• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

POLL: Martha McSally has lead over Kyrsten Sinema as election nears

LOL this thread is taking a Sinematic ass whuppin!

And I'm almost out of popcorn...
 
I repeated what MSNBC and Howard had both reported.
Yes, the McSally camp spin, that has come to nothing, it was just hopeful nonsense.

We'll see what happens. That has nothing to do with how you have continuously changed the subject to try and confused the issue.
The issue, the point, you and I are debating is how the remaining ballots would break....and you have been wrong, and I explained how and why you would be wrong.

And yes, I'm a Left-leaning Centrist that loves Trump. So what? Stop calling me a Right Winger. It's slander.
Rightwinger.
 
According to you the results were supposed to be final after the 30k difference. Looks like you were wrong. Just give it time and we'll see what happens.
LOL, go ahead and show that, I dare you....I double dog dare you.
 
Oh please. The only people who 'love' trump are far right white supremacists. You know 'very fine people'

What does it say about your own tolerance if you think that everybody who disagrees with you is a White supremacist? It's scary how intolerant you are.
 
Yes, the McSally camp spin, that has come to nothing, it was just hopeful nonsense.

The issue, the point, you and I are debating is how the remaining ballots would break....and you have been wrong, and I explained how and why you would be wrong.

Rightwinger.

I have not been wrong. I said the ballots would break Democratic at this point based on multiple reporting sources.
 
I did not say they would not be counted, I said you, like so many rightwingers are ignoring the fact that independents were going to be the voters that decided the race.
Sinema has gone from 8K ahead, to 21K ahead, to 30K ahead....no sign of any McSally re-gains as the rest of Maricopa and Pime Co votes are finalized, ergo Howard Fisher's assessment is holding. Too bad.

Shown.
 
I have not been wrong. I said the ballots would break Democratic at this point based on multiple reporting sources.
"They contend the trend will change when the county gets to the approximately 200,000 early ballots dropped off on Election Day based on their belief that many Republicans who had requested early ballots had not turned them in before."


LOL, the count is well below 200K, 162K right now, and no signs of McSally gaining.

Too bad.
 
"They contend the trend will change when the county gets to the approximately 200,000 early ballots dropped off on Election Day based on their belief that many Republicans who had requested early ballots had not turned them in before."


LOL, the count is well below 200K, 162K right now, and no signs of McSally gaining.

Too bad.

Why are you only talking about a single county and not the whole state? I'm talking about the whole state. The race is called, but all of the ballots hadn't even been reported on NYT last I looked.
 
Why are you only talking about a single county and not the whole state? I'm talking about the whole state.
"I'm going to act like I have not been involved in a debate about THE ONLY REMAINING UNCOUNTED VOTES THAT EXIST IN MARICOPA AND PIMA CO'S THAT HOWARD FISCHER'S ARTICLE WAS CONCERNED WITH"

The race is called, but all of the ballots hadn't even been reported on NYT last I looked.
Non-sequitur, a whatabout, the point at hand was if the uncounted ballots from Maricopa and Pima counties would swing to Sinema or McSally. I'm so sorry you can't remember, over and over, what point you lost.
 
"I'm going to act like I have not been involved in a debate about THE ONLY REMAINING UNCOUNTED VOTES THAT EXIST IN MARICOPA AND PIMA CO'S THAT HOWARD FISCHER'S ARTICLE WAS CONCERNED WITH"

Non-sequitur, a whatabout, the point at hand was if the uncounted ballots from Maricopa and Pima counties would swing to Sinema or McSally. I'm so sorry you can't remember, over and over, what point you lost.

No, the point was not just about the counties you hand pick, I was talking about the counting in general, talking about the entire state. I had even mentioned earlier there were ballots from other counties that needed to be counted. It's weird that you call saying the counting isn't over a non-sequitur to the topic of if the votes will go against McSally and then for her or just against her. The remaining ballots matter to that question.
 
No, the point was not just about the counties you hand pick, I was talking about the counting in general, talking about the entire state. I had even mentioned earlier there were ballots from other counties that needed to be counted. It's weird that you call saying the counting isn't over a non-sequitur to the topic of if the votes will go against McSally and then for her or just against her. The remaining ballots matter to that question.
No, what you argued was repeating the McSally spin that the uncounted votes might initially go to Sinema, but that McS would see gains as the count went on....a hope that it aint over. Yer hope is gone, as is your point. Fischer's point held, the remaining votes from the 2 most populated counties were going to break to Sinema, and the idea that any other counties uncounted vote would help your point was simply a fantasy. You really should stick to arguments concerning subjects you understand.
 
No, what you argued was repeating the McSally spin that the uncounted votes might initially go to Sinema, but that McS would see gains as the count went on....a hope that it aint over. Yer hope is gone, as is your point. Fischer's point held, the remaining votes from the 2 most populated counties were going to break to Sinema, and the idea that any other counties uncounted vote would help your point was simply a fantasy. You really should stick to arguments concerning subjects you understand.

What actually happened is the votes went for Sinema and then McSally just as thought, but it was not enough to overcome the lead Sinema had opened up. You are pretending like I was making a prediction on the race in favor of McSally, which I wasn't. Straw man arguments are all you know how to commit, and you stick to the one type of fallacy you know how to commit really well.
 
Back
Top Bottom