• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

What no one is mentioning about the Mueller Report to still protect Hilary Clinton

hanger4 said:
I suggest you familiarize yourself with the definition of exonerate;

1) absolve (someone) from blame for a fault or wrongdoing, especially after due consideration of the case.
Click to expand...

Well, did Mueller exonerate Trump? To read the posts on here, he did. But Mueller didn't exonerate him in his report, according to what I've read. He just said that no more indictments were coming. and that he found no Trump-Russia conspiracy. That's what happened with Clinton too. No indictments.
 
tres borrachos said:
So Lynch effectively exonerated Clinton. Just like Mueller effectively exonerated Trump by issuing no indictments.

Consistency, you know. I gather that's hard for you to grasp?
Click to expand...

Mueller issued a full report on the results of his "high profile" investigation - Lynch did not.

Consistency, you know. I gather that's hard for you to grasp? ;)
 
joko104 said:
No one is mentioning that the Mueller report found that Hilary Clinton's "recklessness" and violating national security laws with an unsecure server resulted in Russia hacking her email account, which according to Comey had national security secrets. Her violation of law resulting in Russia (and who knows who else) learning American national security secrets.

Hilary Clinton violating federal law put national security secrets into the hands of Russia. That is huge, yet no one mentions that fact. Why? To keep protecting Hilary Clinton?
Click to expand...

You forgot to mention that Trump uses and unsecured IPhone to talk to his friends and confidants and it is being monitored by Russia and China!
 
Neither the FBI or DOJ "exonerated" Hilary Clinton. Comey declared she is a liar, was reckless with national security secrets and had broken the protocols for national security secrets. He did explain she is too powerful and rich to prosecute, but his condemnations were anything but an exoneration.
 
joko104 said:
Ah, another Democrat claiming both former FBI Director Comey and Mueller are lying. Both said Russia (and Comey said numerous other adversarial foreign governments) learned national security secrets from Hilary Clinton.

At the same time, Bill Clinton was personally given half a million dollars from Russians and over $100 million Russian money went into the Clinton foundation.

That virtually no Democrat cares about that means that virtually no Democrat really cares about Russia, collusion or Russia's involvement in our political system. Rather, it is 100% partisan fake outrage.
Click to expand...

Please share a link with all of us where we can read Mueller's claim that Russia learned national secrets from Clinton. Was it in his report? You'd be the only poster who has an advanced copy. Please share with us.
 
Napoleon said:
Which is an important distinction since the statute in question has only ever been used to prosecute people who A) take classified material they are not authorized to be in possession of with the intention of B) sharing that material with others who are not authorized to see it. Neither of which Clinton is guilty of and her setup was certainly more secure than anything her predecessors had.
Click to expand...

Name anything secure about her "setup."
 
joko104 said:
Neither the FBI or DOJ "exonerated" Hilary Clinton. Comey declared she is a liar, was reckless with national security secrets and had broken the protocols for national security secrets. He did explain she is too powerful and rich to prosecute, but his condemnations were anything but an exoneration.
Click to expand...

More like explaining to a judge that you’re re-interpreting a criminal statute for the sole purpose of prosecuting Hillary Clinton would get you laughed out of a court room.
 
ttwtt78640 said:
Mueller issued a full report on the results of his "high profile" investigation - Lynch did not.

Consistency, you know. I gather that's hard for you to grasp? ;)
Click to expand...

So did Lynch indict Clinton or not? The Mueller report issued no further indictments, and as a result, I'm reading that he completely exonerated him. Are those posters all lying? I am consistent. If no indictments means complete exoneration, I'm consistent.

Is that hard for you to grasp?
 
tres borrachos said:
Unfortunately not yet. I wish they'd release it. Not that I want to read 485 pages but I would.
Click to expand...

They probably can't release it immediately due to various reasons, so they will probably have to sift through it and redact a bunch before it comes out.
 
tres borrachos said:
So did Lynch indict Clinton or not? The Mueller report issued no further indictments, and as a result, I'm reading that he completely exonerated him. Are those posters all lying? I am consistent. If no indictments means complete exoneration, I'm consistent.

Is that hard for you to grasp?
Click to expand...

What is clear is that you are avoiding the stunning silence from Lynch on the Hillary Email "matter".
 
ttwtt78640 said:
What is clear is that you are avoiding the stunning silence from Lynch on the Hillary Email "matter".
Click to expand...

I'm going by the posts on this board. No indictments equals exoneration. Once again, are those posters lying or not?
 
Napoleon said:
More like explaining to a judge that you’re re-interpreting a criminal statute for the sole purpose of prosecuting Hillary Clinton would get you laughed out of a court room.
Click to expand...

You do not understand the difference between something being provably illegal and being immoral or incompetent, do you? Actually, the fact is that Comey changed the wording of his report to preclude criminal prosecution. However, Comey had no authority whatsoever to even decide whether prosecution was called for or not.
 
Napoleon said:
A private server is more secure than those used by her predecessors - which were typically servers owned by companies like AOL.
Click to expand...

Have anything to back that claim up?
 
tres borrachos said:
I'm going by the posts on this board. No indictments equals exoneration. Once again, are those posters lying or not?
Click to expand...

Nope, announcing that the investigation has been completed and issuing a report/statement to that effect equals exoneration. Using the "no indictment" standard then Trump was exonerated by Mueller every day.
 
joko104 said:
You do not understand the difference between something being provably illegal and being immoral or incompetent, do you? Actually, the fact is that Comey changed the wording of his report to preclude criminal prosecution. However, Comey had no authority whatsoever to even decide whether prosecution was called for or not.
Click to expand...

I understand that nobody cared what a Secretary of State did via email until the GOP’s love of schaudenfreude involving the Clintons made you all lose your minds. I also understand that we don’t re-interperate criminal statues to apply to specific individuals. There was no legal case to be made against Hillary Clinton.
 
OrphanSlug said:
Do we even know enough about what was really in the report to draw these conclusions?
Click to expand...
We know that Joko's post is a lie, since nothing Mueller has ever filed said Russia hacked Clinton's personal server. We also know (if memory serves) Clinton's personal server was not operational at the time the hacks occurred.

Joko is posting things which are false.
 
ttwtt78640 said:
Nope, announcing that the investigation has been completed and issuing a report/statement to that effect equals exoneration. Using the "no indictment" standard then Trump was exonerated by Mueller every day.
Click to expand...

I missed the report. Do you have an advance link to it so I can see where Mueller exonerated Trump?
 
joko104 said:
No one is mentioning that the Mueller report found that Hilary Clinton's "recklessness" and violating national security laws with an unsecure server resulted in Russia hacking her email account, which according to Comey had national security secrets. Her violation of law resulting in Russia (and who knows who else) learning American national security secrets.

Hilary Clinton violating federal law put national security secrets into the hands of Russia. That is huge, yet no one mentions that fact. Why? To keep protecting Hilary Clinton?
Click to expand...

I have to ask...

Since all we know about the Mueller report is what Barr told us about it and since Barr's letter to Congress says nothing about Clinton, what makes you think the Mueller report found anything about Clinton's actions? Heck, what makes you think Mueller even paid any attention to the Clinton issue?

Anyway, we know the Clinton thing isn't over. Sen. Graham has made that very clear.
 
ttwtt78640 said:
Nope, announcing that the investigation has been completed and issuing a report/statement to that effect equals exoneration. Using the "no indictment" standard then Trump was exonerated by Mueller every day.
Click to expand...
Not that it's my discussion, but DOJ has not exonerated either Clinton or Trump. Declining to pursue charges is not the same as exonerating. Clinton was not charged because the FBI/DOJ felt a case could not stand. That does not mean her actions were completely legal, only that they could not, in good faith, bring a prosecution they did not feel would get a conviction.

Trump also was not exonerated, as Barr's summary only looked at two very narrow interpretations of collusion, and not the broader idea which has been alleged (and confirmed through multiple Mueller indictments and sentencing memos).

Again, I know I'm jumping into a discussion I haven't followed closely, so my apologies if it shows, but the DOJ has not exonerated Trump or Clinton, only declined to press charges.
 
joko104 said:
Ah, another Democrat claiming both former FBI Director Comey and Mueller are lying. Both said Russia (and Comey said numerous other adversarial foreign governments) learned national security secrets from Hilary Clinton.

At the same time, Bill Clinton was personally given half a million dollars from Russians and over $100 million Russian money went into the Clinton foundation.

That virtually no Democrat cares about that means that virtually no Democrat really cares about Russia, collusion or Russia's involvement in our political system. Rather, it is 100% partisan fake outrage.
Click to expand...

Alex? Mr. Jones? Is that you?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom