• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Trump may cheat and pay off women, but that won't get him impeached

trixare4kids said:
The Obama whataboutism in the op-ed puts Trump's hush payoffs to two women into proper perspective, doesn't it?
The left now knows they can't get Trump on collusion or obstruction charges, the original reason Mueller was summoned to investigate, so "they've" decided to whine about the above for the next two years.

It never ends. :lol:
Click to expand...

They've decided to Kavanaugh Trump and allow trial in the court of public opinion, hoping to inflict a political death of 1000 paper cuts. This is all about damaging Trump at this point.
 
Tanngrisnir said:
LOL! He also claimed he never knew Stormy Daniels and that no one in his campaign had any contact with Russians.

How'd that work out so far?

Things change, the more his bull**** gets exposed.
Click to expand...

Of course he boinked Stormy Daniels and of course as an international businessman he had contact with Russians because as an international businessman he wanted to build a Trump tower there. So what? Nothing against the law with either one.
 
Tanngrisnir said:
Laughable Never Never Land crap. It's not the dems using nonstop investigations as a tool. Your historical illiteracy is quite bracing.
Click to expand...

Guess you didn't read the very part you bolded yourself where I said BOTH sides do it.
 
Nickyjo said:
Their testimony is evidence. It can be rebutted, but it ain't ZERO proof. The fact that they were paid off is also not ZERO proof. We have their word, Trump's denials, and the payoffs. Probable cause.
Click to expand...

There is nothing illegal about a person boinking women and then paying them off. Just ask Bill Clinton.
 
Manc Skipper said:
Would those people who voted for him have done so if they knew he'd been rawdogging a porn star while his wife was at home with their newborn? Tough call.

Covering up the hush payments to affect the election is a crime. Especially if the cash was "borrowed" from his election war chest.
Click to expand...

Have you forgotten about the Access Hollywood tapes? If this had come out it wouldn't have made any difference in the election. The payments to these women were very small potatoes and even if they violated campaign finance laws, which there isn't proof that they did, it is still small potatoes. Obama's campaign finance violations were thousands of times worse and Obama didn't get impeached or indicted for it.
 
Sampson Simpson said:
nobody ever claimed his impeachment would be about the sex, its all his crimes, coordination with russians to influence election, his self dealing and making money off his presidency, obstruction of justice, his sketchy business dealings, breaking campaign finance law. You name it.

But ultimately I don't think he will be impeached because republicans are scumbags that defend him and there are some blue dog dems that pander to the right wing idiots in their states
Click to expand...

There is no evidence of any of that. It's just wet dreams of the left.
 
jnug said:
This is the very description of high crimes and misdemeanors. Though it hardly matters. By the time this is over Trump 2020 will be done, dead and buried. Once Trump is out of the presidency he will be spending the entire rest of his life in court or in an orange jump suit or both. So will his kids.
Click to expand...

Name one thing that is high crimes and misdemeanors that is not just you lefties having a wet dream. It's all in your head.
 
Acadia said:
They've decided to Kavanaugh Trump and allow trial in the court of public opinion, hoping to inflict a political death of 1000 paper cuts. This is all about damaging Trump at this point.
Click to expand...

Absolutely correct.
 
Cardinal said:
Nope, Trump's Department of Justice has corroborating evidence, or else the sentencing memorandum written by Federal Prosecutors would have said that that "Cohen asserts that Trump ordered him to commit the crime.

And the judge at Cohen's sentencing today cited the quote that Trump ordered him to commit the crime, which means that it's now the conclusion of both Trump's DOJ and the court system.

Also, AMI admitted to buying the women's stories to help Trump's campaign in return for assisting Prosecutors, so you'll probably get yet even more verification of Trump involved in criminal conspiracy.
Click to expand...
Bull****. The FEC determines campaign finance violations, not the DOJ.
 
Cardinal said:
Nope, Trump's Department of Justice has corroborating evidence, or else the sentencing memorandum written by Federal Prosecutors would have said that that "Cohen asserts that Trump ordered him to commit the crime.

And the judge at Cohen's sentencing today cited the quote that Trump ordered him to commit the crime, which means that it's now the conclusion of both Trump's DOJ and the court system.

Also, AMI admitted to buying the women's stories to help Trump's campaign in return for assisting Prosecutors, so you'll probably get yet even more verification of Trump involved in criminal conspiracy.
Click to expand...

That's exactly what I said! Cohen asserts that Trump ordered him to commit a crime. In other words, all you've got is a liar's testimony.
 
Tanngrisnir said:
LOL! He also claimed he never knew Stormy Daniels and that no one in his campaign had any contact with Russians.

How'd that work out so far?

Things change, the more his bull**** gets exposed.
Click to expand...

Both of those statements you try to attribute to Trump are ABSOLUTE LIES ON YOUR PART. He never said EITHER ONE.
 
jnug said:
Bill Clinton was charged with perjury, not with Election Campaign violations. Now that Pecker and AMI has flipped, and Weisselberg in already cooperating this case is no longer the Clinton case or anything like it or the Edwards case or anything like it. Trump has got some real problems now alongside those that are still cooking in the pot.

I don' t think Trump is Impeached. I don't even want him impeached. He spends the next two years getting punched in the mouth every day then staggers out of the WH and into court for the rest of his life.
Click to expand...

What in the hell are you talking about? I said there was nothing illegal about Trump boinking women and paying them off, just like Bill Clinton has done. What's wrong with that statement?
 
Moderate Right said:
Of course he boinked Stormy Daniels and of course as an international businessman he had contact with Russians because as an international businessman he wanted to build a Trump tower there. So what? Nothing against the law with either one.
Click to expand...

No, no, no... Of COURSE he didn't know her or bang her. I mean, after all, he said he didn't.
 
Grokmaster said:
Bull****. The FEC determines campaign finance violations, not the DOJ.
Click to expand...

For fines not for prosecution. Prosecution is conducted by Federal Prosecutors. By the time this is done that will in fact be the ONLY relevant similarity between the Edwards case and this case. Edwards was Inducted and Prosecuted on Campaign Finance Charges.
 
Acadia said:
They've decided to Kavanaugh Trump and allow trial in the court of public opinion, hoping to inflict a political death of 1000 paper cuts. This is all about damaging Trump at this point.
Click to expand...

It's been about that since Nov 2016.
 
jnug said:
For fines not for prosecution. Prosecution is conducted by Federal Prosecutors. By the time this is done that will in fact be the ONLY relevant similarity between the Edwards case and this case. Edwards was Inducted and Prosecuted on Campaign Finance Charges.
Click to expand...

You guys have totally given up on Russian collusion and obstruction of justice, haven't you? This is why you have creamed your pants over this stuff.
 
Tanngrisnir said:
That's just it: both sides don't do it, nor can you show that they do. It's the republicans, no matter how angry that makes some people.
Click to expand...

Ummmmmmmmmmmmm. It is many of you lefties and the 2019 House members who have already said you plan on investigating Trump to death once they take over in January. So, yes, both sides do do it. But, it's nice to know that you would be ok with the Mueller investigation being dropped as it did not come from Democrats.
 
Moderate Right said:
You guys have totally given up on Russian collusion and obstruction of justice, haven't you? This is why you have creamed your pants over this stuff.
Click to expand...

Oh no we haven't...not by a long shot. You likely have. But we haven't.
 
Moderate Right said:
Not my fault you don't keep up with the news or even read posts here on DP. Why are you here if you don't know what's going on in the world?
Click to expand...

Not my fault you post dishonest comments as usual and can't back anything up with actual proof.
 
Moderate Right said:
It's very telling that articles mention campaign finance violations but nothing about collusion or obstruction of justice.
Click to expand...

Has the Mueller report been released yet? Didn't think so.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom