• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Nathan Phillips vet status in question

I guess you really don't have reading comprehension. You and the one who "liked" your post need to go back to school to understand what that phrase means.

My father never saw a minute of service with a gun in combat zones. I'd say it's shocking that I needed to say that to you in another way when I already said it half a dozen times, but you are both Trump devotees, so I shouldn't be surprised. Next time I'll post it with pictures and characters named Dick and Jane so you two can understand.

Your father was a veteran.

Criteria for a wartime veteran.

https://www.nd.gov/veterans/laws/ve...wartime-veteran-defined-uniform-service-dates

ETA
 
Last edited:
And this has something to do with the thread?

Not the thread. You. If you have been in Corpus for 50 years or so you know doubt know some of my relatives who live there or who lived there before they died. One in particular, who is dead now, was a popular news reporter who enjoyed wide recognition and respect.
 
Not the thread. You. If you have been in Corpus for 50 years or so you know doubt know some of my relatives who live there or who lived there before they died. One in particular, who is dead now, was a popular news reporter who enjoyed wide recognition and respect.

I never suggested I've been in Corpus my whole life. I'm originally from Virginia, I spent 20+ years in the Army and moved here recently.
 
I'd say it's shocking that I needed to say that to you in another way when I already said it half a dozen times, but you are both Trump devotees, so I shouldn't be surprised.

And here we have a classic example of somebody thrusting their beliefs onto others.

I do not like President Trump. I did not vote for President Trump. In 2016 actually did a write-in for another Democrat.

So you fail yet again. DO not take the fact that I am calling you on your nonsensical postings and trying to correct you as some kind of political bias. You obviously know nothing about me, so stop trying to imply I am something I am not, or have beliefs that I do not.

This is typical of what I have seen the Left fall to over the last few years. If you do not like being corrected, you lash out and try to attack the other side.

Let me guess, I also hate Immigrants and Indians also, right?
 
And here we have a classic example of somebody thrusting their beliefs onto others.

I do not like President Trump. I did not vote for President Trump. In 2016 actually did a write-in for another Democrat.

So you fail yet again. DO not take the fact that I am calling you on your nonsensical postings and trying to correct you as some kind of political bias. You obviously know nothing about me, so stop trying to imply I am something I am not, or have beliefs that I do not.

This is typical of what I have seen the Left fall to over the last few years. If you do not like being corrected, you lash out and try to attack the other side.

Let me guess, I also hate Immigrants and Indians also, right?

I don't know what you hate. I know you're a Trump supporter. I've read enough of your posts. If you want to hate immigrants and Indians (Native Americans or the ones from India), that's up to you.

My postings aren't nonsensical. They are spot on.
 
And here we have a classic example of somebody thrusting their beliefs onto others.

I do not like President Trump. I did not vote for President Trump. In 2016 actually did a write-in for another Democrat.

So you fail yet again. DO not take the fact that I am calling you on your nonsensical postings and trying to correct you as some kind of political bias. You obviously know nothing about me, so stop trying to imply I am something I am not, or have beliefs that I do not.

This is typical of what I have seen the Left fall to over the last few years. If you do not like being corrected, you lash out and try to attack the other side.

Let me guess, I also hate Immigrants and Indians also, right?

I can tell you that I've really boned up on logical fallacies since Trump got elected. They are SOP on any debate board which hosts never Trumpers.
 

You didn't read your own link.

A "wartime veteran" is an individual who served in the active military forces, during a period of armed conflict or who received the armed forces expeditionary or other campaign service medal during an emergency condition and who was discharged or released under other than dishonorable conditions.

World War 2 was a period of armed conflict.
 
Dont know if this will clear things up for everyone. I kind of doubt it since folk are pretty committed to their story.

This is the National Defense Service Medal. Its given to ANYONE on active duty during the Korean War, Vietnam War, Gulf Wars. All veterans that served during the periods of conflict are awarded those Medals regardless of where they served. That makes them a veteran...it does not make them a combat veteran, nor does it make them a campaign veteran.
161215-F-YG475-540.JPG

This is the Vietnam Service Medal. It is awarded to people that specifically served in theater.
161215-F-YG475-544.JPG

There is not a question as to whether or not Nathan Phillips served as a Marine reservist. He did. Was he a Vietnam Era marine? The last combat field marines pulled up stake in May of 1971, a year before he joined the marine reserves. But hey...marines were still in the embassy til 1975. SO technically...even though h was a marine reservist serving part time in Nebraska, yes, he was in during the Vietnam Era. To even call yourself a 'Vietnam Era' vet knowing you were a reservist in Nebraska, well...thats a reflection of his character.

But thats not where his problems start. His problems start when he claimed he "returned to the country" as a Vietnam vet and was spat on by hippie chicks. That was a lie. When he claimed he was a recon ranger. That was a lie. When he claimed he knew the signs of danger as a Vietnam veteran. Because that is a lie.
 
I don't know what you hate. I know you're a Trump supporter. I've read enough of your posts. If you want to hate immigrants and Indians (Native Americans or the ones from India), that's up to you.

My postings aren't nonsensical. They are spot on.

And yet you fail again spectacularly. As I said, anybody that does not agree with you is a "Trump supporter".

OK, let me say it this way. Yes, I support President Trump.

I also supported President Obama, President Bush, President Clinton, President Bush, and President Reagan.

You see, I do this because of an oath I have taken. Not just once, but 6 times now. It goes like this:

I, (state name of enlistee), do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; and that I will obey the orders of the President of the United States and the orders of the officers appointed over me, according to regulations and the Uniform Code of Military Justice. So help me God."

Notice, this oath is non-partisan. It does not say I will only follow the "Orders of Presidents I like", it simply states The President. And of all the Presidents I have served under (all 6 of them), I only voted for 3 of them. And President Trump was not one of them.

And even though I did not vote or support him, I do recognize TDS (just as I recognized ODS and BDS). People who so absolutely hate somebody, that they project their beliefs onto them, irreguardless if they are correct or not. But feel free to fact check me, I have written about my feelings about him before the election. Feel free to go through any of them and quote me where I said that I was in any way a supporter of his.

I will wait patiently right here as you gather the evidence to prove your claim. Not that I expect you to in any way apologize when your search comes up empty and that your statement is nothing but a lie. As I have seen from you, facts and beliefs are fluid, and they are whatever you think they should be.

But as I am famous for saying in other areas, I say it now. "Put up or shut up." Either find where I have in any way stated that I am a "Trump Supporter" or anything even close to that, or STFU about things you do not know anything about.

One thing I do share with him I will admit, I have no patience or use for people who lie, insult, or try to make claims that they can not prove. So go ahead, prove that claim. I have over 12,000 posts here, surely if I was a "Trump Supporter" you should have no problem proving that.
 
And yet you fail again spectacularly. As I said, anybody that does not agree with you is a "Trump supporter".

OK, let me say it this way. Yes, I support President Trump.

I also supported President Obama, President Bush, President Clinton, President Bush, and President Reagan.

You see, I do this because of an oath I have taken. Not just once, but 6 times now. It goes like this:



Notice, this oath is non-partisan. It does not say I will only follow the "Orders of Presidents I like", it simply states The President. And of all the Presidents I have served under (all 6 of them), I only voted for 3 of them. And President Trump was not one of them.

And even though I did not vote or support him, I do recognize TDS (just as I recognized ODS and BDS). People who so absolutely hate somebody, that they project their beliefs onto them, irreguardless if they are correct or not. But feel free to fact check me, I have written about my feelings about him before the election. Feel free to go through any of them and quote me where I said that I was in any way a supporter of his.

I will wait patiently right here as you gather the evidence to prove your claim. Not that I expect you to in any way apologize when your search comes up empty and that your statement is nothing but a lie. As I have seen from you, facts and beliefs are fluid, and they are whatever you think they should be.

But as I am famous for saying in other areas, I say it now. "Put up or shut up." Either find where I have in any way stated that I am a "Trump Supporter" or anything even close to that, or STFU about things you do not know anything about.

One thing I do share with him I will admit, I have no patience or use for people who lie, insult, or try to make claims that they can not prove. So go ahead, prove that claim. I have over 12,000 posts here, surely if I was a "Trump Supporter" you should have no problem proving that.

This thread isn't about you, or are you Nathan Phillips? If so, the citizens of Trump Fan Nation want your autograph. But be careful - they may charge you rent for all of the space you now own in their heads.
 
There is not a question as to whether or not Nathan Phillips served as a Marine reservist. He did. Was he a Vietnam Era marine? The last combat field marines pulled up stake in May of 1971, a year before he joined the marine reserves. But hey...marines were still in the embassy til 1975. SO technically...even though h was a marine reservist serving part time in Nebraska, yes, he was in during the Vietnam Era. To even call yourself a 'Vietnam Era' vet knowing you were a reservist in Nebraska, well...thats a reflection of his character.

But thats not where his problems start. His problems start when he claimed he "returned to the country" as a Vietnam vet and was spat on by hippie chicks. That was a lie. When he claimed he was a recon ranger. That was a lie. When he claimed he knew the signs of danger as a Vietnam veteran. Because that is a lie.

The thing is, he did not even claim "Vietnam era", he used the nebulous term "Vietnam times". Saying "Era" is accepted terminology for somebody who served during a conflict, but not in it. Why make up a term that is neither one or the other? And when reporters called him a "Vietnam Veteran", he never corrected them. They have been making this "mistake" for almost 10 years if not longer, yet never once did he appear to try and correct any of them. Ever. So even if this was a mistake by a reporter and not himself making the claim, that says a lot about his interest in having his life told correctly.

And there are always Marines in embassies, that is one of their jobs. Every embassy the US has around the world has Marine guards.
 
This thread isn't about you, or are you Nathan Phillips? If so, the citizens of Trump Fan Nation want your autograph. But be careful - they may charge you rent for all of the space you now own in their heads.

In other words, you just double down yet again with lies without proof.

Goodbye.
 
The thing is, he did not even claim "Vietnam era", he used the nebulous term "Vietnam times". Saying "Era" is accepted terminology for somebody who served during a conflict, but not in it. Why make up a term that is neither one or the other? And when reporters called him a "Vietnam Veteran", he never corrected them. They have been making this "mistake" for almost 10 years if not longer, yet never once did he appear to try and correct any of them. Ever. So even if this was a mistake by a reporter and not himself making the claim, that says a lot about his interest in having his life told correctly.

And there are always Marines in embassies, that is one of their jobs. Every embassy the US has around the world has Marine guards.
The only times there are corrections is when they are exposed.

Speaks volumes.
 
JFC.

If he himself is guilty of stolen valor, then fine, criticize him separately for that. It still has absolute jack **** to do with the reason you know his name in the first place, and the lot of you know it.
 
I can tell you that I've really boned up on logical fallacies since Trump got elected. They are SOP on any debate board which hosts never Trumpers.

I honestly doubt the sanity of anybody that behaves in such a manner. And yes, I felt it was the same for those that attacked the last President for 8 years.

Hatred knows no logic, and when people have that much hatred I question their sanity, and if it is safe for children and small animals to be anywhere near them. If somebody can not have a discussion without resorting to name calling and insults, I simply have no use for them. And for my own safety and sanity I generally mute them. I have enough in my life going on that I do not need to hear the ramblings of sick individuals who will attack people simply because they do not agree. Especially if they can not get things like simple terminology correct.

I am sure many would call me a Trump Supporter if I said water was not blue. Some would probably defend Jeffrey Dahmer, so long as he voted their way.
 
I was a writer/instructor at Ft. Knox during Operation Desert Storm. I suppose now I can claim to be a veteran of Operation Desert Storm. Or even more impressive...a veteran of the First Gulf War.

Somehow, I don't think I will be doing that.
 
JFC.

If he himself is guilty of stolen valor, then fine, criticize him separately for that. It still has absolute jack **** to do with the reason you know his name in the first place, and the lot of you know it.
We know his name because he is a cowardly piece of **** and he walked right past a group of Black Israelites that spent an hour and a half attacking the Indians that were gathered, women in general, black people that didnt agree with them, homosexuals, and the teens both black and white, from the Catholic school, and then that piece of **** confronted the high school kids that were responding NOT to the Indians, but the Black Israelites that had been attacking them. We know his name because the leftit media fabricated a bull**** lie, knowing idiot leftists would swallow it without question regardless of the facts. We now his name because idiot leftists DID swallow that **** and STILL cling to the **** story, even after the leftist media has had to change their narrative and acknowledge how badly they ****ed it up all along. We know his name because even though he has been fully exposed as a cowardly piece of **** and a liar, leftists are still hell bent on defending him solely in the name of defending their own pathetic narrative.

I think we understand the situation perfectly.
 
He served during the Vietnam era, so he’s being truthful when he says he’s a Vietnam era vet.

And he didn’t “initiate” a confrontation, unless you consider beating a drum and chanting a “confrontation.”

Right up into someone's face, I do.
 
We know his name because he is a cowardly piece of **** and he walked right past a group of Black Israelites that spent an hour and a half attacking the Indians that were gathered, women in general, black people that didnt agree with them, homosexuals, and the teens both black and white, from the Catholic school, and then that piece of **** confronted the high school kids that were responding NOT to the Indians, but the Black Israelites that had been attacking them. We know his name because the leftit media fabricated a bull**** lie, knowing idiot leftists would swallow it without question regardless of the facts. We now his name because idiot leftists DID swallow that **** and STILL cling to the **** story, even after the leftist media has had to change their narrative and acknowledge how badly they ****ed it up all along. We know his name because even though he has been fully exposed as a cowardly piece of **** and a liar, leftists are still hell bent on defending him solely in the name of defending their own pathetic narrative.

I think we understand the situation perfectly.

Don't forget he went marching at the Basilica in D.C. and attempted to protest during a Catholic mass! Had to get security to throw them out.
 
JFC.

If he himself is guilty of stolen valor, then fine, criticize him separately for that. It still has absolute jack **** to do with the reason you know his name in the first place, and the lot of you know it.

Actually, I have known his name for years.

He first came under the RADAR of Stolen Valor groups way back in at least 2015, because of his using his Veteran status. And more were raised in 2017 after Vogue (a highly respected source of investigative journalism) interviewed him many times. He even tried to crowd fund a story of his life at one time.

But he was a relatively minor when compared to more famous ones like Soupy, or Lawn Dart Danny. Those individuals came under immediate fire because of claiming awards and rank that they never earned. Phillips was largely flying under the RADAR because he only claimed veteran status and never awards. That changed last weekend when everybody was screaming he was a "Vietnam Vet".
 
Right up into someone's face, I do.

Uh, yeah, banging a drum in someone's face is aggressive behavior. Funny Phillips chose to get up in MAGA teen's face and not the black men who were screaming epithets at his fellow Indians for an hour and a half.
 
Actually, I have known his name for years.

He first came under the RADAR of Stolen Valor groups way back in at least 2015, because of his using his Veteran status. And more were raised in 2017 after Vogue (a highly respected source of investigative journalism) interviewed him many times. He even tried to crowd fund a story of his life at one time.

But he was a relatively minor when compared to more famous ones like Soupy, or Lawn Dart Danny. Those individuals came under immediate fire because of claiming awards and rank that they never earned. Phillips was largely flying under the RADAR because he only claimed veteran status and never awards. That changed last weekend when everybody was screaming he was a "Vietnam Vet".

Ok, fine, you personally heard his name before. I don't aim to dispute you personally having heard the name.


The bottom line is that the way this is being deployed is to somehow discredit his account and shift the subject to him, when it's all on video anyway. But no matter what he did regarding "stolen valor", it didn't have anything to do with the reason everyone else is talking about him, which is the events some days ago where a bunch of different people erred in different ways.

It's just a distraction, at least as presented now.
 
At no point did they do the "tomahawk chop". They did jump up and down while singing and laughing and trying to figure out why the lying attention whore was approaching them beating the drum. As you watch that section, you can see as they slowly start to realize he wasn't being playful but a dick and calm down and go back to leaving him alone.

In addition, the tomahawk chop is not typically racist.

In fact, racism is very real. It's very concerning to all of us rational people. That's why we get bothered so much when the water is muddied with lies like accusing these kids of it. I'm sorry that you want to make the problem worse, but we are looking to address real problems, not make up more.


If it was, there were hundreds of racists at the KC game the other day ;)
 
Green Beret isn't an official designation for anything but headgear, but Army Special Operations Soldiers are often referred to by that term. Marine Force Recon members are often referred to as "Recon Rangers."

I can assure you that they sure don't refer to themselves that way.
I work with recon Marines fairly regularly and haven't ever heard the words recon Ranger or any other type of ranger
 
Back
Top Bottom