• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Transcripts detail how FBI debated whether Trump was 'following directions' of Russia

Grokmaster said:
More glaring proof of the blatant, seditious CORRUPTION of the Obama Swamp leftovers on charge of the KGB-FBI/DOJ, many of whom have since been disgraced, demoted, and removed for their behavior, including McCabe , Strzok, and soon to be Rosenstein.
Click to expand...

"Anyone who opposes dear leader is a traitor!" :lamo

You literally don't give a **** about evidence.
 
Deuce said:
The Democrats already passed multiple bills to reopen the government. The senate passed a bill 100-0. You tell me where the holdup is.
Click to expand...

Their blocking border security, as the nation is starting to see....
 
MovingPictures said:
This is why Republicans dread for when the shutdown is over.

Once the shutdown is over they'll be forced to talk about this stuff, with a Democratic House forcing witnesses to testify on TV. So that even if the Senate tries to sweep things under the rug, the House will still do its job, and inform the public of what is being uncovered.
Click to expand...

TF are they waiting for? if they have real proof of a conspiracy at the highest level, then they need to talk about it NOW as soon as possible. F the shutdown, why the hell would they wait?

unless, of course, its all for political reasons... mmhm.
 
Grokmaster said:
Their blocking border security, as the nation is starting to see....
Click to expand...

Falsely conflating the wasteful wall with border security.

I want actual border security. You want security theater.
 
Deuce said:
Falsely conflating the wasteful wall with border security.

I want actual border security. You want security theater.
Click to expand...

walls have worked well in every instance they have been used. obviously they have to be used in conjunction with improved human assets, but so what ?

Walls Work.
 
Fletch said:
LIberals seem to have no clue how government works. They seem to forget that the republican House passed lots of bills that Obama refused to sign so they never made it out of the senate. Same thing is happening here. Only Obama was a hero when he did it.
Click to expand...

Obama also acted without Congress many times. They seem to forget that, too.
 
Deuce said:
Trump shut down the government to harm people until he got what he wanted. Obama did not.
Click to expand...

Obama refused to sign any bill that didnt fuly fund Obamacare. Trump refuses to sign any bill that doesnt fund his wall. Whats the difference? And if you are so concerned about 'hurting' federal workers--which you arent--you would insist that your leadership simply compromise with Trump and move on. The truth is, you dont give a crap about the workers, your only concern is stopping trump from getting anything that might be considered a win. In fact, the more these workers are harmed, the better you feel. Pretty disgusting, but thats where youre at.
 
Trump is so unpredictable, impetuous, and dangerous that top Trump Economic Adviser Gary Cohn and Trump Staff Secretary Rob Porter worked together to remove documents from Trumps Resolute Desk that, had he signed them, would have initiated mayhem.

Think about that. Trump was considered so dangerous in the WH that his closest staff members were removing critical documents from his desk to protect America :shock:
 
Fletch said:
Obama refused to sign any bill that didnt fuly fund Obamacare. Trump refuses to sign any bill that doesnt fund his wall. Whats the difference? And if you are so concerned about 'hurting' federal workers--which you arent--you would insist that your leadership simply compromise with Trump and move on. The truth is, you dont give a crap about the workers, your only concern is stopping trump from getting anything that might be considered a win. In fact, the more these workers are harmed, the better you feel. Pretty disgusting, but thats where youre at.
Click to expand...

If they cared, the Dems would come to the table and negotiate in good faith. That they are willing to enjoy frolicking on the beach while gov't workers are missing their first paycheck tells me they don't give a crap. And that pain is NOTHING compared to the pain of losing loved ones at the hands of illegals who shouldn't be here in the first place, and/or are only here to commit crimes because of the Left's failed policies.
Did you see the outpouring of condolences to Ronil Singh's famly?

Yeah, me either.
 
Rogue Valley said:
Trump is so unpredictable, impetuous, and dangerous that top Trump Economic Adviser Gary Cohn and Trump Staff Secretary Rob Porter worked together to remove documents from Trumps Resolute Desk that, had he signed them, would have initiated mayhem.

Think about that. Trump was considered so dangerous in the WH that his closest staff members were removing critical documents from his desk to protect America :shock:
Click to expand...

Source? I'd love to see one, because I find it hard to believe stealing from the President would go over well.
 
Hypothetical said:
walls have worked well in every instance they have been used. obviously they have to be used in conjunction with improved human assets, but so what ?

Walls Work.
Click to expand...

The effect is non-zero, that does not make the effect optimal, or cost-effective.

You claim to support border security and yet you oppose a 500-foot tall wall on the Canadian border. Can you explain why that is?
 
Fletch said:
Obama refused to sign any bill that didnt fuly fund Obamacare. Trump refuses to sign any bill that doesnt fund his wall. Whats the difference? And if you are so concerned about 'hurting' federal workers--which you arent--you would insist that your leadership simply compromise with Trump and move on. The truth is, you dont give a crap about the workers, your only concern is stopping trump from getting anything that might be considered a win. In fact, the more these workers are harmed, the better you feel. Pretty disgusting, but thats where youre at.
Click to expand...

No, you're the one who wants to harm workers to further the construction of a hundred billion dollar piece of waste. You are the one trying to cause the most harm, I am trying to stop it. Trump loves harming the workers. He said so himself, they're mostly Democrats anyway.

A bill was voted on in the Senate. 100-0. That's all there is to it.
 
Rogue Valley said:
Trump is so unpredictable, impetuous, and dangerous that top Trump Economic Adviser Gary Cohn and Trump Staff Secretary Rob Porter worked together to remove documents from Trumps Resolute Desk that, had he signed them, would have initiated mayhem.

Think about that. Trump was considered so dangerous in the WH that his closest staff members were removing critical documents from his desk to protect America :shock:
Click to expand...

It is appalling that unelected staffers would take it upon themselves to do such a thing. I dont recall voting for Gary Cohn or Rob Porter for anything. Why should I trust those two guys to do the right thing and how do you know that they did?
 
Deuce said:
No, you're the one who wants to harm workers to further the construction of a hundred billion dollar piece of waste. You are the one trying to cause the most harm, I am trying to stop it. Trump loves harming the workers. He said so himself, they're mostly Democrats anyway.

A bill was voted on in the Senate. 100-0. That's all there is to it.
Click to expand...

The request was for $5 billion not $100 billion and who is harmed building a few miles of wall? Other than your person pride.
 
Deuce said:
The effect is non-zero, that does not make the effect optimal, or cost-effective.

You claim to support border security and yet you oppose a 500-foot tall wall on the Canadian border. Can you explain why that is?
Click to expand...

it's a LOT better than non zero.. let me rephrase.. walls work.. GREAT!

as for your question, simply because i am not aware of 40000 and some odd Illegal immigrants (per government estimates, on the ground) crossing our borders to the north every month, therefore its not as big of a problem there. IF and when it becomes a large issue to the north, then sure, wall it off.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom