• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Despite Trump's view, white nationalism is a growing threat, data shows

TU Curmudgeon

B.A. (Sarc), LLb. (Lex Sarcasus), PhD (Sarc.)
DP Veteran
Joined
Mar 7, 2018
Messages
62,543
Reaction score
19,319
Location
Lower Mainland of BC
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Centrist
From The CBC

Despite Trump's view, white nationalism is a growing threat, data shows

The phone call included condolences, a pledge of solidarity, and a question from the U.S. president.

New Zealand Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern's nation was still aching with grief after a white-nationalist gunman killed 50 people at two mosques in Christchurch. As she spoke on Friday with U.S. President Donald Trump, her American counterpart asked what he could offer.

Ardern reportedly answered, "Sympathy and love for all Muslim communities."

Trump "acknowledged that and agreed," she told reporters. But if the two national leaders sounded like they shared a common understanding, it appears to have been fleeting.

The U.S. president, tweeting about the call, made no mention of Ardern's plea. Instead, on the morning after their chat, Trump defended Fox News personality Jeanine Pirro, whose recent on-air remarks were deemed to be so bigoted against Muslims that the network reportedly suspended her.

COMMENT:-

Unfortunately it appears that the only "evidence" that someone is, in even the tiniest bit, a racist that some will accept is if the person under consideration swears, under oath and under penalty of perjury, that they are a racist. Anything short of that, means that there is enough "evidence" to conclude that the person under consideration is NOT a racist and, accordingly that proves that they are not a racist.

"First they came for the..."

Should one "condemn" __[fill in the blank]__ because there IS racism in __[fill in the blank]__? Nope, there is racism in every country.

Should one "condemn" __[fill in the blank]__ because its people want to pretend that there is no racism in __[fill in the blank]__? You tell me.
 
Back
Top Bottom