• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Russian Interference in U.S. Elections

Logician Man

Logician Man

Zenyatta
DP Veteran
Joined
Jul 23, 2018
Messages
42,446
Reaction score
27,908
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Other
Why would any U.S. President not want to get to the bottom of Russia's ( one of the U.S.'s most adversarial enemies ) interference in our U.S. elections ?...something every U.S. Intel agency says is a given fact.
 
Maybe because the "evidence" is that the "influence" was primarily Twitter and FaceBook posts. If there was some indication that they hacked a voting system and changed votes or ran a PAC and helpef people fill out ballots that would be a different story but it was all propaganda...the same stuff the candidates were doing. It's like "They can't do that to our pledges! Only we can do that to our pledges".
 
Logician Man said:
Why would any U.S. President not want to get to the bottom of Russia's ( one of the U.S.'s most adversarial enemies ) interference in our U.S. elections ?...something every U.S. Intel agency says is a given fact.
Click to expand...

Great question? Why would the SITTING POTUS when it happened..DO THIS?



Obama cyber chief confirms 'stand down' order against Russian cyberattacks in summer 2016


Obama cyber chief confirms '''stand down''' order against Russian cyberattacks in summer 2016



Apparently, because he was "MAKING GOOD" on THIS:

Obama open mic slip: 'After my election I have more flexibility'






Let's see...was just that a TOTAL DERELICTION of DUTY, or OPEN TREASON?


You decide....
 
Grokmaster said:
Great question? Why would the SITTING POTUS when it happened..DO THIS?



Obama cyber chief confirms 'stand down' order against Russian cyberattacks in summer 2016


Obama cyber chief confirms '''stand down''' order against Russian cyberattacks in summer 2016



Apparently, because he was "MAKING GOOD" on THIS:

Obama open mic slip: 'After my election I have more flexibility'






Let's see...was just that a TOTAL DERELICTION of DUTY, or OPEN TREASON?


You decide....
Click to expand...


Has Trump acknowledged Russia meddled in our 2016 and 2018 midterm elections as all 17 U.S. intel agencies claim Russia did? YES or NO ?
 
Logician Man said:
Has Trump acknowledged Russia meddled in our 2016 and 2018 midterm elections as all 17 U.S. intel agencies claim Russia did? YES or NO ?
Click to expand...

Nice attempted DODGE of the EMBRASSING FACTS.


Who was POTUS THEN?

STOP TRYING BLAME TRUMP FOR OBAMA's FAILURE/TREASON.


Has OBAMA EXPLAINED WHY HE DID WHAT I POSTED????



What you asked: " Why would any U.S. President not want to get to the bottom of Russia's ( one of the U.S.'s most adversarial enemies ) interference in our U.S. elections ?...something every U.S. Intel agency says is a given fact.


Well? WHY ?
 
Grokmaster said:
Nice attempted DODGE of the EMBRASSING FACTS.


Who was POTUS THEN?

STOP TRYING BLAME TRUMP FOR OBAMA's FAILURE/TREASON.


Has OBAMA EXPLAINED WHY HE DID WHAT I POSTED????



What you asked: " Why would any U.S. President not want to get to the bottom of Russia's ( one of the U.S.'s most adversarial enemies ) interference in our U.S. elections ?...something every U.S. Intel agency says is a given fact.


Well? WHY ?
Click to expand...

Are you going to answer the fair question or not about the 2016 prez election and 2018 midterms elections in which Trump was President, and in which all 17 U.S. intel agencies stated Russia meddled in ? Has Trump acknowledged Russia meddled in those 2 elections ? YES or NO ?
 
Logician Man said:
Are you going to answer the fair question or not about the 2016 prez election and 2018 midterms elections in which Trump was President, and in which all 17 U.S. intel agencies stated Russia meddled in ? Has Trump acknowledged Russia meddled in those 2 elections ? YES or NO ?
Click to expand...

Excuse ME? RUSSIAN INTERFERENCE in the 2016 ELECTIONS was ALLOWED to go on , UNIMPEDED, BY OBAMA...NOT TRUMP.


If anyone has to ANSWER FOR IT, IT CERTAINLY IS NOT TRUMP.


Once again...YOUR QUESTION: Why would any U.S. President not want to get to the bottom of Russia's ( one of the U.S.'s most adversarial enemies ) interference in our U.S. elections ?...something every U.S. Intel agency says is a given fact.






Well?? WHY??? WGY DID OBAMA ALLOW IT??
 
Grokmaster said:
Excuse ME? RUSSIAN INTERFERENCE in the 2016 ELECTIONS was ALLOWED to go on , UNIMPEDED, BY OBAMA...NOT TRUMP.


If anyone has to ANSWER FOR IT, IT CERTAINLY IS NOT TRUMP.


Once again...YOUR QUESTION: Why would any U.S. President not want to get to the bottom of Russia's ( one of the U.S.'s most adversarial enemies ) interference in our U.S. elections ?...something every U.S. Intel agency says is a given fact.






Well?? WHY??? WGY DID OBAMA ALLOW IT??
Click to expand...

It appears not...moving on...
 
Logician Man said:
It appears not...moving on...
Click to expand...
Yeah..it appears you are unable to explain OBAMA's TREASON and want to keep pretending it didn't happen, while trying to blame Trump, who HAD NOTHING TO DO WITH IT.


"Moving on"?


YOU CANNOT EVEN HONESTLY ANSWER YOUR OWN QUESTION, or ADDRESS THE ACTUAL FACTS of the 2016 ELECTION MEDDLING.
 
Logician Man said:
Why would any U.S. President not want to get to the bottom of Russia's ( one of the U.S.'s most adversarial enemies ) interference in our U.S. elections ?...something every U.S. Intel agency says is a given fact.
Click to expand...

???? We are getting to the bottom of it. We have talked about virtually nothing else for nearly 3 years. The HOuse, the Senate and the FBI have all investigated it and we have had a SC on the case for almost 2 years. The question you should be asking is why Mueller hasnt wrapped this up yet considering we are heading into another presidential election.
 
Fletch said:
???? We are getting to the bottom of it. We have talked about virtually nothing else for nearly 3 years. The HOuse, the Senate and the FBI have all investigated it and we have had a SC on the case for almost 2 years. The question you should be asking is why Mueller hasnt wrapped this up yet considering we are heading into another presidential election.
Click to expand...

I still want to "get to the bottom" of the STAND DOWN ORDER , from Obama to our intel services when he had MONTHS of forewarning about the Russian cyber shenanigans.
 
Grokmaster said:
Yeah..it appears you are unable to explain OBAMA's TREASON and want to keep pretending it didn't happen, while trying to blame Trump, who HAD NOTHING TO DO WITH IT.


"Moving on"?


YOU CANNOT EVEN HONESTLY ANSWER YOUR OWN QUESTION, or ADDRESS THE ACTUAL FACTS of the 2016 ELECTION MEDDLING.
Click to expand...

Obama's treason ? Post the link that shows Obama committed treason, the ensuing investigation, the trial, and which prison he is currently incarcerated in for committing treason. I predict you will put forth no links to support your rather silly positive claim. Care to prove me wrong ?
 
Logician Man said:
Why would any U.S. President not want to get to the bottom of Russia's ( one of the U.S.'s most adversarial enemies ) interference in our U.S. elections ?...something every U.S. Intel agency says is a given fact.
Click to expand...

Because he wants to build a hotel in Russia, and they are one of the few sources he has left for loans.
 
Grokmaster said:
Great question? Why would the SITTING POTUS when it happened..DO THIS?



Obama cyber chief confirms 'stand down' order against Russian cyberattacks in summer 2016


Obama cyber chief confirms '''stand down''' order against Russian cyberattacks in summer 2016



Apparently, because he was "MAKING GOOD" on THIS:

Obama open mic slip: 'After my election I have more flexibility'





Let's see...was just that a TOTAL DERELICTION of DUTY, or OPEN TREASON?


You decide....
Click to expand...

I don't know about any Obama/Putin agreements but it sure would be entertaining if the end result of all this "investigation" is that the Democrats, and especially the Clinton campaign, coordinated with their associates in the media to promote Trump's candidacy through the primaries with the idea being that he'd be the easiest candidate for her to beat.
 
The OP asks THIS QUESTION: "Why would any U.S. President not want to get to the bottom of Russia's ( one of the U.S.'s most adversarial enemies ) interference in our U.S. elections ?...something every U.S. Intel agency says is a given fact" , but, OBVIOUSLY, is only fishing to get a "PILE ON TRUMP" circle jerk going, and HAS NO REAL INTEREST IN THE RESPONSE to the 2016 RUSSIAN ELECTION MEDDLING.

Easy to see WHY:





New details of Russia election hacking raise questions about Obama's response

New details of Russia election hacking raise questions about Obama's response | US news | The Guardian
 
Grokmaster said:
Great question? Why would the SITTING POTUS when it happened..DO THIS?



Obama cyber chief confirms 'stand down' order against Russian cyberattacks in summer 2016


Obama cyber chief confirms '''stand down''' order against Russian cyberattacks in summer 2016



Apparently, because he was "MAKING GOOD" on THIS:

Obama open mic slip: 'After my election I have more flexibility'






Let's see...was just that a TOTAL DERELICTION of DUTY, or OPEN TREASON?


You decide....
Click to expand...


Of all the dishonesty coming from the Scumbag Glee Club, this idea that they would have welcomed the Obama DoJ to have started arresting scumbags in the Scumbag campaign during that campaign is one of the biggest lies they try to foist on fora like this. Who. Do. You. Think. You're. Foolin'?
 
beancounter said:
Because he wants to build a hotel in Russia, and they are one of the few sources he has left for loans.
Click to expand...



Which was so much worse than allowing Putin control of 20% of our uranium reserves, allowing ILLEGAL EXPORTS of yellowcake oversees, and then ordering our intell to STAND DOWN, and not interfere with Russian meddling...the POINT OF THE THREAD's EMBARASSING (for you and yours) answer....
 
Logician Man said:
Why would any U.S. President not want to get to the bottom of Russia's ( one of the U.S.'s most adversarial enemies ) interference in our U.S. elections ?...something every U.S. Intel agency says is a given fact.
Click to expand...

When 17 of your intel agencies tell you it's true?? But you believe Putin?? Big problem.
 
Fletch said:
???? We are getting to the bottom of it. We have talked about virtually nothing else for nearly 3 years. The HOuse, the Senate and the FBI have all investigated it and we have had a SC on the case for almost 2 years. The question you should be asking is why Mueller hasnt wrapped this up yet considering we are heading into another presidential election.
Click to expand...

The election is 21 months away.

Should he wrap up the investigation before the election, the way Ken Starr wrapped up his before the election? Oh wait. That was 1998. Two years after the election - and four years after he started.
 
Grokmaster said:
Excuse ME? RUSSIAN INTERFERENCE in the 2016 ELECTIONS was ALLOWED to go on , UNIMPEDED, BY OBAMA...NOT TRUMP.


If anyone has to ANSWER FOR IT, IT CERTAINLY IS NOT TRUMP.


Once again...YOUR QUESTION: Why would any U.S. President not want to get to the bottom of Russia's ( one of the U.S.'s most adversarial enemies ) interference in our U.S. elections ?...something every U.S. Intel agency says is a given fact.






Well?? WHY??? WGY DID OBAMA ALLOW IT??
Click to expand...

Because Mitch McConnell threatened Obama. Because they thought Hillary would win. You have no reasonable answer at all - deflect - blame Obama. Good luck with that.
 
Grokmaster said:
Which was so much worse than allowing Putin control of 20% of our uranium reserves, allowing ILLEGAL EXPORTS of yellowcake oversees, and then ordering our intell to STAND DOWN, and not interfere with Russian meddling...the POINT OF THE THREAD's EMBARASSING (for you and yours) answer....
Click to expand...

Try to keep up - that's been investigated to death already - you just didn't like the answer.
 
Lutherf said:
I don't know about any Obama/Putin agreements but it sure would be entertaining if the end result of all this "investigation" is that the Democrats, and especially the Clinton campaign, coordinated with their associates in the media to promote Trump's candidacy through the primaries with the idea being that he'd be the easiest candidate for her to beat.
Click to expand...

Entertaining in the sense of its absurdity on its face. Yes.
 
Grokmaster said:
I still want to "get to the bottom" of the STAND DOWN ORDER , from Obama to our intel services when he had MONTHS of forewarning about the Russian cyber shenanigans.
Click to expand...

Good choice of words, "bottom." Because it's the bottom of the barrel of bull**** rightwing excuses for the crimes of Scumbag, and associates.
 
jghiretire said:
Doesn't have a good answer. If he yells loud enough he doesn't have to answer. The usual, right?
Click to expand...

Hilairous, I present the FACTS about who was in charge during the very meddling the OP is about, and "I don't have a good answer".


Has the Witch Hunt been stopped? No.


Now...WHY DID OBAMA ORDER THE STAND DOWN?


Let's see who "DOESN'T HAVE A GOOD ANSWER"....
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom