• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Sandy Hook families can sue gun manufacturer Remington, lower court ruling overturned

marke said:
Leftist democrats never explain how they plan to make sure crooks and crazies do not get their hands on guns.
Click to expand...
In both cases (Sandy Hook and Parkland), there were people who knew of the killers mental health issues beforehand and did not take advantage of available resources that very likely would have prevented the tragedies.

Prevention by intervention is where we need to focus the most attention.

marke said:
Police are not always courageous or prepared which is why it makes sense for private citizens to be prepared as well.
Click to expand...
Most police are plenty brave and prepared to counter/stop violence against innocents, but I do agree that nowadays citizens should be prepared to defend themselves.
 
Chillfolks said:
I've shown you I am willing and most of the people I know are also willing. In the real world I see a lot of willingness to compromise. It's really only a few people who aren't. They are vocal about it, that may be why you are under that impression
Click to expand...

You could be right - I just could be an old crank who has seen too many of the discussions go south and end up hostile.
 
haymarket said:
I do not have the slightest idea what you are talking about.

There will be no compromise on this because your side will never compromise. You deserve the fate you earn and you only will have yourself to blame for it.
Click to expand...

I doubt that.
 
haymarket said:
You could be right - I just could be an old crank who has seen too many of the discussions go south and end up hostile.
Click to expand...

I may have been one of those folks. When people purpose ideas like limiting ammo to 25 rounds a month, requiring all guns be stored at a government run facility that you can check yours out for a limited time, requiring mental health exams to exercise rights, or saying only muskets are covered under the 2nd I tend to get snippy or sarcastic in my replies. I have no problem with compromise as long as it's not just a one way deal
 
Chillfolks said:
I may have been one of those folks. When people purpose ideas like limiting ammo to 25 rounds a month, requiring all guns be stored at a government run facility that you can check yours out for a limited time, requiring mental health exams to exercise rights, or saying only muskets are covered under the 2nd I tend to get snippy or sarcastic in my replies. I have no problem with compromise as long as it's not just a one way deal
Click to expand...

I don't blame you. Those suggestions sound like clear violations of the Second Amendment.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom