• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Big Don Says Shoot the Immigrants

Yes yes I have heard your tripe before. I'm a racist because I expect ANYONE seeking asylum here to follow proper procedures. It's racist of me to expect brown people to follow the SAME laws as white, yellow, and red people. It's racist of me to not treat brown people as if they're above the law.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I467 using Tapatalk

And what are those "proper procedures"? Can they mail in an asylum request?
 
How did rock throwing even come up as an issue? Has the caravan threatened to throw rocks? or is this just Trump stirring up his base before the election?

Mostly the latter. Makes him seem big and tough and riles the blood of his supporters to get them even more frenzied. It's all a puppet show of sorts.
 
I wasn't referring to throwing rocks "across the border", of course. If anyone attempts to harm our officers or soldiers, they had better be prepared to be met with force.
If migrants cooperate peacefully, they will come in, live in tents and be processed. After that, they either qualify for asylum or they get kicked out.

That's the deal. Take it or leave it is all Trump is saying.

eta: firing bullets into our country should not be tolerated and that should be met with deadly force. We are not going to tolerate Hama bs.

Do you think they are going to cross the border and throw rocks?
 
Everyone should be supporting EVerify.

Unless, of course, they get campaign cash from someone who feels otherwise. Also they may feel that holding back support of that single part of immigration reform in order to use it as leverage for accepting other (less popular) parts of a (comprehensive?) immigration reform 'package' bill is the 'right thing to do'.

The bottom line is that congress critters now enjoy a re-election rate of over 90% by not mandating eVerify use for every US worker - so why bother to pass such a law?
 
And what are those "proper procedures"? Can they mail in an asylum request?
They go to a point of entry and they will receive the instructions they need

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I467 using Tapatalk
 
They go to a point of entry and they will receive the instructions they need

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I467 using Tapatalk

And a point of entry would be?
 
I have previously posted that immigrants crossing the line should be used as target practice by the army. Yesterday President Trump announced that any immigrant throwing rocks should be shot. I would certainly consider doing something similar in the UK. Of course, there are those of you who would rather welcome these people, believing they will benefit the US.

If they don't try and force their way into this country endangering our law enforcement by assaulting them with rocks they would be welcome. However they will need to wait their turn among the millions of people who have been waiting for years to come to this country. Sorry but the minute you break our laws you are no longer welcome. You not only go to the back of the line but also behind every person who has not broken our laws. Sorry but striking an officer with a large rock is aggravated assault and will never be tolerated. The law enforcement personnel should be able to fire upon such ruthless criminals. Sorry but throwing rocks at law enforcement is endangering their life and deadly force should be authorized.
 
I have previously posted that immigrants crossing the line should be used as target practice by the army. Yesterday President Trump announced that any immigrant throwing rocks should be shot. I would certainly consider doing something similar in the UK. Of course, there are those of you who would rather welcome these people, believing they will benefit the US.

Well of course he did.

He's got most of his base terrified of their own shadow, and he knows they won't suddenly grow a backbone, so he'll keep on scaring them, and present himself as the only one who can save them.

And so many are so terrified, they will subjugate themselves before Trump, no matter what he does.
 
And what are those "proper procedures"? Can they mail in an asylum request?

file:///C:/Users/warre/AppData/Local/Packages/Microsoft.MicrosoftEdge_8wekyb3d8bbwe/TempState/Downloads/i-589%20(3).pdf


You may have to copy and paste. I am not sure why.
 
1699 Carr Rd, Calexico, CA 92231

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I467 using Tapatalk

So they'd have to travel to the US to apply for asylum. And they are doing what now? Traveling to the US to seek asylum. So there's no indication at this point that what they are trying to do is illegal nor that they are trying to circumvent our laws. So this whole "I just want them to follow the rules" bit isn't well supported as there's nothing going on at this point which is breaking any of our rules. If they are to seek asylum, they must first make it here.
 
Do you think they are going to cross the border and throw rocks?

Based on the emboldened past behavior observed in this caravan, yes, I can say it's not a stretch to assume. Hopefully, the massive presence of force will be enough to deter any violence.
 
Unless, of course, they get campaign cash from someone who feels otherwise. Also they may feel that holding back support of that single part of immigration reform in order to use it as leverage for accepting other (less popular) parts of a (comprehensive?) immigration reform 'package' bill is the 'right thing to do'.

The bottom line is that congress critters now enjoy a re-election rate of over 90% by not mandating eVerify use for every US worker - so why bother to pass such a law?

Very good point.
Can Trump sign an EO on term limits?:lol:
 
They're comin fer yer wimmins!!!

He sounded like a racist southerner in 1935

Scores of murdered women & children killed by illegal aliens were not available to comment on your post.
but I am...
 
So they'd have to travel to the US to apply for asylum. And they are doing what now? Traveling to the US to seek asylum. So there's no indication at this point that what they are trying to do is illegal nor that they are trying to circumvent our laws. So this whole "I just want them to follow the rules" bit isn't well supported as there's nothing going on at this point which is breaking any of our rules. If they are to seek asylum, they must first make it here.
They don't have to seek asylum here. They are choosing to do that. I would imagine they could save some walking by applying in their local embassy as well.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I467 using Tapatalk
 
How did rock throwing even come up as an issue? Has the caravan threatened to throw rocks? or is this just Trump stirring up his base before the election?

They already did it in Mexico and seriously injured many troops and police.
It happened, and they are capable of doing it again.
 
Very good point.
Can Trump sign an EO on term limits?:lol:

Trump can sign any EO (that someone writes for him?) he likes but that does not mean that a federal judge would not issue an immediate injunction blocking it. I'm still waiting for the EO to bill Mexico for the Great Wall of Trump.
 
I think we need to stock the Rio Grande with piranhas

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I467 using Tapatalk

...except piranhas don't attack and eat people.
They are from piranha country and already know this.
Now salt water crocodiles.....???
 
How did rock throwing even come up as an issue? Has the caravan threatened to throw rocks? or is this just Trump stirring up his base before the election?

They attacked Mexican police and military with rocks and other objects.
 
They don't have to seek asylum here. They are choosing to do that. I would imagine they could save some walking by applying in their local embassy as well.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I467 using Tapatalk

They have to show up at a point of entry or already be here. It looks like they're going to a point of entry. Which is all well and within legal bounds. You said your contention was that you wanted them to follow the same rules as everyone else, and the rules state that to seek asylum you must present yourself at a point of entry or already be here. And they're going to a point of entry, meaning they're following the same rules as everyone else.

Thus the contention that this is all about them "following the same rules" as everyone else is bunk, since that appears to be what they are doing.
 
If conservatives really wanted to end illegal immigration (the money people do not) arrest anyone hiring illegal aliens. No jobs no reason to come here.

They would still come here for all the welfare.

But I am with you on this. Those that hire them should be jailed and their businesses fined or shut down.
 
They are invaders who do not have the right to enter the USA. We have rules and laws that they must follow if they want to enter. If they are going to be violent towards our troops then they should suffer the consequences.
 
Back
Top Bottom