• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Top Trump lawyer says Russia probe 'terrible waste of time,' predicts Mueller won't issue report

Grokmaster

Grokmaster

DP Veteran
Joined
Jul 8, 2017
Messages
9,613
Reaction score
2,735
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Libertarian - Right
What if Dowd is absolutely correct, and this is , indeed the case?


The nation is supposed to "stand by" while the House Russianistas try THEIR TURN to "GET THE PRESIDENT, on SOMETHING, ANYTHING?"


Will NADLER , SCHIFF , etal, APOLOGIZE to the President, for their claims about "Russian collusion" ?


It's OBVIOUS that they, too, know that the Russian Nothingburger is OVER, as they have openly stated their intention to start their OWN WITCH HUNT, ILLEGALLY INVESTIGATING EVERY ASPECT of the PRESIDENT's LIFE, in "search of a crime".

stalinist investigation.jpg



Top Trump lawyer says Russia probe 'terrible waste of time,' predicts Mueller won't issue report



The former head of President Trump’s legal team predicted Tuesday that special counsel Robert Mueller won’t issue a report, calling the two-year-long investigation of Russian election interference “one of the greatest frauds this country’s ever seen.”
“I don’t think there’ll be a report,” Mr. Dowd told The Investigation, a podcast. “I will be shocked if anything regarding the president is made public, other than, ‘We’re done.’”Mr. Dowd worked with Mr. Trump for about a year, encouraging extensive cooperation with the Mueller probe.

“ "I know exactly what [Mr. Mueller] has,” Mr. Dowd said. “I know exactly what every witness said, what every document said. I know exactly what he asked. And I know what the conclusion or the result is. There’s no basis. There’s no exposure. It’s been a terrible waste of time.”





John Dowd calls Russia probe 'terrible waste of time,' predicts Mueller won't issue report - Washington Times

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
Grokmaster said:
What if Dowd is absolutely correct, and this is , indeed the case?


The nation is supposed to "stand by" while the House Russianistas try THEIR TURN to "GET THE PRESIDENT, on SOMETHING, ANYTHING?"


Will NADLER , SCHIFF , etal, APOLOGIZE to the President, for their claims about "Russian collusion" ?


It's OBVIOUS that they, too, know that the Russian Nothingburger is OVER, as they have openly stated their intention to start their OWN WITCH HUNT, ILLEGALLY INVESTIGATING EVERY ASPECT of the PRESIDENT's LIFE, in "search of a crime".

View attachment 67250496



Top Trump lawyer says Russia probe 'terrible waste of time,' predicts Mueller won't issue report



The former head of President Trump’s legal team predicted Tuesday that special counsel Robert Mueller won’t issue a report, calling the two-year-long investigation of Russian election interference “one of the greatest frauds this country’s ever seen.”
“I don’t think there’ll be a report,” Mr. Dowd told The Investigation, a podcast. “I will be shocked if anything regarding the president is made public, other than, ‘We’re done.’”Mr. Dowd worked with Mr. Trump for about a year, encouraging extensive cooperation with the Mueller probe.

“ "I know exactly what [Mr. Mueller] has,” Mr. Dowd said. “I know exactly what every witness said, what every document said. I know exactly what he asked. And I know what the conclusion or the result is. There’s no basis. There’s no exposure. It’s been a terrible waste of time.”





John Dowd calls Russia probe 'terrible waste of time,' predicts Mueller won't issue report - Washington Times

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Click to expand...

I wouldn't characterize confiscating millions and convicting criminals to be a waste of time but that's just me. Maybe you prefer to spend your time scratching your ass and trying to figure out how soap works.
 
And just what did you expect one of trumps clowns to say?

"Trump is ****ed I quit"???
 
Master Debator said:
I wouldn't characterize confiscating millions and convicting criminals to be a waste of time but that's just me. Maybe you prefer to spend your time scratching your ass and trying to figure out how soap works.
Click to expand...

Still trying to pretend that the INCIDENTAL PROCESS/FINANCIAL CRIMES from YEARS AGO, = "the goal of the Witch Hunt"?

Whatever you need to tell yourself.

Manafort's convictions were cases that were investigated YEARS AGO....only resurrected to GET TRUMP...on ANYTHING.



~... "Mr. Mueller’s investigators also have indicted 26 Russian nationals and several others. Mr. Dowd described those charges as “nickel-dime process crimes.”

“I ran big corruption cases,” he said. “I didn’t go around, picking scabs and just making any case I could make. If there was a petty case, I shifted it to someone else. I didn’t do it. And that’s where I disagree with Bob [Mueller].” ~


Also from link.
 
GDViking said:
And just what did you expect one of trumps clowns to say?

"Trump is ****ed I quit"???
Click to expand...

Suppose this "clown" is ABSOLUTELY CORRECT?


That is the question I posed...and we are going to find out VERY SOON....


TOO TERRIFYING for you to consider?


The mounting evidence points to exactly what Dowd says...notice the House Stalin-o-crats are NOW all about "EVERYTHING" not Russian Collusion, in their attempt to investigate the President , IN SEARCH OF A CRIME...which is illegal.
 
Last edited:
"Trump top lawyer" = "finding law degree application in the back of a magazine"
 
Airyaman said:
"Trump top lawyer" = "finding law degree application in the back of a magazine"
Click to expand...

Why are all of you TOO TERRIFIED to respond to what I ACTUALLY ASKED???

I didn't say he IS, I asked WHAT IF HE IS>>>????


What if Dowd is absolutely correct, and this is , indeed the case?


Well?
 
NBC News reported Tuesday that the Senate Intelligence Committee is approaching the end of its two-year investigation without proof of a conspiracy between the Trump campaign and Moscow, after having interviewed about 200 witnesses.


The report cited Democrats and Republicans on the committee, BTW. So......
 
Airyaman said:
"Trump top lawyer" = "finding law degree application in the back of a magazine"
Click to expand...

Call Johnny Dowd he will get you out of any jam. The President's not going to be submitting to any interview for your little Russia probe and if you keep asking, then maybe a couple dump trucks show up outside your friggin' FBI headquarters and a couple homeless guys go to the bathroom in your lobby if you keep on with the subpeonas Mr. Mueller.
 
Winston said:
Call Johnny Dowd he will get you out of any jam. The President's not going to be submitting to any interview for your little Russia probe and if you keep asking, then maybe a couple dump trucks show up outside your friggin' FBI headquarters and a couple homeless guys go to the bathroom in your lobby if you keep on with the subpeonas Mr. Mueller.
Click to expand...

Blah, blah, blah. I'm not arguing whether or not Dowd is correct. He very well could be....or maybe not.


Another of the DP LEFT TOO TERRIFIED of the POSSIBILTIY that DOWD IS CORRECT...TO EVEN ANSWER THE SIMPLE QUESTION I POSED:


What if Dowd is absolutely correct, and this is , indeed the case?


Well?
 
Grokmaster said:
Blah, blah, blah. I'm not arguing whether or not Dowd is correct. He very well could be....or maybe not.


Another of the DP LEFT TOO TERRIFIED of the POSSIBILTIY that DOWD IS CORRECT...TO EVEN ANSWER THE SIMPLE QUESTION I POSED:


What if Dowd is absolutely correct, and this is , indeed the case?


Well?
Click to expand...

What if he's not?
 
Grokmaster said:
Still trying to pretend that the INCIDENTAL PROCESS/FINANCIAL CRIMES from YEARS AGO, = "the goal of the Witch Hunt"?

Whatever you need to tell yourself.

Manafort's convictions were cases that were investigated YEARS AGO....only resurrected to GET TRUMP...on ANYTHING.



~... "Mr. Mueller’s investigators also have indicted 26 Russian nationals and several others. Mr. Dowd described those charges as “nickel-dime process crimes.”

“I ran big corruption cases,” he said. “I didn’t go around, picking scabs and just making any case I could make. If there was a petty case, I shifted it to someone else. I didn’t do it. And that’s where I disagree with Bob [Mueller].” ~


Also from link.
Click to expand...

So to reiterate you're against law enforcement. Seems a silly standard to only go after crimes that involve Trump. Why do you hate the president so much that you only want law enforcement to focus on crimes involving the president? Shouldn't they prosecute all crimes they stumble upon in their ongoing investigation?
 
GDViking said:
And just what did you expect one of trumps clowns to say?

"Trump is ****ed I quit"???
Click to expand...

If you look back, that is exactly what several of them have implied after they DID quit.
Don't forget, a good many of Trump's lawyers had to hire their own lawyers.
 
Winston said:
What if he's not?
Click to expand...

Ok...I accept your TERROR at even THINKING ABOUT your WHOLE WORLD COLLAPSING....


You aren't STRONG ENOUGH to SURVIVE ANSWERING THE QUESTION, just yet.


It's OK...have a glass of warm milk, and get some rest....
 
Grokmaster said:
Ok...I accept your TERROR at even THINKING ABOUT your WHOLE WORLD COLLAPSING....


You aren't STRONG ENOUGH to SURVIVE ANSWERING THE QUESTION, just yet.


It's OK...have a glass of warm milk, and get some rest....
Click to expand...

meh...
 
Master Debator said:
So to reiterate you're against law enforcement. Seems a silly standard to only go after crimes that involve Trump. Why do you hate the president so much that you only want law enforcement to focus on crimes involving the president? Shouldn't they prosecute all crimes they stumble upon in their ongoing investigation?
Click to expand...

So to reiterate you're TOO TERRIFIED TO ANSWER S SIMPLE QUESTION, so you're DESPERATELY TRYING TO CHANGE THE SUBJECT.



I didn't say he IS, I asked WHAT IF HE IS>>>????


What if Dowd is absolutely correct, and this is , indeed the case?


Well?

Come back when you're ready too STEP UP TO BAT...till then, enjoy the bench. I won't be responding to anymore SILLIASS DELFECTIONS from you in this thread.


ANSWER THE QUESTION, or you'll just disappear from my screen.
 
Checkerboard Strangler said:
If you look back, that is exactly what several of them have implied after they DID quit.
Don't forget, a good many of Trump's lawyers had to hire their own lawyers.
Click to expand...

More DESPERATE RUNNING.

It's CHILD'S PLAY for me, for force the DP LEFT into DEFLECTION, AD HOMS, ANYTHING TO DODGE THE POINT AND/OR QUESTIONS.



Once again:

What if Dowd is absolutely correct, and this is , indeed the case?
Well?
 
Last edited:
~ ".... “ "I know exactly what [Mr. Mueller] has,” Mr. Dowd said. “I know exactly what every witness said, what every document said. I know exactly what he asked. And I know what the conclusion or the result is. There’s no basis. There’s no exposure. It’s been a terrible waste of time.”


He certainly interacted with Mueller EXTENSIVELY....so.....



What if Dowd is absolutely correct, and this is , indeed the case?

Well?
 
a

What if he's right, well that would mean Mueller and his team were not as good as advertised.

Just what has been made public is enough to prove coordination a d many other illegal acts...
 
Grokmaster said:
Why are all of you TOO TERRIFIED to respond to what I ACTUALLY ASKED???

I didn't say he IS, I asked WHAT IF HE IS>>>????


What if Dowd is absolutely correct, and this is , indeed the case?


Well?
Click to expand...

If my sister had balls she'd be my brother.
 
Grokmaster said:
So to reiterate you're TOO TERRIFIED TO ANSWER S SIMPLE QUESTION, so you're DESPERATELY TRYING TO CHANGE THE SUBJECT.



I didn't say he IS, I asked WHAT IF HE IS>>>????


What if Dowd is absolutely correct, and this is , indeed the case?


Well?

Come back when you're ready too STEP UP TO BAT...till then, enjoy the bench. I won't be responding to anymore SILLIASS DELFECTIONS from you in this thread.


ANSWER THE QUESTION, or you'll just disappear from my screen.
Click to expand...

Oh no, please anything but that.... :2wave:

:roll:

I answered your question. Convicting people who broke the law and confiscating millions in the process is not a waste of time. Maybe you'd like to stop being a coward and answer why you think it is.
 
GDViking said:
a

What if he's right, well that would mean Mueller and his team were not as good as advertised.

Just what has been made public is enough to prove coordination a d many other illegal acts...
Click to expand...

Because the REAL GOAL, was to "GET TRUMP on ANYTHING!!" , after all huh?


Thanks for at least admitting it.


Oh...it COULDN'T JUST MEAN THAT THERE WAS NEVER ANYTHING THERE?




Really?


What other "ILLEGAL ACTS"? By WHOM?


Parking ticket, 1979?
 
Last edited:
Master Debator said:
Oh no, please anything but that.... :2wave:

:roll:

I answered your question. Convicting people who broke the law and confiscating millions in the process is not a waste of time. Maybe you'd like to stop being a coward and answer why you think it is.
Click to expand...

Bye. :2wave:
 
As long as we're playing what ifs, what if Trumps lawyer is as big of a liar and as full of **** as trump himself.

What if lawyers regularly made public announcements that their clients were guilty and they know it?

A lawyer publicly defending a client is not even news...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom