• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

BOMBSHELL: Obama DOJ Told FBI Not To Charge Hillary, Lisa Page Reveals What 'Insurance Policy' Was

rocket88 said:
It's not a bombshell if we've known about it for 4 years. Nor is it news.

FYI, Clintin isn't running in 2020. AOC won't be eligible to run until 2028. You all better start worrying about someone else.
Click to expand...

So you knew OBAMA ORDERED THE FBI/DOJ to not prosecute Clinton?

You KNEW that the "insurance policy" WAS, INDEED THE "WITCH HUNT", and that there was no solid basis for it at its origin?

NO...WE KNEW THAT...you DENIED IT.

Now it's confirmed...
 
Grokmaster said:
Lynch was the head of the DOJ. The CHANGED THE WORDING to justify the order to not prosecute, from "grossly negligent" to "extremely careless".

Irrelevant to the point of WHERE THE DIRECRIVE ORGINATED.
Click to expand...
Nothing you said challenges or contradicts what I said, which was exposing the lies you posted earlier in the thread.

Page seems to know more about it than you
Click to expand...
And I literally posted what Page said, which proved what you posted was a lie.

Thank you for admitting you posted a lie. It's always propaganda from your posts.
Grokmaster said:
So you knew OBAMA ORDERED THE FBI/DOJ to not prosecute Clinton?
Click to expand...
This did not happen. You are intentionally posting lies.
 
Master Debator said:
They sure do seem to understand prosecutorial discretion when state AGs decided not to prosecute cops who shoot unarmed black people.
Click to expand...

They stand and applaud that.
 
jnug said:
You just found this story. Gotta do better than that. You're rehashing old news and putting your spin on it. Nice try.
Click to expand...

Transcripts of closed door testimony that was only released yesterday is not old news.
 
Slyfox696 said:
Nothing you said challenges or contradicts what I said, which was exposing the lies you posted earlier in the thread.

And I literally posted what Page said, which proved what you posted was a lie.

Thank you for admitting you posted a lie. It's always propaganda from your posts.
This did not happen. You are intentionally posting lies.
Click to expand...
Tell it to Lisa Page.


Scott did not act w/o the authority of LYNCH; Lynch did not act w/o the authority of Obama.

The very CREATORS of the Witch Hunt KNEW THEY HAD NO EVIDENCE TO START IT...but deployed their "Insurance Policy" anyway.


This is OBSTRUCTION of JUSTICE and SEDITIOUS CONSPIRACY DEFINED.

You disagree...TELL PAGE SHE'S LYING....
 
Grokmaster said:
So, Comey and the Obama Swamp KGB-FBI/DOJ were FOLLOWING ORDERS from the Obama White House when they failed to charge Hillary Clinton for OBVIOUS CRIMES, and the "insurance policy" WAS/IS THE WITCH HUNT, with NO SIGNIFIICANT EVIDENCE to INITIATE IT, as the more sentient among us have been saying for over TWO YEARS...as the RELEASED TRANSCRIPTS of former FBI lawyer Lisa Page's SWORN TESTIMONY REVEALS.

Gee...looks like the Tarmac Meeting was to give Slick Willie word that "the FIX WAS IN"...

So , let's talk about what "OBSTRUCTION of JUSTICE" actually is, and SEDITION , as well, shall we?






Obama DOJ Told FBI Not To Charge Hillary, Lisa Page Reveals What The 'Insurance Policy' Was



Former FBI lawyer Lisa Page admitted under questioning from Texas Republican Rep. John Ratcliffe last summer that "the FBI was ordered by the Obama DOJ not to consider charging Hillary Clinton for gross negligence in the handling of classified information," the congressman alleged in a social media post late Tuesday, citing a newly unearthed transcript of Page's closed-door testimony.

Lisa Page admitted Obama DOJ ordered stand-down on Clinton email prosecution, GOP rep says | Fox News







One of the biggest revelations was that Page, who was having an affair with then-FBI agent Peter Strzok, said that the infamous "insurance policy" text message was referring to the Russia investigation. "During her interview with the Judiciary Committee in July 2018, Page was questioned at length about that text — and essentially confirmed this referred to the Russia investigation while explaining that officials were proceeding with caution, concerned about the implications of the case while not wanting to go at 'total breakneck speed' and risk burning sources as they presumed Trump wouldn't be elected anyway," Fox News reported. "Further, she confirmed investigators only had a 'paucity' of evidence at the start."

Obama DOJ Told FBI Not To Charge Hillary, Lisa Page Reveals What The 'Insurance Policy' Was | Daily Wire

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Let's see if Barr pursues THESE EXPOSED OUTRAGES...
Click to expand...

Of course President Mom Jeans and his DOJ were knee deep in the corruption. What else would we expect?
 
Grokmaster said:
One of the biggest revelations was that Page, who was having an affair with then-FBI agent Peter Strzok, said that the infamous "insurance policy" text message was referring to the Russia investigation. "During her interview with the Judiciary Committee in July 2018, Page was questioned at length about that text — and essentially confirmed this referred to the Russia investigation while explaining that officials were proceeding with caution, concerned about the implications of the case while not wanting to go at 'total breakneck speed' and risk burning sources as they presumed Trump wouldn't be elected anyway," Fox News reported. "Further, she confirmed investigators only had a 'paucity' of evidence at the start."

Obama DOJ Told FBI Not To Charge Hillary, Lisa Page Reveals What The 'Insurance Policy' Was | Daily Wire

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Let's see if Barr pursues THESE EXPOSED OUTRAGES...
Click to expand...

This testimony, if true, finally explains Comey's puzzling assurance that "No DA would prosecute" base don the clear violation of the law, as he stated in his July 2016 press conference.

Base don this testimony, Comey was spinning the fact that the DOJ had already informed him not to take that path.

Moreover, this brings back the Bill Clinton/Loretta Lynch tarmac meeting since it happened shortly before Comey's press conference. Remember that after that expose Lynch stated that she was going to accept the decision of the FBI, and based on Page's testimony, that was only because she had already told Comey she wouldn't accept prosecution on gross negligence.
 
Grokmaster said:
Tell it to Lisa Page.
Click to expand...
I literally quoted what she said. She says you are posting lies.

Scott did not act w/o the authority of LYNCH; Lynch did not act w/o the authority of Obama.
Click to expand...
:lol:

You are literally making things up now. Lisa Page said NONE of these things. Nothing but the posting of lies.

You disagree...TELL PAGE SHE'S LYING....
Click to expand...
Page's own words says your postings are flatly untrue. I posted what she said. You are ignoring it.

Pure propaganda posts.
 
jmotivator said:
This testimony, if true, finally explains Comey's puzzling assurance that "No DA would prosecute" base don the clear violation of the law, as he stated in his July 2016 press conference.
Click to expand...
It was not puzzling to anyone who isn't an idiot. :shrug:

I was literally explaining it nearly three years ago.
Base don this testimony, Comey was spinning the fact that the DOJ had already informed him not to take that path.
Click to expand...
Comey essentially said what Page testified he was told by the DOJ, which is that the charge was Constitutionally vague and could not be sustained.

Did you bother reading the testimony or just rely on the word of someone who regularly spouts propaganda?

Moreover, this brings back the Bill Clinton/Loretta Lynch tarmac meeting since it happened shortly before Comey's press conference. Remember that after that expose Lynch stated that she was going to accept the decision of the FBI, and based on Page's testimony, that was only because she had already told Comey she wouldn't accept prosecution on gross negligence.
Click to expand...
Lynch did not tell Comey anything about gross negligence.

Seriously, what is it about people that render them incapable of reading or finding out the truth? Page CLEARLY stated the FBI consulted with Richard Scott. I linked to the testimony in post #12 and told you what page to start on.

Try reading.
 
jmotivator said:
This testimony, if true, finally explains Comey's puzzling assurance that "No DA would prosecute" base don the clear violation of the law, as he stated in his July 2016 press conference.

Base don this testimony, Comey was spinning the fact that the DOJ had already informed him not to take that path.

Moreover, this brings back the Bill Clinton/Loretta Lynch tarmac meeting since it happened shortly before Comey's press conference. Remember that after that expose Lynch stated that she was going to accept the decision of the FBI, and based on Page's testimony, that was only because she had already told Comey she wouldn't accept prosecution on gross negligence.
Click to expand...

Lynch already knew the outcome. Billy was just there to make sure.
 
Grokmaster said:
Great job COMPLETELY IGNORING the FACTS of the OP. Bravo!! Way to carry the DP LEFT STANDARD!!

So what if we, the PUBLIC, now have SWORN TESTIMONY of the crimes listed above, given behind closed doors...right?


BTW-the TRANSCRIPTS WERE released YESTERDAY. You really should LOOK AROUND before trying silliass DEFLECTIONS. :roll:


"Gotta do better than that". :lamo

Doug Collins Releases Ex-FBI Lawyer Lisa Page’s Interview Transcripts


Doug Collins Releases Ex-FBI Lawyer Lisa Page’s Interview Transcripts | The Daily Caller
Click to expand...
Facts be damned!
 
veritas1 said:
Lynch already knew the outcome. Billy was just there to make sure.
Click to expand...

Well, sure, but until the Page testimony was revealed there was no way to connect those dots in any direct way. We now know, based on Page's testimony, that Lynch's non-recusal recusal was just because she had already told Comey what to do. So we now see that Lynch was prepared to abide by whatever decision she told Comey to make. :roll:
 
jmotivator said:
Lynch's non-recusal recusal was just because she had already told Comey what to do.
Click to expand...
This is a lie. Lisa Page's testimony clearly states this post of yours is a lie.
 
Slyfox696 said:
This is a lie. Lisa Page's testimony clearly states this post of yours is a lie.
Click to expand...

Nope, it's absolutely true. You are just desperate to maintain your belief that the investigation wasn't a corrupt snow job form the beginning... which it was.
 
rocket88 said:
Of course it's all propaganda. The acolytes haven't figured out that they aren't running against her anymore.
Click to expand...

perhaps SOME people care about actual justice and the law, and cleaning out the swamp. did that ever cross your mind?
 
jnug said:
You just found this story. Gotta do better than that. You're rehashing old news and putting your spin on it. Nice try.
Click to expand...

You know that they expect to have some interesting news being released about Mueller when there is a huge rehash of old stuff from Foxnews and the conserative pseudo-news web sites like the daily caller .
 
jmotivator said:
Nope, it's absolutely true. You are just desperate to maintain your belief that the investigation wasn't a corrupt snow job form the beginning... which it was.
Click to expand...

it certainly demands further investigation now.
 
Hypothetical said:
perhaps SOME people care about actual justice and the law, and cleaning out the swamp. did that ever cross your mind?
Click to expand...

Yes, for example, Mueller does, and that is why so many of the Trump associates have plead guilty or been convince, and are going to prison.
 
RAMOSS said:
Yes, for example, Mueller does, and that is why so many of the Trump associates have plead guilty or been convince, and are going to prison.
Click to expand...

good. if they broke the law then I am glad.


this thread isn't about that though. this is about other possible parts of the real political swamp, that was there before Trump.


now back to the OP... constitutionally VAGUE? so NO ONE has been charged with gross negligence in securing classified information in the last 30 years?

I find that hard to believe.
 
Slyfox696 said:
This is a lie. Lisa Page's testimony clearly states this post of yours is a lie.
Click to expand...


If you go back and consider the way HRC and associates were interviewed it gives a clear picture with how the fix was in even before any investigation started. I excepted long ago that HRC, Obama, the DOJ at the time and the FBI leadership at the time were to big to fail or bring down. The crew mentioned, was far more corrupt than the Trump administration could ever be considering the microscope they are under each day. For me, that fact makes the TDS even funnier and more entertaining, anyone knowledgeable about DC dirty politics with a sliver of integrity and honesty will admit this, not in public or on the record, but it is fact.
 
Slyfox696 said:
It was not puzzling to anyone who isn't an idiot. :shrug:
Click to expand...

*sigh* My how you do debase yourself for corrupt Democrats...

I was literally explaining it nearly three years ago.
Comey essentially said what Page testified he was told by the DOJ, which is that the charge was Constitutionally vague and could not be sustained.
Click to expand...

Heh! You REALLY don't get it. Lynch went on record saying that she would abide by whatever Comey decided AFTER taking the actual letter of the law off the table. And no, it is not a vague law... unless you are a corrupt politician covering for your cronies. Anyone who works in classified settings is WELL versed in precisely that law and the penalties for breaking that law, even if unknowingly.

You guys should probably consider how much effort you spend defending your utterly corrupt Democrat politicians on the grounds that they are idiots....

Did you bother reading the testimony or just rely on the word of someone who regularly spouts propaganda?

Lynch did not tell Comey anything about gross negligence.
Click to expand...

Oh, oh! Here is the second most common defense by Democrats for corrupt democrats... "it's not their fault, they were just in charge!" :roll:

Again, Comey's final exoneration memo made the claim that the FBI had determined that no DA would prosecute, making it appear that the investigation had followed the Lynch non-recusal recusal when, in fact, Lynch's DOJ had in fact been 100% responsible for Comey's final declaration, and Comey had just been there to launder the DOJ's clear bias.

Seriously, what is it about people that render them incapable of reading or finding out the truth? Page CLEARLY stated the FBI consulted with Richard Scott. I linked to the testimony in post #12 and told you what page to start on.
Click to expand...

You'd have to tell me because you've been in flat denial for as long as I've been aware of you.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom