• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Why is illegal border crossing at an 'all time low'?

bubbabgone said:
"Cost effective"?
It would be but I just said "effective".
Click to expand...

So you think it’s not the most cost-effective method for improving border security? Shouldn’t you instead be fighting for whatever is the most cost-effective?

A 700 foot ice wall with automated laser turrets would be effective​ but that doesn’t mean we should ****ing do it.
 
Deuce said:
So you think it’s not the most cost-effective method for improving border security? Shouldn’t you instead be fighting for whatever is the most cost-effective?

A 700 foot ice wall with automated laser turrets would be effective​ but that doesn’t mean we should ****ing do it.
Click to expand...

I agree. A 500 foot ice wall is more than enough, with the giant a scythe blades swinging down and scrapping off the illegals as they attempt to scale the wall. Game of Thrones was very inspiring in that regards.
 
RabidAlpaca said:
We know for you even 1 death would warrant tens of billions of wasted tax payer dollars. It's not too different from you ignoring the vast majority of terrorist acts that a are committed by white, right wing extremists while exaggerating yhe tiny minority that are committed by muslim extremists. You're not consistent.
Click to expand...

Is 100 Americans killed too many? How about 1,000? How about 10,000? At what point do you think is doing something about illegal immigration warranted?

If you have a proposal for dealing with right wing terrorism then I'm all ears.
 
Deuce said:
So you think it’s not the most cost-effective method for improving border security? Shouldn’t you instead be fighting for whatever is the most cost-effective?

A 700 foot ice wall with automated laser turrets would be effective​ but that doesn’t mean we should ****ing do it.
Click to expand...

1) You're supposed to tell me why it wouldn't be "effective". That's regular old "effective" as a deterrent.
2) I said it would be "cost-effective". Once we discuss its "effectiveness" as a deterrent we can discuss "cost effectiveness".
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom