• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Nadler, calling for full Mueller report had different view when Bill Clinton was investigated

have Nadler speaking out of both sides of his mouth.


And I have the LAWS regarding the release of the Special Counsel report...that NADLER NOW WANTS INGNORED:


The DOJ’s regulations also dictate what happens at the conclusion of a special counsel investigation, which is where we are now. Pursuant to 28 CFR § 600.8: “At the conclusion of the Special Counsel’s work, he or she shall provide the Attorney General with a confidential report explaining the prosecution or declination decisions reached by the Special Counsel.” The counsel’s report is to be “handled as a confidential document as are internal documents relating to any federal criminal investigation.”

The attorney general also has an obligation to share the special counsel’s findings with Congress, although there is no duty to disclose the full report. Under 28 CFR § 600.9(a)(3), the attorney general must provide to the chairs and ranking minority members of the House and Senate Judiciary Committees, “to the extent consistent with applicable law, a description and explanation of instances (if any) in which the Attorney General concluded that a proposed action by a Special Counsel was so inappropriate or unwarranted under established Departmental practices that it should not be pursued.” According to Barr, “There were no such instances during the Special Counsel’s investigation.”


Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s Report: What Does the Law Say? | Observer




Rule 6e



Grand Jury Secrecy Rules, Rule 6(e) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure



Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s Report: What Does the Law Say? | Observer

You are not addressing my question. I asked if Nadler is calling for a public release of the Mueller report. I know some members of congress are, just not sure Nadler is. Read the article you linked if you don't understand what I am talking about here.
 
lmfao that's a mighty huge distinction you made there

sure showed me

Yes it is a huge distinction that I suspect completely escapes you.
 
There is absolutely nothing shocking about any of this. Nadler like most of the idiot leftists are nothing more than piece of **** hypocrites, proved not by my accusation but their own actions.
 
And where is GRAHAM calling for the LAW TO BE IGNORED in regards to a Special Counsel report release?


Yet , ANOTHER DESPERATE , DP LEFT DEFLECTION ATTEMPT.



Hypocrisy is hypocrisy, and if you want to get into a hypocrisy pissing contest, right vs left, bring it on.
 
Hypocrisy is hypocrisy, and if you want to get into a hypocrisy pissing contest, right vs left, bring it on.

Care to address the SPECIFIC TOPIC OF THE THREAD?
 
Nadler is a partisan hack. Nothing more need be said, and his pronouncements should be viewed in that light.

Partisanship aside...his outlandish HYPORCRICY (ignored by the complicit Fake News/Lying Left, natch' ), as he besmirches the USAG for doing his job according to the law, is the focus of today's dart throwing disdain or Widdo Jewwy...
 
No but the article you cited came from one.

The LAW I CITED didn't .


I love how anything not LEFT LIES is a "right wing rag"....

THE LAW SAYS WHAT THE LAW SAYS, and the FLAMING HYPOCRITE NADLER wants the USAG to IGNORE THE LAW.
 
The LAW I CITED didn't .


I love how anything not LEFT LIES is a "right wing rag"....

THE LAW SAYS WHAT THE LAW SAYS, and the FLAMING HYPOCRITE NADLER wants the USAG to IGNORE THE LAW.

Yeah well what I'm hearing from "reliable" new sources is the AG may just have to give up the full report to Congress. We'll see … won't we.
 
Back
Top Bottom