...

"against his will"?

Yeah...that's what I mean by "making **** up".
 
Mycroft said:
"against his will"?

Yeah...that's what I mean by "making **** up".
Click to expand...

Please show in that summery where it exonerates Trump of being taken advantage of by Russia? It doesn't and that is why the summery isnt enough.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom