• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

The Young Black Conservatives of Trump’s America

And? They STILL were not forced to lend to people they didn't want to, and no amount of dishonesty from you will change that.

You said they weren't forced to give out those loans. Which is it?

Don't be FOS.
 
:roll:
How many times have I posted why I stop responding to posts in threads? Hell, aside from providing part in my tagline, I literally have this information permanently posted in my ONLY blog submission.
Things you and other "resistance" members of the Forum consider "lies we've called you on" are typically my opinions. If I am posting a fact, I state so and provide links to supporting evidence.
You, for example, find my posts "disingenuous at best" IMO thanks mostly to your own confirmation bias.
Now you go right ahead and (as usual) declare all the "victories" you wish to the acclaim of your echo chamber peers. Simply declaring this does not make it true. :coffeepap:

Yes CA, I think we're all aware of your "I only respond if I feel like it" policy. I find it quite odd for a debate forum. It just seems like your "policy" is a preemptive excuse to post nonsense and have no accountability. But I just don't think your policy should apply if you're posting falsehoods. And especially if you start a thread based on a blatant falsehood. Here you pretend that "President Obama presided over a shutdown to get Obamacare passed". Yea it was explained to you that the republican shutdown was an attempt to repeal Obamacare.

A Forum member had mentioned that Mr. Obama had also presided over a government shutdown seeking votes for the ACA. Up jumps a couple of members from the Left decrying "whataboutism" has no place in the discussion.

Yea CA, it was just so dumb I have to think it was on purpose. Regardless if it was intentional or not, it was so blatantly false you should have acknowledged it when it was pointed out to you. Oh that's right, you have a "I only respond if I feel like it" policy. How convenient. And CA, your posts are written in the style of a conservative editorial back in the day when they tried to not technically lie. they try to give you the impression something is true without actually saying it. Hence your "presided over" verbiage above. Yea, very careful word choice but the rubles read "forced".

so lets sum up. I shown you've posted a falsehood so dumb that intentional can not be ruled out. Your qualifier that "a forum mentioned" only adds to my suspicion about your integrity as well as your "lack of accountability" reply policy. And fyi, your double spaced random blurt response aint helping. CA, I literally would have voted you "whitest white guy" at the forum.
 
He's still got a butt load more than you or I will ever have.

Numbers don't lie, he's doing a good job.

Are you really that impressed by someone who won the lucky sperm club lottery?

Sad, and a bit pathetic.
 
Are you really that impressed by someone who won the lucky sperm club lottery?

Sad, and a bit pathetic.


I'm impressed that he has faced this sort of resistance [with restraint] and still manged to keep many of his campaign promises.
 
Back
Top Bottom