• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

What is the difference between Hillary, Obama and Congressional D’s?

zimmer

Educating the Ignorant
Banned
DP Veteran
Joined
Dec 19, 2008
Messages
24,380
Reaction score
7,805
Location
Worldwide
Gender
Undisclosed
Political Leaning
Conservative
None.

Nobody wanted to campaign with Hillary.

Obama is doing what cost his party 1000-seats... and his crowds are small. He looks tiny and whiny.

This is their winning formula? Mirroring Hillary and Obama?
 
Last edited:
Obama was a bit to the left of Clinton and politically straddled the line between the New Democrats, ushered in by Bill Clinton, and what is now known as Progressive Democrats. Progressive Democrats are sort of a middle ground between New Dealers and New Democrats. Obama is much more relevant to modern democrats than either of the Clintons.
 
Obama was a bit to the left of Clinton and politically straddled the line between the New Democrats, ushered in by Bill Clinton, and what is now known as Progressive Democrats. Progressive Democrats are sort of a middle ground between New Dealers and New Democrats. Obama is much more relevant to modern democrats than either of the Clintons.

The Clintons and Obama are Socialists. Clinton was pragmatic. Obama wasn’t.

I’ve called Democrats... Socialists... for quite some time. For they pine for Socialist legistlation at every turn.

When I began calling them Socialists... Democrats here started whining and claiming I did not know the meaning of Socialist. Well, they haven’t reached their Utopia, but... they keep the eye on the prize.

Today, thanks to Bernie... the party has come out of the closet.

Yet... nobody is eager to be seen with Hillary, and Obama is damaging his party... yet again.

Juxtaposing Obama’s small crowds and his 8-years of failure against Trump’s awesome 2-years and energy... is wonderful.

Thanks Obama.
 
None.

Nobody wanted to campaign with Hillary.

Obama is doing what cost his party 1000-seats... and his crowds are small. He looks tiny and whiny.

This is their winning formula? Mirroring Hillary and Obama?

BO and Globalist Granny couldn't even fill a phone booth at their rallies. But to answer your question, there's not a dime's worth of difference between any leftist. They are basically the same kernel of corn in a turd.
 
None.

Nobody wanted to campaign with Hillary.

Obama is doing what cost his party 1000-seats... and his crowds are small. He looks tiny and whiny.

This is their winning formula? Mirroring Hillary and Obama?

Yeah, that has got to be a kicker for Obama. Hillary's only appearance are paid appearances, and as for Obama, I've seen larger crowds at ass bleaching's. ;)


Tim-
 
It seems Democrats could not rebut the OP.

I’d say that’s not a good indicator for the election... as Hillary and Obama were rejected across America.

Hillary lost, and Obama gutted his party to the tune of 1000 seats.

Remember...The Democrat baseline is the party hasn;t been so weak in a century.

Hopefully new records of Democrat weakness will be set this evening :) Lord knows... they deserve it.
 
Yeah, that has got to be a kicker for Obama. Hillary's only appearance are paid appearances, and as for Obama, I've seen larger crowds at ass bleaching's. ;)


Tim-

And you attend allot of ass bleachings do you ?
 
Yeah, that has got to be a kicker for Obama. Hillary's only appearance are paid appearances, and as for Obama, I've seen larger crowds at ass bleaching's. ;)


Tim-

Well said .....
 
The Clintons and Obama are Socialists. Clinton was pragmatic. Obama wasn’t.

I’ve called Democrats... Socialists... for quite some time. For they pine for Socialist legistlation at every turn.

When I began calling them Socialists... Democrats here started whining and claiming I did not know the meaning of Socialist. Well, they haven’t reached their Utopia, but... they keep the eye on the prize.

Today, thanks to Bernie... the party has come out of the closet.

Yet... nobody is eager to be seen with Hillary, and Obama is damaging his party... yet again.

Juxtaposing Obama’s small crowds and his 8-years of failure against Trump’s awesome 2-years and energy... is wonderful.

Thanks Obama.

We’re all socialists to one extent or another, depending on the government service we use. And capitalists as well. Back in the 1950s when we already had Social(ist) Security, the Right was warning about “creeping socialism.” It creeped some more with Medicare in the 60s, then the EPA in the 70s, then Reagan, who attacked Medicare as something like slavery, didn’t touch it as prez. And Bush added drug coverage, and finally Obama tried to have us catch up with the rest of the world with the ACA. And if he was such a failure, why did Trump promise to do him one better on health care? Face it, people see the GOP as brakes on some of my party’s sillier ideas, but they go along with the programs, even promising to do them better. We are all out of the closet, so long as we don’t call it socialism, and even that is changing.
 
We’re all socialists to one extent or another, depending on the government service we use. And capitalists as well. Back in the 1950s when we already had Social(ist) Security, the Right was warning about “creeping socialism.” It creeped some more with Medicare in the 60s, then the EPA in the 70s, then Reagan, who attacked Medicare as something like slavery, didn’t touch it as prez. And Bush added drug coverage, and finally Obama tried to have us catch up with the rest of the world with the ACA. And if he was such a failure, why did Trump promise to do him one better on health care? Face it, people see the GOP as brakes on some of my party’s sillier ideas, but they go along with the programs, even promising to do them better. We are all out of the closet, so long as we don’t call it socialism, and even that is changing.

This is the beauty of free speech.

For years, as Democrats pined and pursued Socialist legistaltion at every turn... and I correctly identified them as Socialists... the outrage from the Left was hilarious.

Today, as the Democrat Party has become a Radical Leftist Socialist Vessel... we are now ALL Socialists.

ROTFLOL.

No... Leftists are Socialists.

The problem is taking goodies away from people. That’s the power of Socialism... until you reap its full rewards... as the Venezuelans and Soviet slave states had.
 
Last edited:
Democrats double down on failed policies to get elected. They are actually running on Obamascare. You can't make this **** up. They want to vote against jobs and prosperity to vote for hate. What a bunch of maroons!
 
This is the beauty of free speech.

For years, as Democrats pined and pursued Socialist legistaltion at every turn... and I correctly identified them as Socialists... the outrage from the Left was hilarious.

Today, as the Democrat Party has become a Radical Leftist Socialist Vessel... we are now ALL Socialists.

ROTFLOL.

No... Leftists are Socialists.

The problem is taking goodies away from people. That’s the power of Socialism... until you reap its full rewards... as the Venezuelans and Soviet slave states had.

Keep associating Venezuela and the Soviet Union with socialism. The rest of us thinks western Europe, which instituted their brand of socialism while eye to eye with the Soviet empire. True, as you suggested, socialism was the word that dare not speak its name, from Eugene V Debs to Norman Thomas, even as the 20th century saw us create national parks and forests, protect working people from the excesses of capitalism, institute public pensions and health care, and protect the environment. You know, the sort of stuff Debs and Thomas might have liked. It was our little secret, like back in the days when we had to use the Spanish word Negro. That changed in the 1960s to “say it loud, say it loud, I’m black and I’m proud.” We’ll do the same with socialism. I’ll start working on a jingle.
 
Keep associating Venezuela and the Soviet Union with socialism. The rest of us thinks western Europe, which instituted their brand of socialism while eye to eye with the Soviet empire. True, as you suggested, socialism was the word that dare not speak its name, from Eugene V Debs to Norman Thomas, even as the 20th century saw us create national parks and forests, protect working people from the excesses of capitalism, institute public pensions and health care, and protect the environment. You know, the sort of stuff Debs and Thomas might have liked. It was our little secret, like back in the days when we had to use the Spanish word Negro. That changed in the 1960s to “say it loud, say it loud, I’m black and I’m proud.” We’ll do the same with socialism. I’ll start working on a jingle.

Capitalism has raised more people out of poverty than any other system. Socialism, in all of its forms, has failed. Some smart woman once said..."Socialism is great until you run out of other people's money."
 
Capitalism has raised more people out of poverty than any other system. Socialism, in all of its forms, has failed. Some smart woman once said..."Socialism is great until you run out of other people's money."

Two cheers for capitalism! The third cheer is for regulations and laws that limit it, as it is not perfect. That’s the formula we’ve decided on for the last 100 years.

Another smart person said that the genius of capitalism was that it “allowed both the rich and the poor the same right to sleep under bridges.” We do well when we keep both aphorisms in mind.
 
Democrats double down on failed policies to get elected. They are actually running on Obamascare. You can't make this **** up. They want to vote against jobs and prosperity to vote for hate. What a bunch of maroons!

The ACA is pretty popular right now so that's a smart move. And Republicans have nothing worthwhile to run on on the issue of health care.
 
None.

Nobody wanted to campaign with Hillary.

Obama is doing what cost his party 1000-seats... and his crowds are small. He looks tiny and whiny.

This is their winning formula? Mirroring Hillary and Obama?

LOL It could be this..... a approval rating that Trump can only dream of.

-7ptqx7blkqwahltug7wva.png
 
Two cheers for capitalism! The third cheer is for regulations and laws that limit it, as it is not perfect. That’s the formula we’ve decided on for the last 100 years.

Another smart person said that the genius of capitalism was that it “allowed both the rich and the poor the same right to sleep under bridges.” We do well when we keep both aphorisms in mind.

This strawman seems to come up in every argument about capitalism. There are, like, 3 people who argue for unregulated capitalism.
 
None.
Nobody wanted to campaign with Hillary.
Obama is doing what cost his party 1000-seats... and his crowds are small. He looks tiny and whiny.
This is their winning formula? Mirroring Hillary and Obama?
BO and Globalist Granny couldn't even fill a phone booth at their rallies. But to answer your question, there's not a dime's worth of difference between any leftist. They are basically the same kernel of corn in a turd.
Yeah, that has got to be a kicker for Obama. Hillary's only appearance are paid appearances, and as for Obama, I've seen larger crowds at ass bleaching's. ;)
Tim-
It seems Democrats could not rebut the OP.
I’d say that’s not a good indicator for the election... as Hillary and Obama were rejected across America.
Hillary lost, and Obama gutted his party to the tune of 1000 seats.
Remember...The Democrat baseline is the party hasn;t been so weak in a century.
Hopefully new records of Democrat weakness will be set this evening :) Lord knows... they deserve it.
And you attend allot of ass bleachings do you ?
Please don’t answer, Tim.
This is the beauty of free speech.
For years, as Democrats pined and pursued Socialist legistaltion at every turn... and I correctly identified them as Socialists... the outrage from the Left was hilarious.
Today, as the Democrat Party has become a Radical Leftist Socialist Vessel... we are now ALL Socialists.
ROTFLOL.
No... Leftists are Socialists.
The problem is taking goodies away from people. That’s the power of Socialism... until you reap its full rewards... as the Venezuelans and Soviet slave states had.

Will be funny watching you guys twisting logic tomorrow after R’s get hammered tonight.
 
Really? Your brain can't deduce as to why? Embarrassing.

It was a rhetorical question, you should have deduced that. But I will spell it out for you: the only people concerned about things like crowd sizes either have low self esteem or follow in a flock of collective mindlessness.
 
The ACA is pretty popular right now so that's a smart move. And Republicans have nothing worthwhile to run on on the issue of health care.

They tried, but stupid McShame screwed them over. Obamascare is a colossal failure. Personally, I lost my doctor, my plan, my deductible went from $1,000 to $12,500, my premium went from >$400 to $1,000/month....it is basically useless insruance....but hey, at least little illegal alien kids can get free dental care!
 
It was a rhetorical question, you should have deduced that. But I will spell it out for you: the only people concerned about things like crowd sizes either have low self esteem or follow in a flock of collective mindlessness.

Dumbest post yet!
 
Back
Top Bottom