• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

2 years 200 interviews Senate report finds no Russia Collusion

ludin

DP Veteran
Joined
Dec 3, 2013
Messages
57,470
Reaction score
14,587
Gender
Undisclosed
Political Leaning
Undisclosed
Trump thanks MSNBC after report Senate panel found no evidence of Russia conspiracy | Fox News

President Trump is expressing gratitude to MSNBC for a new report that may shed light on the findings from the Senate Intelligence Committee.

NBC News reported Tuesday morning that according to both unnamed Republicans and Democrats, the Senate Intelligence Committee has concluded that there is no direct evidence of conspiracy between the Trump campaign and Russia during the 2016 election after conducting 200 interviews over the course of two years.

As NBC News’ Ken Dilanian reported on-air, Committee Chairman Richard Burr, R-N.C., told another news outlet last week that the panel had reached a conclusion, but now there is reporting from the Democratic side that confirmed Burr’s remarks.

Now what is schiff going to do? even his own colleagues in the senate agree. lmao
TDS melt down in 3, 2, 1.
 
Russia, if you're listening, I hope you can find the evidence.
 
I watched the MSNBC clip in your link there...cute how they put in their headline "Sources: Senate INTEL CMTE. Uncovers no direct evidence of conspiracy between Trump Campaign and Russia" "no direct evidence"....gotta leave open that doubt among their readers minds huh? THIS is what it means when people claim "fake news". Using words to lead a reader/watcher down a certain path.
 
Now what is schiff going to do? even his own colleagues in the senate agree. lmao
TDS melt down in 3, 2, 1.

You mean the same Senate investigation that Michael Cohen and others lied to? Those lies were only uncovered by Mueller and NY prosecutors?

No one cares about the Republican Senate's fake investigation. We'll wait for Mueller, thank you.
 
I watched the MSNBC clip in your link there...cute how they put in their headline "Sources: Senate INTEL CMTE. Uncovers no direct evidence of conspiracy between Trump Campaign and Russia" "no direct evidence"....gotta leave open that doubt among their readers minds huh? THIS is what it means when people claim "fake news". Using words to lead a reader/watcher down a certain path.

yeah i like the whole direct thing. there is either evidence or there isn't.
for me they have cleared him and frankly i think this is why they have been
drumming down the mueller report as this big gotcha.

i think a lot and i mean a lot of people are going to be disappointed in this mueller report.
 
You mean the same Senate investigation that Michael Cohen and others lied to? Those lies were only uncovered by Mueller and NY prosecutors?

No one cares about the Republican Senate's fake investigation. We'll wait for Mueller, thank you.

This is the problem with leftist they don't read.
see i knew you wouldn't read it so i highlighted in my original post which of course you hacked apart because
you have to be dishonest.

Guess what if you read my OP i highlighted that the senate democrats are issuing the same report supporting the republicans.

so now what do you have to say for yourself? It is right there in the OP highlighted.

why do you leftist have to be so dishonest? i think you have to because you can't address actual facts when given them.
 
You mean the same Senate investigation that Michael Cohen and others lied to? Those lies were only uncovered by Mueller and NY prosecutors?

No one cares about the Republican Senate's fake investigation. We'll wait for Mueller, thank you.

Funny how you say "Republican" yet fail to mention the Democrats. In case you missed it...the article mentions them also as agreeing. A bit one sided there on your part don't you think?
 
I watched the MSNBC clip in your link there...cute how they put in their headline "Sources: Senate INTEL CMTE. Uncovers no direct evidence of conspiracy between Trump Campaign and Russia" "no direct evidence"....gotta leave open that doubt among their readers minds huh? THIS is what it means when people claim "fake news". Using words to lead a reader/watcher down a certain path.

What should they have said? Did the Senate Intel committee, via Richard Burr, make that statement, or was it someone else?
 
I watched the MSNBC clip in your link there...cute how they put in their headline "Sources: Senate INTEL CMTE. Uncovers no direct evidence of conspiracy between Trump Campaign and Russia" "no direct evidence"....gotta leave open that doubt among their readers minds huh? THIS is what it means when people claim "fake news". Using words to lead a reader/watcher down a certain path.

So, IOW, you hate accurate reporting. Why am I not surprised?
 
Funny how you say "Republican" yet fail to mention the Democrats. In case you missed it...the article mentions them also as agreeing. A bit one sided there on your part don't you think?

In case you missed it, you're wrong.

Democrats on the Senate Intelligence Committee are pushing back on a claim by the panel’s chair, Richard Burr (R-N.C.), that the committee’s two-year investigation has not found “anything that would suggest there was collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia.” And they dispute an NBC News report saying that Democrats agreed with Burr that they have yet to see clear evidence of a conspiracy between President Donald Trump and Moscow.

“That’s not true,” Sen. Angus King, a Maine independent who caucuses with Democrats, told Mother Jones. “I think it’s misleading. The intelligence committee hasn’t discussed the matter, let alone released a committee report.”


Sen. Dianne Feinstein (Calif.), a senior Democrat on the panel, and Sen. Mark Warner (Va.), the top Democrat on the committee, also said they have not reached any conclusions about their investigation. “I disagree,” Warner said Tuesday when asked about Burr’s claims.


Senate Intelligence Committee Democrats Dispute Claims That Russia Probe Found No Collusion – Mother Jones
 
Something more accurate.



Except...that it isn't.

Tell me what would have been more accurate. Was it the Senate Intel committee or not? If not, who was it?

By the way, you were wrong when you said the Democrats agreed. They don't.
 
In case you missed it, you're wrong.

Democrats on the Senate Intelligence Committee are pushing back on a claim by the panel’s chair, Richard Burr (R-N.C.), that the committee’s two-year investigation has not found “anything that would suggest there was collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia.” And they dispute an NBC News report saying that Democrats agreed with Burr that they have yet to see clear evidence of a conspiracy between President Donald Trump and Moscow.

“That’s not true,” Sen. Angus King, a Maine independent who caucuses with Democrats, told Mother Jones. “I think it’s misleading. The intelligence committee hasn’t discussed the matter, let alone released a committee report.”


Sen. Dianne Feinstein (Calif.), a senior Democrat on the panel, and Sen. Mark Warner (Va.), the top Democrat on the committee, also said they have not reached any conclusions about their investigation. “I disagree,” Warner said Tuesday when asked about Burr’s claims.


Senate Intelligence Committee Democrats Dispute Claims That Russia Probe Found No Collusion – Mother Jones

Hmm...Mother Jones...an extreme left wing rag vs NBC...while I don't trust any of the media, NBC does have a better reputation than Mother Jones.
 
Something more accurate.



Except...that it isn't.

You can pretend that to your heart's content, but it won't change the reality that it's accurate. For that matter, it's just Burr's statement. He himself isn't the intelligence committee and the committee hasn't released it's report yet.

Your magical thinking won't change a thing.
 
Democrats have to keep an investigation alive to have any chance of beating Trump in 2020. The Mueller investigation is looking more and more like it will have no crimes or charges against Trump and when it closes the democrats will have lost their only hope of winning. The democrats are already announcing more investigations in the wake of Muellers likely findings.
 
Hmm...Mother Jones...an extreme left wing rag vs NBC...while I don't trust any of the media, NBC does have a better reputation than Mother Jones.

Oh FFS Kal. Can your post be any more disingenuous?

It contains quotes from real people. I even made it easy for you to see what those real people said. It's up to you to prove Mother Jones wrong by showing that king and Feinstein and Warner did NOT say what MJ attributed to them. Or you can look through Fox News or one of the other right sites to find their reports on it. Fox actually probably didn't report on what they said. Fake news, and all that.
 
man, how stupid is the Senate gonna look once Mueller reports? you'd think they'd at least hedge their bets.
 
Trump thanks MSNBC after report Senate panel found no evidence of Russia conspiracy | Fox News

President Trump is expressing gratitude to MSNBC for a new report that may shed light on the findings from the Senate Intelligence Committee.

NBC News reported Tuesday morning that according to both unnamed Republicans and Democrats, the Senate Intelligence Committee has concluded that there is no direct evidence of conspiracy between the Trump campaign and Russia during the 2016 election after conducting 200 interviews over the course of two years.

As NBC News’ Ken Dilanian reported on-air, Committee Chairman Richard Burr, R-N.C., told another news outlet last week that the panel had reached a conclusion, but now there is reporting from the Democratic side that confirmed Burr’s remarks.

Now what is schiff going to do? even his own colleagues in the senate agree. lmao
TDS melt down in 3, 2, 1.
Add to that what Dowd said, and the Witch Hunt is a true NOTHINGBURGER, after all:




“I know exactly what [Mr. Mueller] has,” Mr. Dowd said. “I know exactly what every witness said, what every document said. I know exactly what he asked. And I know what the conclusion or the result is. There’s no basis. There’s no exposure. It’s been a terrible waste of time.”




John Dowd calls Russia probe 'terrible waste of time,' predicts Mueller won't issue report - Washington Times



Trump told you so.jpg
 
Add to that what Dowd said, and the Witch Hunt is a true NOTHINGBURGER, after all:




“I know exactly what [Mr. Mueller] has,” Mr. Dowd said. “I know exactly what every witness said, what every document said. I know exactly what he asked. And I know what the conclusion or the result is. There’s no basis. There’s no exposure. It’s been a terrible waste of time.”




John Dowd calls Russia probe 'terrible waste of time,' predicts Mueller won't issue report - Washington Times



View attachment 67250498

Mueller has to issue a report. That is the law.
He in the report he can list what he wants but he does have to issue
a report and it goes to the AG.

The AG can then bury it or release what he wants and there is little the congress can do about it.
 
Tell me what would have been more accurate. Was it the Senate Intel committee or not? If not, who was it?

By the way, you were wrong when you said the Democrats agreed. They don't.

yet another TDS'er that can't read. Yes both sides have agreed that there is no evidence of collusion.
just like we knew 2 years ago when they were saying the same thing.

there is no evidence that trump used russia.

You TDs'ers are so hung up on trump that you purposely ignore the real person that tried to get russia to influence the election
which was hillary clinton.

It is documented fact all the evidence is right there and it exists.
yet you hear crickets from the TDS crowd.
 
yet another TDS'er that can't read. Yes both sides have agreed that there is no evidence of collusion.
just like we knew 2 years ago when they were saying the same thing.

there is no evidence that trump used russia.

You TDs'ers are so hung up on trump that you purposely ignore the real person that tried to get russia to influence the election
which was hillary clinton.

It is documented fact all the evidence is right there and it exists.
yet you hear crickets from the TDS crowd.

You have to quote the "TDS'er" who can't read if you have something to say to him or her. I'm not doing it for you.
 
You mean the same Senate investigation that Michael Cohen and others lied to? Those lies were only uncovered by Mueller and NY prosecutors?

No one cares about the Republican Senate's fake investigation. We'll wait for Mueller, thank you.

Exactly, these Trump idiots trying to pretend there was nothing going on while most members of Trumps inner circle can campaign staff have made plea deals, been indicted, convicted, with more to come.

So a hack GOP Senate who does nothing but sell a load of **** to their idiot constituency can go suck it. you work for like 25% of the population and everybody else knows you are useless ****s, just need to get everybody else to vote

The "direct evidence' and what the right would accept as evidence, reminds me of this Chappelle Show skit, go to 3:00 mark. Where what proof he would want was "if there was a video of R Kelly pissing on a woman, while she was woman holding two forms of ID, with his grandma in the room, i would believe he peed on that woman"

YouTube
 
Last edited:
man, how stupid is the Senate gonna look once Mueller reports? you'd think they'd at least hedge their bets.

Republicans always look stupid, because they pander to the stupid. They pander to the lowest of the low. EVerything they do is to reach those people. So their idiot constituency love dumb, just like they are
 
I did hence you responded.

You quoted me to talk to someone else. Please quote that person and address him or her directly. I'm not interested in you quoting me and talking about someone else and "TDS", whatever that is.
 
Back
Top Bottom