• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Tucker Carlson

You said he 'essentially alludes to women being bitches'. That's a lie. He said women can sense fear and cowardice in a man the way dogs can sense fear and cowardice. Now, I don't know that that is true or not but it is not what you dishonestly claim it to be. You hate the guy so you have no problem with lying in a effort to destroy him. But that's how you libs are: dishonest and hateful.

Who said I hate him? I think he is an ignorant piece of ****, but hate is going way overboard. I don't know him well enough to hate or not hate him. I do, however, know enough about what he says and thinks to find him utterly reprehensible.

That isn't the same thing as hating someone. I disagree with your stance that there was nothing wrong with what he said. That in no way implies I hate you. Same applies to Tucker. The only difference is I don't think you are a piece of ****.
 
Who said I hate him? I think he is an ignorant piece of ****, but hate is going way overboard. I don't know him well enough to hate or not hate him. I do, however, know enough about what he says and thinks to find him utterly reprehensible.
So what is it about his beliefs that you find 'reprehensible' and make him 'an ignorant piece of ****?'

That isn't the same thing as hating someone. I disagree with your stance that there was nothing wrong with what he said. That in no way implies I hate you. Same applies to Tucker. The only difference is I don't think you are a piece of ****.
You should. I agree with most of what he believes.
 
Elizabeth Warrens college application on line 2....something about bull****.

I don't care what she identifies as, my comments on that topic were largely based either on the hypocrisy of the situation or the comedy of it (For instance the Boston Clam Chowder recipe for Pow wow chow is pretty damned hilarious). Also, Tucker isn't running for office so I'm not sure the relevance of what his comments have towards his show. If he were running for office then digging up his past comments and questioning him on where he stands on such issues would be relevant in my opinion.
 
He was bigoted in his comments?? He used racist taunt?? He promoted white supremacy?? Since none of that happened, the only conclusion that can be drawn is that


Saladin4 Posts=hackish lies, nonsense and calls for violence.

Yeah, I'd like to stomp this preening asshole Tucker Carlsen...Believe it
 
There is nothing remotely outrageous in his remarks particularly given the context in which they were given. You've obviously never listened to shows like Stern or Bubba
First of all, I didn’t make any claim of outrageous language or behavior, you did. Secondly, you obviously don’t understand the meaning of outrageous, as Bubba, by definition, is a “shock jock” and shocking is synonymous with outrageous. The goal of programs like his is to be outrageous, and Carlson’s comments were inline with the goal.
 
No. Admittedly, I haven't listened to his comments nor care to. This strategy of digging up old comments from decades back in order to destroy someone is getting ridiculous.

Then perhaps you should listen to his comments before opining. That's what everyone else has done.
 
First of all, I didn’t make any claim of outrageous language or behavior, you did. Secondly, you obviously don’t understand the meaning of outrageous, as Bubba, by definition, is a “shock jock” and shocking is synonymous with outrageous. The goal of programs like his is to be outrageous, and Carlson’s comments were inline with the goal.

So taken in the context of that show, whats the problem?
 
So taken in the context of that show, whats the problem?
I don’t have any problem with it. I already know Carlson is a total dick head, so it’s not at all surprising that he’d go on a radio show and be himself.
 
I don’t have any problem with it. I already know Carlson is a total dick head, so it’s not at all surprising that he’d go on a radio show and be himself.

In other words, you really don't have an argument here. Fair enough.
 
meanwhile...back at the ranch...Bill Clinton molested and raped women and the same lefties applaud him to this day.
 
No, you calling him a 'dickhead' is an opinion, not a fact. And an opinion based in ignorance and bias at that.
Nope. Carlson’s definitely a dick head.:thumbs:
 
Promote child sex and lose advertisers. Whodda thunk it?

Outback Steakhouse stopped advertising on Tucker Carlson's Fox News show earlier this year as brands fled in droves after the host's controversial comments


27 brands? Hmm...what's left, My Pillow?


Well...I can see how that might ruin your steak.

It's fascinating to me that pederasty apologism is emerging as a firewall of what's acceptable on the Right and how some of them, particularly alt-righters, are willing to cross that wall. As if a thirteen-year-old could EVER consent to sex with a grown man.
 
Actually, he has. Trump kicked CNN's Jim Acosta out of the WH and pulled his credentials; after CNN sued on First Amendment issues, a judge made the WH give the credentials back. Also, at rallies he demonizes CNN and other media outlets to the point where journalists are receiving threats from his whacko fan base; and of course, during two large press conferences in the Rose Garden, Trump had CNN, MSNBC, and other representatives of the "liberal media" shuffled to standing room at the back of the seated reporters, mocked them, then refused to call on any of them to answer questions.

That's off the top of my head. If that's not enough for you, I'm certain a quick Google of "Trump's attempts to shut down liberal media" will shovel more into your lap than you can handle.

Talking badly about the media which obviously hates you is hardly shutting them up. What story has not been aired by the MSM because of Trump? What newspaper article has not been written? What internet blog has been halted? Not calling on certain reporters at news conferences does not equate to censoring the media.
 
:lamo...so, as I said at the time, it's you who appears confused. Again, let's not mistake your personal interpretations of others' stated words... for the actual facts, ok? That always gets you in trouble. Feel free to bring that thread up again, if you wish...just don't bring it into this thread. You have a penchant for hijacking threads with your rabbit-hole diversions whenever you arguments begin to get picked apart by more knowledgeable people.


:lamo You're grasping. I've never once offered an opinion about him. What I HAVE noted is that your attempts to inject him into this thread were a CLEAR indication that you felt convicted by this Carlson story. It's this sort of deflection that so often gives away the true sentiments of your side. As I've often noted, you people simply do not have the personal integrity or backbone own up to your mistakes, or to the mistakes of your political leaders, without couching it in some form of "both sides" or "whatabout" nonsense. It's just pathetic, but it's as predictable as the sun rising in the east. You guys just cannot help yourselves. It's a characater test that you fail, every time.


:lamo
The "market" (i.e. rational people) decided, long ago, that Sharpton's controversial antics were in NO WAY akin to advocating child rape, incest, pedophilia and running a child sex slave ring,....AND that his inflammatory and often offensive rhetoric from the 80's and 90's was not a reflection of the man today. Obviously (judging by his antics and rhetoric RIGHT NOW, and his doubling down on those of his past), the same cannot be said about Tucker Carlson. People get that. People get that, if a younger Al Sharpton was angry and bigoted toward whites, he's not the same man today. People also get that Tucker Carlson was an angry bigot 20 years ago...and he's still the same angry bigot today. It's really not that complicated. The only people who do NOT grasp that "nuance" (which is putting it kindly, because it's really not all that nuanced), are people like you. And that's because, well...clearly....you are what you are.



:lamo
"race monger"...."race baiter"....
File both of those terms under the category of "Terms created and used entirely by the White Grievance community". Look, don't get angry because people keep calling you out for your bigotry. That's your fault. People can see that you CLEARLY have a bur in your saddle about black people. You show that, over and over, in thread after thread. Only you know, for sure, why; but everyone else can see that you do it.

-----------

The bottom line here is that you have demonstrated that you still support Tucker Carlson, who is CLEARLY a pretty vile racial and religious bigot, as well as a misogynist. You support him because those things don't ofend you, and because his politics (which include those things) agree with yours. That's your right. Just stop hiding behind fake-a$$ "whataboutisms" and own up to your own feelings.

Man up, man.

Carlson never promoted child rape. That is complete bullsh*t. Nor has he said anything remotely close to "racial or religious bigotry". That's simply the left lying in order to demonize and marginalize people and views they hate. All rational people know this. As for your race mongering, again, put up any post of mine which fits that description. If you can't, then you need to STFU.
 
Promote child sex and lose advertisers. Whodda thunk it?

Outback Steakhouse stopped advertising on Tucker Carlson's Fox News show earlier this year as brands fled in droves after the host's controversial comments


27 brands? Hmm...what's left, My Pillow?


Well...I can see how that might ruin your steak.

His comments were really sick. Warren Jeffs raped numerous young girls. I think his youngest bride was 12. Tucker is a deeply sick person for defending that pedophile monster.
 
Carlson never promoted child rape. That is complete bullsh*t. Nor has he said anything remotely close to "racial or religious bigotry". That's simply the left lying in order to demonize and marginalize people and views they hate. All rational people know this. As for your race mongering, again, put up any post of mine which fits that description. If you can't, then you need to STFU.

More tapes released today...You'll need to double down to defend this dirtbag
 
His comments were really sick. Warren Jeffs raped numerous young girls. I think his youngest bride was 12. Tucker is a deeply sick person for defending that pedophile monster.

More comments released today...About underage girls, the guy is a real perv
 
Back
Top Bottom