- Joined
- Jan 25, 2012
- Messages
- 31,926
- Reaction score
- 29,388
- Location
- Vancouver, Canada Dual citizen
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Independent
I get extreme?
Dude! You're the one with the talking monkeys story.
Now you're in space
I get extreme?
Dude! You're the one with the talking monkeys story.
That demonstrates just how frightened they are. It is a HUGE mistake to attack stuff like this, as most people see such gestures as harmless, NO DIFFERENT than wearing a red hat with Make America Groan Again.
But, they instinctively know that women won last night. All the while the most untrustworthy politician in the history of America was lying his face off, there sat Nancy Pelosi like a good mom, reminding Americans Trump now has limitations and is afraid of her.
And then, cut to the crowd and a sea of white amid an ocean of nearly identical colors on men, dark suit, usually blue, and red tie (Trump never where's anything else.) It was a stark contrast and a reminder through the whole speech that the spoiled brat's days are numbered
No one is frightened by that. Where do you get these moronic talking points from?
It's so obvious from the posts...
but then you wouldn't notice standing behind the big orange head of your master.
In 30 + years of political reporting I have NEVER seen such an eruption of panic as on these pages!
PLEASE!
NOT ONE WORD about what Pelosi did, but you attack women for what they are wearing?
That's political commentary for the American right?
Yeah, that's convince a lot of voters...."their women all dress the same!" from Trump on the hustings, now that is comedy.
You're not even in the fight. NOT ONE WORD about a wall...all of a sudden, but pages and pages attacking women for dressing the same.
Anything of meaning you got in that pack of lies?
See, frightened and more so. Pelosi is wreaking havoc on Trump
I dunno, Tres. While I'm sure that the uniform look was to express solidarity I also think that the choice of white was a political statement and I also think we all know what white means, politically speaking.
Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.) wore white to Tuesday’s State of the Union for an important reason.
“2019 is the 100th anniversary of the women’s right to vote,” the freshman lawmaker told CNN before President Donald Trump’s address. “There’s so much more that we have to fight for, from wage equality to paycheck fairness to protecting ourselves and believing survivors.”
...
Ocasio-Cortez also wore white to her swearing-in ceremony earlier this year.
“I wore all-white today to honor the women who paved the path before me, and for all the women yet to come,” she tweeted at the time. “From suffragettes to Shirley Chisholm, I wouldn’t be here if it wasn’t for the mothers of the movement.”
told what to wear, when to clap, when to stand, joyless and angry, Democrat women are the antithesis of free thinking,free speaking Conservative women
The choice of white hearkens back to womens' suffrage.
https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entr...have-to-fight-for_us_5c5ae7a3e4b00187b556fdfa
There is more to do and that's their message. Considering a fair number of those women in white are in fact women of color, your comment about hoods, makes no sense.
Gina, with respect to suffrage the government was, at the time, prohibiting women from voting. Any time the government is preventing anyone from exercising individual liberty that government should be challenged and taken to task. However, using the force of government to impose social change on the public is a different matter entirely. If we wish to maintain a free society then government must be limited to addressing inequalities in ways that are LEAST restrictive to individual liberty. Once government becomes a tool for imposing equality the people of that society are no longer free.
You may not agree with AOC's specific comments (I don't want to derail the thread with a detailed discussion about those comments) but what does that have to do with hoods?
Gina, with respect to suffrage the government was, at the time, prohibiting women from voting. Any time the government is preventing anyone from exercising individual liberty that government should be challenged and taken to task. However, using the force of government to impose social change on the public is a different matter entirely. If we wish to maintain a free society then government must be limited to addressing inequalities in ways that are LEAST restrictive to individual liberty. Once government becomes a tool for imposing equality the people of that society are no longer free.
When money is speech then the wealthy control the conversation.
When money is speech then the wealthy control the conversation.
The hoods was more in relation to damned near everything coming back to racism these days. It was that and the proximity of this to the issues democrats are having in Virginia.
Bottom line, Gina, I'm sick and tired of carving out niche issues for everyone and then trying to use the federal government to "fix" them. I'm tired of day after day of political theater. I'm sick and tired of everything being a threat to our survival as a nation. At this point I really can't bring myself to do much more than mock all this crap.
Money is a tool. It isn't speech. It can be used to promote speech but it isn't the only way to do that either.
I don't disagree with the observation that our nation, in their political culture, has become freakishly childish; one example you missed being that of the Congresswomen getting ginned up with showboating their politicized biological sex. Historically it has not been customary for anyone to be in other than business attire, even if the politicians identified as a proud member of a religion, class, national origin, or race.
Adding to the childishness was the need for the black women, as well as some black men, to add African symbolism as an add-on apparel to assert their special racial identity - but one wonders, when will we see Americans dressed as plains Indians, desert arabs, skirted natives, kilted clansmen, or fez wearing Turks? How about some horned helmeted Vikings or lederhosen clothed for their cherished genetic heritage? Or wearing hoodies...oh wait, we've already seen that.
Honestly, this bandwagon get-up as modern day suffragettes for a cause resolved a hundred years ago is quite dumb and immature - still, in the current atmosphere we can all look forward to the men who will be coming dressed with the accoutrements of unionized coal miners with IWW buttons... you know, to assert their identity for the cameras.
You must be fairly old to think that white suits are not "business attire" for women. It sounds like you'd only be satisfied if the room was full of white men all dressed in dark suits and white shirts.
Conservative freedom is the freedom to do as you're told.
Or else.
told what to wear, when to clap, when to stand, joyless and angry, Democrat women are the antithesis of free thinking,free speaking Conservative women
Women like ann coulter?
Thatds be one. She's the very definition of free thinking and free speaking.
As she slams wonder boy.