• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Footage of shirtless Bernie Sanders Singing Drunkenly with Soviets in 1988.

I never said a peep about bombs. Having said that, the Hiroshima bomb was a uranium bomb so the idea that you can't make weapons out of it is erroneous although nobody does it now. Secondly, even if all this information is correct, the main point still stands and that is that, if Trump were making this deal today, we all know what the reactions and claims would be.

Except we are still decommissioning a-bombs not making more. I'm pretty sure that the Dems would not make up a phony story about it like the GOP has. Dems are not as gullible and want real facts and data instead of trumped up talking points. You might as well face it, you fell for the phony story didn't you?
 
You say that as if you think I don't want you to keep mentioning it. Like Comet Ping Pong, Benghazi, and Seth Rich, Venezuela is a topic that helps the susceptible to identify themselves.


It is an excellent sifter.

What you want is not of interest to me except to the extent that your vote can empower people with ideas that have proven to be real life failures. The lessons of Venezuela never seem to be learned by the left. Their default response is that they just didn't do enough of it. Why, more will surely work---this time.
 
Except we are still decommissioning a-bombs not making more. I'm pretty sure that the Dems would not make up a phony story about it like the GOP has. Dems are not as gullible and want real facts and data instead of trumped up talking points. You might as well face it, you fell for the phony story didn't you?

No. I read the NRC's letter outlining 20% of capacity. They're the experts are they not? Secondly, as far as falling for phony stories, you guys are neck deep in the Trump as Puin's covert agent fairytale so you have no leg to stand on. You also have not denied what the left's reaction would be had Trump and not Obama, signed off on Uranium One.
 
Right, because the only way Trump is guilty of anything in relation to Russia is if every single subject of a Trumpist whattaboutism is also guilty of the same thing in relation to Russia that Trump is.

Clearly, this is the case because it is impossible for team Trump to have committed crimes in relation to Russia, and a whattaboutism subject to have not committed any crimes in relation to Russia.

Right.

:roll:

That's a very strawey straw man there since I never implied any such thing. In fact, it is more likely that neither committed a crime than that only Trump has, particularly when evidence of said crime cannot be produced.
 
https://forward.com/schmooze/418282...-sanders-singing-drunkenly-with-soviets-in-88



A Tip ‘o the hat to the anti Kavenaugh peeps, who removed the even low bar for truth and justice. Bernie is fatally doxx’ed, and so are all of his commie pinko left wing followers.

For singing "This Land is Your Land", a patriotic song about America, and celebrating the first US pizza franchise in the USSR?
Yeah, that fell flat.

PS: Incredibly funny to see a MacBook owner who can't even figure out how to properly upload a video from their "superior" computer, so instead they point their camcorder at the screen. I thought Apple owners were smarter?
 
Your dear leader is the one who loves dictators like the one in Venezuela. And thank god for "little Marco" taking charge of our policy or we would be supporting Maduro too.

Complete nonsense. Show me one shred of evidence that Trump supports Maduro. There is also a difference between supporting a dictator and having a hands off policy regarding one, especially ones far away from this hemisphere.
 
No. I read the NRC's letter outlining 20% of capacity. They're the experts are they not? Secondly, as far as falling for phony stories, you guys are neck deep in the Trump as Puin's covert agent fairytale so you have no leg to stand on. You also have not denied what the left's reaction would be had Trump and not Obama, signed off on Uranium One.

Yes you were misled and badly. Like you wanted it to be true. You didn't bother to do your own research because the right wing bubble is so comfy. I can only speak for myself but I would be making the same points no matter who was in charge when the sale was made. But you will get fooled again and again. Like your blind belief that Trump is not a criminal and always has been. Do yourself a favor and actually do some real research on the Trump/Russia connection. It's been going on for a decade at least. You can start here...
https://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2017/03/connections-trump-putin-russia-ties-chart-flynn-page-manafort-sessions-214868
 
Yes you were misled and badly. Like you wanted it to be true. You didn't bother to do your own research because the right wing bubble is so comfy. I can only speak for myself but I would be making the same points no matter who was in charge when the sale was made. But you will get fooled again and again. Like your blind belief that Trump is not a criminal and always has been. Do yourself a favor and actually do some real research on the Trump/Russia connection. It's been going on for a decade at least. You can start here...
https://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2017/03/connections-trump-putin-russia-ties-chart-flynn-page-manafort-sessions-214868

What Trump did with Russia as a private person is irrelevant to the bogus claims of collusion in the election. The big bang the left is expecting from Mueller is going to be a pathetic and disappointing fizzle. The fact that not a single person has been charged with anything having to do with collusion should tell you what's going to happen. As for Uranium One, like I said, the NRC's 2015 letter stated that they controlled 20% of mining capacity going forward. I take their word for it.
 
Back
Top Bottom