• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Seth Rich Lie Exposed

Which is why I am completely fine with watching you run, yet again. Because apparently insults are the best you can actually muster.

You took like five days to respond and instead of something of substance you accuse me of running. SAD!

By the way, when you blame the Clintons for your side believing in pizza gate that's what's known as a defense. The fact is you'd have to be a complete moron conspiracy theorist to have believed any of that. At no point did that story sound plausible to anyone with common sense.
 
Which is actually counter active to what you previously stated.

You're running what Trump said against what people would actually believe.
So which is correct, a joke that Trump made at his rallies, or your suggestion that republicans would inherently be cold blooded?

I also feel the need to point this out before it gets swept over. But that joke was made as a counter to the way that the media was portraying him and with how their continued lies about him, had inadvertently ruined the populaces trust. Saying that he could shoot someone and at that point, with how their view in the public eye was. No one would really believe the news media, simply because they'd already pissed away that trust, by their own hand.
When people cheer a moron, they should not be surprised others believe them to be morons too.
 
Even if that was all I had. It would far exceed all of whatever regressives like you can muster.

Really? you bitch about the left being too inclusive with "identity politics" and then say you have more minorities in your camp? :lol:

You clearly will say anything no matter how untrue. Also proven in your whining about how you can't understand how right wing violence is the bigger threat in our nation. So sorry reality is cramping your fake news bubble you live in.
 
My point was that Trump said he could do anything he wants and not loose any votes. It's not a joke. Sadly, it's true. It doesn't run counter to anything I've said. He could simply say that the victim was an illegal alien and his base would cheer.

Seeing as we have no basis for that being true to begin with. Your assumption is nothing more, or less than what it already is. Just an assumption.
 
You took like five days to respond and instead of something of substance you accuse me of running. SAD!

By the way, when you blame the Clintons for your side believing in pizza gate that's what's known as a defense. The fact is you'd have to be a complete moron conspiracy theorist to have believed any of that. At no point did that story sound plausible to anyone with common sense.

Does it look like I need to work on your time table?

I also don't blame the Clintons. I'm pointing out how such things can take root. Your the one who just seem to ignore everything in favor of your own view of some twisted reality.

But you know I'm just tired of chasing you and waiting for you to actually own up to something for once. You haven't done as such in all the time I've seen you on here and I don't see you doing as such in the near, to mediate future.
 
When people cheer a moron, they should not be surprised others believe them to be morons too.

Yet they cheered for Obama, Hillary, Bernie, Cortez, Kamala and a myriad of others...

Either way, it's still just your opinion. So I don't see any reason to worry in the very least.
 
Really? you bitch about the left being too inclusive with "identity politics" and then say you have more minorities in your camp? :lol:

You clearly will say anything no matter how untrue. Also proven in your whining about how you can't understand how right wing violence is the bigger threat in our nation. So sorry reality is cramping your fake news bubble you live in.

This would be a much better point, if identity politics wasn't all that you had to bank on.

You clearly will say anything no matter how untrue.
That bit of projection there was pretty damn cute, all things considered.

I have no problem recognizing that there is such a thing as right wing violence. But you somehow thinking that left wing violence doesn't even exist. Is probably the more serious sign of a problem, that I've had the privilege of seeing in the last seven years of this career.
 
This would be a much better point, if identity politics wasn't all that you had to bank on.


That bit of projection there was pretty damn cute, all things considered.

I have no problem recognizing that there is such a thing as right wing violence. But you somehow thinking that left wing violence doesn't even exist. Is probably the more serious sign of a problem, that I've had the privilege of seeing in the last seven years of this career.

That's a lot of typing to say, "I know you are but what am I?"
 
That's a lot of typing to say, "I know you are but what am I?"

And that's a small amount of typing to still say nothing in the end. But the same pitiful response that regressives like yourself are usually capable of. But only just in the barest of most occasions.

In the end, you're going to ignore all of the people who get assaulted, threatened and even killed by those on your side. Simple because they're your people. I have no care for what you really think reality pertains to, because you'll continue to display just how horrifying biased you are. So much so that it's a detriment to your own defense in almost every stretch of understanding.
 
And that's a small amount of typing to still say nothing in the end. But the same pitiful response that regressives like yourself are usually capable of. But only just in the barest of most occasions.

In the end, you're going to ignore all of the people who get assaulted, threatened and even killed by those on your side. Simple because they're your people. I have no care for what you really think reality pertains to, because you'll continue to display just how horrifying biased you are. So much so that it's a detriment to your own defense in almost every stretch of understanding.

And you are going to ignore facts like usual. Sorry, I don't do nutjob conspiracies.
 
So long as the target is white, or republican. They'd most likely be fine with that person being murdered in cold blood.

I'm not sure you understand the meaning of your own signature. Firstly, it's not an accurate quote. “We flood communities with so many guns that it is easier for a teenager to buy a Glock than get his hands on a computer or even a book.”
When President Obama delivered that line to a room full of about a thousand cops, there was not a lot of evident disagreement. During the memorial service for five slain Dallas police officers who were killed in the July 7, 2016 shooting, Obama made the comparison between buying a gun and a book.

President Obama was trying to address crime and lack of opportunity. This was his whole point:

“We flood communities with so many guns that it is easier for a teenager to buy a Glock than get his hands on a computer or even a book, and then we tell the police, ‘You’re a social worker, you’re the parent, you’re the teacher, you’re the drug counselor.’”
 
And you are going to ignore facts like usual. Sorry, I don't do nutjob conspiracies.

Seeing as none have really been supplied so far. I can't ignore something that doesn't exist. Then gain, you're are making more than enough up for several poster on one pages. So I really shouldn't be at a loss for missing out on anything at this point.

Lets try this. It's no secret that left-wing and right-wing violence exist. But here is the issue that you seem to be forgetting, or entirely omitting for your own benefit. Right-violence, while not as numerous as one would believe. Is more prone to actually causing deaths when it occurs. While left-wing violence, usually consist of assaults and large amounts of property damage. However, in the last few years we've seen the media televise more far-right incidents. While protecting incidents perpetrated by the far-left, or just the left in general. I remember when the left was actually rather progressive and not what it's become today.

We've seen groups like CNN protect them. This also includes Vox, The Young Turks, MSNBC etc.

While we've seen the right-wing media outright denounce acts perpetrated by those on the right.

I'm not saying that right-wing violence doesn't happen. I'm merely saying that you wont even admit that left-wing violence even exist.
 
I'm not sure you understand the meaning of your own signature. Firstly, it's not an accurate quote. “We flood communities with so many guns that it is easier for a teenager to buy a Glock than get his hands on a computer or even a book.”
When President Obama delivered that line to a room full of about a thousand cops, there was not a lot of evident disagreement. During the memorial service for five slain Dallas police officers who were killed in the July 7, 2016 shooting, Obama made the comparison between buying a gun and a book.

President Obama was trying to address crime and lack of opportunity. This was his whole point:

“We flood communities with so many guns that it is easier for a teenager to buy a Glock than get his hands on a computer or even a book, and then we tell the police, ‘You’re a social worker, you’re the parent, you’re the teacher, you’re the drug counselor.’”

Yes, he tried.

He tried and failed.
 
Seeing as none have really been supplied so far. I can't ignore something that doesn't exist. Then gain, you're are making more than enough up for several poster on one pages. So I really shouldn't be at a loss for missing out on anything at this point.

Lets try this. It's no secret that left-wing and right-wing violence exist. But here is the issue that you seem to be forgetting, or entirely omitting for your own benefit. Right-violence, while not as numerous as one would believe. Is more prone to actually causing deaths when it occurs. While left-wing violence, usually consist of assaults and large amounts of property damage. However, in the last few years we've seen the media televise more far-right incidents. While protecting incidents perpetrated by the far-left, or just the left in general. I remember when the left was actually rather progressive and not what it's become today.

We've seen groups like CNN protect them. This also includes Vox, The Young Turks, MSNBC etc.

While we've seen the right-wing media outright denounce acts perpetrated by those on the right.

I'm not saying that right-wing violence doesn't happen. I'm merely saying that you wont even admit that left-wing violence even exist.

Stop crying and lying already. I condemn left wing violence. It just doesn't fit your lying narrative of how you and your ilk are the perpetual victims.
 
Stop crying and lying already. I condemn left wing violence. It just doesn't fit your lying narrative of how you and your ilk are the perpetual victims.

And back to the insults... great.

Never expect a regressive to rise above. you'll only end up disappointed.

I'm done with you now, so go run somewhere else.
 
And back to the insults... great.

Never expect a regressive to rise above. you'll only end up disappointed.

I'm done with you now, so go run somewhere else.

giphy.gif
 
No, people wanted to see Obama's birth certificate to be sure. This is the seat of the presidency, not the position of fry cook at some street side bar & grill. When it all came out and was certified that nothing was wrong. The opposition stopped from all, save for the most vocal and hysterical of the far-right. People only kept hearing about it, because of the media dedicating so much time to an issue that was now and forever, dead.
-
Sandy hook, to my knowledge has only been considered fake by one media personality and that was Alex Jones. A man who routinely plays a fake character, all of the damn time. Screaming at piles of **** in the street and will only report actual news on the slowest of days. He's sometimes funny, but not in anyway an actual majority of the conservative mindset.
-
You're referring to pizza gate. Which to this day I still believe is a story that was "said" to be pushed by supporters of Donald Trump. But strangely grew to prominence on Reddit... which should've been everyone's ****ing clue that it was a damn troll, though cleverly disguised to be an actual story. I have seen no proof that it was originally spread by conservatives, or Trump supports for that matter. Though I must give the Reddit posters credit, it was a very potent story. But were it not for the Clinton's proclivities at the time. Such a story would never of gotten such traction in the first place. What with the incredibly close ties to Epstein and the fact that they practically helped out Laura Silsby. A woman that was found trying to smuggle both women and children out of Haiti. So given such verdant information. It was not hard for such a story to grow from being a simple Reddit post. To being covered by several of the larger media groups in the nation.

All of this still has yet to show that conservatives, even on a slim majority, are "as you say" divorced from reality. A conspiracy is as hungry as a blazing fire and given more then enough space to feed, it will do so. Growing out of hand as it does.
The same goes for all groups.

Pizzagate was "seeded" on Reddit by Russian trolls. Just ask "FBIAnon". Are all you Trumpist's such rubes? Oh wait... you already answered that.

For a story to gain traction, propagandists plant false information on anonymous chat boards, hoping real people will pick it up and add a “human touch” to acts of digital manipulation. “If you want to sow a conspiracy, you seed it someplace – 4chan or Reddit is a perfect vehicle,” he says, and wait for someone like Katz to take the bait. “Someone or some group,” Watts says, “possibly took this unwitting woman and made her the source that they need.”

On a pair of anonymous message boards, we found several possible seeds of Pizzagate. On July 2nd, 2016, someone calling himself FBIAnon, who claimed to be a “high-level analyst and strategist” for the bureau, hosted an Ask Me Anything forum on 4chan. He claimed to be leaking government secrets – á la Edward Snowden – out of a love for country, but it wasn’t always clear which country he meant. At various times, he wrote, “Russia is more a paragon of freedom and nationalism than any other country” and “We are the aggressors against Russia.” FBIAnon’s secrets were about the Department of Justice’s inquiry into the Clinton Foundation, which federal prosecutors never formalized. “Dig deep,” he wrote. “Bill and Hillary love foreign donors so much. They get paid in children as well as money.”
Pizzagate: Anatomy of a Fake News Scandal – Rolling Stone
 
Yet they cheered for Obama, Hillary, Bernie, Cortez, Kamala and a myriad of others...

Either way, it's still just your opinion. So I don't see any reason to worry in the very least.

Well, as we see in all your posts above, your opinion is pretty senseless.
 
I remember this one well. Another disgusting example of spreading a total lie at the expense of further torturing a family that had already lost a loved one to crime. Pecker head, Sean Hannity, had to be forced by his own network to shut his lying mouth about it.

Calling Hannity a pecker head is an insult to peckers.
 
Well, as we see in all your posts above, your opinion is pretty senseless.

Once again, that's just your opinion and given your history on such things. It really doesn't carry much weight besides being a breath.
 
Back
Top Bottom