• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Schiff: Evidence of collusion between Trump campaign, Russia 'pretty compelling'

Mach said:
Of course it's compelling...for 50% of the population. The other 50% simply doesn't care and prefers to rationalization it in a myriad of ways...outright denial, trolling, lying, fine people on both sides, conspiracy theories, scorched earth, etc.



The thread is about Schiff claiming, in contrast to a senate Republican, that the evidence of collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia is "pretty compelling".

As far as I know, it was not a response of Schiff to the phony question "what about Marc Elias!!!". Are you trying to derail the thread on purpose, or by accident?
Click to expand...

It really does become a "pile'on" doesn't it??? You really have to wonder.
 
calamity said:
Not to mention Manafort's connection to the Russian mob which he met with at Trump Tower for years.
Click to expand...

The biggest question I have with Manafort is if he was so much in debt, why would he work on Trump's campaign for free. Hmmmm.
 
eohrnberger said:
There's probably still some 'Deep State' provocateurs in the DOJ / FBI that need to get cleaned out, as these executive branch agencies should be studiously and demonstrably non-partisan and non-political in their application and enforcement of law. Anything less than this spirals down to banana republic / Soviet regime territory, which isn't how Democracies are supposed to work.

Sure, each employee, officer, staffer in these agencies can have their own political leanings, their own outside of the office political support and activities, but they need to deliver their governmental duties in a demonstrably non-partisan and non-political manner.
Click to expand...

Deep State?.....You one of those QNON conspiracy types?......Hanging on every word from Alex Jones?.....Deep State=Total BULL****
 
JacksinPA said:
Schiff: Evidence of collusion between Trump campaign, Russia 'pretty compelling' | TheHill

House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff (D-Calif.) is pushing back against Senate Intelligence Committee Chairman Richard Burr's (R-N.C.) assertion that the Senate panel has not found evidence of collusion between President Trump's campaign and Russia.

Schiff said Sunday on CNN's "State of the Union" that there is "pretty compelling evidence" of collusion during the 2016 election.
===========================================================
Quoting Sciff: "You can see evidence in plain sight on the issue of collusion, pretty compelling evidence. Now, there's a difference between seeing evidence of collusion and being able to prove a criminal conspiracy beyond a reasonable doubt."

Burr last week had said that his committee doesn't "have anything that would suggest there was collusion by the Trump campaign and Russia."

Leave it to the Repubs to defend Trump until the last.
Click to expand...
p
Let me ask the russian under my bed, nope he said no collusion , he also said he would not pretend to hack the dnc if I pretended to feed him.
 
trixare4kids said:
"Rules for thee, not for me", the hallmark of the looney progressive left and their political operatives, the media.
cb35722db2d17fd14b316e1e606e6a13--this-meme-know-the-truth.jpg
Click to expand...

WOW you need to look in the mirror when you talk about hypocrisy. Loony?? All the RW got on Bill Clinton was a blow job in the oval office after......how many years??
Look that one up.
 
Saladin4 said:
Deep State?.....You one of those QNON conspiracy types?......Hanging on every word from Alex Jones?.....Deep State=Total BULL****
Click to expand...
Total bull****?
I guess you mussed the 60 minutes interview.

Sent from my Pixel 2 using Tapatalk
 
JacksinPA said:
Schiff: Evidence of collusion between Trump campaign, Russia 'pretty compelling' | TheHill

House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff (D-Calif.) is pushing back against Senate Intelligence Committee Chairman Richard Burr's (R-N.C.) assertion that the Senate panel has not found evidence of collusion between President Trump's campaign and Russia.

Schiff said Sunday on CNN's "State of the Union" that there is "pretty compelling evidence" of collusion during the 2016 election.
===========================================================
Quoting Sciff: "You can see evidence in plain sight on the issue of collusion, pretty compelling evidence. Now, there's a difference between seeing evidence of collusion and being able to prove a criminal conspiracy beyond a reasonable doubt."

Burr last week had said that his committee doesn't "have anything that would suggest there was collusion by the Trump campaign and Russia."

Leave it to the Repubs to defend Trump until the last.
Click to expand...

Let's see the evidence, Schitt.
 
MovingPictures said:
From Trump? None yet.

But there's a mountain of evidence that Stone, Flynn, Don Jr, Kushner, Manafort, and Papadopoulos invited Russian nationals to help them in the election.
Click to expand...

Let's see it.
 
JacksinPA said:
Schiff: Evidence of collusion between Trump campaign, Russia 'pretty compelling' | TheHill

House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff (D-Calif.) is pushing back against Senate Intelligence Committee Chairman Richard Burr's (R-N.C.) assertion that the Senate panel has not found evidence of collusion between President Trump's campaign and Russia.

Schiff said Sunday on CNN's "State of the Union" that there is "pretty compelling evidence" of collusion during the 2016 election.
===========================================================
Quoting Sciff: "You can see evidence in plain sight on the issue of collusion, pretty compelling evidence. Now, there's a difference between seeing evidence of collusion and being able to prove a criminal conspiracy beyond a reasonable doubt."

Burr last week had said that his committee doesn't "have anything that would suggest there was collusion by the Trump campaign and Russia."

Leave it to the Repubs to defend Trump until the last.
Click to expand...

If Schiff sees evidence, he needs to present it. Or, STFU.
 
MovingPictures said:
From Trump? None yet.

But there's a mountain of evidence that Stone, Flynn, Don Jr, Kushner, Manafort, and Papadopoulos invited Russian nationals to help them in the election.
Click to expand...

Yeah, let's see it.
 
jghiretire said:
WOW you need to look in the mirror when you talk about hypocrisy. Loony?? All the RW got on Bill Clinton was a blow job in the oval office after......how many years??
Look that one up.
Click to expand...

12 months.
 
joko104 said:
To date not one iota of evidence of collusion by President Trump has ever been offered. However, the OPer is welcome to present what evidence he has.
Click to expand...

Why don't you do what the adults do, and let the investigation play out, and wait for Schiff to present his thoughts. You may not realize this, but the OP isn't presenting himself as someone who has evidence. He repeated what Schiff said.

Why do you make such ridiculous posts and not address the actual topic?
 
LowDown said:
Let's see it.
Click to expand...

You really don't know about Stone and Flynn and Manafort? You really don't know about the Trump Tower meeting and Don Junior? You never heard about what Papadopolous did?

No wonder Trump won. He was elected by people who don't even read the news.
 
Integrityrespec said:
If Mueller had any evidence of Trump working with the Russians we would have seen it by now. If not, then Mueller needs fired for allowing a guy working for the Russians for the past two years as an agent of Russia. This is evidence that nothing exist.
Click to expand...

You would have seen whatever investigators have before they have finished their investigations? Really?

Please let us know when investigators shared findings with you before they publicly announced whatever evidence they have collected. I'd like to see it.
 
JacksinPA said:
Schiff: Evidence of collusion between Trump campaign, Russia 'pretty compelling' | TheHill

House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff (D-Calif.) is pushing back against Senate Intelligence Committee Chairman Richard Burr's (R-N.C.) assertion that the Senate panel has not found evidence of collusion between President Trump's campaign and Russia.

Schiff said Sunday on CNN's "State of the Union" that there is "pretty compelling evidence" of collusion during the 2016 election.
===========================================================
Quoting Sciff: "You can see evidence in plain sight on the issue of collusion, pretty compelling evidence. Now, there's a difference between seeing evidence of collusion and being able to prove a criminal conspiracy beyond a reasonable doubt."

Burr last week had said that his committee doesn't "have anything that would suggest there was collusion by the Trump campaign and Russia."

Leave it to the Repubs to defend Trump until the last.
Click to expand...

then he should be able to cite that evidence.

making general statements of opinion is not evidence.
let him provide it and if he can't then well he is the idiot we all know that he is.

If he can't produce anything then he is just being a loud mouth.
he has to prove his statement true.

So come on schiff lets go provide us the evidence.
i wait for crickets.
 
MovingPictures said:
From Trump? None yet.

But there's a mountain of evidence that Stone, Flynn, Don Jr, Kushner, Manafort, and Papadopoulos invited Russian nationals to help them in the election.
Click to expand...

So did clinton, GPS fusion, steele etc ...
so where is the outrage on that one.

only we actually have evidence they actually did do it.
 
MovingPictures said:
From Trump? None yet.

But there's a mountain of evidence that Stone, Flynn, Don Jr, Kushner, Manafort, and Papadopoulos invited Russian nationals to help them in the election.
Click to expand...

PS none of those people have been indicted for collusion or interfering with an election.
 
Cardinal said:
I admit to being confused why people feel like they need to wait for more proof that Trump and his campaign colluded with Russia. This is no longer an open question. We know they did it. What kind of smoking gun do people think they're going to get? Are they waiting for a handwritten letter from Trump saying, "Dear Putin, please interfere with our election and change the election results and in return I'll give back Alaska"?
Click to expand...

Because we live in the US. in the US you are innocent until proven guilty.

so Please provide us with the list of names of people that have been charged with
collusion with russia
and with being found guilty of election tampering.

also please provide when they were convicted and their court date.

So far no one has been charged with colluding with russia.
so unless you have some court case that no one else has seen i ask you to provide it.

What we do know is that Hillary clinton hired GPS fusion who worked with russian nationalist to try
and interfere with the election. SO you should 100% be absolutely outraged demanding investigations
etc for what they did and how they operated.

if not we can simply dismiss anything you have to say on this.
 
Cardinal said:
What part of “my post wasn’t directed towards you” are you having difficulty with?
Click to expand...

have a nice day. your concession is noted.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom