• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Far Right Common with ISIS

veritas1 said:
Ah, so INDIVIDUALS are responsible for their own actions. Now, we're getting somewhere.
Click to expand...

Not when the American Taliban have their guy in the office of Vice President and their personal mascot, the immigrant hating racist, as President--God's very own selection, they say.
 
veritas1 said:
Simple, because over 1,000 years of Western history had already given marriage a definition and it was not the one you foisted upon it. Marrying gays says that the state gives it the same moral sanction as marrying men and women. If one cares about such a thing, then they cannot support gay marriage. That is wholly different from caring what gays do otherwise or how they live.
Click to expand...

What if one of your children were gay and wanted to get married? Would you tell them the same thing?

If you don't like gay marriage don't get gay married. Why deny others their freedom to do so? It seems like a very Taliban view that you must enforce your interpretation of religious beliefs on others.
 
SonOfDaedalus said:
What if one of your children were gay and wanted to get married? Would you tell them the same thing?

If you don't like gay marriage don't get gay married. Why deny others their freedom to do so? It seems like a very Taliban view that you must enforce your interpretation of religious beliefs on others.
Click to expand...

Pray it away, perhaps.
 
veritas1 said:
I'd have to. Morals and values don't change just because someone close to you is involved.
Click to expand...

You are making my case. Thanks. I can always use allies.
 
calamity said:
Not when the American Taliban have their guy in the office of Vice President and their personal mascot, the immigrant hating racist, as President--God's very own selection, they say.
Click to expand...

Oh, so individuals are not responsible for their own actions? My, how very convenient. Every wrongdoer can blame his deed on somebody else. Why am I not surprised that this is your position?
 
calamity said:
Most of Mississippi and almost all of Louisiana. But, yes, the American Taliban is not the Afghani Taliban. Hence, the "American" :roll:
Click to expand...

Mississippi and Louisiana have a awful lot of nice people living there.

You pick a few people or incidents and trash a entire state.

You are the most adolescent poster I have ever seen on a forum.

What town are you from Mr. Perfect? :roll:

I'll bet it has it's own racists.
 
Unitedwestand13 said:
Ah the nuclear family, the bastion of traditional values and essential to the American way of life.....


The amount of sarcasm in my previous statement could fill two Olympic sized swimming pools.

Look I get the appeal of the nuclear family, but I don’t think it is necessarily the universal way of raising a family.
Click to expand...

Far be it from me to say that you have no right to an opinion. I don't think it is borne out by facts or data, but you are free to have it.
 
RetiredUSN said:
Mississippi and Louisiana have a awful lot of nice people living there.

You pick a few people or incidents and trash a entire state.

You are the most adolescent poster I have ever seen on a forum.

What town are you from Mr. Perfect? :roll:

I'll bet it has it's own racists.
Click to expand...

I choose to fly over those awful places...Best to see them from afar...Like 35,000 feet
 
veritas1 said:
Pretty much a waste. They must derive some vicarious pleasure out of saying outlandishly stupid crap and then have others debunk it.
Click to expand...

Sucking the air out of the room, or news cycle.

Raises the question, what are they trying to distract away from? What's most recent in the news?

Lisa Page's interview which demonstrated Obama's use of government power against the political opposition and to protect those not, but that's already a few days old.

Anything new that you can think of?
 
eohrnberger said:
Sucking the air out of the room, or news cycle.

Raises the question, what are they trying to distract away from? What's most recent in the news?

Lisa Page's interview which demonstrated Obama's use of government power against the political opposition and to protect those not, but that's already a few days old.

Anything new that you can think of?
Click to expand...

lol...yeah, Lisa Page is being hidden by a false flag operation in New Zealand. Damn. You caught us. :roll:
 
eohrnberger said:
Sucking the air out of the room, or news cycle.

Raises the question, what are they trying to distract away from? What's most recent in the news?

Lisa Page's interview which demonstrated Obama's use of government power against the political opposition and to protect those not, but that's already a few days old.

Anything new that you can think of?
Click to expand...

Absolutely comedy GOLD!
 
RetiredUSN said:
Mississippi and Louisiana have a awful lot of nice people living there.

You pick a few people or incidents and trash a entire state.

You are the most adolescent poster I have ever seen on a forum.

What town are you from Mr. Perfect? :roll:

I'll bet it has it's own racists.
Click to expand...

Most of the state is living in the early 20th century, although it appears Arkansas is worse than either one of them.
America’s 10 worst states to live in
 
calamity said:
Now they speak about banning Muslims and building walls. You know, like the guy you voted for.
Click to expand...

There you go again with another brain dead Calamity post full of punk snark.

I didn't vote for Trump, and I don't like Trump

I have already stated this about a 100 times on this forum, but you are too busy creating your own bigoted threads to notice.

The funny thing is, that people like you are more often than not more likely to hide behind their keyboards than to even talk like you do to peoples faces.

Again.....what perfect town are you from?
 
veritas1 said:
You couldn't hit the side of a barn with a howitzer from 10 feet away.
Click to expand...
LOL. Just a guess, here, but I suspect you have never fired a howitzer.
 
RetiredUSN said:
There you go again with another brain dead Calamity post full of punk snark.

I didn't vote for Trump, and I don't like Trump

I have already stated this about a 100 times on this forum, but you are too busy creating your own bigoted threads to notice.

The funny thing is, that people like you are more often than not more likely to hide behind their keyboards than to even talk like you do to peoples faces.

Again.....what perfect town are you from?
Click to expand...

Indeed. Full of snark. That and the on continuous claims that you've said something when you didn't. :roll:

Almost like he is arguing with himself and you are just a bystander there for him to dump his snark on you.
 
veritas1 said:
Of course. Marriage was intended for the propagation of children and the strengthening of the nuclear family. Making it available to any two people (or more) who can fog up a mirror, shows that it is totally devalued much beyond whatever tax benefits can be gained by it. There was a reason for the exclusivity of marriage and that has been shoved aside.
Click to expand...
Okay, I'm calling BS on repeated counter-historical claims. Marriage, in the western tradition, was not established for propagating. That is propaganda. It was established for property transfer. It was, literally centuries later that "the church" created a sacrament for it - because they wanted to get in on the whole property thing.

Just sayin'.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom