Don Jr.’s going to jail so he went on Fox News to talk about it.

Tangmo · Feb 26, 2019

humbolt said:
I hear the West Wing is called little St. Petersburg.

Moscow on the Potomac.

Treason and son of treason.

humbolt · Feb 26, 2019

Tangmo said:
Moscow on the Potomac.

Treason and son of treason.

It's hard for me to believe you guys take this stuff seriously. Not too hard, but without substance, it strains credulity. Having some experience is such things, I expect Trump's finances may be of some concern. That would not surprise me. The rest? Let's just wait until what ever Mueller has determined is available to the public.

Fletch · Feb 26, 2019

Tangmo said:
Gave up on the questions for a while eh.

Don't blame you given the gas you're taking. Yet it's nothing like the gas you're emiting. I'm speaking volumes of course.

I'm trying to stay with Don Jr. who is son of treason. Which is how he got to be the topic. There you have an answer. First one in a long time innit. Probably the last one you'll see for a long time too. I'd change my strategy again but that's just me. Cause with treason and son of treason the options are running out rapidly.

Do you ever type out a post that makes sense?

Fletch · Feb 26, 2019

markjs said:
NO, in other words, READ what I said, Notice the likes? Proves I'm right.:roll:

You're dismissed, run along now sport!:lamo

Im not going anywhere, but what I am going to do is continue to point out your inability to answer simple and direct questions. Oh, and by the way, have you been able to solve the 2+2 riddle yet? Or would you like me to give you a couple clues?

markjs · Feb 26, 2019

markjs said:
Why would anyone ever answer any of your incessantly vapid queries, that you've absolutely no interest in?:roll:

Your question?

Fletch said:
And why would Don Jr. being going to jail?

Asked and answered by the OP, had you read the link. Dismissed for irrelevancy...:roll:

Bore someone else with your schtick, IDC.:shrug:

Fletch · Feb 26, 2019

markjs said:
Your question?

Asked and answered by the OP, had you read the link. Dismissed for irrelevancy...:roll:

Bore someone else with your schtick, IDC.:shrug:

If YOU had read the link you would know that what you just said was a lie.

So tell me, why would Don Jr. be going to jail? You wont answer for one simple reason: you cant. So rather than admit your obvious ignorance, you attack me. I get it, there are a number of liberals who do the exact same thing. But it doesnt explain why you cant answer the 2+2 part though. Could it be that you cant answer that either? So it seems.

markjs · Feb 26, 2019

Fletch said:
If YOU had read the link you would know that what you just said was a lie.

So tell me, why would Don Jr. be going to jail? You wont answer for one simple reason: you cant. So rather than admit your obvious ignorance, you attack me. I get it, there are a number of liberals who do the exact same thing. But it doesnt explain why you cant answer the 2+2 part though. Could it be that you cant answer that either? So it seems.

:yawn:

Fletch · Feb 26, 2019

markjs said:
:yawn:

So why would Don Jr. be going to jail?

And 2+2= ?

markjs · Feb 26, 2019

Fletch said:
So why would Don Jr. be going to jail?

And 2+2= ?

You've already gotten far more response than your played out schtick merits. Go bore someone who finds you worthwhile, perhaps in a world of five plus billion there might be a handful still left?:roll:

Everyone here knows, no matter the answer provided, you will sit there and dumbly ask the same question over and over lather rinse and repeat. Apparently it's the only arghument you're able to come up with. Not my concern tho, I'm done even reading your nonsense for the day at least, if not the week or month. Ignore is for weenies, I can easily ignore you without a feature.

Act like you have a question, ignore the answer, ask again over and over ad infinitum, falsely claim victory, it's just what you do.... (Nobody is sure why?)

Enjoy, I can just about personally guarantee, nobody else will enjoy your one-trick-pony inane posting style, but somehow you persist. I suppose you must get something from it?:roll:

Fletch · Feb 26, 2019

markjs said:
You've already gotten far more response than your played out schtick merits. Go bore someone who finds you worthwhile, perhaps in a world of five plus billion there might be a handful still left?:roll:

Everyone here knows, no matter the answer provided, you will sit there and dumbly ask the same question over and over lather rinse and repeat. Apparently it's the only arghument you're able to come up with. Not my concern tho, I'm done even reading your nonsense for the day at least, if not the week or month. Ignore is for weenies, I can easily ignore you without a feature.

Act like you have a question, ignore the answer, ask again over and over ad infinitum, falsely claim victory, it's just what you do.... (Nobody is sure why?)

Enjoy, I can just about personally guarantee, nobody else will enjoy your one-trick-pony inane posting style, but somehow you persist. I suppose you must get something from it?:roll:

Let me refresh your memory since that seems to be every bit as bad as your ability to be truthful. The OP claimed "Don Jr. is going to jail." I asked, "Why would Don Jr. be going to jail?" Rather than answer, you have droned on for post after post pretending that such a question is somehow out of bounds. Its not. The fact is, you simply cannot answer it yet lack the courage or integrity to admit it. So you attack me for asking. I get it. Thats your style and your choice. But dont get pissed at me when I expose your crap for what it is. Crap.

markjs · Feb 26, 2019

Tangmo said:
Gave up on the questions for a while eh.

Don't blame you given the gas you're taking. Yet it's nothing like the gas you're emiting. I'm speaking volumes of course.

I'm trying to stay with Don Jr. who is son of treason. Which is how he got to be the topic. There you have an answer. First one in a long time innit. Probably the last one you'll see for a long time too. I'd change my strategy again but that's just me. Cause with treason and son of treason the options are running out rapidly.

Why does anyone reply to that guy? Are we that bored? I mean might as wejj just have a jack in the box that pops up and says "what crimes?"

Like a stuck record only less useful.:roll:

Tangmo · Feb 26, 2019

markjs said:
You've already gotten far more response than your played out schtick merits. Go bore someone who finds you worthwhile, perhaps in a world of five plus billion there might be a handful still left?:roll:

Everyone here knows, no matter the answer provided, you will sit there and dumbly ask the same question over and over lather rinse and repeat. Apparently it's the only arghument you're able to come up with. Not my concern tho, I'm done even reading your nonsense for the day at least, if not the week or month. Ignore is for weenies, I can easily ignore you without a feature.

Act like you have a question, ignore the answer, ask again over and over ad infinitum, falsely claim victory, it's just what you do.... (Nobody is sure why?)

Enjoy, I can just about personally guarantee, nobody else will enjoy your one-trick-pony inane posting style, but somehow you persist. I suppose you must get something from it?:roll:

markjs said:
Why does anyone reply to that guy? Are we that bored? I mean might as wejj just have a jack in the box that pops up and says "what crimes?"

Like a stuck record only less useful.:roll:

Well taken.

Still however and while I don't have any data to present I'd say an interrogatory at an internet discussion board is either not serious or too serious. Straightforward statements are on the other hand best, or so I'd say.

It is plain the person we're talking about asking the question is doing so because he knows his answer already. And as you point out, and as we know, only the answer he likes will do. And in the instance of the questionkinder the answer doesn't matter as you point out and as we well know.

Yes obviously the poster we're responding to is playing and dawdling because he hasn't anything better to go with. To answer your question born of frustration, doing a little fun and games myself isn't so bad and in fact can be justified as, well, justified. Given he's not serious why should I be so. (I myself rarely put a question mark btw, for the obvious reason it might encourage someone to reply.) It's also true that flash questions are easier and quicker to post than an expository or being analytical, and that even the lazy and repetitive questions presented imply superiority and the initiative which is self comforting and designed to mask the vacuous fakery to begin with.

I'm also sure he knows he needs a new posting formula but hasn't come up with one because he's used all of 'em that he knows. His intellectual resources are spent so he's got nothing left to put forward. It's either throw in the towel as it were or drone on, and he is rightwing driven to go on with the droning. The Right has always been certain anyway that endless droning rules and he who posts last wins. And that it's all about winning even if they haven't won any for a long time already. With only more of the same on the roadmap.