• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

BOMBSHELL: Obama DOJ Told FBI Not To Charge Hillary, Lisa Page Reveals What 'Insurance Policy' Was

Grokmaster

DP Veteran
Joined
Jul 8, 2017
Messages
9,613
Reaction score
2,735
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Libertarian - Right
So, Comey and the Obama Swamp KGB-FBI/DOJ were FOLLOWING ORDERS from the Obama White House when they failed to charge Hillary Clinton for OBVIOUS CRIMES, and the "insurance policy" WAS/IS THE WITCH HUNT, with NO SIGNIFIICANT EVIDENCE to INITIATE IT, as the more sentient among us have been saying for over TWO YEARS...as the RELEASED TRANSCRIPTS of former FBI lawyer Lisa Page's SWORN TESTIMONY REVEALS.

Gee...looks like the Tarmac Meeting was to give Slick Willie word that "the FIX WAS IN"...

So , let's talk about what "OBSTRUCTION of JUSTICE" actually is, and SEDITION , as well, shall we?






Obama DOJ Told FBI Not To Charge Hillary, Lisa Page Reveals What The 'Insurance Policy' Was



Former FBI lawyer Lisa Page admitted under questioning from Texas Republican Rep. John Ratcliffe last summer that "the FBI was ordered by the Obama DOJ not to consider charging Hillary Clinton for gross negligence in the handling of classified information," the congressman alleged in a social media post late Tuesday, citing a newly unearthed transcript of Page's closed-door testimony.

Lisa Page admitted Obama DOJ ordered stand-down on Clinton email prosecution, GOP rep says | Fox News







One of the biggest revelations was that Page, who was having an affair with then-FBI agent Peter Strzok, said that the infamous "insurance policy" text message was referring to the Russia investigation. "During her interview with the Judiciary Committee in July 2018, Page was questioned at length about that text — and essentially confirmed this referred to the Russia investigation while explaining that officials were proceeding with caution, concerned about the implications of the case while not wanting to go at 'total breakneck speed' and risk burning sources as they presumed Trump wouldn't be elected anyway," Fox News reported. "Further, she confirmed investigators only had a 'paucity' of evidence at the start."

Obama DOJ Told FBI Not To Charge Hillary, Lisa Page Reveals What The 'Insurance Policy' Was | Daily Wire

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Let's see if Barr pursues THESE EXPOSED OUTRAGES...
 
Last edited:
You just found this story. Gotta do better than that. You're rehashing old news and putting your spin on it. Nice try.
 
You just found this story. Gotta do better than that. You're rehashing old news and putting your spin on it. Nice try.

Old news that was just uncovered. Heads may yet roll .....
 
You just found this story. Gotta do better than that. You're rehashing old news and putting your spin on it. Nice try.

Great job COMPLETELY IGNORING the FACTS of the OP. Bravo!! Way to carry the DP LEFT STANDARD!!

So what if we, the PUBLIC, now have SWORN TESTIMONY of the crimes listed above, given behind closed doors...right?


BTW-the TRANSCRIPTS WERE released YESTERDAY. You really should LOOK AROUND before trying silliass DEFLECTIONS. :roll:


"Gotta do better than that". :lamo

Doug Collins Releases Ex-FBI Lawyer Lisa Page’s Interview Transcripts


Doug Collins Releases Ex-FBI Lawyer Lisa Page’s Interview Transcripts | The Daily Caller
 
So, Comey and the Obama Swamp KGB-FBI/DOJ were FOLLOWING ORDERS from the Obama White House when they failed to charge Hillary Clinton for OBVIOUS CRIMES, and the "insurance policy" WAS/IS THE WITCH HUNT, with NO SIGNIFIICANT EVIDENCE to INITIATE IT, as the more sentient among us have been saying for over TWO YEARS...as the RELEASED TRANSCRIPTS of former FBI lawyer Lisa Page's SWORN TESTIMONY REVEALS.

Gee...looks like the Tarmac Meeting was to give Slick Willie word that "the FIX WAS IN"...

So , let's talk about what "OBSTRUCTION of JUSTICE" actually is, and SEDITION , as well, shall we?






Obama DOJ Told FBI Not To Charge Hillary, Lisa Page Reveals What The 'Insurance Policy' Was



Former FBI lawyer Lisa Page admitted under questioning from Texas Republican Rep. John Ratcliffe last summer that "the FBI was ordered by the Obama DOJ not to consider charging Hillary Clinton for gross negligence in the handling of classified information," the congressman alleged in a social media post late Tuesday, citing a newly unearthed transcript of Page's closed-door testimony.

Lisa Page admitted Obama DOJ ordered stand-down on Clinton email prosecution, GOP rep says | Fox News







One of the biggest revelations was that Page, who was having an affair with then-FBI agent Peter Strzok, said that the infamous "insurance policy" text message was referring to the Russia investigation. "During her interview with the Judiciary Committee in July 2018, Page was questioned at length about that text — and essentially confirmed this referred to the Russia investigation while explaining that officials were proceeding with caution, concerned about the implications of the case while not wanting to go at 'total breakneck speed' and risk burning sources as they presumed Trump wouldn't be elected anyway," Fox News reported. "Further, she confirmed investigators only had a 'paucity' of evidence at the start."

Obama DOJ Told FBI Not To Charge Hillary, Lisa Page Reveals What The 'Insurance Policy' Was | Daily Wire

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Let's see if Barr pursues THESE EXPOSED OUTRAGES...

LOL!! Don't you know by now it only a "BOMBSHELL" if it's about Trump?

The Trump haters don't care...not even the conservative Trump haters who also hated Obama.

My hope is that the new AG will think this is enough of a bombshell to take action.
 
Old news that was just uncovered. Heads may yet roll .....

New information revealed: We never heard that COMEY WAS FOLLOWING ORDERS, or the ABSOLUTE VERIFICATION that the texts referring to the "insurance policy" were exactly the seditious conspiracy it appeared to be, further exacerbated by her admission that there was NOT EVIDENCE TO START THE WITCH HUNT, in the first place.
 
Last edited:
LOL!! Don't you know by now it only a "BOMBSHELL" if it's about Trump?

The Trump haters don't care...not even the conservative Trump haters who also hated Obama.

My hope is that the new AG will think this is enough of a bombshell to take action.


It would certainly seem so...
 
LOL!! Don't you know by now it only a "BOMBSHELL" if it's about Trump?

The Trump haters don't care...not even the conservative Trump haters who also hated Obama.

My hope is that the new AG will think this is enough of a bombshell to take action.
Against the people [underlings] who perpetrated this fraud... maybe. Obama and Hillary? probably not.
 
Against the people [underlings] who perpetrated this fraud... maybe. Obama and Hillary? probably not.

So Lynch ordered the "stand down" on her own? Doubtful, IMHO. Same with the Witch Hunt... Hillary was squawking about the Russians almost within HOURS of the election. This was from the TOP DOWN, also IMHO.
 
So, Comey and the Obama Swamp KGB-FBI/DOJ were FOLLOWING ORDERS from the Obama White House when they failed to charge Hillary Clinton for OBVIOUS CRIMES, and the "insurance policy" WAS/IS THE WITCH HUNT, with NO SIGNIFIICANT EVIDENCE to INITIATE IT, as the more sentient among us have been saying for over TWO YEARS...as the RELEASED TRANSCRIPTS of former FBI lawyer Lisa Page's SWORN TESTIMONY REVEALS.

Gee...looks like the Tarmac Meeting was to give Slick Willie word that "the FIX WAS IN"...

So , let's talk about what "OBSTRUCTION of JUSTICE" actually is, and SEDITION , as well, shall we?






Obama DOJ Told FBI Not To Charge Hillary, Lisa Page Reveals What The 'Insurance Policy' Was



Former FBI lawyer Lisa Page admitted under questioning from Texas Republican Rep. John Ratcliffe last summer that "the FBI was ordered by the Obama DOJ not to consider charging Hillary Clinton for gross negligence in the handling of classified information," the congressman alleged in a social media post late Tuesday, citing a newly unearthed transcript of Page's closed-door testimony.

Lisa Page admitted Obama DOJ ordered stand-down on Clinton email prosecution, GOP rep says | Fox News







One of the biggest revelations was that Page, who was having an affair with then-FBI agent Peter Strzok, said that the infamous "insurance policy" text message was referring to the Russia investigation. "During her interview with the Judiciary Committee in July 2018, Page was questioned at length about that text — and essentially confirmed this referred to the Russia investigation while explaining that officials were proceeding with caution, concerned about the implications of the case while not wanting to go at 'total breakneck speed' and risk burning sources as they presumed Trump wouldn't be elected anyway," Fox News reported. "Further, she confirmed investigators only had a 'paucity' of evidence at the start."

Obama DOJ Told FBI Not To Charge Hillary, Lisa Page Reveals What The 'Insurance Policy' Was | Daily Wire

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Let's see if Barr pursues THESE EXPOSED OUTRAGES...

“Sentient?”

:lamo
 
Far right wing rantings and ravings screaming at the top of their voices to each other and getting increasingly worked up and angry.

Nothing to see here.
 
As usual, the facts are nothing like the accusation.

Here's the transcript: https://dougcollins.house.gov/sites/dougcollins.house.gov/files/Lisa Page interview Day 1.pdf

The beginning of the line of questioning begins on Page 93. Lisa Page CLEARLY states the FBI had no way of rebutting Clinton's claim regarding intent. They ultimately examined whether they could bring a mishandling case. They considered gross negligence, but could not make a case out of it because, according to Richard Scott (not Loretta Lynch or anyone higher in the Department), it was "Constitutionally vague" and "it had either never been done or had only been done once like 99 years ago". Thus the prosecutors "did not feel that they could sustain a charge".

The FBI then had the Department of Justice pull EVERY mishandling case in the previous 30 years, to see if they could create a criminal charge out of that.

As usual, the propagandists are lying to people.

So, Comey and the Obama Swamp KGB-FBI/DOJ were FOLLOWING ORDERS from the Obama White House when they failed to charge Hillary Clinton
This is a lie.
My hope is that the new AG will think this is enough of a bombshell to take action.
What is there to take action on? The FBI and DOJ, according to the transcript, did exactly what they are supposed to do.

More propaganda by the usual suspects.

Against the people [underlings] who perpetrated this fraud... maybe. Obama and Hillary? probably not.
There was no fraud. Try reading.

So Lynch ordered the "stand down" on her own?
This is a lie. There was no "stand down" and Comey did not consult with Lynch. The transcript clearly states it was Richard Scott.
 
Last edited:
As usual, the facts are nothing like the accusation.

Here's the transcript: https://dougcollins.house.gov/sites/dougcollins.house.gov/files/Lisa Page interview Day 1.pdf

The beginning of the line of questioning begins on Page 93. Lisa Page CLEARLY states the FBI had no way of rebutting Clinton's claim regarding intent. They ultimately examined whether they could bring a mishandling case. They considered gross negligence, but could not make a case out of it because, according to Richard Scott (not Loretta Lynch or anyone higher in the Department), it was "Constitutionally vague" and "it had either never been done or had only been done once like 99 years ago". Thus the prosecutors "did not feel that they could sustain a charge".

The FBI then had the Department of Justice pull EVERY mishandling case in the previous 30 years, to see if they could create a criminal charge out of that.

As usual, the propagandists are lying to people.

This is a lie.
What is there to take action on? The FBI and DOJ, according to the transcript, did exactly what they are supposed to do.

More propaganda by the usual suspects.

There was no fraud. Try reading.

This is a lie. There was no "stand down" and Comey did not consult with Lynch. The transcript clearly states it was Richard Scott.

Grok lying?!? Inconceivable!
 
Last week, Rep. Collins released Bruce Ohr's testimony and it just demolished the narrative of Russian Collusion on behalf of Trump, his campaign and transition team.

This week he releases Lisa Page's testimony and it shows it was Loretta Lynch's DOJ that said they would not prosecute Hillary Clinton even though the FBI had determined she had violated the Espionage Act which was learned by Baker's testimony. That is why the wording in their final report changed from gross negligence to extreme carelessness. Page's testimony sure shines a bad light on Lynch and her prosecutors and it shows both Comey and Lynch lied to the public. It also shows the fix was in for Clinton months before the case was closed.

One thing I noticed is there are conflicts in Page's testimony with Ohr's and that is when Page learned about Steele, Fusion GPS and the salacious Trump Dossier. Ohr says Page was made known about it early on and Page's testimony states it was later.

It would be interesting to see how Lorettta Lynch's testimony holds up to Page's testimony. Maybe Collins will drop that one next week.
 
LOL!! Don't you know by now it only a "BOMBSHELL" if it's about Trump?

The Trump haters don't care...not even the conservative Trump haters who also hated Obama.

My hope is that the new AG will think this is enough of a bombshell to take action.

It's not a bombshell if we've known about it for 4 years. Nor is it news.

FYI, Clintin isn't running in 2020. AOC won't be eligible to run until 2028. You all better start worrying about someone else.
 
As usual, the facts are nothing like the accusation.

Here's the transcript: https://dougcollins.house.gov/sites/dougcollins.house.gov/files/Lisa Page interview Day 1.pdf

The beginning of the line of questioning begins on Page 93. Lisa Page CLEARLY states the FBI had no way of rebutting Clinton's claim regarding intent. They ultimately examined whether they could bring a mishandling case. They considered gross negligence, but could not make a case out of it because, according to Richard Scott (not Loretta Lynch or anyone higher in the Department), it was "Constitutionally vague" and "it had either never been done or had only been done once like 99 years ago". Thus the prosecutors "did not feel that they could sustain a charge".

The FBI then had the Department of Justice pull EVERY mishandling case in the previous 30 years, to see if they could create a criminal charge out of that.

As usual, the propagandists are lying to people.

This is a lie.
What is there to take action on? The FBI and DOJ, according to the transcript, did exactly what they are supposed to do.

More propaganda by the usual suspects.

There was no fraud. Try reading.

This is a lie. There was no "stand down" and Comey did not consult with Lynch. The transcript clearly states it was Richard Scott.

Of course it's all propaganda. The acolytes haven't figured out that they aren't running against her anymore.
 
Praise be to Allah Obama intervened on behalf of the Prophet.
 
It's not a bombshell if we've known about it for 4 years. Nor is it news.

FYI, Clintin isn't running in 2020. AOC won't be eligible to run until 2028. You all better start worrying about someone else.

Putting the word BOMBSHELL!!!! in front of the title makes it new news.
 
As usual, the facts are nothing like the accusation.

Here's the transcript: https://dougcollins.house.gov/sites/dougcollins.house.gov/files/Lisa Page interview Day 1.pdf

The beginning of the line of questioning begins on Page 93. Lisa Page CLEARLY states the FBI had no way of rebutting Clinton's claim regarding intent. They ultimately examined whether they could bring a mishandling case. They considered gross negligence, but could not make a case out of it because, according to Richard Scott (not Loretta Lynch or anyone higher in the Department), it was "Constitutionally vague" and "it had either never been done or had only been done once like 99 years ago". Thus the prosecutors "did not feel that they could sustain a charge".

The FBI then had the Department of Justice pull EVERY mishandling case in the previous 30 years, to see if they could create a criminal charge out of that.

As usual, the propagandists are lying to people.

They sure do seem to understand prosecutorial discretion when state AGs decided not to prosecute cops who shoot unarmed black people.
 
So, Comey and the Obama Swamp KGB-FBI/DOJ were FOLLOWING ORDERS from the Obama White House when they failed to charge Hillary Clinton for OBVIOUS CRIMES, and the "insurance policy" WAS/IS THE WITCH HUNT, with NO SIGNIFIICANT EVIDENCE to INITIATE IT, as the more sentient among us have been saying for over TWO YEARS...as the RELEASED TRANSCRIPTS of former FBI lawyer Lisa Page's SWORN TESTIMONY REVEALS.

Gee...looks like the Tarmac Meeting was to give Slick Willie word that "the FIX WAS IN"...

So , let's talk about what "OBSTRUCTION of JUSTICE" actually is, and SEDITION , as well, shall we?






Obama DOJ Told FBI Not To Charge Hillary, Lisa Page Reveals What The 'Insurance Policy' Was



Former FBI lawyer Lisa Page admitted under questioning from Texas Republican Rep. John Ratcliffe last summer that "the FBI was ordered by the Obama DOJ not to consider charging Hillary Clinton for gross negligence in the handling of classified information," the congressman alleged in a social media post late Tuesday, citing a newly unearthed transcript of Page's closed-door testimony.

Lisa Page admitted Obama DOJ ordered stand-down on Clinton email prosecution, GOP rep says | Fox News







One of the biggest revelations was that Page, who was having an affair with then-FBI agent Peter Strzok, said that the infamous "insurance policy" text message was referring to the Russia investigation. "During her interview with the Judiciary Committee in July 2018, Page was questioned at length about that text — and essentially confirmed this referred to the Russia investigation while explaining that officials were proceeding with caution, concerned about the implications of the case while not wanting to go at 'total breakneck speed' and risk burning sources as they presumed Trump wouldn't be elected anyway," Fox News reported. "Further, she confirmed investigators only had a 'paucity' of evidence at the start."

Obama DOJ Told FBI Not To Charge Hillary, Lisa Page Reveals What The 'Insurance Policy' Was | Daily Wire

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Let's see if Barr pursues THESE EXPOSED OUTRAGES...

Could lead to impeachment, yes? Of course it is a years old claim having a Fox News rebirth to take some heat off Trump.
 
Far right wing rantings and ravings screaming at the top of their voices to each other and getting increasingly worked up and angry.

Nothing to see here.
Uh-huh. I didn't realize that LISA PAGE was "far right wing", or that her SWORN TESTIMONY was "rantings and ravings".

Everything we suspected has been verified by the Witch Hunt's OWN WITNESS.


Enjoying the view down there?


heads in sand.jpg
 
As usual, the facts are nothing like the accusation.

Here's the transcript: https://dougcollins.house.gov/sites/dougcollins.house.gov/files/Lisa Page interview Day 1.pdf

The beginning of the line of questioning begins on Page 93. Lisa Page CLEARLY states the FBI had no way of rebutting Clinton's claim regarding intent. They ultimately examined whether they could bring a mishandling case. They considered gross negligence, but could not make a case out of it because, according to Richard Scott (not Loretta Lynch or anyone higher in the Department), it was "Constitutionally vague" and "it had either never been done or had only been done once like 99 years ago". Thus the prosecutors "did not feel that they could sustain a charge".

The FBI then had the Department of Justice pull EVERY mishandling case in the previous 30 years, to see if they could create a criminal charge out of that.

As usual, the propagandists are lying to people.

This is a lie.
What is there to take action on? The FBI and DOJ, according to the transcript, did exactly what they are supposed to do.

More propaganda by the usual suspects.

There was no fraud. Try reading.

This is a lie. There was no "stand down" and Comey did not consult with Lynch. The transcript clearly states it was Richard Scott.

Lynch was the head of the DOJ. The CHANGED THE WORDING to justify the order to not prosecute, from "grossly negligent" to "extremely careless".

Irrelevant to the point of WHERE THE DIRECRIVE ORGINATED.

Page seems to know more about it than you, and the rest of the Desperately Dancing DP Left...
 
Uh-huh. I didn't realize that LISA PAGE was "far right wing", or that her SWORN TESTIMONY was "rantings and ravings".

Everything we suspected has been verified by the Witch Hunt's OWN WITNESS.

You are the one pushing this as news and you are far far right wing.
 
Back
Top Bottom