• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

16 States Sue to Stop Trump

Rogue Valley

Lead or get out of the way
DP Veteran
Joined
Apr 18, 2013
Messages
94,329
Reaction score
82,713
Location
Barsoom
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Independent
16 States Sue to Stop Trump’s Use of Emergency Powers to Build Border Wall

Donald+Trump+Border+Patrol+Monitors+California+yBEghQ5ZMull.jpg

Trump wall prototype designs erected near San Diego. All failed DHS tests.

2/18/19
WASHINGTON — A coalition of 16 states, including California and New York, on Monday challenged President Trump in court over his plan to use emergency powers to spend billions of dollars on his border wall. The lawsuit is part of a constitutional confrontation that Mr. Trump set off on Friday when he declared that he would spend billions of dollars more on border barriers than Congress had granted him. The clash raises questions over congressional control of spending, the scope of emergency powers granted to the president, and how far the courts are willing to go to settle such a dispute. The suit, filed in Federal District Court in San Francisco, argues that the president does not have the power to divert funds for constructing a wall along the Mexican border because it is Congress that controls spending. Xavier Becerra, the attorney general of California, said in an interview that the president himself had undercut his argument that there was an emergency on the border. “Probably the best evidence is the president’s own words,” he said, referring to Mr. Trump’s speech on Feb. 15 announcing his plan: “I didn’t need to do this, but I’d rather do it much faster.”

The lawsuit, California et al. v. Trump et al., says that the plaintiff states are going to court to protect their residents, natural resources and economic interests. “Contrary to the will of Congress, the president has used the pretext of a manufactured ‘crisis’ of unlawful immigration to declare a national emergency and redirect federal dollars appropriated for drug interdiction, military construction and law enforcement initiatives toward building a wall on the United States-Mexico border,” the lawsuit says. Congress is on its own separate track to challenge the president’s declaration. The House of Representatives, now controlled by Democrats, may take a two-prong approach when it returns from a recess. One would be to bring a lawsuit of its own. Joining California and New York are Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Hawaii, Illinois, Maine, Maryland, Michigan, Minnesota, Nevada, New Jersey, New Mexico, Oregon and Virginia.

More states are joining the California lawsuit. At its core, Trumps "national emergency" declaration is a willful and unlawful Constitutional emergency.
 
Odds are these States will get a favorable ruling out of the Federal District Court in San Francisco, the question will end up being what happens next.
 
16 States Sue to Stop Trump’s Use of Emergency Powers to Build Border Wall

Donald+Trump+Border+Patrol+Monitors+California+yBEghQ5ZMull.jpg

Trump wall prototype designs erected near San Diego. All failed DHS tests.



More states are joining the California lawsuit. At its core, Trumps "national emergency" declaration is a willful and unlawful Constitutional emergency.

Congress gave the Executive open-ended unilateral authority to define what constitutes a national emergency and to appropriate funds accordingly. There is no Constitutional issue here.
 
Back
Top Bottom